Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Linda Gask

Publications and source records attributed to Linda Gask.

29 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Qualitative study of patients' perceptions of the quality of care for depression in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Research into quality of care in primary mental health care has largely focused on the role of the general practitioner (GP) in the detection and management of patients' problems. AIM: To explore depressed patients' perceptions of the quality of care received from GPs. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. SETTING: General practices in Greater Manchester. METHOD: Purposive sampling and semi-structured interviewing of 27 patients who had received care from 10 GPs for depression. RESULTS: Quality of care in depression depends on good communication between the doctor and the patient, but patients who are depressed often have difficulty in discussing their problems with doctors. They are also unlikely to be active in seeking care; for example, in making follow-up appointments, especially when they are uncertain that depression is a legitimate reason for seeing the doctor. Patients sometimes accept care that does not meet professional standards, either because of low expectations of what the National Health Service (NHS) can provide, or because of low self-worth associated with their problem. CONCLUSION: The depressed person may feel that they do not deserve to take up the doctor's time, or that it is not possible for doctors to listen to them and understand how they feel. Doctors need to be active in providing care that meets professional standards. We advocate a model of care in which patients with depression are followed up systematically.

Adult↗

A qualitative investigation into women's experiences after a miscarriage: implications for the primary healthcare team.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 16% of clinically confirmed pregnancies end in miscarriage. However, there is frequently no routine follow-up by the primary healthcare team (PHCT) to identify psychiatric morbidity after miscarriage. AIM: To explore women's experiences of miscarriage care that may impact on the ability of the PHCT to detect psychiatric morbidity after a miscarriage. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative study using questionnaires, semi-structured interviews of patients, and interviews of healthcare professionals in focus groups. SETTING: Patients who had experienced a miscarriage were recruited from the gynaecology wards of a district general hospital. The healthcare professionals were recruited from 14 local general practices. METHOD: Post-miscarriage 'psychiatric cases' were identified using the hospital anxiety and depression (HAD) scale. A theoretical sampling technique was used to identify patients for semi-structured interviews. Interviews with healthcare professionals were conducted in three focus groups. RESULTS: Seven themes emerged from the interviews and focus groups that characterised the experience of patients and the perception of health professionals after a miscarriage. These were a need and desire for formal follow-up plans, poor recall and understanding of initial events, a need for more information and answers, normalisation of miscarriage by the PHCT, guilt and false assumptions, variable standards of care and skills deficiencies, and suggestions for further improvements. CONCLUSION: Themes that emerged from interviews, questionnaires, and focus groups indicate that there are deficiencies and inconsistencies in current care provision that are likely to impact on the ability of the PHCT to identify psychiatric morbidity following a miscarriage.

Abortion, Spontaneous↗

Teaching mental health skills to general practitioners and medical officers.

