Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Palazzo

Publications and source records attributed to L Palazzo.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

[Endoscopic ultrasonography of the digestive tract].

Endoscopic ultrasonography of the digestive tract provides for a precise ultrasonic study of the accessible gastrointestinal walls (oesophagus, stomach, duodenum, rectum) and, through these walls, of the adjacent organs (lymph node clusters, posterior mediastinum, pancreas, extrahepatic biliary ducts and perirectal environment). This method is better than computerized tomography to evaluate the local and regional extension of oesophageal and cardial carcinomas producing little or no stenosis and of gastric and rectum carcinomas and lymphomas. It is the examination of choice to detect a peri-anastomotic recurrence of these cancers and to evaluate submucosal tumors of the digestive tract. This method, without morbidity is better than computerized tomography or ultrasonography in the aetiological diagnosis of obstacles in the biliary tract and in the diagnosis and pretherapeutic assessment of pancreatic cancers or endocrine tumors.

Biliary Tract Diseases↗
PubMed1990

[Endoscopic ultrasonography in the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer. A prospective study in 31 patients].

Endoscopic transrectal ultrasonography (EUS) is performed with an ultrasonic transducer (7.5 mHz or 12 mHz) situated in the tip of a side viewing endoscope. Its accuracy to assess the depth of rectal cancer invasion was studied prospectively in 31 patients. The ultrasonic examination was complete in 26 cases; in 5, the stricturing tumour could not be passed by the probe. The depth of invasion was correctly evaluated in 27 of the 31 patients (accuracy: 90 per cent). The 7 superficial lesions were all correctly detected with EUS. EUS appears to be a very promising method for the pretherapeutic staging of rectal cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

[Epithelial gastric polyps in a series of 13000 gastroscopies].

The frequency and characteristics of epithelial gastric polyps were studied over a 4-years periods. In a series of 13,000 gastric fibroscopies, 191 patients (1.3 per cent) were fund to have a "polypous lesion". Among these, 48 had hyperplastic polyps, 19 had fundic gland polyps and 6 had adenomatous polyps. The remaining patients had either lesions of interstitial gastritis (118) or normal histology (34). Hyperplastic polyps were 5 mm large in 87 per cent of the cases, and 7 out of 10 were solitary. They were equally distributed between fundus and antrum and associated with atrophic gastritis in 9 out of 22 cases. In 2 cases, they were accompanied with gastric cancer. Fundic gland polyps were less than 5 mm large in 84 per cent of the cases and solitary in 5 out of 19 cases. Adenomatous polyps were associated with hyperplastic polyps in 4 patients, including 1 mixed polyp (hyperplastic containing adenomatous areas). Follow-up with regular endoscopic examinations is accepted for adenomatous polyps; it seems to be justified in patients with hyperplastic polyps, and lesions bigger than 10 mm should be removed in view of the as yet imperfectly evaluated risk of malignant degeneration.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Staging of esophageal carcinoma: comparison of results with endoscopic sonography and CT.

We compared the results of endoscopic sonography and CT in the preoperative staging of 46 patients with esophageal carcinoma studied prospectively. All patients had surgery and 44 had pathologic examination of the mediastinal and celiac lymph nodes. The results of CT and endoscopic sonography were compared with surgical and pathologic findings. A total of 51 tumors were found in 46 patients. Sonographic estimation of tumor extension through the different layers of the esophagus was correct in 37 (73%) of all 51 tumors and in 22 (85%) of the 26 tumors in which the examination was complete. The echoendoscope (13-mm diameter) could not pass through the tumor in 23 cases (50%). Infiltration to adjacent organs was found in 15 cases at surgery. In four of these 15, the extension was detected by CT; in seven of the 15 cases, it was detected by sonography. False-negative determination of tumor extension occurred with endoscopic sonography in patients with stenotic tumor. There were no false-positive results with either CT or endoscopic sonography. For detection of mediastinal lymph-node involvement, the sensitivity of CT was 48%. The sensitivity of sonography was 50% if metastatic nodes unexplored by sonography were included, or 84% if only cases in which stenosis was passed were considered. Statistical comparison revealed that sonography was superior to CT for the detection of metastases to lymph nodes. CT and endoscopic sonography provide complementary information. When the echoendoscope can be maneuvered past the tumor, sonography can be used accurately to define extension through the layers of the esophagus, extension to the adjacent organs, and involvement of the lymph nodes. When the tumor cannot be passed by the echoendoscope, CT is superior to sonography for detection of mediastinal extension.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

[Echoendoscopy: a new technic for studying esophago-gastric subepithelial tumors and extrinsic compression].

