Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L S Seiden

Publications and source records attributed to L S Seiden.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

The serotonin-1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 modifies fluoxetine's antidepressant-like profile on the differential reinforcement of low rates 72-s schedule in rats.

RATIONALE: Recent preclinical and clinical data suggest that co-administration of a serotonin-1A (5-HT-1A) receptor antagonist with an antidepressant drug has greater therapeutic efficacy than when the antidepressant drug is administered alone. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present experiment was to determine whether pretreatment with the selective 5-HT-1A receptor antagonist N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)- 1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(pyridinyl)cyclohexanecarboxamide (WAY-100635; 0.003, 0.03, 0.3 mg/kg, s.c.) would alter the effects of the antidepressant fluoxetine (2.5-10 mg/kg, i.p.) on the differential reinforcement of low-rate 72-s (DRL 72-s) schedule. The DRL 72-s schedule is a behavioral screen selective and sensitive to antidepressant drugs. RESULTS: WAY-100635 had no behavioral effects on its own. The lower doses of fluoxetine (2.5 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg) had no effects, but 10 mg/kg increased reinforcement rate without affecting response rate. The increase in reinforcement rate was blocked by pretreatment with 0.03 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg WAY-100635, although the combination of fluoxetine and WAY-100635 also significantly reduced response rate. Interestingly, 0.003 mg/kg or 0.03 mg/kg WAY-100635 administered with 5.0 mg/kg fluoxetine increased reinforcement rate, even though this dose of fluoxetine had no effect on performance. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that the behavioral effects of fluoxetine are modified by 5-HT-1A receptor blockade.

Animals↗

Rats selectively bred for responsiveness to 5-hydroxytryptamine(1A) receptor stimulation: differences in differential reinforcement of low rate 72-second performance and response to serotonergic drugs.

High (+/-)-8-hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin HBr (8-OH-DPAT)-sensitive (HDS) rats and low 8-OH-DPAT-sensitive (LDS) rats were selectively bred for differences in sensitivity to the hypothermic effect of the 5-hydroxytryptamine(1A) (5-HT(1A)) receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT in 30 to 35-day-old rat pups. These rats were trained on the differential reinforcement of low rate 72-s operant schedule. On this schedule, LDS rats had a higher response rate and a lower reinforcement rate than HDS rats. Drugs with primary action on the 5-HT system, 8-OH-DPAT, ketanserin, and fluoxetine, decreased response rate of HDS and LDS rats but increased the reinforcement rate of only the LDS rats. However, a drug with primary action on the norepinephrine system, desipramine, decreased response rate and increased reinforcement rate of HDS and LDS rats, suggesting that norepinephrine function was similar in the two lines of rats. The finding with desipramine indicates that increases in reinforcers on the differential reinforcement of low rate 72-s task are not simply dependent on baseline response or reinforcement rate. We also observed that 8-OH-DPAT engenders a greater hypothermic response in adult (90-day-old) HDS rats than in adult LDS rats. The 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY-100635 antagonized the hypothermic response. Tissue levels of 8-OH-DPAT from several brain regions in LDS and HDS rats did not differ from each other at either 15- or 30-min postinjection. Because the LDS and HDS rats have different responses to 5-HT-acting drugs, these rats may be useful for studying the role of the serotonergic system in depression.

8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin↗

Serotonergic mediation of DRL 72s behavior: receptor subtype involvement in a behavioral screen for antidepressant drugs.

