Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Linda Lillakas

Publications and source records attributed to Linda Lillakas.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Development of head movement propensity in 4-15 year old children in response to visual step stimuli.

Head movement frequency of children in response to horizontal step stimulus is investigated. The aim is to determine if there is a correlation between the age of the child and the frequency of head movements made to visual step stimuli presented at a fixed distance. Also of importance is whether there is a period of rapid change in the frequency of head movements, and if so, what factors could be influencing this change. Seventy-three participants, between the ages of 4 and 15 years were requested to "look at a spot of light" in response to step stimuli which varied in size from 5 to 60 degrees. Eye and head movements were recorded with a video based eye tracker (EL-Mar 2020) equipped with a Flock of Birds head tracker. Frequency of head movements was calculated for each participant and averaged across participants for each age group. Average head movement frequency was then plotted as a function of age. The frequency and variability of head movements decreases as a function of age. This decrease is linear between the ages of 4 and 15 years (y = -1.465x + 22.58; R(2) = 0.4378; F = 26.48; P < 0.0001). More head movements are made in response to larger step sizes than to smaller ones for all ages. The gradual decrease in frequency of head movements in response to step stimuli suggests that a specific environmental event, such as reading, is not the cause of the decline. Improved efficiency of eye movements could be due to pre-programmed factors related to neurological development. Alternatively, cognitive factors may be involved. Children may actually learn that utilizing their head for gaze shifts is more energy and time consuming, than merely using the eyes alone.

Adolescent↗

Saccadic adaptation in Chiari type II malformation.

BACKGROUND: Saccadic adaptation corrects errors in saccadic amplitude. Experimentally-induced saccadic adaptation provides a method for studying motor learning. The cerebellum is a major participant in saccadic adaptation. Chiari type II malformation (CII) is a developmental deformity of the cerebellum and brainstem that is associated with spina bifida. We investigated the effects of CII on saccadic adaptation. METHOD: We measured eye movements using an infrared eye tracker in 21 subjects with CII (CII group) and 39 typically developing children (control group), aged 8-19 years. Saccadic adaptation was induced experimentally using targets that stepped horizontally 120 to the right and then stepped backward 3 degrees during saccades. RESULTS: Saccadic adaptation was achieved at the end of the adaptation phase in participants in each group. Saccadic amplitude gain decreased by 6.9% in the CII group and 9.3% in the control group. The groups did not differ significantly (p = 0.27). Amplitude gain reduction was significantly less in the CII participants who had multiple shunt revisions. Regression analyses revealed no effects of spinal lesion level, presence of nystagmus, or cerebellar vermis dysmorphology on saccadic adaptation. CONCLUSION: The neural circuits involved in saccadic adaptation appear to be functionally intact in CII.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

Fixation stability using radial gratings in patients with age-related macular degeneration.

BACKGROUND: The fixation stability of patients with macular atrophy is generally worse than that of people without pathology. METHODS: The effects of 2 types of high-contrast fixation stimuli on fixation stability were compared between patients with longstanding age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and control subjects with normal vision. One stimulus was a 9-cycle square-wave radial grating measuring 5 degrees in diameter and the other a white 0.5 degrees disc. A video-based infrared eye tracker with remote optics was used to record eye position while participants fixated the stimuli in primary position of gaze for 6 to 7 s. Fixation stability was measured with a bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA). RESULTS: For patients with AMD, fixation stability for the radial grating was largely independent of visual acuity, whereas fixation stability for the disc diminished with acuity. For the control observers, there were no differences in fixation stability for the 2 kinds of stimuli. INTERPRETATION: In clinical and research settings, radial gratings can be useful targets for fixation for patients with macular disease since they provide enough visual information to help maintain fixation stability. These findings have important implications for the design of clinical tests and procedures such as perimetry, multifocal electroretinography, and optical coherence tomography for patients with macular atrophies.

Adult↗

Horizontal saccade dynamics across the human life span.

