[The use of metallic crowns in pedodontics].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to L Martens.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Medical and pharmaceutical insurance claims associated with lower extremity diabetic ulcers were examined retrospectively to better understand the costs and duration of treatment in clinical practice. The study population consisted of working-age individuals (18 to 64 years old) with health care benefits provided through private employer-sponsored insurance plans. Diagnostic information contained in the claims database was used to identify the severity of the ulcers, and the charges associated with treatment were based on claims data. Claims for lower extremity ulcers were found in 5.1% of individuals with diabetes. Although many lower extremity ulcers heal with standard treatment, some are more resistant to treatment and require costly ongoing medical care. Almost half of these cases were associated with deep infection, osteomyelitis, or amputation. Total payments for treatment of lower extremity ulcers in this population averaged $2687 per patient per year, or $4595 per ulcer episode, with inpatient expenditures accounting for more than 80% of these costs. Costs were significantly higher for patients with more severe ulcers or with inadequate vascular status in the affected limb. We concluded that lower extremity ulcers occur in a large number of working-age people with diabetes and contribute significantly to the morbidity associated with this disease. The high cost of treating diabetic foot ulcers suggested by this analysis argues for the development of better treatment strategies and outcomes assessments for these patients.
To establish a reliable screening method for caries prediction and to identify predominant risk factors, this study tested whether a cross-sectional caries risk model assessed at age 7 could be used to predict future caries onset in the permanent first molars at age 10 in 3,303 children born in 1989. As prediction variables, assessing the believed risk, baseline data at age 7 on oral health status, oral hygiene level, oral health behaviour and sociodemographic factors were used. The real risk, based on data collected for the first permanent molars during the follow-up, was assessed by different approaches. Cumulative incidence during the 3-year observation period was 31.6%, ranging from 22.4% in the believed low-risk group to 43.2% in the believed high-risk group. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed with net caries increment as outcome measure, adjusted for the real time at risk, using eruption times. Baseline dmfs and occlusal and buccal plaque indices were highly significant for having a high caries increment in permanent first molars with respective odds ratios of 1.07, 1.43 and 1.35. Brushing less than once a day and the daily use of sugar-containing drinks between meals were confirmed as risk factors (OR 2.43 and 1.25, respectively). The logistic regression analysis provided a sensitivity of 59-66% and a specificity of 65.7-72.8%, which indicates that the risk marker did not have an important predictive power. None of the socio-demographic and behavioural variables had enough predictive power at community level to be useful for identifying caries susceptible children. Even the power of dmfs at baseline must be considered modest.
As part of an epidemiological study on the oral health of Flemish schoolchildren, fluoride use was studied together with risk factors (medical history, tap water fluoride concentration, use of fluoride supplements, toothpaste and brushing habits). Fluorosis was scored according to the Thylstrup-Fejerskov index (TFI) in children aged 11 years (4,128 children examined). Explanatory variables were recorded yearly, starting at the age of 7. Earliest toothpaste use was reported at the age of 1. By age 7, 99.7% of the children reported the use of toothpaste (90% fluoride-containing), but only 13.9% reported using a pea-sized amount. At age 7, 66% of the children had received systemic fluoride supplements during at least part of their childhood. At 11 years, 92% of the children used a fluoride-containing toothpaste and 6% still received systemic fluoride supplements. Fluorosis was present in about 10% of all the children examined, mainly TFI score 1 (7.3% in upper central incisors). Logistic regression established tooth brushing frequency and fluoride supplement use, in addition to tap water fluoride concentrations above 0.7 mg/l, as significant risk factors when the presence of fluorosis on at least one tooth was used as outcome variable. Children having fluorosis had a lower risk of caries, both in the primary (median dmft 1, range 0-10 vs. 2, range 0-12) and permanent dentition (median DMFT 0, range 0-5 vs. 0, range 0-11).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.