Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L J Murray

Publications and source records attributed to L J Murray.

57 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Centrocytic lymphoma: a distinct clinicopathologic and immunologic entity. A multiparameter study of 18 cases at diagnosis and relapse.

The clinical, pathologic, and immunologic aspects of malignant lymphoma of centrocytic type (ML,cc) were studied at diagnosis and often at relapse in 18 patients. The typical patient was a middle-aged or older man with adenopathy, often massive splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, marrow involvement, and, not infrequently, peripheral blood involvement. Histopathologically, ML,cc had a diffuse or vaguely nodular growth pattern with, predominantly, cells resembling centrocytes (cleaved follicular center cells) sometimes with admixed small round lymphocytes but with virtually no transformed cells. In 2 cases the neoplastic cells formed a mantle zone around reactive-appearing follicles. Cell suspensions and frozen sections revealed the monoclonal B-cell nature of all but 1 nonmarking case, and the polyclonality of the follicles in the 1 mantle zone case tested. The B cells had some, but not all, characteristics of both normal mantle and follicular center cells when eight nodes were studied with the use of a panel of monoclonal antibodies, peanut lectin, and endogenous alkaline phosphatase activity. Of 13 patients who underwent repeat biopsies, 1 developed a high grade unclassifiable B-cell lymphoma, and 6 had less marked changes. None of 7 patients tested had a change in light chain class. In conclusion, ML,cc is a distinct entity separable from other B-cell lymphomas in which either centrocytes or small round lymphocytes predominate.

Adult↗

T cells in follicular centroblastic/centrocytic (cleaved follicular centre cell) lymphomas at diagnosis, relapse and transformation.

Although T cells are often a prominent component of follicular (+/- diffuse) centroblastic/centrocytic (cleaved follicular centre cell--FCC) lymphomas (CB/cc/F +/- D), their evolution during the course of the disease and prognostic significance are uncertain. A total of 127 histopathologic and immunophenotypic studies from 77 patients with at least one histologic diagnosis of CB/cc/F +/- D were therefore retrospectively reviewed to address these questions. The proportion of T cells in each biopsy was analysed with reference to both histologic (diagnosis--Kiel and Lukes/Collins classification, presence of transformation, growth pattern, presence of residual mantle zones, biopsy sites) and clinical (biopsy date and number, treatment status) parameters. The actuarial survival for those patients whose first or second biopsy showed CB/cc/F +/- D and had immunophenotypic studies was also compared based on the proportions of T cells present. Among the biopsies which were obtained from 0 to 153 months following diagnosis, the mean proportion of T cells was 25 +/- 18 per cent. The only histopathologic group that showed a significantly different proportion of T cells were lymphomas of large cleaved FCC type (38 +/- 20 per cent). Although the number of T cells present varied greatly between different patients and among different biopsies in the same patients, neither biopsy number nor treatment status affected the mean proportion of T cells in CB/cc/F +/- D. With the exception of those biopsies from 1 to 11 months following diagnosis, the interval time between diagnosis and biopsy also did not affect the number of T cells present. Finally, the proportion of T cells in the lymphomas could not be shown to be of prognostic importance. Thus, the proportion of T cells in de novo CB/cc/F +/- D, at relapse or in transformation does not vary in a consistent fashion. Although extremely variable, the number of T cells present cannot be considered a feature of earlier or later disease and is not of demonstrable prognostic importance. Studies of specific subsets of T cells may provide more definite associations.

Biopsy↗

Effect of a neoprene sleeve on knee joint position sense during sitting open kinetic chain and supine closed kinetic chain tests.

The primary objective of the present study was to compare the effect of a neoprene sleeve on knee joint position sense during a sitting open kinetic chain test and a supine closed kinetic chain test. Young (24 +/- 2 years old), healthy subjects (18 men and 18 women) performed knee joint angle replication tests during open kinetic chain knee extension (sitting) and closed kinetic chain leg press (supine with an axial load of 15% body weight) before and after application of a neoprene sleeve over the dominant knee. The improvement in ability to replicate joint angles after application of the sleeve (sleeve effect) was significantly less during the supine closed kinetic chain test (0.3 degree +/- 1.4 degrees) than during the sitting open kinetic chain test (1.2 degrees +/- 1.1 degrees). The sleeve effect was inversely related to subjects' performance without the sleeve during both the sitting open kinetic chain and supine closed kinetic chain tests, suggesting that some people may derive greater benefit from the sleeve than others. Although the sleeve effects were small, particularly during the supine closed kinetic chain test, 72% of subjects felt that the sleeve improved their overall test performance. Future research is needed to establish the functional relevance of the small sleeve effects observed and to identify the characteristics of people who might derive greatest benefit from sleeve use.

Adult↗