Biomedical subjects

Lea M Starita

Publications and source records attributed to Lea M Starita.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

'Truthsets' for clinical validation of large-scale functional assays: Practice recommendations from Cancer Variant Interpretation Group UK (CanVIG-UK).

BACKGROUND: Large-scale functional assays, including multiplex assays of variant effect, have substantial potential to resolve variants of uncertain significance (VUS), particularly for rare missense variants where clinical and population evidence are limited. The ClinGen assay-level clinical validation framework described by Brnich et al provided baseline guidance for the use of functional data for variant classification. However, clear consensus regarding construction of variant 'truthsets' by which to clinically validate functional data remains lacking. METHODS: CanVIG-UK developed consensus recommendations for truthset construction through an iterative national consultation process involving the CanVIG Steering Advisory Group (CStAG), wider CanVIG-UK membership, and engagement with international functional genomics experts. Consultation was based on previous analyses of 2,120 truthset constructions examining the impact of truthset composition on evidence point allocation within the ClinGen assay-level clinical validation framework. RESULTS: Across several consultations, CanVIG-UK established nine guiding principles and seven best-practice recommendations for assay-level clinical validation, using the assumed context of an assay for a cancer susceptibility gene where loss-of-function is the mechanism of pathogenicity. The principal recommendation stipulates, where assays are intended for use in interpretation of largely missense variants, the truthset used to validate should comprise only missense variants. Rather than mixtures of different variant types which may serve to over-estimate assay performance. Additional recommendations support option for relaxation of truthset stringency to improve power, augmentation of benign missense truthsets with systematically derived 'proxy-clinical' benign variants, independent clinical validation separate from assayist-defined validation, and careful evaluation of missense score distributions against that of protein-truncating and synonymous variants. Guidance is also provided for scenarios with limited pathogenic truthset availability and for assays reporting multiple deleterious zones or readouts. CONCLUSIONS: The CanVIG-UK principles and recommendations for truthset construction upon the ClinGen assay-level clinical validation framework, while aiming to form a baseline for future discussion regarding other functional and disease contexts and helping to address the gap between publication of new data and routine clinical implementation.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Not Forgotten: Patient Experiences with Genetic Variant Reclassifications.

PURPOSE: Genetic variant reclassification is increasingly common in clinical genomics, yet limited data describe how patients experience re-contact and variant reclassification in routine clinical care. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 20 adult patients who received a variant reclassification following routine clinical genetic testing. Interviews explored emotional responses, communication experiences, and perceived value of genetic testing. Data were analyzed using Template Analysis, a form of thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three overarching themes were identified. Participants identified a need for improved communication of reclassified results, particularly with respect to timing, modality, and contextualization (Theme 1). Experiences with reclassification also shaped perceptions of the value of genetic testing, with most participants viewing testing as worthwhile despite its evolving nature (Theme 2). Finally, many participants interpreted reclassification as evidence of personalized and ongoing care, reinforcing trust in genetic testing and biomedical research (Theme 3). Participants generally preferred to be informed of reclassified results regardless of reclassification type, although the direction of reclassification influenced emotional responses and preferred modes of communication. Downgrades from variants of uncertain significance to benign or likely benign were widely viewed as meaningful by participants. CONCLUSION: Variant reclassification was experienced as a signal of personalized, ongoing care. Timely, contextualized, patient-centered re-contact practices may reduce uncertainty, strengthen trust, and help patients not feel forgotten.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2025

Imprecision medicine: Systematic gaps in reporting variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and their reclassifications.

PURPOSE: Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are frequently encountered during clinical genetic testing. To explore the clinical burden of VUS, we developed the Brotman Baty Institute Clinical Variant Database, which is an electronic health record (EHR)-linked database of clinical germline genetic variant information from patients with rare genetic disorders seen at 2 tertiary academic medical centers. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed EHRs and genetic testing reports from 5158 patients seen across diverse adult genetics practices at these institutions from 2015 to 2024. We also compared these EHR-based variant classifications with those in ClinVar. RESULTS: The number of reported VUS relative to pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants can vary by over 14-fold depending on the primary indication for genetic testing and 3-fold depending on self-reported race. Furthermore, at least 1.6% of variant classifications used in the EHR for clinical care are outdated based on ClinVar variant classifications, including 26 instances in which the testing lab updated ClinVar, but the reclassification was never communicated to the patient. CONCLUSION: Our findings reveal that the clinical burden of VUS in adult medical genetics is unequally distributed across patients. We also highlight a deficiency in existing systems for communicating variant reclassifications to ClinVar, patients, and providers.

Humans↗