The value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of subepithelial tumors and extrinsic compression of the esophagus and the stomach was evaluated in 34 patients with 21 subepithelial tumors and 13 extrinsic compressions. Endoscopic ultrasonography was always performed after axial-vision fiberscopy anal routine biopsy specimens were obtained. Computed tomography was also done in all cases of extrinsic compression. Distinction between subepithelial tumor and extrinsic compression was made in all patients by endoscopic ultrasonography and in 5 cases by fiberscopic examination with biopsy specimens. Localization and intramural spread of subepithelial tumors were correctly determined in 12 of 13 cases by endoscopic ultrasonography (diagnostic accuracy: 92 percent). The echoendoscopic semiology of 21 subepithelial tumors was retrospectively established. The histologic nature of some of these tumors can be suggested by these signs. Endoscopic ultrasonography is superior to computed tomography in the evaluation of esogastric extrinsic compressions, particularly in the diagnosis of posterior mediastinal carcinomatosis and of tumoral invasion of the deep parietal layers. We conclude that endoscopic ultrasonography is currently the best procedure in the assessment of subepithelial tumors and extrinsic compressions of the esophagus and the stomach.

Carcinoma↗
PubMed1990

[Endoscopic ultrasonic diagnosis and cancer of the esophagus. Results of a prospective comparative study with x-ray computed tomography in 51 surgically treated patients].

To investigate whether endoscopic ultrasonography could improve the preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma we prospectively studied 56 tumors in 51 patients between March 1987 an March 1988. The results for assessing local and regional extension and preoperative staging were compared with those of computed tomography, surgery, and pathological findings. When the procedure was complete (n = 25) the accuracy of parietal spread assessment was 85.7 percent; sensitivity for nodal involvement was 83.3 percent versus 50 percent for computed tomography with an accuracy of 97.6 percent versus 96.4 percent; the discrimination between superficial and advanced cancer was 100 percent; the accuracy for preoperative staging using the Japanese classification was 84 percent. When the procedure was not complete (stenosis), endoscopic ultrasonography was complementary to computed tomography: local invasion of anatomical structures (n = 16) was better assessed by combined endoscopic ultrasonography and computed tomography (n = 11) than by endoscopic ultrasonography (n = 8) or computed tomography (n = 6) alone. We conclude that endoscopic ultrasonography is the best procedure for staging esophageal carcinoma without stenosis; further miniaturization of the transducer is necessary to improve results in the case of narrow stenosis.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1990

[Results of endoscopic ultrasonography in the preoperative assessment of rectal cancer].

Endoscopic transrectal ultrasonography is performed with an ultrasonic transducer (7.5 MHz or 12 MHz) in the tip of a side viewing endoscope. Its accuracy to assess the depth of rectal cancer invasion was prospectively studied in 27 patients. The ultrasonic examination was correct in 23 cases; in 4 cases, the stricturing tumour could not be passed by the probe. The depth of invasion was correctly appreciated in 24 of the 27 cases (accuracy of 89%). The 6 superficial lesions were all correctly detected with endoscopic transrectal ultrasonography. Therefore, endoscopic transrectal ultrasonography appears to be a very promising method in the pretherapeutic staging of rectal cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

Endosonography: promising method for diagnosis of extrahepatic cholestasis.

Endosonography, ultrasonography, and computed tomography (CT) were carried out prospectively in 52 patients with extrahepatic cholestasis. 35 patients had extrahepatic biliary obstructions (21 tumorous, 14 non-tumorous) and 17, with recent gallstone migration within the bile duct, had no extrahepatic obstruction at the time of investigation. The definitive diagnosis was established by surgery (in 39 patients), by transendoscopic sphincterotomy (11 patients), or by retrograde biliary opacification (2 patients). Endosonography was significantly more sensitive than ultrasonography or CT (100% vs 80% and 83%, respectively) in making a positive diagnosis of obstruction. Endosonography was also significantly more accurate than ultrasonography or CT (97% vs 49% and 66%) in diagnosing the cause of the obstruction and more effective in the assessment of the locoregional spread of tumorous obstructions (75% vs 38% and 62%). Thus, endosonography was superior to ultrasonography and CT in the diagnosis and staging of biliary obstructions.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

[Endoscopic ultrasonography of the digestive tract].

Endoscopic ultrasonography of the digestive tract provides for a precise ultrasonic study of the accessible gastrointestinal walls (oesophagus, stomach, duodenum, rectum) and, through these walls, of the adjacent organs (lymph node clusters, posterior mediastinum, pancreas, extrahepatic biliary ducts and perirectal environment). This method is better than computerized tomography to evaluate the local and regional extension of oesophageal and cardial carcinomas producing little or no stenosis and of rectal carcinomas. It is the examination of choice to detect a perianastomotic recurrence of these cancers and to evaluate submucosal tumours of the digestive tract and thick fold stomach diseases. Its use in the aetiological diagnosis of obstacles in the biliary tract and in the pretherapeutic assessment of pancreatic and biliary tract cancers seems to be very promising.

Biliary Tract Diseases↗
PubMed1989

[Primary rectal lymphoma: value of rectal endosonography].

The authors report a case of primary rectal lymphoma characterized by dyspareunias and a raised erythematous rectal mucosa visible at rectoscopy. They stress the difficulty of the diagnosis, requiring deep biopsies, and the advantage of endorectal sonography. Its efficacy in defining the parietal and depth spread is evaluated between 90-95 p. cent, while it is lower (72%) regarding node invasion.

Adult↗