BACKGROUND: The functioning of the brain serotonin system has been implicated in the action of antidepressant drugs. The behavior of rats performing the Differential Reinforcement of Low Rate-72 sec (DRL 72s) has been used as a screen for drugs with antidepressant activity. Many antidepressant drugs alter serotonergic function. Hence, experiments were designed to investigate the role of the brain serotonin system in the performance of DRL 72s behavior. METHODS: Rats were trained to perform a DRL 72s, and then depleted (LESION) of brain serotonin (5-HT) using intracerebroventricular 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT). Control rats (SHAM) were injected with the 5,7-DHT vehicle. RESULTS: The 5,7-DHT-treated rats showed a higher response rate, a decrease in the number of reinforcements, and a shift in the interresponse time (IRT) distribution toward shorter IRTs when compared to SHAM and prelesion performance. The behavioral deficit in the 5,7-DHT rats persisted for 17 weeks. Postmortem assays indicated extensive depletion of 5-HT in all the assayed brain regions of the LESION rats. The effects of the serotonergic agonists 8-hydroxy-2-di-N-propylaminotetralin (8-OH-DPAT), 5-methoxy-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeODMT), buspirone, and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) were assessed. 5-MeODMT and 8-OH-DPAT resulted in greater improvement of DRL 72s performance in the LESION rats than in the SHAM rats. Buspirone failed to ameliorate the behavioral deficit in the LESION rats and produced a behavioral deficit in the SHAM rats. 5-HTP improved performance in the SHAM rats and in the LESION rats. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the contention that the brain 5-HT system is involved in the mediation of antidepressant drug effects.

5,7-Dihydroxytryptamine↗

The behavioral effects of sertraline, fluoxetine, and paroxetine differ on the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate 72-second operant schedule in the rat.

RATIONALE: Recent evidence indicates that specific serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are not a clinically or experimentally homogeneous class of drugs. Because the differential- reinforcement-of-low-rates 72-second (DRL 72-s) operant schedule has been extensively used as a screen for antidepressant effects of drugs, different SSRIs were compared on the task to further examine their behavioral effects. OBJECTIVES: These experiments were designed with two main purposes in mind: first, to determine whether all three SSRIs tested would produce antidepressant-like effects on the DRL 72-s (as measured primarily by an increase in reinforcement rate) and, second, to identify differences between the drugs using peak-deviation analysis of inter-response times (IRTs). METHODS: Different groups of rats were injected with one of three SSRIs: fluoxetine, sertraline, or paroxetine. Following drug administration, rats were tested on the DRL 72-s operant schedule. RESULTS: All three SSRIs produced significant increases in reinforcement rate, but only sertraline and fluoxetine significantly decreased response rate. Additionally, paroxetine was observed to disrupt the pattern of responding as indicated by decreases in peak area (PkA). Sertraline and paroxetine, but not fluoxetine, produced increases in peak location (PkL). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that, although SSRIs are correctly identified as antidepressants by the DRL 72-s operant schedule, they may exert their effects in subtly different ways, as indicated by the differences observed to exist between the drugs. It appears unlikely that the behavioral effects of the SSRIs are attributable solely to 5-HT transporter binding. Instead, the differential behavioral effects may be the result of a combination of factors, including 5-HT transporter binding, 5-HT(1A) autoreceptor activation, and binding to other receptors.

Animals↗

Reserpine attenuates D-amphetamine and MDMA-induced transmitter release in vivo: a consideration of dose, core temperature and dopamine synthesis.

Amphetamine releases dopamine through a transporter-mediated mechanism. The purpose of this report was to further our understanding of the intracellular pool from which amphetamine releases dopamine: the cytoplasmic pool, the vesicular pool, or both. Rats were treated with D-amphetamine (AMPH) (1.0 or 10.0 mg/kg) or an amphetamine analog, methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) (2.0, 5.0, or 10.0 mg/kg). Pre-treatment with 10.0 mg/kg reserpine (18 h prior to AMPH or MDMA) attenuated dopamine release for high and low AMPH doses; however the low-dose effect showed borderline significance. Pre-treatment with 10.0 mg/kg reserpine attenuated dopamine and serotonin release induced by MDMA. The dopamine effect was seen at all three MDMA doses; the effect on serotonin was only measured at the 10.0 mg/kg dose. Reserpine pre-treatment caused reductions in core body temperature; heating the rats to normal body temperature for 3 h prior to AMPH or MDMA, and during the 4 h post-treatment period partially reversed the reserpine-induced attenuation of dopamine release. However, the intermediate level of dopamine release for the reserpinized-heated animals was not significantly different from either the reserpine group (not heated) or the AMPH or MDMA alone groups. In a separate group of rats, the effects of reserpine and reserpine+heat on dopamine synthesis were measured. DOPA accumulation after treatment with the aromatic acid decarboxylase inhibitor NSD-1015 (100 mg/kg, 30 min before sacrifice), was greater in rats treated with reserpine compared to controls; heating the reserpinized rats did not significantly alter the amount of DOPA accumulation; however there was a trend towards further increase. These results suggest that D-amphetamine releases dopamine that is stored in both vesicles and the cytoplasm. Cooling may contribute to the attenuation of AMPH or MDMA-induced dopamine release observed after reserpine; however, AMPH or MDMA dependence upon vesicular stores most likely explains the diminished release after reserpine. The attenuation of AMPH or MDMA-induced transmitter release by reserpine is thought to be counteracted by a reserpine-induced replenishment of stores. Therefore, all doses of D-amphetamine may use vesicular stores; the degree to which new synthesis counteracts the vesicular depletion may be the variable which differentiates low from high doses of D-amphetamine.

