Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Linda Ganzini

Publications and source records attributed to Linda Ganzini.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Nurses' experiences with hospice patients who refuse food and fluids to hasten death.

BACKGROUND: Voluntary refusal of food and fluids has been proposed as an alternative to physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill patients who wish to hasten death. There are few reports of patients who have made this choice. METHODS: We mailed a questionnaire to all nurses employed by hospice programs in Oregon and analyzed the results. RESULTS: Of 429 eligible nurses, 307 (72 percent) returned the questionnaire, and 102 of the respondents (33 percent) reported that in the previous four years they had cared for a patient who deliberately hastened death by voluntary refusal of food and fluids. Nurses reported that patients chose to stop eating and drinking because they were ready to die, saw continued existence as pointless, and considered their quality of life poor. The survey showed that 85 percent of patients died within 15 days after stopping food and fluids. On a scale from 0 (a very bad death) to 9 (a very good death), the median score for the quality of these deaths, as rated by the nurses, was 8. On the basis of the hospice nurses' reports, the patients who stopped eating and drinking were older than 55 patients who died by physician-assisted suicide (74 vs. 64 years of age, P<0.001), less likely to want to control the circumstances of their death (P<0.001), and less likely to be evaluated by a mental health professional (9 percent vs. 45 percent, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of reports by nurses, patients in hospice care who voluntarily choose to refuse food and fluids are elderly, no longer find meaning in living, and usually die a "good" death within two weeks after stopping food and fluids.

Age Factors↗

End-of-life care in geriatric psychiatry.

Depression, anxiety and delirium are relatively common during the final stages of terminal disease, and each can profoundly impact the quality of those last days for both patient and involved family. In this article the authors review the assessment and treatment of each syndrome in the context of palliative care for older adults. Treatment of mental disorders at the end of life warrants special consideration due to the need to balance the benefits of treatment against the potential burden of the intervention, especially those that might worsen quality of life. Dementia and the complications of depression and behavioral disturbance within dementia are also discussed. Finally, caregivers of dying patients are vulnerable to stress, depression, grief, and complicated bereavement. Interventions for caregivers who are debilitated by these states are briefly summarized.

Aged↗

Delirium, depression, and anxiety.

Patients who are critically ill often develop a variety of psychiatric symptoms, which require assessment and treatment. The most common psychiatric disorder in the intensive care unit is delirium. Depressed mood and anxiety also occur, at times as discrete disorders, but more often secondary to delirium. Patients with severe mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder, also may become critically ill--assessment and management of these patients often requires specialized psychiatric care and is not addressed here.

Anxiety↗

Oregon hospice nurses and social workers' assessment of physician progress in palliative care over the past 5 years.

BACKGROUND: The 1997 enactment of the Oregon Death with Dignity Act intensified interest in improving physician education and skills in caring for patients at the end of life. OBJECTIVE: To obtain hospice nurse and social workers' collateral ratings of efforts made by Oregon physicians to improve their palliative care skills over the previous 5 years. DESIGN: A descriptive survey of nurses and social workers from all 50 Oregon outpatient hospice agencies. MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS: Oregon hospice nurse (N=185) and social worker (N=52) respondents, who had worked in hospice for at least 5 years, rated changes they observed over the past 5 years in physicians' approach to caring for their hospice clients. Six characteristics, including willingness to refer patients to hospice, willingness to prescribe sufficient pain medications, knowledge about using pain medications in hospice patients, interest in caring for hospice patients, competence in caring for hospice patients, and fearfulness of prescribing sufficient opioid medications were evaluated. Positive changes were endorsed by the majority of respondents on all but the scale measuring fearfulness of prescribing opioid medications; on the latter, 47% of nurses rated doctors as less fearful, whereas 53% rated them as about the same or more fearful than they were 5 years earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents rated Oregon physicians as showing improvements in knowledge and willingness to refer and care for hospice patients.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

Health professionals' views on standards for decision-making capacity regarding refusal of medical treatment in mild Alzheimer's disease.

This study was designed to determine which elements professionals consider important for evaluation of decision-making capacity. Survey with a vignette case report of an individual with mild dementia was mailed to four groups of individuals: 1. members of the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine, 2. chairs of Veterans Affairs (VA) Ethics Advisory Committees (EACs), 3. randomly selected geriatricians who were members of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), and 4. randomly selected psychologists who were members of the GSA. Two hundred thirty-seven psychiatrists, 95 VA EAC chairs, 103 geriatricians, and 46 psychologists responded to this survey. The majority of the respondents endorsed all five basic elements as necessary for determination of decision-making capacity in the presented vignette, but only a minority of respondents endorsed all five basic elements, and a small proportion of respondents endorsed only one or two elements. The results indicate that physicians do not use uniform standards for assessment of decision-making capacity.

