Biomedical subjects

Lee Weng

Publications and source records attributed to Lee Weng.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Rosetta error model for gene expression analysis.

MOTIVATION: In microarray gene expression studies, the number of replicated microarrays is usually small because of cost and sample availability, resulting in unreliable variance estimation and thus unreliable statistical hypothesis tests. The unreliable variance estimation is further complicated by the fact that the technology-specific variance is intrinsically intensity-dependent. RESULTS: The Rosetta error model captures the variance-intensity relationship for various types of microarray technologies, such as single-color arrays and two-color arrays. This error model conservatively estimates intensity error and uses this value to stabilize the variance estimation. We present two commonly used error models: the intensity error-model for single-color microarrays and the ratio error model for two-color microarrays or ratios built from two single-color arrays. We present examples to demonstrate the strength of our error models in improving statistical power of microarray data analysis, particularly, in increasing expression detection sensitivity and specificity when the number of replicates is limited.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2005

Toxicogenomic analysis methods for predictive toxicology.

Toxicogenomics, the application of genomic data to elucidate or predict an organism's response to a toxicant, can inform the drug development process in important ways. It is apparent that standardized approaches to many types of toxicogenomic questions are still being formulated. Specifically, a significant body of proof of principle studies has emerged that demonstrates a range of statistical methodologies applied to predictive toxicology. These studies rely on class prediction methods--mathematical models generated using the gene expression profiles of known toxins from representative toxicological classes--to predict the toxicological effect of a compound based on the similarities between its gene expression profile and the profiles of a given toxicological class. Class prediction methods hold promise for increasing the rate at which compounds can be evaluated for toxicity early in the drug discovery process, while at the same time reducing the length of toxicological studies and their associated costs. Class prediction methods are informed by class comparison and class discovery steps, which inform, respectively, the selection of genes whose response can be used to distinguish among the toxicological classes and the number of classes distinguishable using the response of these genes. Together these steps use a variety of complementary statistical techniques to achieve a successful class prediction model. This report attempts to review some of the themes that appear to be emerging in the application of these techniques to predictive toxicology methods over toxicogenomics' short history.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of gene expression in Mammalian cells.

Using DNA microarrays together with quantitative proteomic techniques (ICAT reagents, two-dimensional DIGE, and MS), we evaluated the correlation of mRNA and protein levels in two hematopoietic cell lines representing distinct stages of myeloid differentiation, as well as in the livers of mice treated for different periods of time with three different peroxisome proliferative activated receptor agonists. We observe that the differential expression of mRNA (up or down) can capture at most 40% of the variation of protein expression. Although the overall pattern of protein expression is similar to that of mRNA expression, the incongruent expression between mRNAs and proteins emphasize the importance of posttranscriptional regulatory mechanisms in cellular development or perturbation that can be unveiled only through integrated analyses of both proteins and mRNAs.

Animals↗