Animals↗

Small changes in ambient temperature cause large changes in 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-induced serotonin neurotoxicity and core body temperature in the rat.

The amphetamine derivative 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is a drug of abuse and has been shown to be neurotoxic to 5-HT terminals in many species. MDMA-engendered neurotoxicity has been shown to be affected by both ambient temperature and core body temperature. We now report that small (2 degreesC) changes in ambient temperature produce changes in core temperature in MDMA-treated rats, but the same changes in ambient temperature do not affect core temperature of saline-treated animals. Furthermore, increases in core temperature of MDMA-treated animals increase neurotoxicity. Rats were given MDMA (20 or 40 mg/kg) or saline and placed in an ambient temperature of 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, or 30 degreesC using a novel temperature measurement apparatus that controls ambient temperature +/-0.5 degrees C. Two weeks after MDMA treatment, the rats were killed, and regional 5-HT and 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid levels were analyzed as a measure of neurotoxicity. Rats treated with MDMA at 20 and 22 degrees C showed a hypothermic core temperature response. Treatment with MDMA at 28 and 30 degreesC produced a hyperthermic response. At ambient temperatures of 20-24 degrees C, neurotoxicity was not observed in the frontal cortex, somatosensory cortex, hippocampus, or striatum. At ambient temperatures of 26-30 degrees C, neurotoxicity was seen and correlated with core temperature in all regions examined. These data indicate that ambient temperature has a significant affect on MDMA neurotoxicity, core temperature, and thermoregulation in rats. This finding has implications on both the temperature dependence of the mechanism of MDMA neurotoxicity and human use because fatal hyperthermia is associated with MDMA use in humans.

3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid↗

Holtzman and Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats: differences in DRL 72-sec performance and 8-hydroxy-di-propylamino tetralin-induced hypothermia.

Several compounds were tested on the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate 72-sec (DRL 72-sec) schedule, a behavioral screen to determine putative antidepressants; these compounds were evaluated in two outbred stocks of rats, Harlan and Holtzman Sprague-Dawley rats. A dose-response determination for the tricyclic antidepressants, imipramine and desipramine, the selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine, the 5-HT2 receptor antagonist, ketanserin, the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, (+/-)8-hydroxy-di-propylamino tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) and the dopamine releasing compound, amphetamine, were assessed in both rat stocks. The two stocks of rats differed in their baseline performance on the DRL 72-sec schedule. The Harlan rats had a higher reinforcement rate and a lower response rate than the Holtzman rats. In Holtzman, but not in Harlan rats, imipramine, ketanserin, fluoxetine and 8-OH-DPAT increased reinforcement rate and decreased response rate on the DRL 72-sec schedule, confirming previous studies. However, desipramine was the only drug to increase reinforcement rate and decrease response rate in both Holtzman and Harlan rats; in Harlan rats, drugs that primarily act upon the 5-HT system, imipramine, ketanserin, fluoxetine and 8-OH-DPAT, disrupted the DRL 72-sec performance and did not increase the number of reinforcements over baseline as was seen in Holtzman rats. Amphetamine disrupted DRL 72-sec performance in both Holtzman and Harlan rats in a similar manner. The hypothermic response to 8-OH-DPAT was also assessed in the two stocks of rats; Holtzman rats had a smaller decrease in core body temperature than Harlan rats. The observed behavioral and pharmacological differences between Holtzman and Harlan rat stocks may be genetically and/or environmentally mediated.

