Colon cancer clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Leonard Saltz.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Compared with surgery alone, preoperative radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (combined-modality therapy; CMT) improves outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Although numerous studies have focused on identifying molecular markers of prognosis in the primary rectal cancer before CMT, our aim was to identify markers of prognosis in residual rectal cancer after preoperative CMT. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with locally advanced (T3-4 and/or N1) rectal cancer were treated with preoperative radiotherapy (median, 5040 cGy) with or without 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Residual tumor in the resected specimen, available for 52 patients, was analyzed for tumor-node-metastasis stage, lymphovascular and/or perineural invasion, and immunohistochemical expression of p27, p21, p53, Ki-67, retinoblastoma gene, cyclin D1, and bcl-2. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 69 months, the overall 5-year RFS was 74%. RFS was significantly worse for patients with positive p27 expression (P = .005), T3-4 tumors (P = .02), and positive lymph nodes (P = .04) in the irradiated specimen. On multivariate analysis, positive p27 expression remained an independent negative prognostic factor for RFS (P = .04). None of the other proteins was significantly associated with RFS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that positive p27 expression in rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation is an independent negative predictor of RFS. Expression of p27 in the residual rectal cancer may therefore identify patients with disease likely to be refractory to standard therapy and for whom investigational approaches should be strongly considered.
PURPOSE: The role of surgery to remove the primary tumor among patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical practice patterns for patients > or = 65 years of age with stage IV CRC in a US population-based cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare-linked database to evaluate the patterns of cancer treatment for 9,011 Medicare beneficiaries presenting with stage IV CRC from 1991 to 1999. Patients were categorized according to whether they had primary-cancer-directed surgery (CDS) or no CDS within 4 months of diagnosis. The use of other treatment modalities, including metastasectomy, chemotherapy, and radiation, was evaluated in relationship to whether patients belonged to the CDS or no CDS group. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent (6,469 of 9,011) of patients received CDS, and their 30-day postoperative mortality was 10%. Patients with left-sided or rectal lesions, patients older than age 75 years, blacks, and those of lower socioeconomic status were less likely to undergo CDS; but even among those older than age 75, the CDS rate was 69% (3,378 of 4,909). In contrast, chemotherapy use was less common (47% for patients who had CDS and 31% for those who did not). Metastasectomy was rare; only 3.9% of patients underwent these operations at any point from diagnosis to death. CONCLUSION: Palliative resection of the primary tumor is often performed for elderly US patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. This practice pattern merits re-evaluation, given the improvement in the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy.
PURPOSE: Primary chemoradiation failure for epidermoid carcinoma of the anus is treated by surgical resection. This study evaluates the outcome of salvage surgery at one institution. METHODS: All patients (n = 177) with a diagnosis of epidermoid carcinoma of the anus undergoing surgery since 1980 were reviewed. After criteria-based exclusion (n = 115), the remaining patients (n = 62) were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed on abdominoperineal resection/low anterior resection patients. Variable comparisons were made using log-rank and Cox regression analyses. Inguinal lymph node dissection patients (n = 5) were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 24.2 months. Actuarial five-year survival in all abdominoperineal resection/low anterior resection patients (n = 57) was 33 percent (median, 34.1 months). Univariate predictors of decreased survival were tumor size > 5 cm or adjacent organ involvement at salvage, positive nodal disease at salvage, and positive margins. Independent predictors of decreased survival were the same except for tumor size or adjacent organ involvement at salvage (not significant). Patients undergoing potentially curative resections (n = 47) had an actuarial five-year survival of 40 percent (median, 49 months). The univariate and multivariate predictors of both decreased survival and recurrence in this subgroup included: disease persistence after chemoradiation and nodal disease at salvage. Tumor size > 5 cm or adjacent organ involvement at salvage predicted recurrence with only univariate analysis. Interestingly, actuarial five-year survival after potentially curative resection for recurrence after chemoradiation was 51 percent (as opposed to 31 percent for persistence). After potentially curative resections, most documented recurrences (79 percent) occurred within two years and were locoregional (74 percent). Actuarial five-year recurrence-free survival was 46 percent. Three of five inguinal lymph node dissection patients were alive without disease at 21.2, 81.7, and 84.3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage surgery after failed chemoradiation therapy has a reasonable chance of cure. Favorable independent prognostic factors include recurrence ( vs. persistence) after chemoradiation (when salvage is potentially curative), absence of nodal disease at salvage, and negative margins. Salvage inguinal lymph node dissection after failed chemoradiation therapy also is potentially curative.
