Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L R Dreyfus

Publications and source records attributed to L R Dreyfus.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Judging relative duration: the role of rule and instructional variables.

Humans compared 2 durations according to different rules. Some judged which duration lasted longer, some judged whether the duration ratio was less or greater than 3:1, and others judged according to a same-different rule. Under each condition, 1/2 of the participants had advance knowledge of the rule, whereas the others acquired the discrimination solely on the basis of informative feedback. Discrimination was affected by both factors. Same-different and ratio comparisons were less accurate than ordinal comparisons. Rule knowledge affected the ratio and same-different comparisons but did not affect judgment about which duration lasted longer. Debriefing of uninformed participants revealed that most guessed that the rule involved judging which duration lasted longer. These results highlight the role of linguistic variables in humans' relational comparisons of duration.

Adult↗

Duration comparison: relative stimulus differences stimulus age, and stimulus predictiveness.

Under a psychophysical trials procedure, pigeons were presented with a red light of one duration followed by a green light of a second duration. Eight geometrically spaced base durations were paired with one of four shorter and four longer durations as the alternate member of a duration pair, with different pairs randomly intermixed. One choice was reinforced if red had lasted longer than green, and a second choice was reinforced if green had lasted longer. Performance was compared when all the base durations and their pair members were included (entire-range condition) or when only the four longest base durations and their comparison durations (restricted-range condition) were used. Discrimination sensitivity decreased for longer duration pairs under both conditions, supporting a memory-based account. Sensitivity was lower under the restricted-range condition. Under both conditions, a bias to report "green as longer" increased as the second green duration increased. Bias changed as a matching function of the green-duration predictiveness of the correct choice. The results are related to a quantitative model of timing and remembering proposed by Staddon.

Animals↗

Discrimination of duration ratios by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Humans (Homo sapiens) were trained on 2 versions of a 2-alternative, forced-choice procedure. First, subjects judged which of 2 successive stimulus durations was longer. Second, subjects judged whether the ratio of the 2 durations was less or greater than a criterion ratio (e.g., 2:1). Accuracy was significantly lower for the task in which the judgment was made according to the ratio of the 2 durations. This result is different than that obtained by Fetterman, Dreyfus, and Stubbs (1989), who trained pigeons (Columbia livia) on a similar pair of tasks and found that pigeons' performance was comparable for the 2 discriminations. Comparisons of the pigeon and human data suggest that humans were more accurate than pigeons when the judgment involved which duration was longer, but that accuracy was comparable for the ratio-based task.

Adult↗

Discrimination of duration ratios.

Trained pigeons to make discriminations on the basis of the ratio of two stimulus durations. A red light of one duration was followed by a green light of a different duration, with 900 red-green pairs intermixed over trials. A choice followed the red-green pair; a response to a green side key was reinforced if the red-green ratio was less than a criterion ratio, and a response to a red side key was reinforced if the ratio exceeded the criterion. Reinforcement depended on whether red or green was longer under the basic condition; in other conditions, however, reinforcement depended on whether one duration was two or four times longer than the other. Sensitivity was similar across conditions, for the basic shorter-longer rule, and for the more complex rule of one duration as two or four times the other. Most choices were made on the basis of the ratio relation between the two durations and according to Weber's law. These results extend the findings of Dreyfus, Fetterman, Smith, and Stubbs (1988), and provide a new methodology for psychophysical scaling with animals.

Animals↗

Discrimination of temporal relations by pigeons.

In four experiments, pigeons were tested on a duration comparison task involving the successive presentation of two visual stimuli that varied in duration from trial to trial. Following presentation of the durations, two choice keys were lit, and reinforcement for choices was based on the temporal relation between duration of the pair. In Experiment 1, the range of durations was varied over conditions. Responding changed as an orderly function of the ratio of the two durations. There was a decrease in discrimination accuracy as average duration increased over condition but no difference in accuracy between shorter and longer problems within a duration range. There was no systematic response bias over conditions for all problems within a range, but there was a bias to report the second duration longer than the first for "long" problems within a range. In Experiment 2, the pigeons were transferred from a task involving spatially differentiated choices to one involving hue-differentiated choices. Performance was similar to that of the spatial procedure of Experiment 1. Additional analyses revealed that although information provided by a single duration of the pair was sometimes predictive of the temporal relation between pair members, responding was also based on the relation and comparison of both durations. In Experiment 3, the pigeons were exposed to a single duration range that included many durations from the four ranges of Experiment 1. Discrimination accuracy was comparable in the fourth and longest category. Manipulation of absolute reinforcement rate in Experiment 4 resulted in no chang in discrimination accuracy, suggesting that the decline in accuracy over conditions of Experiment 1 could not be attributed to decreases in reinforcement rate that accompanied lengthier durations. The results are discussed in terms of theories of animal timing, with Staddon's (1983, 1984) temporal perspective model providing the most systematic account of all aspects of performance.

Animals↗

Choice with a fixed requirement for food, and the generality of the matching relation.

