The role of transplant coordinator.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to L Ohler.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as a single agent is increasingly used for the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for stem cell transplantation. In patients with perturbed hematopoiesis the mobilizing capacity of G-CSF alone may be inadequate. We have shown in rhesus monkeys that interleukin-3 (IL-3) pretreatment markedly potentiated the increase in PBPC numbers by subsequent administration of granulocyte/macrophage-CSF (GM-CSF). Here we studied the effect of IL-3 pretreatment on G-CSF-induced mobilization of PBPCs in 6 patients with Hodgkin's disease (n = 5) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 1) who had low progenitor cell numbers because of previous chemotherapy. Patients were treated in cycle 1 with G-CSF at a dose of 5 microgram/kg/d for 5 days and, after a treatment-free interval, received cycle 2 consisting of 5 microgram/kg/d of IL-3 for 7 days followed by G-CSF again at a dose of 5 microgram/kg/d for 5 days. G-CSF alone increased the mean number of circulating colony-forming units-GM (CFU-GM) by 21-fold, the number of burst-forming units-erythroid (BFU-E) by 9-fold, and the number of CFU-mix by 24-fold over pretreatment values. Treatment with 5 microgram/kg/d of IL-3 for 7 days did not mobilize by itself but significantly potentiated G-CSF-induced mobilization of all progenitor cell types leading to a 56-, 15-, and 46-fold increase over baseline of CFU-GM, BFU-E, and CFU-mix numbers, respectively. In 2 patients in whom leukapheresis was performed after G-CSF alone the target number of 2 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells was not reached. However, leukapheresis after the IL-3/G-CSF combination obtained > or =2 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells in 3 of 6 patients, including both patients who had inadequate collection after G-CSF alone. In one patient adequate function of mobilized progenitors could be shown by the demonstration of rapid trilineage engraftment after infusion of progenitors after myeloablative chemotherapy. Seven-day pretreatment with IL-3 may be a useful mean to augment mobilization of circulating progenitors by G-CSF. The combination of IL-3 and G-CSF seems to allow the procurement of sufficient numbers of PBPCs in some patients who cannot be mobilized adequately by G-CSF alone.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Recombinant human colony stimulating factors (CSFs) as single agents are increasingly used for mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for stem cell transplantation. We have shown in rhesus monkeys that interleukin-3 (IL-3) pretreatment markedly potentiated the increase in PBPC numbers of subsequent administration of granulocyte/macrophage-CSF (GM-CSF). Here we studied the effect of IL-3 pretreatment on GM-CSF-induced mobilization of PB progenitors in patients who were potential candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation (n = 16). Patients were treated with GM-CSF at a dose of 5 micrograms/kg/d for 5 d and after a treatment free interval received another cycle of GM-CSF immediately following pretreatment with IL-3 at different doses and duration: 2.5 micrograms/kg/d (n = 4), 5 micrograms/kg/d (n = 3) and 10 micrograms/kg/d (n = 3) for 3 d, 5 micrograms/kg/d for 7 d (n = 4) and 5 micrograms/kg/d for 14 d (n = 2), respectively. Only 7 d pretreatment with IL-3 showed consistent effects. Although IL-3 did not mobilize by itself, pretreatment with 5 micrograms/kg/d of IL-3 for 7 d significantly potentiated GM-CSF-induced mobilization of PB CFU-GM numbers, leading to a mean increase in PB CFU-GM numbers over baseline by 18.5 +/- 5.2 (SEM) fold by IL-3/GM-CSF as compared to a 4.7 +/- 1.7-fold increase by GM-CSF alone. A significant enhancement by the 7 d IL-3 pretreatment was also observed for erythroid (BFU-E) and multipotential progenitor cells (CFU-mix) which were 3.3 +/- 1.3- and 3.4 +/- 0.9-fold, respectively, mobilized by GM-CSF alone, as compared to 8.5 +/- 2.3- and 19.2 +/- 3.4-fold, respectively, by the IL-3/GM-CSF combination. Our results suggest that 7 d pretreatment with IL-3 may be a useful mean to augment mobilization of circulating progenitors by more lineage-restricted CSFs. These findings may be important for the design of mobilization strategies that use growth factors without preceding chemotherapy.
