Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Lawrence A Leiter

Publications and source records attributed to Lawrence A Leiter.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Increased soluble Fas plasma levels in subjects at high cardiovascular risk: Atorvastatin on Inflammatory Markers (AIM) study, a substudy of ACTFAST.

OBJECTIVE: Increasing evidence indicates that the Fas/Fas ligand interaction is involved in atherogenesis. We sought to analyze soluble Fas (sFas) and soluble Fas ligand (sFasL) concentrations in subjects at high cardiovascular risk and their modulation by atorvastatin treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: ACTFAST was a 12-week, prospective, multicenter, open-label trial which enrolled subjects (statin-free or statin-treated at baseline) with coronary heart disease (CHD), CHD-equivalent, or 10-year CHD risk > 20%. Subjects with LDL-C between 100 to 220 mg/dL (2.6 to 5.7 mmol/L) and triglycerides < or = 600 mg/dL (6.8 mmol/L) were assigned to a starting dose of atorvastatin (10 to 80 mg/d) based on LDL-C at screening. Of the 2117 subjects enrolled in ACTFAST, AIM sub-study included the 1078 statin-free patients. At study end, 85% of these subjects reached LDL-C target. Mean sFas levels were increased and sFasL were reduced in subjects at high cardiovascular risk compared with healthy subjects. Atorvastatin reduced sFas in the whole population as well as in patients with metabolic syndrome or diabetes. Minimal changes were observed in sFasL. CONCLUSIONS: sFas concentrations are increased and sFasL are decreased in subjects at high cardiovascular risk, suggesting that these proteins may be novel markers of vascular injury. Atorvastatin reduces sFas, indicating that short-term treatment with atorvastatin exhibits antiinflammatory effects in these subjects.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Korean red ginseng (Panax ginseng) improves glucose and insulin regulation in well-controlled, type 2 diabetes: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of efficacy and safety.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To address the paucity of randomized clinical studies assessing ginseng on long-term outcomes in type 2 diabetes, we assessed the clinical antidiabetic efficacy and safety of 12 weeks of supplementation with a Korean red ginseng (KRG) preparation, dose, and mode of administration, selected from an acute, clinical, screening model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nineteen participants with well-controlled type 2 diabetes (sex: 11 M:8 F, age: 64+/-2 years, BMI: 28.9+/-1.4 kg/m(2), HbA(1c): 6.5%) completed the study. Using a double-blind, randomized, crossover design, each participant received the selected KRG preparation (rootlets) and placebo at the selected dose (2 g/meal=6 g/day) and mode of administration (preprandial oral agent [-40 min]) for 12 weeks as an adjunct to their usual anti-diabetic therapy (diet and/or medications). Outcomes included measures of efficacy (HbA1c and fasting- and 75-g oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT]-plasma glucose [PG], plasma insulin [PI], and insulin sensitivity index [ISI] indices); safety (liver, kidney, haemostatic, and blood-pressure function); and compliance (returned capsules, diet-records, and body-weight). There was no change in the primary endpoint, HbA(1c). The participants, however, remained well-controlled (HbA1c=6.5%) throughout. The selected KRG treatment also decreased 75 g-OGTT-PG indices by 8-11% and fasting-PI and 75 g-OGTT-PI indices by 33-38% and increased fasting-ISI (homeostasis model assessment [HOMA]) and 75 g-OGTT-ISI by 33%, compared with placebo (P<0.05). Safety and compliance outcomes remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Although clinical efficacy, as assessed by HbA1c, was not demonstrated, 12 weeks of supplementation with the selected KRG treatment maintained good glycemic control and improved PG and PI regulation safely beyond usual therapy in people with well-controlled type 2 diabetes. Further investigation with similarly selected KRG treatments may yield clinical efficacy.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