Aged↗

Oregon physicians' perceptions of patients who request assisted suicide and their families.

In 1997, the Oregon Death with Dignity Act was enacted, allowing a physician to prescribe a lethal dose of medication for a competent, terminally ill patient who requests one. In 2000, we conducted single, semistructured, in-depth, face-to-face interviews with 35 Oregon physicians who received a request for a lethal prescription. The interviews focused on physicians' perceptions of patients who requested assisted suicide, the reasons for the request, and the reactions of their families. The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative techniques. Physicians described requesting patients as having strong and vivid personalities characterized by determination and inflexibility. These individuals wanted to control the timing and manner of death and to avoid dependence on others. These preferences reflected long-standing coping and personality traits. Physicians perceived that these patients viewed living as purposeless and too effortful, and that they were ready for death. The requests, which were forceful and persistent, could occur at any point after diagnosis of the terminal illness, and were paralleled by refusal of medical interventions including palliative treatments. Many family members were reluctant to support these requests until they recognized the strength of the preference.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Experiences of Oregon nurses and social workers with hospice patients who requested assistance with suicide.

BACKGROUND: Oregon's 1997 Death with Dignity Act legalizes physician-assisted suicide. To date, information about patients who have requested this option has come from surveys of physicians. Although 78 percent of the 91 Oregonians who have died by assisted suicide were enrolled in hospice programs, there is little information about the experiences of hospice practitioners with these patients. METHODS: In 2001, we mailed a questionnaire to all hospice nurses and social workers in Oregon. RESULTS: Of 545 eligible hospice nurses and social workers, 397 (73 percent) returned the survey, including 71 percent of nurses and 78 percent of social workers. Since November 1997, 179 of the respondents (45 percent) had cared for a patient who requested assistance with suicide. Hospice nurses reported on 82 patients who had received prescriptions for lethal medication. Ninety-eight percent of the nurses had discussed the request with a coworker, and 77 percent of the requests had been presented at a hospice interdisciplinary conference on patient care. A very important reason for the request was to control the circumstances of death. The least important reasons included depression, lack of social support, and fear of being a financial drain on family members. Although the patients were concerned about burdening others, only 11 percent of hospice nurses rated their family caregivers as more burdened than family caregivers for other hospice patients. CONCLUSIONS: Since assisted suicide was legalized in Oregon, many hospice nurses and social workers have provided care for a patient who requested assistance with suicide. They rated desire for control as a very important reason for these requests.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

The final month of life in patients with ALS.

OBJECTIVE: To study the health care experiences and palliative care needs of patients with ALS in their final month of life. METHODS: Caregivers of decedent patients with ALS completed a single survey focused on the final month of life. They reported the patients' physical and emotional symptoms, preferences for end-of-life care, completion of advance directives, and preparation for death. The caregiver reported which life-sustaining treatments were administered, withheld, or withdrawn; whether the patient was enrolled in hospice; and their own satisfaction with the patient's medical care. RESULTS: Fifty caregivers completed the survey. Caregivers reported that the most common symptoms in the last month of life included difficulty communicating (62%), dyspnea (56%), insomnia (42%), and discomfort other than pain (48%). Pain was both frequent and severe. One-third of caregivers were dissatisfied with some aspect of symptom management. Caregivers reported an advance directive was completed by 88% of patients and the patients' goals of care were honored by 88% of health care practitioners. Two-thirds of patients were enrolled in hospice. Compared to nonhospice patients, hospice patients were significantly more likely to: 1) die in their preferred location; 2) die outside the hospital; and 3) receive morphine. Most caregivers reported that their loved one was at peace, and prepared for and was accepting of death. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers report that many patients with ALS still experience distressing physical symptoms in the last month of life, despite enrollment in hospice. Most patients with ALS, however, anticipate and plan for their deaths and have their wishes respected.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis↗

Predictors and correlates of interest in assisted suicide in the final month of life among ALS patients in Oregon and Washington.