Pigeons were trained on choice procedures in which responses on each of two keys were reinforced probabilistically, but only after a schedule requirement had been met. Under one arrangement, a fixed-interval choice procedure was used in which responses were not reinforced until the interval was over; then a response on one key would be reinforced, with the effective key changing irregularly from interval to interval. Under a second, fixed-ratio choice procedure, responses on either key counted towards completion of the ratio and then, once the ratio had been completed, a response on the probabilistically selected key would produce food. In one experiment, the schedule requirements were varied for both fixed-interval and fixed-ratio schedules. In the second experiment, relative reinforcement rate was varied. And in a third experiment, the duration of an intertrial interval separating choices was varied. The results for 11 pigeons across all three experiments indicate that there were often large deviations between relative response rates and relative reinforcement rates. Overall performance measures were characterized by a great deal of variability across conditions. More detailed measures of choice across the schedule requirement were also quite variable across conditions. In spite of this variability, performance was consistent across conditions in its efficiency of producing food. The absence of matching of behavior allocation to reinforcement rate indicates an important difference between the present procedures and other choice procedures; that difference raises questions about the specific conditions that lead to matching as an outcome.

Journal Article↗

Levels of aggregation: Relative time allocation in concurrent-schedule performance.

The proportion of time allocated to one component of a concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedule was computed for groups of interchangeover times (aggregates) within several intact time series. Variability in obtained proportions decreased as the number of interchangeover times within each aggregate increased; however, modal proportions failed to correspond to overall relative time allocation computed over the course of an entire experimental session, even at the largest aggregate size. The aggregated time series showed periodicities at small aggregate sizes and general trends in local preference at larger aggregate sizes. It is suggested that overall relative time allocation represents a molar extreme in the aggregation of behavior that may not accurately reflect central tendency in the allocation of time to available alternatives within the context of ongoing behavior.

Journal Article↗

An invariant relation between changing over and reinforcement.

Although concurrent schedules may arrange reinforcers irregularly, relatively large numbers of reinforcers are obtained when an animal changes from one schedule to the other. This paper proposes a quantitative relation that predicts the proportion of reinforcers obtained when an animal is working on a schedule and the proportion when the animal changes over to a schedule. Basically the relation states that the number of reinforcers obtained while an animal works on a schedule varies directly with the relative amount of time spent working on that schedule; and the number of reinforcers obtained when an animal changes to a schedule varies directly with the relative amount of time spent on the alternate schedule. An important aspect of this relation is that when relative reinforcement rates are less than .50, more reinforcers are obtained just after an animal changes to a schedule than at all other times when this schedule is engaged. Data obtained both from a stat-bird and a live pigeon were in close agreement with the quantitative predictions. The relation between changing over and reinforcement held across several procedural changes that included changes in relative reinforcement rate, changes from independent to interdependent scheduling procedures, and changes in the variable-interval reinforcement distributions. The results are discussed in terms of the effects of the local distribution of reinforcement on responding. The local reinforcement distribution can affect local response rates and affects the resulting matching relation. This arrangement has implications for explanations of choice.

Journal Article↗

Differential effects of low doses of ethanol on the impulse activity in various regions of the limbic system.

This study was a follow-up to our earlier data which indicated that the hippocampus was one of the brain areas in which ethanol had a preferential action. Rabbits were chronically implanted with electrodes in 9 brain areas associated with the hippocampus. The EEG and multiple-unit activity were recorded simultaneously in each area before and for 15 min after i.p. injection of ethanol at dosages of 0, 150, 300, or 600 mg/kg, given in random order. Subjective evaluation of EEG tracings from all brain areas did not disclose any regional differences. The incidence of hippocampal theta rhythm was depressed transiently at the 2 lower doses and was increased in some rabbits at later post-injection times after the largest dose. Quantitative analysis of the unit activity revealed several major effects of ethanol. Individual rabbits varied significantly in their degree of response. The effects of ethanol included phasic decreases and increases, which varied with the brain area and the dose. A predominant depression of MUA occurred in the septum, fimbria/fornix, entorhinal cortex, and CA1 zone of the hippocampus. Large transient increases in MUA were noted in the CA1, hippocampal commissure, and entorhinal cortex. Overall, regional differences in unit activity consisted of a relatively greater effect in the septum, CA1, and the entorhinal cortex. Conspicuously smaller effects were evident in the CA3 and dentate zones of the hippocampus.

Animals↗

Ethanol-induced regional and dose-response differences in multiple-unit activity in rabbits.

Multiple-unit activity (MUA), recorded simultaneously from many brain areas, was used to detect the existence ahd location of "target sites" for ethanol action in rabbits with chronically implanted electrodes in 14 areas. Each of 12 rabbits received intraperitoneal injection of 300, 600, 900, and 1200 mg/kg of 20% ETOH and a saline control injection given in random order with at least a 4-day interval between injections. Large amounts of MUA data, recorded continuously for a 2-min pre-injection control period and a 15-min post-injection period, were quantified by a sensitive and unique technique. MUA changes did not correlate with alcohol-induced changes in the corresponding EEG for the same locus. Whereas visual inspection of the EEG did not disclose any regional differences in response to ethanol, both temporal and topographical differences in ethanol effect on MUA were observed. There were 14 histologically verified brain areas with adequate sample size for statistical evaluation of MUA response. At high doses, all brain areas were affected. Included among the brain areas which were least affected by low doseas were the caudate nucleus, septum, fornix, and medial forebrain bundle. Those areas that met the criteria for target sites of responding quickly (less than 5 min) to low doses (300 mg/kg) were: cerebellar cortex, cerebral cortex, hippocampus, lateral and medial geniculate nuclei, midbrain reticular formation, and pyriform cortex. In conjunction with the preliminary study [Brain Res. 70, 361 (1974], the data indicate that the most ethanolsensitive tissue is found in the various kinds of cortex, cerebellar and cerebral (both paleocortex and neocortex).

Animals↗