David Goldberg opened by describing the research that had led up to the present WPA teaching package. Early research had demonstrated that many psychological illnesses were not detected in primary care settings (Goldberg & Huxley 1980; ibid 1992), and these findings have been replicated in 14 centres round the world, with broadly similar results (Ustun & Sartorius 1995). We have found that in the UK the problem is not defects in factual knowledge, but not having clinical skills to assist in the management of mental disorders in general medical settings. The clinical skills needed in primary care are seldom taught in medical schools, and cannot be learned by listening to a lecture: it is necessary to practice them after they have been demonstrated. To do this it is convenient to break complex clinical skills down into their components: these are called "micro-skills", and we will deal later with the way in which these are taught. The most powerful method for improving mental health skills in this setting is to provide doctors with feedback--either video or audio--of their interview with real patients. The emphasis of such teaching must be on the interview techniques used by the doctor, rather than the clinical problems displayed by the particular patient being interviewed (Gask et al 1991). The problem with this is that video-feedback teaching of the necessary type is not always available, so we have developed videotapes that we can send out to distant locations, and which focus the attention of both local tutor and postgraduates on what should be learned. Because it is essential that most of the teaching is done by the live teacher rather than the videotape, there are always several "discussion points" so that postgraduates can ask questions, or describe their own way of dealing with particular situations. The videotapes are supplied together with teaching notes for the tutor, power points slides which can be adapted to suit local conditions, "role plays" to allow postgraduates to practice each skill they wish to learn, and other support materials. There is also a paper written by ourselves in association with Norman Sartorius, who has encouraged us to prepare the teaching package under the auspices of the WPA. Linda Gask described the process of teaching specific 'microskills', by working through how the skills necessary for the management of people who present in primary and general medical settings have been described and taught in the UK (see box 1). A model of the strategies and skills to be [figure: see text] taught was first developed utilizing the experience professionals and teachers from both primary care and mental health. A videotape was produced in which the skills to be acquired were demonstrated by real primary care doctors in role-played interviews with the addition of subtitles to label particular skills. The videotape is then utilised in a group teaching session to model the specific component skills of the model or 'microskills' to the participants in order to demonstrate exactly how the strategies of the model are applied in a real consultation. Watching the videotape will not however change behaviour. To do this, it is necessary to role-play brief scenarios so that the professional is able to practice the actual words he or she would use. This role-play work may be carried out in pairs, with one doctor playing the professional and the other playing the patient, or in threes, with the addition of an observer who ensures that the participants keep to the task. At the end of the role-play all participants provide feedback. These methods are described in much more detail in Gask (1999). Finally, there is also the possibility of videotaping one of these role-played interviews and teaching on this tape with the group as a whole. The specific skills and methods required to do this are described in much more detail along with the research evidence for these methods in Gask (1998). Our approach to facilitating the group in the exercise of videofeedback teaching is summarised in box 2.

Family Practice↗

Developing a U.K. protocol for collaborative care: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the views of stakeholders including patients, general practitioners (GPs) and mental health workers on the feasibility, acceptability and barriers to a collaborative care model for treatment of depression within the context of U.K. primary health care. METHOD: We used semistructured interviews and focus groups with a purposive sample of 11 patients and 38 professionals from a wide selection of primary and secondary care mental health services, as well as framework analysis using a "constant comparative" approach to identify key concepts and themes. RESULTS: Regular contact for patients with depression is acceptable and valued by both patients and professionals. However, patients value support, whereas professionals focus on information. To be acceptable to patients, contacts about medication or psychosocial support must minimize the potential for patient disempowerment. The use of the telephone is convenient and lends anonymity, but established mental health workers think it will impair their judgments. While patients merely identified the need for skilled case managers, GPs preferred established professionals; however, these workers did not see themselves in this role. All involved were cautious about deploying new workers. Additional barriers included practical and organizational issues. CONCLUSIONS: Although a telephone-delivered mix of medication support and low-intensity psychological intervention is generally acceptable, significant issues to be addressed include the values of the current mental health workforce, fears about new workers' experience and competence, the balance of face-to-face and telephone contacts and case manager education in nonspecific skills necessary to develop a therapeutic alliance, as well as the knowledge and skills required for education, medication support and behavioral activation. Qualitative research can add value to careful modeling of collaborative care prior to international implementation.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Turning theory into practice: rationale, feasibility and external validity of an exploratory randomized controlled trial of training family practitioners in reattribution to manage patients with medically unexplained symptoms (the MUST).