Six patients with hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and neutropenia (median neutrophil count 563/microliters, range 30-1200) were treated with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at a dose of 5 micrograms/kg by daily subcutaneous injection as an adjunct to interferon-alpha (IFN-a) therapy, in order to ameliorate neutropenia. Five of six patients responded to G-CSF with normalization of neutrophil counts (> 1800/microliters) within 2-11 days and a median neutrophil count of 5211/microliters (range 4312-10160) at the end of G-CSF therapy. In three of these patients, infections resolved when neutropoiesis recovered. In one patient with very severe neutropenia (30/microliters), in whom myeloid progenitors were not detectable, G-CSF therapy failed to restore granulopoiesis. Cessation or interruption of G-CSF after 2-5 weeks of therapy resulted in a rapid decline of neutrophil counts to lower or subnormal levels (median value 1478/microliters, range 770-2739) within 1 week, suggesting that the improvement of granulopoiesis was dependent on G-CSF and not due to IFN-a therapy. G-CSF may be a useful adjunct to IFN-a therapy in patients with HCL in order to manage or prevent neutropenic complications in the early phase of treatment.
Due to the relatively low tumour cell contamination of peripheral blood in patients with multiple myeloma, autologous transplantation of circulating stem cells may have theoretical advantages over autologous bone marrow transplantation. In four patients with multiple myeloma who where considered potential candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation G-CSF (600 micrograms/day) was administered following chemotherapy in order to maximally increase the number of circulating progenitor cells during haematopoietic rebound and to facilitate progenitor cell harvest by leukapheresis. In two previously untreated patients the administration of G-CSF following chemotherapy according to the UVA protocol (ultralan, vincristine, adriamycin) greatly increased circulating haematopoietic stem cells from 247 to 7552 CFU-GM/ml in patient 1 and from 173 to 6361 CFU-GM/ml in patient 2, which by far exceeded the increase in progenitor cells following chemotherapy alone, namely only to 594 and 317 CFU-GM/ml in patient 1 and patient 2, respectively. In two repeatedly pretreated patients, the combination of UVA and G-CSF was much less effective. Progenitor cells increased from 144 to 735 CFU-GM/ml in patient 3 and only from 222 to 232 CFU-GM/ml in patient 4. In both cases, however, mobilization of haematopoietic progenitor cells by G-CSF following cyclophosphamide (50 and 70 mg/kg body weight, respectively) led to much higher CFU-GM peak values (5324 in patient 3 and 2245 in patient 4), thus allowing an adequate harvest of mononuclear cells and CD 34+ cell numbers to achieve, in all probability, the prompt and complete reconstitution of haematopoiesis in case of transplantation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Miller Fisher's syndrome is characterized by the symptomtrias of ophtalmoplegia, ataxia and areflexia. Five cases of Miller Fisher syndrome are presented.; the nosological position of this disorder is reviewed. Involvement of brainstem is present in some cases--but obviously facultative.
Results of cardiac transplantation have improved steadily following the first successful operation in 1967. However, rejection, infection, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and accelerated coronary artery disease remain important late problems after successful heart transplantation. Facilitated patient access to the transplant center based upon geographic proximity to the home, family, and primary care physicians leads to enhanced care by allowing the original transplant team to remain actively involved with ease in the long-term follow-up. With this goal in mind, a cardiac transplantation center was developed with emphasis on developing an organized approach to providing care for patients with refractory congestive heart failure in the Virginia, West Virginia, Washington, D.C., Maryland, and Delaware area. Twenty-one of the 22 patients (95.4 per cent) survived and resumed active lives one to 26 months following heart transplantation. Forty-four rejection episodes occurred and were treated successfully, primarily on an outpatient basis. Only six infections were serious enough to require readmission to Fairfax Hospital, but all responded completely to treatment. Cardiac transplantation at a center focusing on regional patient care is not only less costly and more comfortable for patients and their families, but the continuity of care and comprehensive management of late complications can lead to improved long-term survival rates.