The 2006 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part II - Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To provide updated, evidence-based recommendations for the management of hypertension in adults. OPTIONS AND OUTCOMES: For lifestyle and pharmacological interventions, evidence from randomized, controlled trials and systematic reviews of trials was preferentially reviewed. Changes in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality were the primary outcomes of interest. For lifestyle interventions, blood pressure (BP) lowering was accepted as a primary outcome given the lack of long-term morbidity/mortality data in this field. For treatment of patients with kidney disease, the development of proteinuria or worsening of kidney function was also accepted as a clinically relevant primary outcome. EVIDENCE: MEDLINE searches were conducted from November 2004 to October 2005 to update the 2005 recommendations. In addition, reference lists were scanned and experts were contacted to identify additional published studies. All relevant articles were reviewed and appraised independently by content and methodological experts using prespecified levels of evidence. RECOMMENDATIONS: Lifestyle modifications to prevent and/or treat hypertension include the following: perform 30 min to 60 min of aerobic exercise four to seven days per week; maintain a healthy body weight (body mass index of 18.5 kg/m2 to 24.9 kg/m2) and waist circumference (less than 102 cm for men and less than 88 cm for women); limit alcohol consumption to no more than 14 standard drinks per week in men or nine standard drinks per week in women; follow a diet that is reduced in saturated fat and cholesterol and that emphasizes fruits, vegetables and low-fat dairy products; restrict salt intake; and consider stress management in selected individuals. Treatment thresholds and targets should take into account each individual's global atherosclerotic risk, target organ damage and comorbid conditions. BP should be lowered to less than 140/90 mmHg in all patients, and to less than 130/80 mmHg in those with diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease (regardless of the degree of proteinuria). Most adults with hypertension require more than one agent to achieve these target BPs. For adults without compelling indications for other agents, initial therapy should include thiazide diuretics. Other agents appropriate for first-line therapy for diastolic hypertension with or without systolic hypertension include beta-blockers (in those younger than 60 years), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (in nonblack patients), long-acting calcium channel blockers or angiotensin receptor antagonists. Other agents for first-line therapy for isolated systolic hypertension include long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers or angiotensin receptor antagonists. Certain comorbid conditions provide compelling indications for first-line use of other agents: in patients with angina, recent myocardial infarction or heart failure, beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors are recommended as first-line therapy; in patients with diabetes mellitus, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists (or in patients without albuminuria, thiazides or dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers) are appropriate first-line therapies; and in patients with nondiabetic chronic kidney disease, ACE inhibitors are recommended. All hypertensive patients should have their fasting lipids screened, and those with dyslipidemia should be treated using the thresholds, targets and agents recommended by the Canadian Hypertension Education Program Working Group on the management of dyslipidemia and the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Selected patients with hypertension, but without dyslipidemia, should also receive statin therapy and/or acetylsalicylic acid therapy. VALIDATION: All recommendations were graded according to strength of the evidence and voted on by the 45 members of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program Evidence-Based Recommendations Task Force. All recommendations reported here achieved at least 95% consensus. These guidelines will continue to be updated annually.

Advisory Committees↗
PubMed2006

Long-term intake of North American ginseng has no effect on 24-hour blood pressure and renal function.

Ginseng is consumed by 10% to 20% of adults in Asia and by up to 5% in Western countries. Despite observational evidence suggesting a link between its intake and the development of hypertension, there remains no long-term scrutiny for its effect on blood pressure (BP). We therefore undertook a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, crossover trial in 52 hypertensive individuals to determine the effect of 12-week North American ginseng intake on 24-hour BP; we also measured serum cystatin C as a marker of renal function. After a 4-week placebo run-in, we randomly assigned 52 participants to 3 g/day of ginseng or placebo for 12 weeks. This was followed by an 8-week washout and a subsequent 12-week period in which the opposite treatment was administered. At run-in and at weeks 0 and 12 of each treatment period, participants were fitted with an ambulatory BP monitor to assess 24-hour BP. The primary outcome was the treatment difference at week 12 in mean 24-hour systolic BP. Secondary outcomes were treatment differences at week 12 in other ambulatory BP parameters and serum cystatin C. Forty participants (77%) completed the trial, with 3 removed from main analysis (n=2, antihypertensive drug changes; n=1, incomplete ambulatory monitoring). In the remaining 37, 12-week ginseng treatment was associated with a neutral effect on all ambulatory BP parameters compared with placebo; an intention-to-treat analysis supported this. Ginseng did not affect serum cystatin C level. Overall, long-term ginseng use had no effect on 24-hour BP and renal function in hypertensive individuals.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed2006

Optimal care of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes patients: shared responsibilities between the cardiologist and diabetologist.

Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease are inextricably linked. Patients with type 2 diabetes are at increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. However, controlling blood glucose, which until recently had often been the focus of the diabetologist, is only one component of optimal cardiovascular risk reduction. Vascular protection of the patient with diabetes also includes management of hypertension and dyslipidaemia and lifestyle changes such as smoking cessation. Now both cardiologists and diabetologists need to optimise all components of vascular protection, including glycaemic control, in patients with diabetes. An elevated blood glucose is predictive of poor outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes, even if frank diabetes is not present. Early control of hyperglycaemia should be achieved: a strategy that results in improved outcomes. More than two-thirds of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) have abnormal glucose regulation, which is a predictor of poor outcome. Therefore, the presence of diabetes (and/or glucose intolerance) should be routinely screened for in cardiac patients on admission to hospital. Early identification and treatment of CAD in patients with diabetes is important for optimal prevention of cardiovascular events. However, screening all diabetes patients for CAD is not feasible, and selection of patients for non-invasive cardiac testing remains a challenge for both the diabetologist and cardiologist. Optimal care of diabetic and cardiac patients requires a multidisciplinary team approach, with key roles for the cardiologist and diabetologist.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed2006

Contemporary management of dyslipidemia in high-risk patients: targets still not met.

PURPOSE: Our objective was to evaluate treatment patterns and the attainment of current National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)-recommended lipid targets in unselected high-risk ambulatory patients. METHODS: Between December 2001 and December 2004, the prospective Vascular Protection and Guidelines Oriented Approach to Lipid Lowering Registries recruited 8056 outpatients with diabetes, established cardiovascular disease (CVD), or both, who had a complete lipid profile measured within 6 months before enrollment. The primary outcome measure was treatment success, defined as the achievement of LDL-cholesterol<2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) according to NCEP guidelines. We examined patient characteristics and use of lipid-modifying therapy in relation to treatment outcome, which included the recently proposed optional LDL-cholesterol target (<1.8 mmol/L [70 mg/dL]) for very high-risk patients. RESULTS: Overall, 78.2% of patients were treated with a statin and 51.2% had achieved the recommended LDL-cholesterol target. Treatment success rate was highest in diabetic patients with CVD (59.6%), followed by nondiabetic patients with CVD (51.8%), and lowest (44.8%) in diabetic patients without CVD (P<.0001). Compared with untreated patients, those on statins were more likely to achieve target (34.4% vs 55.9%, P<.0001). Of the patients who failed to meet target, only 9.9% were taking high-dose statin, while 29.3% were not prescribed any statin therapy. Among very high-risk patients, 20.8% attained the optional LDL-cholesterol goal. In multivariable analysis, advanced age, male sex, diabetes, coronary artery disease, coronary revascularization, and use of statin were associated with treatment success (all P<.0001). CONCLUSION: Despite the well-established benefits of available lipid-modifying drugs, current management of dyslipidemia continues to be suboptimal, with a substantial proportion of patients failing to achieve guideline-recommended lipid targets. There remains an important opportunity to improve the quality of care for these high-risk patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Lower is better: implications of the Treating to New Targets (TNT) study for Canadian patients.

Recent clinical trials have indicated that lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels below currently recommended targets results in favourable surrogate and clinical end points. The Treating to New Targets (TNT) study now confirms that aggressive cholesterol lowering to a mean LDL-C of 2.0 mmol/L with atorvastatin 80 mg daily, compared with the previous target of 2.5 mmol/L with atorvastatin 10 mg daily, results in improved clinical outcomes in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease. A lower LDL-C target of less than 2.0 mmol/L will present therapeutic challenges, because approximately only one-half of high-risk patients will achieve this target using monotherapy with the newer and more powerful statins. Furthermore, registry data show that one-half of these patients are not even achieving the current LDL-C target of 2.5 mmol/L. Causes of the care gap are discussed and possible remedies to achieve the new lower targets are suggested.

