Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Mangold

Publications and source records attributed to L Mangold.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Small pelvic lymph node metastases: evaluation with MR imaging.

The purpose of this study was to determine if lymph node asymmetry in small (< 1.0 cm) pelvic lymph nodes was a significant prognostic feature in determining metastatic disease. Two hundred and sixteen patients who presented with pelvic carcinoma underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). They were correlated with pathological findings obtained at surgery. We considered the maximum diameter (MAD) of both round- or oval-shaped suspicious masses seen in the axial plane. Two different cut-off values were determined: lymph node diameter greater than 1.0 cm (criterion 1) and lymph node diameter greater than 0.5 cm with asymmetry relative to the opposite side for lymph nodes ranging from 0.5 cm to 1.0 cm (criterion 2). With criterion 1, MRI had an accuracy of 88%, a sensitivity of 65%, a specificity of 96%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 88% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 88% in the detection of pelvic lymph node metastasis. By considering criterion 2, MRI had an accuracy of 85%, a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 91%, a PPV of 71% and a NPV of 91%. Normal small asymmetric lymph nodes were present in 5.6% of cases. Normal asymmetry of pelvic lymph nodes is not uncommon. It cannot be relied on to diagnose metastatic involvement in cases of small suspicious lymph nodes.

Adult↗

[Value of asymmetry criterion in MRI for the diagnosis of small pelvic lymphadenopathies (inferior or equal to 1 cm)].

The purpose of this study was to determine if lymph node asymmetry in small (< 1.0 cm) pelvic nodes was a significant prognostic feature in determining metastatic disease. 216 patients who presented pelvic carcinoma underwent MR imaging. They were correlated to pathological findings obtained by surgery. We considered on the axial plan the maximum diameter (MAD) of both round or oval-shaped suspicious masses. Two different cut-off values were determined: node diameter superior to 1.0 cm (criterion 1) and node diameter superior to 0.5 cm with asymmetry relative to the opposite side for nodes ranging from 0.5 cm to 1.0 cm (criterion 2). With criterion 1 MR Imaging had an accuracy of 88%, a sensitivity of 65%, a specificity of 96%, a PPV of 88% and a NPV of 88% in detection of pelvic node metastasis. By considering criterion 2, MR Imaging had an accuracy of 85%, a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 89%, a PPV of 71% and a NPV of 91%. Normal small asymmetric lymph nodes were present in 5.6% of cases. Asymmetry of normal or inflammatory pelvic nodes is not uncommon. It cannot be relied on to diagnose metastatic involvement in cases of small suspicious lymph nodes, especially because of its low specificity and positive predictive value.

Adult↗