8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin↗

Brain serotonin neurotoxicity and primary pulmonary hypertension from fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine. A systematic review of the evidence.

OBJECTIVES: Obesity is an important clinical problem, and the use of dexfenfluramine hydrochloride for weight reduction has been widely publicized since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration. However, animal and human studies have demonstrated toxic effects of fenfluramines that clinicians should be aware of when considering prescribing the drugs. Our purpose was to systematically review data on brain serotonin neurotoxicity in animals treated with fenfluramines and the evidence linking fenfluramines to primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH). DATA SOURCES: Archival articles and reviews identified through a computerized search of MEDLINE from 1966 to April 1997 using "fenfluramine(s)," "serotonin," "neurotoxicity," "behavior," "anorexigens," "weight loss," and "primary pulmonary hypertension" as index terms. STUDY SELECTION: Reports dealing with long-term effects of fenfluramines on brain serotonin neurons, body weight, and pulmonary function in animals and humans. DATA EXTRACTION: Reports were reviewed by individuals with expertise in serotonin neurobiology, neurotoxicity, neuropsychiatry, and pulmonary medicine and evaluated for appropriateness for inclusion in this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Fenfluramines cause dose-related, long-lasting reductions in serotonin axonal markers in all the animal species tested and with all the routes of drug administration used. Doses of fenfluramines that produce signs of brain serotonin neurotoxicity in animals are on the same order as those used to treat humans for weight loss when one takes into account known relations between body mass and drug clearance. However, no human studies have been conducted, and the pathological and clinical potential for neurotoxicity in humans is unknown. Appetite suppressants-most commonly fenfluramines-increase the risk of developing PPH (odds ratio, 6.3), particularly when used for more than 3 months (odds ratio, >20). CONCLUSIONS: Fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine have been demonstrated to damage brain serotonin neurons in animal studies. It is not known if such damage occurs in humans or if there are clinical consequences. Use of fenfluramines is associated with an increased risk of PPH. Future studies should address the long-term consequences of prolonged use of fenfluramines.

Animals↗

Administration of fenfluramine at different ambient temperatures produces different core temperature and 5-HT neurotoxicity profiles.

This study investigated the effect of two different ambient temperatures on fenfluramine-induced 5-HT neurotoxicity. Fenfluramine (FEN) (12.5 mg/kg x 4; injections made hourly) or saline (SAL) was administered to rats in either a normal laboratory temperature of 24 degrees C or a warm environment of 30 degrees C. Animals were kept at that ambient temperature for 20 h after FEN administration. Ambient temperature was controlled to +/-0.5 degrees C and rat core temperature was continually measured using a non-invasive apparatus. FEN-treated rats at 24 degrees C displayed a core temperature hypothermia with a peak low of 33.8 degrees C, and this core temperature hypothermia lasted for 20 h after FEN administration. Rats treated with FEN at 30 degrees C displayed a significant core temperature hyperthermia for 4 h after the first drug injection compared to SAL-treated groups, with a peak core temperature of 38.6 degrees C. 2 weeks after FEN injections, brain regions were analyzed by HPLC. Both groups of FEN-treated rats showed decreases in 5-HT and 5-HIAA in the hippocampus, frontal cortex, somatosensory cortex, striatum, hypothalamus and septum. However, FEN rats treated at 30 degrees C had significantly greater decreases (26-35%) in 5-HT compared to FEN-treated rats at 24 degrees C in the frontal cortex, hippocampus, striatum and somatosensory cortex and significantly greater decreases (26-50%) in 5-HIAA in the frontal cortex, hippocampus and somatosensory cortex. This study indicates fenfluramine can produce neurotoxicity in rats that display either a core temperature hypothermia or hyperthermia, although hyperthermic rats have greater 5-HT and 5-HIAA depletions than the hypothermic rats.

