Biomedical subjects

Leonardo A Meza-Zepeda

Publications and source records attributed to Leonardo A Meza-Zepeda.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Array comparative genomic hybridization reveals distinct DNA copy number differences between gastrointestinal stromal tumors and leiomyosarcomas.

Leiomyosarcomas are spindle cell tumors showing smooth muscle differentiation. Until recently, most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) were also classified as smooth muscle tumors, but now GISTs are recognized as a separate entity, defined as spindle cell and/or epithelioid tumors localized in the gastrointestinal tract. Using microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH), we have created a detailed map of DNA copy number changes for 7 GISTs and 12 leiomyosarcomas. Considerable gains and losses of chromosomal segments were observed in both tumor types. The most frequent aberration observed in GISTs was loss of chromosomes 14 and 22, with minimal recurrent regions in 14q11.2-q32.33 (71% of the tumors) and 22q12.2-q13.31 (100%). In leiomyosarcomas, frequent loss of chromosome 10 and 13q was observed, with minimal recurrent regions in 10q21.3 (75%) and 13q14.2-q14.3 (75%). Recurrent high-level amplification of 17p13.1-p11.2 was detected in leiomyosarcomas. Expression profiling using cDNA microarrays revealed four candidate genes in this region with high expression (AURKB, SREBF1, MFAP4, and FLJ10847). Altered expression of AURKB and SREBF1 has been observed previously in other malignancies. Hierarchical clustering of all samples separated GISTs and leiomyosarcomas into two distinct clusters. Statistical analysis identified six chromosomal regions, 1p36.11-p13.1, 9q21.11-9q34.3, 14q11.2-q23.2, 14q31.3-q32.33, 15q24.3-q26.3, and 22q11.21-q13.31, which were significantly different in copy number between GISTs and leiomyosarcomas. Our results show the potential of using array comparative genomic hybridization to classify histologically similar tumors such as GISTs and leiomyosarcomas.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Mapping and characterization of the amplicon near APOA2 in 1q23 in human sarcomas by FISH and array CGH.

BACKGROUND: Amplification of the q21-q23 region on chromosome 1 is frequently found in sarcomas and a variety of other solid tumours. Previous analyses of sarcomas have indicated the presence of at least two separate amplicons within this region, one located in 1q21 and one located near the apolipoprotein A-II (APOA2) gene in 1q23. In this study we have mapped and characterized the amplicon in 1q23 in more detail. RESULTS: We have used fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation (array CGH) to map and define the borders of the amplicon in 10 sarcomas. A subregion of approximately 800 kb was identified as the core of the amplicon. The amplification patterns of nine possible candidate target genes located to this subregion were determined by Southern blot analysis. The genes activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) and dual specificity phosphatase 12 (DUSP12) showed the highest level of amplification, and they were also shown to be over-expressed by quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). In general, the level of expression reflected the level of amplification in the different tumours. DUSP12 was expressed significantly higher than ATF6 in a subset of the tumours. In addition, two genes known to be transcriptionally activated by ATF6, glucose-regulated protein 78 kDa and -94 kDa (GRP78 and GRP94), were shown to be over-expressed in the tumours that showed over-expression of ATF6. CONCLUSION: ATF6 and DUSP12 seem to be the most likely candidate target genes for the 1q23 amplification in sarcomas. Both genes have possible roles in promoting cell growth, which makes them interesting candidate targets.

Apolipoprotein A-II↗

PubMed2004

M-CGH: analysing microarray-based CGH experiments.

BACKGROUND: Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation (array CGH) is a technique by which variation in relative copy numbers between two genomes can be analysed by competitive hybridisation to DNA microarrays. This technology has most commonly been used to detect chromosomal amplifications and deletions in cancer. Dedicated tools are needed to analyse the results of such experiments, which include appropriate visualisation, and to take into consideration the physical relation in the genome between the probes on the array. RESULTS: M-CGH is a MATLAB toolbox with a graphical user interface designed specifically for the analysis of array CGH experiments, with multiple approaches to ratio normalization. Specifically, the distributions of three classes of DNA copy numbers (gains, normal and losses) can be estimated using a maximum likelihood method. Amplicon boundaries are computed by either the fuzzy K-nearest neighbour method or a wavelet approach. The program also allows linking each genomic clone with the corresponding genomic information in the Ensembl database http://www.ensembl.org. CONCLUSIONS: M-CGH, which encompasses the basic tools needed for analysing array CGH experiments, is freely available for academics http://www.uio.no/~junbaiw/mcgh, and does not require any other MATLAB toolbox.

Chromosomes, Artificial, Bacterial↗

PubMed2004

Amplification of chromosome 1 sequences in lipomatous tumors and other sarcomas.