Atorvastatin↗
PubMed2006

Metabolic syndrome under fire: weighing in on the truth.

In the past two decades, the 'metabolic syndrome' has raised much clinical and research interest and remains a controversial topic. The constellation of commonly coexisting cardiovascular risk factors, now known as the metabolic syndrome, has had many definitions which has added to the confusion surrounding the syndrome. Recently, the controversy has been escalated by a joint statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes calling into question the existence and clinical utility of the metabolic syndrome as a discrete clinical entity. Despite the controversy, there is agreement that the risk factors of abdominal obesity, hypertension, elevated glucose and dyslipidemia commonly coexist in the same patient, and are important to identify when assessing an individual patient's risk. Therefore, whether the 'syndrome' is a distinct clinical entity is not important. By definition, a syndrome is a group of signs or symptoms that commonly group together. It remains a useful clinical tool to raise awareness among health care professionals to look for 'nontraditional' cardiovascular risk factors, such as glucose intolerance or elevated waist circumference, in patients with other components of the syndrome, without negating the importance of identifying and treating the other 'traditional' risk factors not identified in the syndrome. It also reminds clinicians of the importance of lifestyle interventions to treat all of the components of the syndrome. Therefore, the 'metabolic syndrome' continues to serve a useful clinical purpose to raise awareness among health care professionals and aid in identifying high-risk individuals.

Blood Glucose↗
PubMed2006

PROVE-IT proved it: lower is better--pro.

Data from prospective epidemiological studies and randomized controlled trials have clearly demonstrated that lower low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations are associated with the greatest reduction in cardiovascular events. Coronary artery disease mortality is lowest in epidemiological studies in those individuals with the lowest cholesterol concentrations. In angiographic studies, patients who had their cholesterol lowered had less angiographic worsening of their atherosclerosis, with those trials that had the lowest on-treatment LDL-C, and especially those that had the greatest percentage of LDL-C lowering, showed the least progression of atherosclerosis. Clinical trials have also highlighted the fact that lower LDL-C concentrations are associated with reduced risk for both a first and a subsequent coronary event with analyses showing that event rates in both primary and secondary prevention trials are directly proportional to on-treatment LDL-C concentrations. An aggressive approach to LDL-C lowering, especially in the high-risk patient, seems warranted.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed2006

Korean red ginseng rootlets decrease acute postprandial glycemia: results from sequential preparation- and dose-finding studies.

