Biomedical subjects
L J Carpenito
Publications and source records attributed to L J Carpenito.
Speaking the language of nursing diagnosis. Interview by Michael Villaire.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Has JCAHO eliminated care plans? As I see it.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
You can capture personal histories.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Translating nursing diagnosis into ICD code.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Developments in nursing classification. Nursing diagnosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Nursing diagnosis in critical care: impact on practice and outcomes.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Nursing diagnosis: selected dilemmas in practice.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Diagnostics: Actual, potential, or possible?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Diagnosing nutrition problems.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Why you have to make those tough decisions.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Altered thoughts or altered perceptions?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Is the problem a nursing diagnosis?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The failing or unsatisfactory student.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Development of definitions for taxonomy II.
In the process of placing diagnoses into Taxonomy I, certain inconsistencies became apparent. Inadequate definition of both diagnoses and human response patterns, lack of defining characteristics, and inconsistency in the levels of abstraction within the taxonomic hierarchy made the task of assigning a diagnosis to a taxonomic pattern difficult. Ambiguity in the definitions of the nine patterns resulted in ambiguity in the basic foundation, which affected the entire structure. The Taxonomy Committee, before evaluating the current structure, had to make the following decisions regarding the current human response patterns: (1) Should the nine human response patterns be retained for further taxonomic work? and (2) If they are retained, what should be the first step in examining Taxonomy I-Revised? This second article in a series of four will familiarize the readers with the process and decisions by which Taxonomy II of the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) is evolving through the work of the Taxonomy Committee. This article also will identify the specific problems encountered in the development of Taxonomy I and Taxonomy I-Revised, and describe the steps establishing the validity of the process of formation of the nine human response patterns.
Axes: focus of taxonomy II.
A number of persistent issues in the nursing diagnosis community have challenged the ability of one nursing diagnosis taxonomy to account for nursing's practice. The North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) Taxonomy Committee, charged with the preparation of one taxonomy for all, has struggled with some of these issues and has initiated development of axes. The issues, figuratively speaking, become the axes. The axes are intended to describe the dimensions of the human condition. This article, third in a series of four, describes the process and development of the proposed axes.
Toward further understanding of nursing diagnosis: an interpretation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.