Animals↗

Combined phentermine/fenfluramine administration enhances depletion of serotonin from central terminal fields.

Administration of phentermine (Phen) together with (+/-) fenfluramine (Fen) enhances the weight reduction that is observed with either drug alone; consequently, these anorectic agents are commonly prescribed together for weight reduction. Repeated administration of Fen is known to cause long-term depletion of axonal serotonin (5-HT) and loss of 5-HT transporters, and is therefore considered neurotoxic. We now report that combined administration of Phen/Fen (5 mg/kg/3.125 mg/kg, and 20 mg/kg/3.125 mg/kg) can enhance the neurotoxic effect of Fen (3.125 mg/kg) and Phen (5 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg) on central 5-HT systems. Rats were repeatedly treated once each hour for a total of four injections with saline, Phen (5 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg), Fen (3.125 mg/kg and 12.5 mg/kg), or combined Phen/Fen (5 mg/kg/3.125 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg/3.125 mg/kg), and sacrificed either 7 or 28 days after cessation of treatment. Combined administration of Phen/Fen (5 mg/kg/3.125 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg/3.125 mg/kg) caused significantly greater reductions of 5-HT levels in the striatum, nucleus accumbens/olfactory tubercle, hypothalamus, amygdala, frontal parietal cortex, and hippocampus than either drug alone. Combined Phen/Fen at the higher drug-dose combination (20 mg/kg/3.125 mg/kg) was observed to reduce the density of 5-HT transporters in rat striatum at both 7 and 28 days after cessation of treatment. In addition, combined administration of Phen/Fen (5 mg/kg/3.125 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg/3.125 mg/kg) caused greater weight loss than that observed with either compound alone. Collectively, the present data demonstrate that combined Phen/Fen administration enhances the neurotoxicity of Phen or Fen on 5-HT neurons.

Animals↗

Evaluation of d-amphetamine effects on the binding of dopamine D-2 receptor radioligand, 18F-fallypride in nonhuman primates using positron emission tomography.

We have investigated the ability of dopamine to compete with the binding of the high affinity dopamine D2 receptor positron emission tomography (PET) radioligand, 18F-fallypride. In vitro dissociation of 18F-fallypride with dopamine in rat striatal homogenates exhibited a dissociation rate, k(off), of 1.76 x 10(-2) min(-1) while the association rate constant, k(on), was found to be 5.30 x 10(8) M(-1) min(-1). This resulted in a dissociation constant, K(D) of 33 pM for 18F-fallypride. For in vivo studies, we investigated the effects of reserpine and d-amphetamine treatment on 18F-fallypride in an attempt to study competition of endogenous dopamine with the radioligand at the receptor sites in rats and monkeys. PET experiments with 18F-fallypride in two male rhesus monkeys were carried out in a PETT VI scanner. In control experiments, rapid specific uptake of 18F-fallypride in the striata was observed (0.05-0.06% injected dose (ID)/g) while nonspecifically bound tracer cleared from other parts of the brain. Striata/cerebellum ratios for 18F-fallypride were approximately 8 at 80 min postinjection, respectively. The monkeys received various doses (0.25 to 1.50 mg/kg) of d-amphetamine (AMPH) pre- and postinjection of the radioligand. There was a decrease of specifically bound 18F-fallypride as well as evidence of an enhanced clearance of specifically bound 18F-fallypride after administering AMPH in the two monkeys. The dissociation rates, k(off), of 18F-fallypride without AMPH was <10(-4) min(-1) but after 25 min preadministration of AMPH (1 mg/kg), it was 4.1 x 10(-3) min(-1) and after 17, 45 and 90 min postadministration of AMPH (1 mg/kg) it was 3.6 x 10(-3) to 4.0 x 10(-3) min(-1). Lower doses of AMPH (0.25 mg/kg) had a reduced effect on the binding of 18F-fallypride. No effect was seen until about 30 minutes after the injection of AMPH. Studies with various doses indicated that 18F-fallypride has a maximum response at doses of 0.75-1.50 mg/kg, with an approximately 16%/hour reduction in binding. These results indicate that AMPH stimulated release of endogenous dopamine reduces the specific binding of 18F-fallypride.

