Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L L Elliott

Publications and source records attributed to L L Elliott.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Developmental differences in identifying and discriminating CV syllables.

The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether age-related differences would be observed for identification and discrimination of synthesized, five-formant CV syllables among listeners who showed equal performance scores on a standard clinical test of speech understanding. A second question concerned the relations between performance on identification and discrimination tasks as a function of age. Two 13-item continua that varied in the place of articulation feature ([ba, da, ga]) were used; they differed primarily in the presence of absence of a 5-ms noise burst at the consonant onset. Digitized natural speech syllables were also employed in one experimental task. Strong age effects were obtained for the three tasks--identification of syllables, adaptive estimation of "ba, da-" and "da, ga-" boundaries, and discrimination. With the exception of one condition for six-year-olds, only adults showed significant differences between boundaries and just noticeable differences. Minimal differences were obtained in responses to stimuli with and without initial bursts. Across ages there were no significant differences in the subjects' ability to label the synthesized syllables as compared to the natural speech stimuli. Possible explanations for the observed developmental effects are discussed.

Adult↗

Pure-tone sensitivity and ear canal pressure at threshold in children and adults.

Previous investigation have found that young children have poorer pure-tone auditory sensitivity than older children or adults. This study addressed the question of whether these age-related sensitivity differences are attributable to children having middle ear disorders that produce a conductive hearing loss or to differences in ear canal sound pressure at threshold. Results ruled out both of these possible explanations for the age effect.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗

Children's pure-tone detection.

A three-alternative, forced-choice adaptive procedure, with suitable reinforcement, is appropriate for testing auditory sensitivity in young children. Data obtained using this rigidly specified test protocol support previous findings of reduced auditory sensitivity in young children.

Audiometry↗

Children's understanding of monosyllabic nouns in quiet and in noise.

A four-alternative, forced choice adaptive procedure was used to measure the lowest intensity at which children could identify monosyllabic nouns that had been standardized to be understandable (at comfortable listening levels) to inner city, 3-year-old children. Results showed no age-related performance changes when the words were presented against a 12-talker babble or against filtered noise. In quit, however, performance improved between the ages of 5 and 10 years. Performance of children with learning problems was poorer than performance of children achieving normal school progress, even though clinical measures of auditory sensitivity showed no differences. Results are discussed in terms of "semantic closure" skills of children.

Adult↗

Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability.

Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on the SPIN test (Speech Perception in Noise) is described. The 11- and 13-year-olds performed significantly poorer than 15- and 17-year-olds, and this difference occurred primarily for high-predictability sentences presented at a O-dB signal-to-babble ratio. Performance of nine-year-olds was significantly poorer than performance of 11-year-olds. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.

Adolescent↗

Temporal and masking phenomena in persons with sensorineural hearing loss.

Relatively few experimental investigations have studied backward or forward masking, masking level differences, or differential frequency effects in simultaneous masking among persons with hearing impairment. This is regrettable since such efforts may lead to important new understandings of auditory processes. This paper reviews available data, discusses some precautions of experimental procedure, and offers suggestions for future research directions.

Acoustic Stimulation↗