Biomedical subjects

Lajos Pusztai

Publications and source records attributed to Lajos Pusztai.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab in participants in Asia with early triple-negative breast cancer: An updated subgroup analysis of the KEYNOTE-522 randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In KEYNOTE-522 (NCT03036488), addition of perioperative pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). pCR and EFS results in participants enrolled in Asia were consistent with those in the overall population. We report OS, updated EFS, and safety outcomes in participants enrolled in Asia. METHODS: Participants with newly diagnosed, high-risk, early-stage TNBC (T1c [N1‒N2] or T2‒T4 [N0‒N2] per AJCC 7th edition) were randomized 2:1 to 8 cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or placebo plus chemotherapy. After definitive surgery, participants received adjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or placebo for ≤9 cycles. Primary endpoints were pCR (ypT0/Tis ypN0) and EFS. OS was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Of 1174 randomized participants, 216 were enrolled in Asia. At data cutoff (March 22, 2024), EFS events occurred in 18/136 participants (13.2%) in the pembrolizumab + chemotherapy group versus 22/80 (27.5%) in the placebo + chemotherapy group (HR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.23‒0.81]); 60-month EFS rates (95% CIs) were 87.4% (80.6%‒92.0%) and 72.1% (60.7%‒80.6%), respectively. In the respective groups, 12/136 (8.8%) and 16/80 participants (20.0%) died (HR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.19‒0.86]); 60-month OS rates (95% CIs) were 91.9% (85.8%‒95.4%) and 81.1% (70.5%‒88.1%). Treatment-related AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 19/136 participants (14.0%) with pembrolizumab + chemotherapy and 7/79 (8.9%) with placebo + chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: OS and updated EFS outcomes in KEYNOTE-522 participants enrolled in Asia were consistent with those in the overall population and support use of perioperative pembrolizumab + neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a standard-of-care treatment in this setting.

Adjuvant↗

PubMed2026

Development and Validation of a Multimodal Clinical, Pathologic, and Genomic Model for Breast Cancer Recurrence.

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a multimodal recurrence-risk model integrating histology, genomic testing, and clinical variables. METHODS: We developed AI-Path, a whole-slide image biomarker for recurrence prediction trained in CALGB 9344, and validated it in three independent cohorts: TAILORx, a multi-site Chicago cohort, and the MDX-BRCA cohort. We then integrated AI-Path with Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS), tumor size, and nodal status into a Cox model, PathClinRS, fit using 60% of cases from TAILORx, with the remaining 40% held out for validation. The primary end point was distant recurrence-free interval. Performance was assessed using Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: A total of 12,418 patients were included. In TAILORx, AI-Path outperformed RS for distant recurrence (C-index, 0.682 vs 0.647; P = .038), driven by superior prediction of late recurrence (0.656 vs 0.567; P < .001). In node-negative disease, PathClinRS outperformed RSClin in the TAILORx fitting (0.72 vs 0.70; P = .016) and validation sets (0.74 vs 0.70; P = .004). In node-positive disease, PathClinRS outperformed RSClinN+ in Chicago (0.94 vs 0.74; P < .001) and MDX-BRCA (0.71 vs 0.66; P = .004) cohorts. Compared with NATALEE eligibility, PathClinRS identified nearly twice as many high-risk node-negative patients while maintaining a comparable 10-year distant recurrence risk (16.7% vs 16.6% per NATALEE eligibility in TAILORx fitting; 21.0% vs 19.4% in TAILORx validation). PathClinRS identified 68% of intermediate risk premenopausal patients as low-risk with no evidence of chemotherapy benefit, compared to only 36% identified as low risk by standard clinicopathologic criteria. CONCLUSION: Digital histopathology provides prognostic information complementary to genomic assays and has the potential to personalize therapy beyond existing clinicogenomic tools.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Artificial intelligence-based tumour infiltrating lymphocyte quantification in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: an independent validation study.