Animals↗

Sensitization to amphetamine on the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate 72-s schedule.

The purpose of the present study is to determine whether the effect of specific intermittent injections of amphetamine (AMPH) on a differential reinforcement schedule of low rate (DRL) would result in a sensitized response to subsequent AMPH injections. Two groups of rats were trained on a DRL 72-s schedule until they reached stable baseline performance. One group (SENS, n = 8) was treated intermittently (no more than twice a week) with 1.5 mg/kg amphetamine for 3.5 weeks. The other group (CONT, n = 8) received intermittent saline (SAL) 1 ml/kg for 3.5 weeks. Acute injections of 1.5 mg/kg AMPH in the SENS group, engendered an increase in response rate, a decrease in reinforcement rate and disruption of the inter-response time (IRT) distribution profile. Acute SAL injections in the CONT group had no effect. Rats pretreated with intermittent 1.5 mg/kg AMPH, when treated with a lower dose of AMPH (0.5 mg/kg), showed an increase in response rate, a decrease in reinforcement rate and disruption of the IRT distribution profile by decreasing peak area and shifting the peak location towards a shorter IRT duration. Therefore, in rats pretreated intermittently with 1.5 mg/kg AMPH (SENS group), the dose of 0.5 mg/kg AMPH elicited a similar change in DRL 72-s response pattern, as did the acute injection of 1.5 mg/kg AMPH. In contrast, in rats pretreated with SAL (CONT group), the low dose of AMPH had either no or small effects. Thus, pretreatment with 1.5 mg/kg AMPH increases the magnitude of the response to 0.5 mg/kg AMPH. These results indicate that rats performing on the DRL 72-s schedule exhibit sensitization to AMPH, after AMPH is given intermittently over a 3-week period.

Amphetamine↗

Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure.

An adjusting-amount procedure was used to measure discounting of reinforcer value by delay. Eight rats chose between a varying amount of immediate water and a fixed amount of water given after a delay. The amount of immediate water was systematically adjusted as a function of the rats' previous choices. This procedure was used to determine the indifference point at which each rat chose the immediate amount and the delayed amount with equal frequency. The amount of immediate water at this indifference point was used to estimate the value of the delayed amount of water. In Experiment 1, the effects of daily changes in the delay to the fixed reinforcer (100 microliters of water delivered after 0, 2, 4, 8, or 16 s) were tested. Under these conditions, the rats reached indifference points within the first 30 trials of each 60-trial session. In Experiment 2, the effects of water deprivation level on discounting of value by delay were assessed. Altering water deprivation level affected the speed of responding but did not affect delay discounting. In Experiment 3, the effects of varying the magnitude of the delayed water (100, 150, and 200 microliters) were tested. There was some tendency for the discounting function to be steeper for larger than for smaller reinforcers, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. In all three experiments, the obtained discount functions were well described by a hyperbolic function. These experiments demonstrate that the adjusting-amount procedure provides a useful tool for measuring the discounting of reinforcer value by delay.

Animals↗

Methylenedioxymethamphetamine-induced serotonin deficits are followed by partial recovery over a 52-week period. Part I: Synaptosomal uptake and tissue concentrations.

The effects of a high dose methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) regimen on the serotonin (5-HT) system were evaluated over a 52-wk period. MDMA was administered to rats (20 mg/kg) 8 times at 12-hr intervals. Tissue concentrations of dopamine (DA) and 5-HT, and synaptosomal uptake of 3H-5-HT and 3H-DA were measured at 2, 8, 16, 32 or 52 wk posttreatment. Synaptosomal uptake of 3H-5-HT (hippocampus) was decreased at 2 and 8 wk, but not at 16, 32 or 52 wk after drug. 5-HT tissue concentrations were measured in frontal cortex, frontal-parietal cortex, occipital-temporal cortex, nucleus accumbens/olfactory tubercle, striatum, amygdala, hippocampus, septum, hypothalamus, ventral tegmentum/substantia nigra. Two weeks after MDMA treatment, all regions showed decreased 5-HT tissue concentrations except septum. Recovery over the 52-wk interval was noted for all depleted regions, but the rate and degree of recovery was region dependent. Frontal-parietal cortex, occipital-temporal cortex and hippocampus showed the least recovery, with significant depletions at 52 wk posttreatment. Hypothalamus showed an increase in 5-HT tissue concentrations relative to age-matched controls at 52 wk. These results indicate that a high-dose MDMA regimen results in long-lasting depletions of serotonin. The rate and degree of recovery of serotonin tissue concentrations seen over the 52-wk test period is region specific.

