Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L L Brunetti

Publications and source records attributed to L L Brunetti.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1990

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation policies and practices. A statewide nursing home study.

We determined the prevalence of written cardiopulmonary resuscitation policies in North Carolina nursing homes and evaluated their content according to predetermined criteria. Questionnaires were mailed to 236 state-registered facilities. Two hundred nine nursing homes (88.5%) responded to the questionnaire; 83% reported having a written policy, and half (86 nursing homes) provided copies. Nine of ten nursing homes reported that cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed at their institution, and a similar number (92%) permitted physician orders restricting cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Written policies were systematically compared with 10 model criteria. Policy content varied substantially. More than half of the policies contained provisions for authorization, informed consent, documentation, competency, review, and applicability of do not resuscitate orders. Less than half contained criteria for autonomy, treatment alternatives, dignity and quality of care, and patient identification. Nursing homes that had written policies were newer, larger, and for-profit; had a greater proportion of skilled nursing care beds; and were more likely to have both Medicare and Medicaid certification. The variations in these policies place nursing home residents at risk for having important personal rights limited or ignored. Inclusion of these 10 policy criteria in a comprehensive cardiopulmonary resuscitation policy would represent an important step toward enhancing the quality of decision making by nursing home residents.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Physicians' attitudes towards living wills and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a physician's familiarity with the living will directly relates to an expressed willingness to discuss resuscitation issues with patients. DESIGN: Survey of selected primary care and medical sub-specialist physicians most likely to care for seriously or terminally ill patients. SETTING: Private-practice clinicians practicing in an urban county. PARTICIPANTS: Internists, family practitioners, cardiologists, oncologists, and neurologists in private practice. INTERVENTIONS: None. RESULTS: Almost all responding physicians (97.2%) knew of the living will, although few (13.5%) had executed one for themselves. Most were willing to keep a copy of their patients' living wills with their office records. However, only a few physicians (20%) indicated they routinely discussed extraordinary care issues with their patients. In fact, most (70%) reported they rarely or never discussed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with their patients. With terminally ill patients, physician initiative was greater: 69% reported discussing resuscitation preferences. Comparable discussions with elderly patients were undertaken only if the physician believed they would be warranted by the clinical circumstances. When questioned about their own sentiments towards resuscitation, most physicians indicated they would not want CPR if they were terminally ill (86%) or mentally incompetent (93%). A similar number (92%) would refuse artificial feeding if permanently comatose. CONCLUSIONS: Many physicians recognize the importance of living wills as an expression of patient treatment preferences. Nevertheless, discussion of patient preferences is unlikely because of physicians' reluctance, except in limited circumstances, to initiate a dialogue about life-sustaining measures. Because patients also are often unwilling to begin such discussions, better methods of facilitating discussion of CPR and other extraordinary health care measures must be sought.

Adult↗