Aortic valvuloplasty, an investigational alternative to valve replacement, is explained from the perspectives of a nurse in a cardiac catheterization laboratory, a nurse in a coronary care unit, and a cardiologist. A case study is presented along with a plan of care developed around three nursing diagnoses. A prevalvuloplasty nursing diagnosis includes a teaching plan to assist nurses in preparing patients for aortic valvuloplasty.
Cardiac transplantation moved from the realm of an investigational procedure to a therapeutic modality in the early 1980s. While one-year survival of 80 percent or greater can be expected, close follow-up is required to monitor for rejection, infection, and other late complications. With the need for close surveillance, both short and long-term, improved patient access to the transplantation center based on geographic proximity allows enhanced care by the original transplant team.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Advances in immunology, immunosuppressive therapy, and preservation techniques have contributed to making cardiac transplantation an accepted therapy for end-stage heart disease. One-year survival rates now exceed 90% at some transplant centers. However, serious complications, such as infection, rejection, coronary artery disease, and malignancies, continue to plague long-term survival rates in this patient population. Balancing the immune system between infection and rejection requires the special expertise of experienced cardiologists and immunologists. An improved understanding of the immune system promises to increase long-term survival rates of cardiac transplant recipients. Critical care nurses require special assessment skills to meet the demanding challenges of cardiac transplant recipients in the immediate postoperative period. The impact of cardiac denervation, immunosuppression, and the risk for acute rejection add a different perspective for nursing interventions in the critical care environment. With mortality rates remaining at 8 to 10% for the first month following cardiac transplantation, the skill of critical care nurses is crucial to decreasing morbidity and increasing survival during the acute perioperative period.
OBJECTIVE: To explore and describe perceived stress and coping strategies among families of candidates for cardiac transplant during the organ waiting period. DESIGN: This descriptive, multiinstitutional study was guided by the T-Double ABCX Model of Family Adjustment and Adaptation (McCubbin & Thompson, 1987). SETTING: Five tertiary care centers with transplant programs in three Southeastern cities. SUBJECTS: Thirty-eight family members of patients on the active list for cardiac transplantation, including 35 women and three men with a mean age of 44 years (SD = 13.17). Subjects had a family member on the waiting list for a mean of 6.5 months. INSTRUMENTS: Family members completed the following three instruments: (1) Family Inventory of Life Events and Changes (FILE), (2) Family Crisis Oriented Personal Scale (FCOPES), and (3) Family Perception of the Transplant Experience Scale (FPTES). RESULTS: Stress: 53% and 47% of respondents indicated that they were experiencing moderate and low degrees of stress, respectively. Coping: Family members used more coping mechanisms than normative subjects in the literature. Coping strategies used in order of decreasing frequency: (1) knowing our family has the strength to solve our problems, (2) facing problems head-on, and (3) seeking support from friends. Appraisal: Mean score of 32.13 reflects subjects' positive perception of the pretransplant experience. The three statements with which the subjects most strongly agreed: (1) heart illness has changed roles of family members, (2) family member will survive the transplant operation; and (3) this is an experience that could bring out the family's strengths. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in the number of coping strategies used with low to moderate stress levels suggests the effectiveness of coping strategies in mediating stress. The preference for active rather than passive coping strategies may be reflective of the selection criteria for transplant candidates or nursing interventions during this period to minimize stress and promote family coping.
The effectiveness of the transplantation team in diffusing stress during the pretransplantation period is increasingly important the longer the patient remains on the transplant waiting list. This study describes the stressors and coping strategies of heart transplant candidates during the waiting period. Thirty-nine candidates on the active list for heart transplantation from four mid-East Coast transplantation centers participated. With a possible stress score of 0 to 243, the mean score for this sample was a low 72.84 (standard deviation = 37.47). The three most common stressors were (1) requiring a heart transplant, (2) having terminal heart disease, and (3) worrying family members. The three most common coping strategies were (1) thinking positively, (2) using humor, and (3) trying to keep life as normal as possible. The finding of low stress levels was surprising but may reflect the presence of hope or the patient's desire to spare family members worry--a concern commonly cited by patients. Another explanation is that patients desiring to be perceived as ideal transplant recipients may have underreported their stress. This suggests that the transplantation team should support positive coping strategies when possible and that both patient and family coping should be closely monitored throughout the waiting period.