INTRODUCTION: Recent data suggest a favorable prognosis for rectal cancer patients with a pathologic complete response to preoperative combined modality therapy. Prolongation of the interval between preoperative combined modality therapy and surgery (RT-surgery interval) as a means of increasing pathologic complete response rate has not been fully examined. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-five rectal cancer patients undergoing preoperative pelvic external beam radiation therapy and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy followed by rectal resection were identified. All patients had endorectal ultrasound prior to combined modality therapy. Final pathology reports were reviewed for ypT and ypN stage and margin status. Medical records were reviewed for sphincter preservation, operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, and morbidity (overall, anastomotic, and perineal). RESULTS: A pathologic complete response (ypT0N0) occurred in 24 patients (15 percent). Median RT-surgery interval was 44 (range, 15-206) days. A pathologic complete response occurred in 19 percent of patients with an interval >44 days, vs. 12 percent in those with an interval < or =44 days ( P = 0.27). Downstaging by three stages occurred more frequently in the long-interval group (15 percent vs. 6 percent, P = 0.11). The rates of sphincter preservation, positive margins, estimated blood loss, and operative time were not significantly different. Overall morbidity was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate a trend toward increased pathologic complete response rate and downstaging with increased RT-surgery interval. However, sphincter preservation is not increased. Until prospective analyses are conducted assessing the impact of prolonged RT-surgery interval on long-term outcome, the benefit of a prolonged interval between the completion of preoperative combined modality therapy and surgery remains unclear.
BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated that fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) can assess extent of pathologic response of primary rectal cancer to preoperative chemoradiation. Our goal was to determine the prognostic significance of FDG-PET assessment of rectal cancer response to preoperative chemoradiation. STUDY DESIGN: Fifteen patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer (clinically bulky or tethered, or ultrasound evidence of T3-4 disease, N1 disease, or both) deemed eligible for preoperative radiation and 5-FU-based chemotherapy (5,040 cGy to the pelvis and 2 cycles of bolus 5-FU/leucovorin) were prospectively enrolled from May 1997 to September 1998. FDG-PET was performed before and 4 to 5 weeks after completion of preoperative chemoradiation. FDG-PET parameters included maximum standard uptake value (SUV(max)), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and visual response score. Patients were prospectively followed after operation, and disease status was determined. RESULTS: All patients demonstrated some degree of response to preoperative therapy based on pathologic examination. At a median followup of 42 months (range 23 to 54 months), 11 patients had no evidence of disease and 4 had died of disease. The mean percentage decrease in SUV(max) (DeltaSUV(max)) was 69% for patients free from recurrence and 37% for patients with recurrence (p = 0.004). DeltaSUV(max) >or= 62.5 and deltaTLG >or= 69.5 were the best predictors of no-evidence-of-disease status and freedom from recurrence. Patients with DeltaSUV(max) >or= 62.5 and deltaTLG >or= 69.5 had significantly improved disease-specific and recurrence-free survival (p = 0.08, 0.02 and p = 0.03, 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that FDG-PET assessment of locally-advanced rectal cancer response to preoperative chemoradiation may predict longterm outcomes.
Our objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sequential raltitrexed (Tomudex) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by bolus administration every 3 weeks in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) and appendiceal adenocarcinoma. This phase I dose-escalation study was carried out in three stages: (1) 5-FU fixed at 900 mg/m, raltitrexed escalated from 0.5 to 3.0 mg/m, (2) raltitrexed fixed at 3.0 mg/m, 5-FU escalated from 900 mg/m until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and (3) 5-FU fixed at the dose level below DLT, raltitrexed escalated from 3.0 mg/m until MTD. Seventy-one patients with measurable disease were enrolled. No DLTs were observed during stage 1 of treatment. At a fixed dose of raltitrexed 3.0 mg/m, DLT developed when 5-FU was increased to 1350 mg/m (stage 2). When 5-FU was fixed at 1200 mg/m and raltitrexed was increased to 6.0 mg/m (stage 3), DLT was dose limiting. The recommended doses for further study are 5.5 mg/m ralitrexed and 1200 mg/m 5-FU. Of the 69 patients evaluated for efficacy, one had a complete response (8.0 months) and five had partial responses (5.1-11.6 months). Thirty patients had stable disease for 5 or more cycles of therapy (mean time to progression: 3.6 months). Median survival was 11.7 months. We conclude that raltitrexed can be combined with bolus 5-FU, at raltitrexed doses that are higher than the recommended single-agent dose of 3.0 mg/m, with manageable toxicity. This combination shows encouraging activity, and survival appears promising in the pre-treated aCRC patient population. Further clinical trials are warranted.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: Clinical trials have not demonstrated that adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival for patients with resected stage II colon cancer. Nevertheless, patients may receive this treatment despite its uncertain benefit. The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which adjuvant chemotherapy is used for patients with stage II colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database, we identified 3,151 patients aged 65 to 75 with resected stage II colon cancer and no adverse prognostic features. The primary outcome was chemotherapy use within 3 months of surgery ascertained from claims submitted to Medicare. Relationships between patient characteristics and adjuvant chemotherapy use were measured and their significance was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Survival for treated and untreated patients was compared using a Cox model. RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of patients received chemotherapy during the 3 postoperative months. Younger age at diagnosis, white race, unfavorable tumor grade, and low comorbidity were each associated with a greater likelihood of receiving treatment. Sex, the number of examined lymph nodes in the tumor specimen, the urgency of the surgical admission, and median income was each unrelated to treatment. Five-year survival was 75% for untreated patients and 78% for treated patients. After adjusting for known between-group differences, the hazard ratio for survival associated with adjuvant treatment was 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.09). CONCLUSION: A substantial percentage of Medicare beneficiaries with resected stage II colon cancer receive adjuvant chemotherapy despite its uncertain benefit.
