Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Laurie Petrovick

Publications and source records attributed to Laurie Petrovick.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Falls from height: spine, spine, spine!

BACKGROUND: Falls from a height are a major cause of morbidity and hospital cost. Spinal injury is frequently associated with falls from height, but reliable predictive factors have not been identified. Diagnostic evaluation of the spine is complex and debated. Our objective was to characterize spinal injury after falls from height and identify predictive factors of spinal injuries. STUDY DESIGN: Medical records of patients with falls from height>10 feet admitted in a Level I trauma center during a period of 66 months were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors of spinal injuries. RESULTS: Of 414 patients, 127 (31%) suffered 277 spinal injuries. Multiple spinal injuries at different levels were found in 62 (49%) patients; in 19 (15%) spinal injuries were at noncontinuous levels. The only independent predictor of spinal injury was alcohol intoxication (odds ratio=3.305; 95% CI, 1.75-6.242; p<0.001) but the number of intoxicated patients was low and the predictive ability weak. Level of falls from height did not correlate with likelihood of spinal injury. Twenty-four of 107 (22%) patients with spinal injuries and a reliable clinical examination had no symptoms related to the spine; all but 2 had distracting injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal injury is frequent among survivors of falls from height>10 feet. Because of the absence of reliable predictors of spinal injury, the possibility of multiple noncontinuous fractures, and the presence of distracting injuries clouding the clinical presentation, aggressive evaluation of the entire spine is warranted.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMed2006

Routine repeat head CT for minimal head injury is unnecessary.

BACKGROUND: Patients with MHI and a positive head computed tomography (CT) scan frequently have a routine repeat head CT (RRHCT) to identify possible evolution of the head injury requiring intervention. RRHCT is ordered based on the premise that significant injury progression may take place in the absence of clinical deterioration. METHODS: In a Level I urban trauma center with a policy of RRHCT, we reviewed the records of 692 consecutive trauma patients with Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 13-15 and a head CT (October 2004 through October 2005). The need for medical or surgical neurologic intervention after RRHCT was recorded. Patients with a worse and unchanged RRHCT were compared, and independent predictors of a worse RRHCT were identified by stepwise logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 179 patients with MHI and RRHCT ordered. Of them, 37 (21%) showed signs of injury evolution on RRHCT and 7 (4%) required intervention. All 7 had clinical deterioration preceding RRHCT. In no patient without clinical deterioration did RRHCT prompt a change in management. A Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 15 (13 or 14), age higher than 65 years, multiple traumatic lesions found on first head CT, and interval shorter than 90 minutes from arrival to first head CT predicted independently a worse RRHCT. CONCLUSIONS: RRHCT is unnecessary in patients with MHI. Clinical examination identifies accurately the few who will show significant evolution and require intervention.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Cerebral fractional anisotropy score in trauma patients: a new indicator of white matter injury after trauma.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies evaluating quantitative cerebral white matter diffusion anisotropy indexes have shown alteration in patients after trauma. To date, no clinically applicable scale exists by which to gauge and test the relevance of these findings. We propose the cerebral fractional anisotropy score in trauma (C-FAST) as an index of white matter injury, and we correlate C-FAST with several predictor and outcome variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients were randomly selected from the trauma surgery service. Thirty control patients were randomly selected from the emergency department. All patients were subjected to MRI evaluation, including a diffusion-weighted sequence. Data extracted from the record of each subject included Glasgow Coma Scale, revised trauma score, Abbreviated Injury Scale, initial head CT results, patient disposition, length of hospital stay, and length of stay in intensive care unit. Region of interest measurements were made in fractional anisotropy maps in each of 12 white matter regions. Univariate statistics and a two-tailed t test were performed on the raw fractional anisotropy data. Data were then dichotomized using thresholds from univariate statistics. A C-FAST score was devised from the dichotomized data. Logistic regression analyses were performed among the C-FAST, outcome, and predictor data. RESULTS: Good correlation was noted between the C-FAST and death, hospital stay greater than 10 days, and intensive care unit stay greater than 5 days. Correlation with discharge to rehabilitation facility was good when adjusted for age and sex. Glasgow Coma Scale, revised trauma score, and Abbreviated Injury Scale show good correlation as predictors of a critical C-FAST. CONCLUSION: The C-FAST is a promising index derived from MRI diffusion fractional anisotropy measurements that shows successful correlation with outcome and predictor variables. A larger investigation is needed to verify the validity and stability of the correlations.

Adult↗