Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Werthamer

Publications and source records attributed to L Werthamer.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Applying cost analysis methods to school-based prevention programs.

In order to efficiently allocate scarce prevention resources, policymakers need information about the economic costs of school-based substance use prevention programs. The objective of this paper is to outline economic cost analysis methods and demonstrate their applicability to school-based prevention programs. As an example, the paper focuses on estimating the economic cost of ALPHA, an intensive school-based substance use prevention program. The cost of ALPHA is compared to the costs of 3 elementary school programs that were alternatives to ALPHA. We collected cost information for 3 years, using a cost questionnaire that was completed by program and school budget officers and school principals. The program costs obtained from these sources were modified to conform to well-established economic cost analysis principles.

Child↗

Adolescent patients--healthy or hurting? Missed opportunities to screen for suicide risk in the primary care setting.

CONTEXT: Adolescent suicide rates have increased dramatically in recent decades. Suicide is the third leading cause of mortality among persons aged 10 to 19 years. Several official guidelines recommend screening for suicidal behavior in the primary care setting. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of adolescent suicidal behavior known to primary care providers and to determine the knowledge, attitudes, and practice of primary care physicians in Maryland regarding screening for risk factors for adolescent suicide. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using mailed survey. SETTING: Maryland from May to July 1995. PARTICIPANTS: All pediatrician (n = 816) and family physician (n = 592) members of the state chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Physicians, respectively, who were actively providing ambulatory care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adolescent suicidal behavior known to primary care providers and predictors of routine screening for risk factors for adolescent suicide. RESULTS: The response rate was 66%. Three hundred twenty-eight physicians (47%) reported that 1 or more adolescent patients attempted suicide in the previous year, but only 158 (23%) either frequently or always screened adolescent patients for suicide risk factors. Significant factors correlating with routine screening for suicide risk factors included frequently or always counseling about the safer storage of firearms in the home (odds ratio [OR], 5.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-10.2); agreeing or strongly agreeing that they were sufficiently trained and knew how to screen for risk factors (OR, 3.2; 95%/CI, 1.7-6.3); agreeing or strongly agreeing that they had enough time during the well visit to screen for mental health problems (OR, 2.9: 95% CI, 1.6-5.3); frequently or always counseling about child passenger safety (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.6-4.7); spending more than 5 minutes in anticipatory guidance during the well visit (OR, 2.7: 95% CI, 1.5-4.6); practicing in an urban setting (OR, 2.3; 95)% CI, 1.2-4.7); agreeing or strongly agreeing that physicians can be effective in preventing adolescent suicide and that what they do during an office visit may help prevent adolescent suicide (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.4); and female sex (OR. 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.2). CONCLUSION: Despite the substantial proportion of primary care providers who encountered suicidal adolescent patients, most providers still do not routinely screen their patients for suicidality or associated risk factors. More training is needed and desired by the survey respondents. Patient confidentiality issues must be addressed. Development and widespread use of a short, easily administered, reliable, and valid screening tool are recommended to help busy clinicians obtain more complete information during all visits.

Adolescent↗

Proximal impact of two first-grade preventive interventions on the early risk behaviors for later substance abuse, depression, and antisocial behavior.

We assessed the immediate effects of two universal, first-grade preventive interventions on the proximal targets of poor achievement, concentration problems, aggression, and shy behaviors, known early risk behaviors for later substance use/abuse, affective disorder, and conduct disorder. The classroom-centered (CC) intervention was designed to reduce these early risk behaviors by enhancing teachers' behavior management and instructional skills, whereas the family-school partnership (FSP) intervention was aimed at improving parent-teacher communication and parental teaching and child behavior management strategies. Over the course of first and second grades, the CC intervention yielded the greatest degree of impact on its proximal targets, whereas the FSP's impact was somewhat less. The effects were influenced by gender and by preintervention levels of risk. Analyses of implementation measures demonstrated that greater fidelity to the intervention protocols was associated with greater impact on behavior ratings and on achievement scores, thus providing some evidence of specificity in the effect of the interventions.

Baltimore↗