PURPOSE: To investigate saccade dynamics as a function of age to determine whether they follow the pattern of development and decline predicted by Weale's model of aging. METHODS: One hundred ninety-five participants between the ages of 3 and 86 years made visually guided horizontal prosaccades ranging in size from 1 degrees to 60 degrees in response to dot stimuli. Eye movements were recorded binocularly with a video-based eye tracker, sampling at 120 Hz. Saccadic latency, accuracy, and velocity were measured and analyzed as a function of age. RESULTS: Mean saccadic latency decreased from 439 ms at 3 years to 172 ms at 14 years, followed by a period of relative stability to age 50 and finally, gradually increased to 264 ms at >or=80 years. For saccadic accuracy (amplitude gain), there was a statistically significant (P<0.05) interaction between saccade size and age. Participants made increasingly hypometric saccades as age and saccade size increased. Average age group saccadic asymptotic peak velocity (Vmax) increased during childhood from 446 deg/s at age 3, to a peak of 610 deg/s at 14 years and then gradually declined with age to approximately 345 deg/s for participants>or=80 years. CONCLUSIONS: Age affected saccadic latency, accuracy, and velocity. For each parameter there was a different pattern of development and decline probably related to the way in which the portion of the brain that controls each function develops and ages.

Adolescent↗

Saccadic adaptation in children.

Saccades are fast-orienting eye movements. Saccadic adaptation, a form of motor learning, is a corrective change in the amplitude of saccades in response to error. The aim of the study was to ascertain whether saccadic adaptation occurs in typically developing children. We recorded saccades with an infrared eye tracker in 39 children, aged 8 to 19 years, at baseline to 12-degree horizontal target steps and after an adaptive task. During the adaptive task, a saccadic hypometric error was induced. This task consisted of 200 12-degree target steps that stepped backward 3 degrees during the initial saccade and without the participants' awareness. The initial saccade triggered the back-step. This paradigm required a corrective reduction of the amplitude of the initial saccades in response to the induced error. Saccadic adaptation was achieved in 26 participants, whose mean saccadic amplitudes decreased by 13% (P < .05). Saccadic adaptation was not influenced by age. We conclude that children as young as 8 years old have established functions of the neural circuits responsible for the motor learning required for saccadic adaptation.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

Smooth pursuit eye movements in children.

Smooth pursuit eye movements consists of slow eye movements that approximate the velocity of the eyes to that of a small moving target, so that target image is kept at or near the fovea. Little information on smooth pursuit is available in children. We used an infrared eye tracker to record smooth pursuit in 38 typically developing children, aged 8-19 years. Participants followed a visual target moving sinusoidally at +/-10 degrees amplitude, horizontally and vertically at 0.25 or 0.5 Hz. The mean horizontal smooth pursuit gains, the ratio of eye to target velocities, were 0.84 at 0.25 Hz and 0.73 at 0.5 Hz. Mean vertical smooth pursuit gains were 0.68 at 0.25 Hz and 0.45 at 0.5 Hz. Smooth pursuit gains were significantly lower for vertical in comparison to horizontal tracking, and for 0.5 Hz in comparison to 0.25 Hz tracking (P<0.0001). Smooth pursuit gains increased with age (P<0.01, Pearson's correlation tests), with horizontal gains attaining reported adult values by mid adolescence. Vertical gains had large variability among participants. The median phase, the time interval between eye and target velocities, varied between 39 and 86 ms. Phase was not influenced by age. We conclude that smooth pursuit gains are lower in children than gains reported in adults. Vertical pursuit gain is significantly lower than horizontal pursuit gain. Gains improve with age and approach adult values in mid adolescence. Children have larger phases than reported adults values indicating that prediction in the smooth pursuit system is less mature in children.

Adolescent↗

Saccades in children.

Saccades are necessary for optimal vision. Little is known about saccades in children. We recorded saccades using an infrared eye tracker in 39 children, aged 8-19 years. Participants made saccades to visual targets that stepped 10 degrees or 15 degrees horizontally and 5 degrees or 10 degrees vertically at unpredictable time intervals. Saccadic latency decreased significantly with increasing age, while saccadic gain and peak velocity did not vary with age. Saccadic gains and peak velocities in children are similar to reported adult values. This implies maturity of the neural circuits responsible for making saccades accurate and fast. Saccade latency decreases as the brain matures.