Amplifications and gains involving 1q are common abnormalities in solid tumors. Recently, an amplicon originating from 1q21-23, containing the candidate oncogenes COAS1, COAS2 and COAS3 (Chromosome One Amplified Sequence) was identified. The presence, distribution and copy number level of extra COAS sequences were investigated in 48 bone and soft tissue tumor (BSTT) samples using metaphase FISH analysis. Amplification was seen in 27/48 (56%) samples. With few exceptions, all 3 genes were involved, but on average COAS2 exhibited higher copy numbers. The presence of extra COAS signals, irrespective of copy numbers, was found at similar frequencies in different histologic tumor subtypes. However, medium or high level amplification was common in lipomatous tumors but rare in other, nonlipomatous tumors (9/21 vs. 2/27 samples). The most common localization of extra COAS signals in lipomatous tumors was in supernumerary ring and giant marker chromosomes. Among nonlipomatous tumors, the distribution of extra COAS genes was more disperse, being located in various unidentified chromosomal structures, including double minutes, and only rarely in ring chromosomes. Because MDM2 is known to be amplified frequently in BSTTs, and in particular in atypical lipomatous tumors, cases with extra copies of COAS were studied also with an MDM2 probe. Twelve out of 18 lipomatous tumors had extra copies of both COAS and MDM2, and the 2 genes were found to be coamplified and interspersed exclusively in ring and giant marker chromosomes. Also 12 out of 18 nonlipomatous tumors exhibited simultaneous gain of COAS and MDM2, but colocalization in the same chromosome was less frequent. The role of the frequent coamplification of COAS, or some other yet unknown gene in the 1q21-23 region, and MDM2 remains to be elucidated.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Analyses of single-copy Arabidopsis T-DNA-transformed lines show that the presence of vector backbone sequences, short inverted repeats and DNA methylation is not sufficient or necessary for the induction of transgene silencing.

In genetically transformed plants, transgene silencing has been correlated with multiple and complex insertions of foreign DNA, e.g. T-DNA and vector backbone sequences. Occasionally, single-copy transgenes also suffer transgene silencing. We have compared integration patterns and T-DNA/plant DNA junctions in a collection of 37 single-copy T-DNA-transformed Arabidopsis lines, of which 13 displayed silencing. Vector sequences were found integrated in five lines, but only one of these displayed silencing. Truncated T-DNA copies, positioned in inverse orientation to an intact T-DNA copy, were discovered in three lines. The whole nptII gene with pnos promoter was present in the truncated copy of one such line in which heavy silencing has been observed. In the two other lines no silencing has been observed over five generations. Thus, vector sequences and short additional T-DNA sequences are not sufficient or necessary to induce transgene silencing. DNA methylation of selected restriction endonuclease sites could not be correlated with silencing. Our collection of T-DNA/plant DNA junctions has also been used to evaluate current models of T-DNA integration. Data for some of our lines are compatible with T-DNA integration in double-strand breaks, while for others initial invasion of plant DNA by the left or by the right T-DNA end seem important.

Arabidopsis↗

PubMed2002

Positional cloning identifies a novel cyclophilin as a candidate amplified oncogene in 1q21.

Gains of 1q21-q23 have been associated with metastasis and chemotherapy response, particularly in bladder cancer, hepatocellular carcinomas and sarcomas. By positional cloning of amplified genes by yeast artificial chromosome-mediated cDNA capture using magnetic beads, we have identified three candidate genes (COAS1, -2 and -3) in the amplified region in sarcomas. COAS1 and -2 showed higher amplification levels than COAS3. Most notably, amplification was very common in osteosarcomas, where in particular COAS2 was highly expressed. COAS1 has multiple repeats and shows no homology to previously described genes, whereas COAS2 is a novel member of the cyclosporin-binding peptidyl-prolyl isomerase family, very similar to cyclophilin A. COAS2 was overexpressed almost exclusively in aggressive metastatic or chemotherapy resistant tumours. Although COAS2 was generally more amplified than COAS1, it was not expressed in well-differentiated liposarcomas, where amplification of this region is very common. All three genes were found to be amplified and over-expressed also in breast carcinomas. The complex nature of the 1q21-23 amplicons and close proximity of the genes make unequivocal determination of the gene responsible difficult. Quite likely, the different genes may give selective advantages to different subsets of tumours.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMedDate not supplied

DNA damage responses in cell cycle G2 phase and mitosis--tracking and targeting.

BACKGROUND: In order to determine temporal responses of cell cycle populations to DNA damage, a rational combination of cell cycle analyses is critical. Moreover, the targeting of cell cycle checkpoint responses may modify the cytotoxic effect of DNA damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The characteristics of cell cycle populations (DNA content, cell cycle transitioning of S phase cells and size of mitotic cell fraction within the total G2/M phase population) in HeLa cells exposed to ionizing radiation were analyzed using three individual flow cytometry-based assays. The potential radiosensitization from inhibiting DNA damage responses was assessed by the colony formation assay. RESULTS: Irradiation resulted in an initial accumulation of S phase cells in G2 phase, from which the arrested cells were subsequently released to enter mitosis. Upon drug inhibition of G2 checkpoint signaling or mitotic progression, the cytotoxic effect of ionizing radiation on the HeLa cells was amplified. CONCLUSION: DNA damage-induced cell cycle responses, analyzed by selected cytometry assays and modified by specific targeting, might contribute to an understanding of how to improve radiotherapy outcome.

Cell Division↗