PURPOSE: Preclinical studies indicate that the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol potentiates the induction of apoptosis by paclitaxel, provided paclitaxel is followed by flavopiridol. We therefore designed a phase I clinical trial of sequential paclitaxel and flavopiridol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paclitaxel was administered at a fixed dose, as either a 24- or 3-hour infusion on day 1, followed by a 24-hour infusion of flavopiridol on day 2. Doses of flavopiridol were escalated in successive cohorts according to a modified Fibonacci design. Flavopiridol pharmacokinetics were obtained on all patients. RESULTS: Dose-limiting neutropenia developed with 24-hour paclitaxel doses of 135 and 100 mg/m(2) and flavopiridol doses of 10 and 20 mg/m(2), respectively. With 3-hour paclitaxel at 100 mg/m(2), flavopiridol could be escalated to 70 mg/m(2) without dose-limiting toxicity. With 3-hour paclitaxel next escalated to 135 mg/m(2), dose-limiting neutropenia and pulmonary toxicity occurred when flavopiridol was escalated to 94 mg/m(2). This did not correlate with any change in flavopiridol or paclitaxel pharmacokinetics. At a 3-hour paclitaxel dose of 175 mg/m(2), dose-limiting pulmonary toxicity occurred in only one patient at flavopiridol doses under 94 mg/m(2). Clinical activity was observed in patients with esophagus, lung, and prostate cancer, including patients who had progressed on paclitaxel. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II doses will be a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel at 175 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by a 24-hour infusion of flavopiridol at 70 mg/m(2) on day 2. Flavopiridol dose escalations to 80 mg/m(2) are possible. At these doses, toxicities are manageable and clinical activity is promising.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether selected clinicopathologic factors, including the extent of pathologic response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy (RT +/- chemo), have an impact on long-term recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer after optimal multimodality therapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although complete pathologic response to preoperative RT +/- chemo has been detected in up to 30% of rectal cancers, its significance on long-term outcome has not been widely reported. Previous retrospective studies evaluating clinical outcome in patients with complete or near-complete pathologic response documented good prognosis in this population but were limited by median follow-up in the range of 2 to 3 years. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with locally advanced (T(3-4) and/or N1) primary rectal cancer were prospectively identified. All were treated at one institution with preoperative RT to the pelvis (at least 4,500 cGy). Forty patients received concurrent preoperative 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy and 27 received both pre- and postoperative chemotherapy. Patients underwent resection 4 to 7 weeks after completion of RT. TNM stage, angiolymphatic or perineural invasion, and extent of response to preoperative RT +/- chemo were determined by pathologic evaluation. Adverse pathologic features were defined as the presence of angiolymphatic and/or perineural invasion. RFS at 5 years was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 69 months, 5-year RFS was 79%. RFS was significantly worse for patients with aggressive pathologic features and positive nodal status identified in the postirradiated surgical specimen. Risk ratios for RFS were 3.68 for the presence of aggressive pathologic features and 4.64 for node-positive rectal cancers. In patients with greater than 95% rectal cancer response to preoperative RT +/- chemo, only one patient has died as a consequence of cancer, another has died of an unrelated cause, and the remainder were free of disease with a minimum follow-up of 47 months. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a marked response to preoperative RT +/- chemo may be associated with good long-term outcome but was not predictive of RFS. The presence of poor histopathologic features and positive nodal status are the most important prognostic indicators after neoadjuvant therapy.
BACKGROUND: Preoperative combined-modality therapy (CMT) for rectal cancer allows a sphincter-sparing procedure in some individuals who would otherwise require an abdominoperineal resection. To further define the subset of rectal cancer patients suitable for this approach, we determined the adequacy of a distal margin of < or = 1 cm in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer requiring preoperative CMT. METHODS: Ninety-four consecutive patients, status post curative low anterior resection for rectal cancer after preoperative CMT, were identified from the prospective Colorectal Service Database. Distal margin length, tumor grade, tumor-node-metastasis stage, presence of lymphovascular and perineural invasion, and tumor distance from the anal verge were examined for their effect on recurrence and survival. Median follow-up was 44 months. RESULTS: Distal margin length ranged from.1 to 9.5 cm (median, 2.0 cm) and did not correlate with local recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.1; P =.34) or recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.1; P =.29) by univariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimates of recurrence-free survival and local recurrence at 3 years for the < or = 1 cm versus >1 cm and the < ore = 2 cm versus > 2 cm groups were not significantly different. Groups were well matched for other clinicopathologic variables. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing resection and preoperative CMT, distal margins < or = 1 cm do not seem to compromise oncological outcome.