Adolescent↗

Dynamics of saccadic adaptation: differences between athletes and nonathletes.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to delineate differences in saccadic adaptation characteristics between a population of racquet sports athletes and nonathletes. METHODS: Eye movements were recorded at 120 Hz using a video-based eye tracker (ELMAR 2020) in a sample of 27 athletes (varsity badminton and squash players) and 14 nonathletes (<3 hours/week participation in recreational sports). Responses to negative positional error and positive positional error were studied in two sessions on separate days. Negative positional errors were induced by displacing the stimuli backwards by 3 degrees from the initial target step (12 degrees). Likewise, positive positional errors were induced by displacing the stimuli forward by 3 degrees . Amplitude gains were calculated for trials before, during, and after the adaptation phase. The magnitude and the rate of change of saccadic adaptation were determined from the amplitude gains. Differences between the groups were compared using regression analysis. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the two groups in the magnitude of saccadic adaptation, both for negative (athletes -60%, nonathletes -57%) and positive (athletes +26%, and nonathletes +27%) positional error. Racquet sports athletes showed a significantly faster rate of adaptation for the positive positional error. A significant difference was not observed in the rate of adaptation for the negative positional error. CONCLUSIONS: Racquet sports athletes and nonathletes adapt to positional error signals by similar amounts. However, racquet sports athletes respond to positive positional errors at a faster rate, suggesting that a strategic component or environmental influences (such as practice) may play a role in saccadic adaptation.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

Effect of retrobulbar injection of lidocaine on saccadic velocities.

PURPOSE: To determine whether exposing the extraocular muscles (EOMs) to lidocaine via retrobulbar injection for cataract surgery has a demonstrable negative effect on subsequent function of the muscle. SETTING: York Finch Eye Associates, Humber River Regional Hospital, and Toronto Western Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. METHODS: This study comprised 37 eyes that had phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation; 13 eyes had retrobulbar lidocaine with hyaluronidase and 24 eyes, topical anesthesia. The postoperative saccadic velocities were compared with the preoperative velocities using a sensitive recording device. The results were compared within and between the retrobulbar lidocaine and topical anesthesia groups. RESULTS: No detectable decrement in postoperative saccadic velocities was detected in any patient, and no difference was found between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Exposing EOMs to lidocaine for cataract surgery had no detectable negative effect on saccadic velocities 1 week after surgery.

Aged↗

Children's pursuit eye movements: a developmental study.

We examined the pursuit eye movements of adults and three groups of children 4-6, 8-10, 12-16 years of age. The first experiment compared tracking performance of a partially occluded target with that of a fully visible target. The second experiment examined pursuit abilities of children using a non-cognitive source of information for motion, i.e., proprioception. In this experiment, we compared the ability to track one's own strobe-illuminated finger with the tracking of the experimenter's finger. In the first experiment, only children 4-6 years of age had difficulty inhibiting the tendency to look towards the visible portion of the partially occluded target. They also had significantly fewer epochs of pursuit relative to teenagers and adults. The older children's pursuit eye movements (8-10) were neither significantly different from the youngest nor from the two older groups. In the second experiment, all participants pursued their own finger better than the experimenter's finger, but the youngest children had significantly fewer epochs of pursuit relative to adults. Pursuit of a partially occluded target and incorporation of proprioceptive signals to drive smooth pursuit eye movements are abilities present at four years of age that continue to develop with increasing age.

Adolescent↗

Leonardo's constraint: two opaque objects cannot be seen in the same direction.

Given Leonardo's constraint that 2 opaque objects cannot be seen in the same direction, how are the regions of objects occluded to 1 eye included in perception? To answer this question, the authors presented 3-dimensional stimuli, similar to the ones that concerned Leonardo, and measured the visual directions of their monocular and binocular regions. When the distance between near and far objects was large, the nonfixated object was seen as double and blurry. Leonardo's constraint was met by seeing the near object as double and transparent or the distant object as double and superimposed. When the distance between near and far objects was small, the constraint was met by a perceptual displacement and compression of parts of the nonfixated object.

Depth Perception↗

The pursuit of Leonardo's constraint.

Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519) identified two stimulus situations that cannot be painted faithfully on a canvas: (a) when two objects are located in the same direction with respect to the painter's head, and (b) when parts of a surface are visible to one eye, but occluded from the other eye. He analysed these situations in terms of rays being emitted from the two eyes and, aside from the origin of the rays, the projective geometry he used was correct. His analyses showed that what can be seen from two vantage points cannot be represented on a canvas, because a 'correct' painting must be created from a single 'station point'. He was struck by the consequence of this fact that the depth seen on a canvas cannot match that of viewing the scene with two eyes. Subsequent visual scientists focused on Leonardo's observation about the lack of vivid depth in a picture. We argue that a complete understanding of what we see in the two stimulus situations requires consideration of visual direction in addition to visual depth. More specifically, we argue that the visual directions of the two objects, (a) above, and the visual direction of the monocular areas, (b) above, are dependent upon the constraint that two opaque objects cannot be represented in the same direction. Demonstrations that readers can perform, and that support this argument, are provided on the Perception website at http://www.perceptionweb.com/perc0102/ono.html.

Depth Perception↗