Animals↗

Methylenedioxymethamphetamine-induced serotonin deficits are followed by partial recovery over a 52-week period. Part II: Radioligand binding and autoradiography studies.

In our study, age-matched Holtzman Sprague-Dawley rats (275-300 g) received injections with either saline (0.9%) or 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA; 20 mg/kg free base, s.c) twice daily for 4 days and allowed to recover for 2, 8, 16, 32 and 52 wk after the final injection before death. Radioligand binding studies with 125I-RTI-55 to dopamine uptake sites in striatal homogenates showed no effect of MDMA on the density of dopamine uptake sites. In contrast, saturation binding studies with 125I-RTI-55 to 5-HT uptake sites in hippocampal and frontal-parietal homogenates showed a significant reduction in the number of uptake sites at 2 wk after MDMA treatment (34 and 25%, respectively of controls). By 16 wk, a partial recovery in the number of 5-HT uptake sites was observed in both tissues; however, only a full recovery of serotonin uptake sites was observed in hippocampus at the end of 52 wk. In more detailed studies using autoradiography with 125I-RTI-55, recovery of serotonin uptake sites varied from region to region. In particular, recovery of 5-HT uptake sites in cerebral cortex was observed to follow a rostral-caudal gradient. In addition, recovery of 5-HT uptake site in hippocampus also followed a rostral-caudal gradient. Different rates of recovery of 5-HT uptake sites were also observed for cingulate cortex, laterodorsal thalamus and ventromedial hypothalamus. No effect of MDMA was observed over lateral hypothalamus, substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area, or over serotonergic cell bodies such as dorsal raphe and median raphe. In conclusion, our study is consistent with previous studies describing the selective neurotoxicity of MDMA for serotonin neurons and presents evidence showing the rate of recovery of 5-HT uptake sites varies according to region and that recovery of 5-HT uptake sites in neocortex and hippocampus follows a rostral-caudal gradient.

Animals↗

Co-administration of MDMA with drugs that protect against MDMA neurotoxicity produces different effects on body temperature in the rat.

The substituted amphetamine 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) has been shown to be neurotoxic to serotonin (5HT) terminals in the rat, and rat body temperature (TEMP) has been shown to affect this neurotoxicity. This study looked at the effect on CORE TEMP of three drugs that protect against MDMA neurotoxicity in the rat. Male Holtzmann rats were injected with a control saline (SAL) injection or with ketanserin (KET; 6 mg/kg), alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine (AMPT; 75 mg/kg) or fluoxetine (FLUOX; 10 mg/kg) before a 40-mg/kg MDMA or SAL injection. CORE TEMP was recorded throughout the study using a noninvasive peritoneally implanted temperature probe. Rats pretreated with KET had no change in CORE TEMP until MDMA was injected, at which time an immediate hypothermia was seen that continued for 180 minutes, with a peak low of 34.7 degrees C. Rats treated with AMPT had no change in CORE TEMP until the MDMA was injected, at which time an immediate hypothermia was seen that continued for 240 min., with a peak low of 34.3 degrees C. Two weeks later, brain regions were analyzed for 5-HT and 5-hydroxindole acetic acid levels. MDMA produced significant (P < .05) decreases in 5-HT and 5-hydroxindole acetic acid levels in the frontal cortex, somatosensory cortex, striatum and hippocampus, and pretreatment with KET or AMPT prevented these depletions. When rats were given the KET/MDMA or AMPT/MDMA drug injections and warmed to prevent hypothermia, the protection against neurotoxicity was removed, which indicated that the hypothermia mediated the protective effects of KET and AMPT. In comparison with the hypothermia seen with AMPT or KET pretreatment, pretreatment with FLUOX had no effect on CORE TEMP. The rats given the FLUOX/MDMA treatment did not have different CORE TEMPs than rats given SAL/MDMA. The FLUOX pretreatment protected against MDMA-induced 5-HT and 5-hydroxindole acetic acid depletions in the frontal cortex, somatosensory cortex, striatum and hippocampus. This study suggests that a decrease in CORE TEMP may be a mechanism of protection against MDMA neurotoxicity by some drugs but that there is also a mechanism of protection that is independent of a change in body temperature.

