Conditioning by the method of Ivanov-Smolenskii.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Conditioning, Classical↗
Biomedical subjects
L Nicholson
Publications and source records attributed to L Nicholson.
A comparison of diagnostic tests to determine Helicobacter pylori infection.
Twenty-five Helicobacter pylori positive and 25 H. pylori negative subjects as defined by culture and phase contrast microscopy of antral biopsy specimens obtained from routine upper endoscopy were studied. Antral biopsies were examined by rapid urease test, phase contrast microscopy, culture and histology. Venous blood was tested for H. pylori specific IgG antibodies by an ELISA technique. Within 7 days of endoscopy the patients also had a [14C]-urea breath test. The sensitivity and specificity of the rapid urease test was 92%, the breath test 96% and 100%, histopathology 96% and 91% and serology 96% and 88%, respectively. The [14C]-urea breath test performed over 1 h with sampling of subjects at 0, 0.5 and 1 h was an accurate and reliable method. Results expressed as counts per minute of the expired 14CO2 proved to be a simple method of assessing H. pylori status. A significant correlation between severity of histological antral gastritis and the amount of 14CO2 expired was observed. This study has shown that the non-invasive 14C-urea breath test and serology are highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection.
Breath Tests↗
Helicobacter pylori prevalence in endoscopy and medical staff.
The epidemiology and mode of transmission of Helicobacter pylori is currently unclear; it is postulated that the human stomach is the natural reservoir and that spread occurs by faecal-oral or oral-oral transmission. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of H. pylori in gastroenterologists and gastroenterology nurses compared with internists, general nurses and the normal population. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique (sensitivity 96%, specificity 88%) was used to detect circulating H. pylori immunoglobulin G antibodies in 39 gastroenterologists, 107 gastroenterology nurses, 25 internists and 42 general nurses. These subjects were compared to an age- and sex-matched Caucasian population obtained by random sampling of an urban population area. The overall prevalence of H. pylori in gastroenterologists was 69% compared to 40% of internists (P < 0.01), 17% of gastroenterology nurses (P < 0.001), 19% of general nurses (P < 0.01) and 32% of controls (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in H. pylori prevalence between the gastroenterology nurses and controls, general nurses and controls. The prevalence in gastroenterologists increased with years of practice to levels greater than age-matched controls. The prevalence in gastroenterology nurses increased with age and years of working and was similar to age-matched control subjects. These findings of an increased prevalence of H. pylori infection in gastroenterologists performing endoscopy support human-to-human transmission possibly from patients to medical staff.
Adult↗
Is there an Intranet in your future?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Appointments and Schedules↗
The implications of telephone deregulation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Hospital Communication Systems↗
Evaluation of clinical thermometers for accuracy and reliability.
The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy and reliability of a wide range of clinical thermometry instruments and technologies. In a historical sense, the purpose of this study was to determine if the improvements in speed, ease of use, and safety realized in the last 100 years have been offset by a loss of accuracy and/or reliability. In view of current events, the purpose was to determine if the new generation of electronic, digital clinical thermometers could be used to replace the traditional glass/mercury thermometers. Nine clinical thermometers representing electronic, digital oral, and predictive oral; electronic, digital infrared tympanic; and liquid crystal urinary technologies were evaluated. Accuracy was determined by comparing the temperatures obtained from these test instruments with those of the reference, glass/mercury oral thermometer. Reliability was determined by test-retest evaluation. All of the thermometers evaluated were significantly less accurate when compared with the reference thermometer in this study. All of the test instruments significantly underestimated higher temperatures and overestimated lower temperatures. This study indicated that the improvements in safety, speed, and ease of use of the newer clinical thermometers have been offset by a loss in accuracy and reliability. It also indicated that the current generation of electronic, digital clinical thermometers, in general, may not be sufficiently accurate or reliable to replace the traditional glass/mercury thermometers.
Adult↗