To understand the factors associated with interest in assisted suicide among terminally ill patients, we surveyed 50 caregivers of decedent amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients from Oregon and Washington regarding perceptions of patients' interest in assisted suicide and their physical and emotional state in the last month of life. For 38 caregivers, we had baseline information from the patients themselves, gathered a median of 11 months before death, regarding depression, hopelessness, sense of burden, social support, quality of life, pain, and suffering. According to our respondents, one-third of ALS patients discussed wanting assisted suicide in the last month of life. Hopelessness and interest in assisted suicide at baseline predicted desire for assisted suicide later on. ALS patients who were interested in assisted suicide, compared to those who were not, had greater distress at being a burden to others and more insomnia, pain, and discomfort other than pain.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis↗

Ten myths about decision-making capacity.

As a matter of practical reality, what role patients will play in decisions about their health care is determined by whether their clinicians judge them to have decision-making capacity. Because so much hinges on assessments of capacity, clinicians who work with patients have an ethical obligation to understand this concept. This article, based on a report prepared by the National Ethics Committee (NEC) of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), seeks to provide clinicians with practical information about decision-making capacity and how it is assessed. A study of clinicians and ethics committee chairs carried out under the auspices of the NEC identified the following 10 common myths clinicians hold about decision-making capacity: (1) decision-making capacity and competency are the same; (2) lack of decision-making capacity can be presumed when patients go against medical advice; (3) there is no need to assess decision-making capacity unless patients go against medical advice; (4) decision-making capacity is an "all or nothing" phenomenon; (5) cognitive impairment equals lack of decision-making capacity; (6) lack of decision-making capacity is a permanent condition; (7) patients who have not been given relevant and consistent information about their treatment lack decision-making capacity; (8) all patients with certain psychiatric disorders lack decision-making capacity; (9) patients who are involuntarily committed lack decision-making capacity; and (10) only mental health experts can assess decision-making capacity. By describing and debunking these common misconceptions, this article attempts to prevent potential errors in the clinical assessment of decision-making capacity, thereby supporting patients' right to make choices about their own health care.

Cognition Disorders↗

Ten myths about decision-making capacity.

As a matter of practical reality, what role patients will play in decisions about their health care is determined by whether their clinicians judge them to have decision-making capacity. Because so much hinges on assessments of capacity, clinicians who work with patients have an ethical obligation to understand this concept. This article, based on a report prepared by the National Ethics Committee (NEC) of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), seeks to provide clinicians with practical information about decision-making capacity and how it is assessed. A study of clinicians and ethics committee chairs carried out under the auspices of the NEC identified the following 10 common myths clinicians hold about decision-making capacity: (1) decision-making capacity and competency are the same; (2) lack of decision-making capacity can be presumed when patients go against medical advice; (3) there is no need to assess decision-making capacity unless patients go against medical advice; (4) decision-making capacity is an "all or nothing" phenomenon; (5) cognitive impairment equals lack of decision-making capacity; (6) lack of decision-making capacity is a permanent condition; (7) patients who have not been given relevant and consistent information about their treatment lack decision-making capacity; (8) all patients with certain psychiatric disorders lack decision-making capacity; (9) patients who are involuntarily committed lack decision-making capacity; and (10) only mental health experts can assess decision-making capacity. By describing and debunking these common misconceptions, this article attempts to prevent potential errors in the clinical assessment of decision-making capacity, thereby supporting patients' right to make choices about their own health care.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Psychiatry resident graduate comfort with general medical issues: impact of an integrated psychiatry-primary medical care training track.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a psychiatry-primary medical care (PPMC) training track impacts comfort and behaviors related to addressing general medical issues after residency. METHOD: Thirty five psychiatry resident graduates completed mailed surveys; nine of them had completed the PPMC track. RESULTS: Compared to non-PPMC participants, PPMC participants felt better prepared to address medical issues and tended to perform more consultations and feel more comfortable referring patients to general medical providers. They were not more likely to perform routine health screenings. CONCLUSION: Integrated training tracks may impact resident preparedness and career choice but may be insufficient to influence practice behaviors related to delivering general medical care.

Attitude↗

Pitfalls in assessment of decision-making capacity.

A total of 395 consultation-liaison psychiatrists, geriatricians, and geriatric psychologists responded to a survey that asked them to rate the frequency and importance to clinical care of 23 potential pitfalls and misunderstandings by clinicians who refer patients for assessment of decision-making capacity. Respondents also indicated which pitfalls were the most important to address in educating health care professionals. Overall, 22 of 23 pitfalls were rated as common by more than half of the respondents. Thirty-six percent of the respondents indicated that the most important pitfall to address in educating health care professionals was the tendency for health care practitioners to assume that a patient who lacks capacity for one type of medical decision also lacks capacity for all medical decisions. The results suggest that additional education is needed to improve clinicians' ability to evaluate patients' decision-making capacity.

Aged↗