Animals↗

Methamphetamine and methylenedioxymethamphetamine neurotoxicity: possible mechanisms of cell destruction.

Methamphetamine and MDMA as well as similar substituted phenethylamines are toxic to DA and/or 5-HT neurons. The duration and magnitude of these effects are dose dependent and are accompanied by different degrees of recovery. MDMA-induced 5-HT damage persists for up to 52 weeks in the rat, and methamphetamine-induced DA damage persists for up to 3 years in the rhesus monkey. Several possible mechanisms of amphetamine-analog toxicity have been reviewed. The excitatory feed-forward loop theory is best supported by the literature. This theory, however, is very wide ranging and difficult to prove or disprove. The hydroxy radical and DA mediation theories are both well supported by the data reviewed. It should be noted that these two hypotheses are closely related to each other. The DA mediation theory is based on the requirement of an intact DA system for methamphetamine and MDMA neurotoxicity to occur. The hydroxy radical theory is also based on the presence of DA and 5-HT; in addition, it suggests the formation of toxic hydroxy radicals from DA or 5-HT as the specific mechanism for the amphetamine-analog neurotoxicity. The hydroxy radical theory also accounts for the fact that amphetamine-analog neurotoxicity is selectively toxic to the DA and/or 5-HT systems of the brain; that is, the toxin is formed either in the synapse or within the neurons that release DA and/or 5-HT as a result of amphetamine analog treatment. The toxic drug metabolite theory, while not exhaustively studied, has little support from the literature at present. Similarly, the NMDA receptor mediation theory, in its most straightforward form, also has little support from the literature. The protective effects of the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 may be a modulatory effect resulting from changes in temperature regulation, rather than a direct effect of antagonizing a link in the toxic mechanism itself. It should be noted that the effects of the protective agent plus amphetamine-analog combinations on body temperature, when thoroughly investigated, may serve to separate agents which protect through a cooling mechanism from agents that protect by interfering with the toxic process itself.

Animals↗

Amphetamine analogs have differential effects on DRL 36-s schedule performance.

Amphetamine and related compounds have previously been shown to differentially release dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5HT) in vivo and in vitro. The purpose of this report is directly to compare five amphetamine analogs on differential reinforcement of low rate 36-s (DRL 36-s) schedule performance, and to determine whether the reported increases in dopamine and/or serotonin release induced by these drugs can be related to observed behavioral differences. Amphetamine (AMPH) and methamphetamine (METH) induced large increases in response rate, methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and para-chloroamphetamine (PCA) caused small increases in response rate, while fenfluramine (FEN) had no effect on response rate. AMPH, METH, PCA and MDMA caused a dose-dependent decrease in reinforcement rate, and FEN had no effect on reinforcement rate. AMPH, METH, and PCA but not FEN, shifted the peak of the inter-response time (IRT) distribution toward shorter intervals, MDMA decreased peak location only at the highest dose. All five drugs caused a dose-dependent decrease in peak area, indicating a loss of schedule control on the DRL 36-s schedule. Consistent with in vitro and in vivo release studies, the differential results of these five drugs on DRL 36-s schedule performance suggest a predominant dopamine role for AMPH and METH, a predominant serotonin role for FEN, and different degrees of combined dopaminergic and serotonergic roles for MDMA and PCA in the mediation of the task.

Amphetamines↗