Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Sung

Publications and source records attributed to L Sung.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Endometriosis is not detrimental to embryo implantation in oocyte recipients.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to determine the effects of endometriosis on implantation and pregnancy rates in ovum recipients. METHODS: The medical records of 239 consecutive oocyte recipient patients who were treated between January 1, 1991, and June 30, 1995, were analyzed retrospectively. Recipients with endometriosis (group 1; n = 55) were compared to recipients without endometriosis (group II; n = 184). Patients in group I had active endometriotic disease confirmed by laparoscopy and were subdivided into mild (Stages I and II; n = 18) and moderate to severe (Stages III and IV; n = 37) endometriosis. RESULTS: No difference was found in recipient age, endometrial thickness, donor age, and embryos transferred. The pregnancy rates (28 versus 29%) and implantation rates (12 and 13%) were also comparable between group I and group II, as well as between patients with mild and patients with moderate to severe endometriosis. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of endometriosis in oocyte recipients does not lower implantation or pregnancy rates. We conclude that the adverse effect of endometriosis on reproductive outcome is not related to implantation but, in fact, is most likely an effect on oocyte or embryo quality.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Sisters of women with premature ovarian failure may not be ideal ovum donors.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the sisters of women with premature ovarian failure (POF) showed a response to gonadotropin stimulation comparable to that of anonymous ovum donors. DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: Records of 228 consecutive ovum recipients in an academic assisted reproductive technology program. PATIENT(S): Criteria for inclusion were oocyte recipients age < or = 40 years, FSH > 18 mIU/mL (conversion factor to SI unit, 1.00), and/or failure to respond appropriately to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). Seventy-nine recipients were classified on the basis of whether they received oocytes from anonymous donors (group I, n = 66) or sister donors (group II, n = 13). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation response, pregnancy rates (PRs), and implantation rates. RESULT(S): The ages of the donors to groups I and II were comparable (31.1 +/- 16.7 versus 29.8 +/- 7.2 years), but those in group II exhibited a higher baseline FSH level (12.8 +/- 2.1 versus 8.6 +/- 5.8 mIU/mL). Group II versus I had a relative risk of 5.1 for cancellation (4 of 13 [30.8%] versus 4 of 66 [6.1%], respectively). In completed cycles of groups I and II, respectively, there was no difference in serum E2 on the day of hCG administration (2,356 +/- 826 versus 1,847 +/- 843 pg/mL; conversion factor to SI unit, 3,671), number of oocytes retrieved (25 +/- 14 versus 22 +/- 13), number of embryos transferred (4.4 +/- 2.1 versus 4.0 +/- 1.0), spontaneous abortion rate (22.7% versus 25.0%), PR (35.5% versus 36.4%), and implantation rate (16.2% versus 16.4%). CONCLUSION(S): There is an increased cancellation rate and, consequently, an overall trend toward decreased ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation in the sisters of patients with POF. Despite these factors, the implantation rates and PRs of embryos derived from patients reaching retrieval were similar to those from anonymous donors. We recommend counseling women with POF that their sisters may not be ideal ovum donors.

Adult↗