BACKGROUND: Fractionation of a ginseng source to produce differences in the ginsenoside profile might influence its effect on postprandial glycemia. To explore this possibility and identify an efficacious ginseng for a longterm study, we conducted a preparation-finding study of different Korean red ginseng (KRG) root fractions followed by a dose-finding study of the most efficacious fraction. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, within-subject design was used in both studies. In the preparation-finding study, 7 healthy subjects (sex: 3m:4f, age: 32 +/- 4 y, BMI: 24 +/- 2 kg/m2) received 6 g placebo and KRG-rootlets, -body, and -H2O extract 40 min before a 50 g-OGTT with finger-prick blood samples at -40-, 0-, 15-, 30-, 45-, 60-, 90-, 120-min. In the dose-finding study, 12 healthy subjects (sex: 9M,3F, age: 29 +/- 3 y, BMI: 22.5 +/- 1 kg/m2) received 0 g (placebo), 2 g, 4 g, and 6 g of the most efficacious root fraction following the same protocol. Ginsenosides were analyzed using HPLC-UV. RESULTS: In the preparation-finding study, a wide variation in the ginsenoside profiles was achieved across the 3 KRG fractions. This variation coincided with differential effects. The main effects of KRG-rootlets (p = 0.050) and time (p < 0.001) and their interaction (p < 0.1) were significant. This was reflected in a 29% reduction in area under the curve (AUC) by KRG-rootlets compared with placebo (p = 0.052). Conversely, neither KRG-H2O extract nor KRG-body affected glycemia. Stepwise-multiple regression models identified Rg1 as the sole predictor of mean- and AUC postprandial blood glucose. In the dose-finding study, KRG-rootlets were tested as the most efficacious fraction. A significant effect of KRG-rootlets treatment (mean of 3 doses) but not dose was found. The mean of 3 doses decreased AUC by 17% compared with placebo (p = 0.057). CONCLUSIONS: Together the studies indicate 2 g KRG-rootlets is sufficient to achieve reproducible reductions in postprandial glycemia. But the longterm sustainability of KRG selected using this approach remains to be tested.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Assessment of the longer-term effects of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods in hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Cholesterol-lowering foods may be more effective when consumed as combinations rather than as single foods. OBJECTIVES: Our aims were to determine the effectiveness of consuming a combination of cholesterol-lowering foods (dietary portfolio) under real-world conditions and to compare these results with published data from the same participants who had undergone 4-wk metabolic studies to compare the same dietary portfolio with the effects of a statin. DESIGN: For 12 mo, 66 hyperlipidemic participants were prescribed diets high in plant sterols (1.0 g/1000 kcal), soy protein (22.5 g/1000 kcal), viscous fibers (10 g/1000 kcal), and almonds (23 g/1000 kcal). Fifty-five participants completed the 1-y study. The 1-y data were also compared with published results on 29 of the participants who had also undergone separate 1-mo metabolic trials of a diet and a statin. RESULTS: At 3 mo and 1 y, mean (+/-SE) LDL-cholesterol reductions appeared stable at 14.0 +/- 1.6% (P < 0.001) and 12.8 +/- 2.0% (P < 0.001), respectively (n = 66). These reductions were less than those observed after the 1-mo metabolic diet and statin trials. Nevertheless, 31.8% of the participants (n = 21 of 66) had LDL-cholesterol reductions of >20% at 1 y (x +/- SE: -29.7 +/- 1.6%). The LDL-cholesterol reductions in this group were not significantly different from those seen after their respective metabolically controlled portfolio or statin treatments. A correlation was found between total dietary adherence and LDL-cholesterol change (r = -0.42, P < 0.001). Only 2 of the 26 participants with <55% compliance achieved LDL-cholesterol reductions >20% at 1 y. CONCLUSIONS: More than 30% of motivated participants who ate the dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods under real-world conditions were able to lower LDL-cholesterol concentrations >20%, which was not significantly different from their response to a first-generation statin taken under metabolically controlled conditions.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In 2001, the Adult Treatment Panel III of the National Cholesterol Education Program issued recommendations, which were updated in 2004 to reflect knowledge from five major clinical trials completed after 2001. This review discusses the results of key clinical trials released in 2005 and their potential impact on the guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS: Three major clinical trials, one subgroup analysis, and one meta-analysis were published in 2005 that can potentially affect the existing guidelines. The Treating to New Targets and the Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering trials demonstrated the incremental benefit of more aggressive low-density cholesterol lowering in stable coronary heart disease. The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration meta-analysis of statin trials supported the importance of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction, irrespective of initial lipid profile, in reducing cardiovascular events. A subgroup analysis of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial - Lipid-Lowering Arm demonstrated statin benefits in diabetes, whereas the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes study failed to show overall treatment benefits with a fibrate in diabetes. SUMMARY: Lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol remains central in reducing cardiovascular risk; however, the recent trials support a target of less than 2.0 mmol/l (<80 mg/dl), rather than the less than 1.8 mmol/l (70 mg/dl) suggested by the 2004 update, for all high-risk patients and not, as recommended previously, just for those with additional factors. For individuals with diabetes, recent data support the use of statin therapy, even in those at less than high risk. First-line therapy should remain statins and not fibrates.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Can thiazolidinediones delay disease progression in type 2 diabetes?