BACKGROUND: The evidence for the effectiveness of reattribution training are limited, and optimal service delivery is not yet established. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to establish the feasibility and to optimize the service delivery and design of a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) of reattribution training for patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUSs) in routine primary care. METHODOLOGY: The study was of a cluster RCT design with the practice as the unit of randomization. Health facilitator (HF)-delivered reattribution training was compared with no reattribution training. The primary outcome measure used is doctor-patient communication in the consultation. Quantitative and qualitative methods identify barriers to effectiveness. The acceptability and feasibility of the intervention were established by attendance rates and postal survey after completion of training. RESULTS: Sixteen practices and 70 family practitioners (FPs) were recruited with representative practice and FP characteristics. Six hours of HF reattribution training to FPs in the workplace proved feasible and acceptable with all 35 FPs completing the training. Feedback from 27 (77%) FPs who received training indicated that 25 (93%) FPs believed that specific and relevant learning achievements were made, 22 (82%) felt more confident and 21 (77%) thought the training was useful. CONCLUSION: HF-delivered reattribution training to whole practices is feasible and acceptable, and its effectiveness is measurable in routine primary care.

Adult↗

The changing nature of consultation-liaison in primary care: bridging the gap between research and practice.

Consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry is hypothesized to be a model of interface between primary care and specialist mental health services with significant advantages over other models of organizing mental health care. However, there are significant complexities in the definition and evaluation of this model. As well as discussing the definition of C-L in primary care, this paper highlights the gap between models of traditional C-L that are popular in practice and the increasingly complex models (based on chronic disease management) evaluated in research studies. It is hypothesized that traditional C-L approaches and newer models use different mechanisms of change to achieve their goals. The former focus on the relationships between primary care and specialist professionals, while the latter highlight the importance of the development of effective systems of delivering care. Although the latter may be crucial in enhancing the "efficacy" and "effectiveness" of these models in terms of clinician behavior change and patient outcome, the former may be crucial in terms of "dissemination" and "implementation" of these models from research contexts to routine care settings.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗

Treatment of patients with somatized mental disorder: effects of reattribution training on outcomes under the direct control of the family doctor.

Reattribution training is an 8-hour, skills-based training program delivered to family doctors so that they may better manage patients with somatized mental disorder. Separate consecutive cohorts of 103 and 112 patients with somatized mental disorder, respectively, visited eight family doctors before and after these physicians had undergone reattribution training. Reattribution training was associated with more frequent endorsement by patients after 1 month that they received the help they wanted and fewer beliefs by patients after 3 months that their symptoms had only a physical cause. Reattribution training did not change the incidence of investigations initiated by the family doctor, prescriptions for psychotropic or nonpsychotropic drugs, or referrals over 3 months.

Female↗

Powerlessness, control, and complexity: the experience of family physicians in a group model HMO.

BACKGROUND: I wanted to explore family physicians' perceptions of working in a group model health maintenance organization participating in ongoing quality improvement initiatives. METHODS: I undertook a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with 24 family physicians in which there was specific inquiry about informants' perceptions of organizational and team functionality. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged from the data: lack of control, strategies for coping, and valuing the practice of primary care. More than one half of the physicians interviewed expressed a sense of powerlessness to change or control their working environment. Some physicians managed to retain a sense of control or at least to mitigate the impact of their powerlessness by employing a range of different strategies for coping. Maintaining a sense of specialist skill in the complex art of family practice was important to many of the physicians interviewed. This sense of specialization across the broad and varied canvas of family practice was not always attainable, however. CONCLUSIONS: Retaining the family physician's enthusiasm means both acknowledging what is difficult about family practice and considering how the experience of being a family physician can be improved. To achieve these ends probably means not only finding ways of restoring to family physicians a sense of professional autonomy and control over their immediate working environment but also assigning greater value to the skills in managing clinical and organizational complexity that are particular to family practice.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Pain symptoms in depression: definition and clinical significance.

This article presents the findings of a focused literature review and consensus meetings on the definition and clinical significance of painful symptoms in patients with depression. About 50% of depressed patients report pain, and many types of pain occur more frequently in people with depression than in those without. There is some evidence that pain in depressed patients is associated with a poor response to treatment. Pain and depression may share common pathways and may both respond to treatment with certain antidepressants. Doctors need to be alert to pain in depressed patients and be prepared to treat it.

Antidepressive Agents↗