BACKGROUND: Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are a robust prognostic marker in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI)-derived computational tools assessing TILs could improve efficiency, but require independent validation against clinical outcomes. We aimed to compare the prognostic performance of AI-derived TIL scores with pathologist-scored TILs in a large, prospectively collected dataset pooled from randomised controlled trials. METHODS: CATALINA was an independent, external validation study using prospectively collected long-term clinical outcome data pooled from seven randomised clinical trials conducted at multiple sites. We independently evaluated two previously validated AI pipelines that generate five computationally assessed tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte (cTIL) scores by masked, independent deployment of locked models. cTIL scores were correlated with the mean of the pathologist-scored stromal TILs (sTILs) in 220 digitised haematoxylin and eosin whole slide images in a cohort of patients with early-stage triple-negative or HER-2 positive breast cancer, previously scored by trained pathologists in a TIL-reproducibility study. Prognostic performance was assessed in a separate cohort of patients with early triple-negative breast cancer pooled from seven prospective, randomised adjuvant trials. Multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for clinicopathological factors and study heterogeneity assessed associations of cTIL score and sTIL score with invasive disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival, and overall survival. 5-year discrimination was estimated using time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). FINDINGS: Individual data were collated from 1759 patients, of whom 1356 had complete clinicopathological data, pathologist sTIL scores, and cTIL scores available. Modest correlation (r 0·375-0·473) was observed between cTIL scores and the mean pathologist sTIL score. Both sTIL and cTIL were independently associated with 5-year invasive disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival, and overall survival after adjustment for clinicopathological factors (hazard ratio for invasive disease-free survival was 0·73 [95% CI 0·66-0·82]; q<0·0001, distant disease-free survival was 0·70 [0·61-0·79]; q<0·0001, and overall survival was 0·72 [0·63-0·82]; q<0·0001 for sTIL scores and 0·80 [0·73-0·89]; q<0·0001, 0·77 [0·69-0·86]; q<0·0001, and 0·79 [0·70-0·88]; q=0·0002, respectively, for percentage_lymphocyte scores). In models adjusted for clinicopathological variables and sTIL score, cTIL score did not maintain a statistically significant prognostic association. Both sTIL and cTIL scores improved the 5-year AUC over clinicopathological variables alone, while cTIL score did not significantly further improve AUC when combined with clinicopathological variables and sTIL score. INTERPRETATION: Two cTIL models deployed entirely without retraining or modification provided statistically significant prognostic information and improved risk discrimination compared with clinicopathological variables alone in this large, platform-based, independent validation study. Although cTIL score did not incrementally improve prognostication compared with models combining clinicopathological variables with sTIL score, these findings support the application of cTILs as a reproducible prognostic biomarker, particularly in settings where routine or widespread pathologist assessment is unavailable. FUNDING: Breast Cancer Research Foundation (USA).

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Integration of Gene Expression and Digital Histology to Predict Treatment-Specific Responses in Breast Cancer.

Deep learning models applied to digital histology can predict gene expression signatures (GES) and offer a low-cost, rapidly available alternative to molecular testing at the time of diagnosis. We optimized transformer-based models to infer GES results and applied this approach to pre-treatment H&E-stained biopsies from 1,940 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in clinical trial and real-world cohorts. The most predictive histology-derived GES for pathologic complete response (pCR) in the I-SPY2 trial was validated in four external cohorts: CALGB 40601, CALGB 40603, a trial of durvalumab plus CT, and standard-of-care CT-treated patients from the University of Chicago. Among HER2-negative patients, a transformer-based model trained using a signature composed of estrogen-regulated genes, proliferation, apoptosis, and interferon response genes predicted pCR with an AUC of 0.794, outperforming models based on clinical features alone (AUC 0.704, p = 0.001), pathologist TIL assessment, and a model trained directly to predict response from I-SPY2 cases. Tertiles of this signature stratify patients into clinically relevant groups with increasing likelihood of complete response, with pCR rates ≥50% in the top tertile regardless of treatment or hormone receptor status. Additional transformer-based signature models predicted response to specific therapies (but not chemotherapy alone), including a HER2 signaling signature in IO-treated patients, and a claudin-low signature in bevacizumab treated patients. In HER2- cohorts with available gene expression data and histology, models trained on expression data performed similarly to digital histology predictions, but the combination of gene expression and histology outperformed histology alone. These findings suggest that histology-based GES provides additive information to RNA sequencing data and can inform precision treatment selection across breast cancer subtypes.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2025

Dynamic clustering of genomics cohorts beyond race, ethnicity-and ancestry.

BACKGROUND: Recent decades have witnessed a steady decrease in the use of race categories in genomic studies. While studies that still include race categories vary in goal and type, these categories already build on a history during which racial color lines have been enforced and adjusted in the service of social and political systems of power and disenfranchisement. For early modern classification systems, data collection was also considerably arbitrary and limited. Fixed, discrete classifications have limited the study of human genomic variation and disrupted widely spread genetic and phenotypic continuums across geographic scales. Relatedly, the use of broad and predefined classification schemes-e.g. continent-based-across traits can risk missing important trait-specific genomic signals. METHODS: To address these issues, we introduce a dynamic approach to clustering human genomics cohorts based on genomic variation in trait-specific loci and without using a set of predefined categories. We tested the approach on whole-exome sequencing datasets in ten cancer types and partitioned them based on germline variants in cancer-relevant genes that could confer cancer type-specific disease predisposition. RESULTS: Results demonstrate clustering patterns that transcend discrete continent-based categories across cancer types. Functional analysis based on cancer type-specific clusterings also captures the fundamental biological processes underlying cancer, differentiates between dynamic clusters on a functional level, and identifies novel potential drivers overlooked by a predefined continent-based clustering. CONCLUSIONS: Through a trait-based lens, the dynamic clustering approach reveals genomic patterns that transcend predefined classification categories. We propose that coupled with diverse data collection, new clustering approaches have the potential to draw a more complete portrait of genomic variation and to address, in parallel, technical and social aspects of its study.

Humans↗