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes results from increasing insulin resistance coupled with progressive loss of beta-cell function. Further deterioration of beta-cell function is associated with progression of diabetes and the potential development of microvascular and macrovascular complications. SCOPE: This review examines current knowledge of beta-cell function and uses this information to assess how the results of ongoing trials could increase our understanding of disease progression and potential interventions. Data were derived from a Medline search using the search terms 'beta-cell dysfunction', 'IGT', 'thiazolidinediones', 'metformin', and 'sulfonylurea'. RESULTS: The mechanisms that underlie beta-cell dysfunction are complex and most likely involve the interplay of a range of factors that reduce both beta-cell mass and secretory function. These include detrimental effects associated with hyperglycemia itself, elevated free fatty acids, and inflammatory responses linked to adipocyte-derived cytokines, with apoptosis a key underlying mechanism. Early intervention with treatments that address these defects, and preserve beta-cell function while improving insulin sensitivity, may delay disease progression in patients with type 2 diabetes and also prevent the development of diabetes in 'at-risk' individuals. Two of the studies examining the effects of interventions on development and progression of diabetes that are due to report shortly are ADOPT (A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial), comparing a thiazolidinedione, metformin and a sulfonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes not previously treated with oral hypoglycemic agents, and DREAM (Diabetes REduction Assessment with ramipril and rosiglitazone Medication), assessing the effects of a thiazolidinedione and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and/or impaired fasting glucose. CONCLUSIONS: Although we do not have a full understanding of the mechanisms driving progression of type 2 diabetes, there is growing evidence that we may be able to modulate them and thereby improve patient outcomes.

Diabetes Complications↗
PubMed2005

North American ginseng exerts a neutral effect on blood pressure in individuals with hypertension.

An early observational study suggested that ginseng could elevate blood pressure. This caused concern because 4.5% of American adults use ginseng, with a popular choice being North American ginseng. To date, North American ginseng lacks hemodynamic evaluation; therefore, we conducted a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial to investigate its effect on blood pressure in 16 hypertensive individuals (mean+/-SD age 61.1+/-8.1 years; systolic/diastolic blood pressure 132.4+/-12.8/83.3+/-8.1 mm Hg; 13 on antihypertensives). We used 6 batches of North American ginseng root that varied in quality and ginsenoside content, representing the spectrum of this ginseng on the market. On 8 mornings, each participant was fitted with an ambulatory blood pressure monitor, which measured blood pressure during a 30-minute baseline period. Each participant then consumed in a randomized and double-blind fashion 3 g of encapsulated treatment: placebo (on 2 mornings) or powdered North American ginseng (on 6 mornings). After treatment, blood pressure was measured every 10 minutes for 160 minutes, and its change at each post-treatment time point relative to baseline was determined per individual and averaged, and the mean was obtained for the overall 160-minute period. None of the North American ginsengs or their mean differed from placebo in their effect on overall (160 minutes) mean blood pressure change. None affected blood pressure versus placebo at the 10-minute intervals; but their mean versus placebo increased systolic and diastolic blood pressure at 140 and 160 minutes, respectively, and lowered diastolic blood pressure at 100 minutes. The findings together suggested that North American ginseng exerts a neutral acute effect on blood pressure in hypertensive individuals.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

The prevention of diabetic microvascular complications of diabetes: is there a role for lipid lowering?

The role of hyperglycemia in the development of microvascular complications of diabetes, such as nephropathy, retinopathy and neuropathy, has been well documented. Evidence is accumulating to support the concept that dyslipidemia can also contribute to the development of these complications. Lipid-lowering agents, such as statins, have been shown to prevent cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes. However, in addition to preventing macrovascular diseases, statins may also be able to retard the progression of microvascular complications of diabetes. Indeed, in addition to reducing lipid levels, these agents can improve endothelial function and reduce oxidative stress, which can improve microvascular function. These findings would provide further support for the use of lipid-lowering agents in patients with diabetes.

Diabetic Angiopathies↗