Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Heinemann

Publications and source records attributed to L Heinemann.

164 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneously administered U40 and U100 formulations of regular human insulin.

Action profiles of 12 U of regular human insulin (Actrapid HM) administered subcutaneously as a U40 or U100 formulation were studied. Euglycaemic glucose clamps were performed on two separate days in 8 healthy subjects (basal i.v. insulin infusion 0.1 mU/kg/min, plasma glucose 5.0 mmol/l, mean +/- SD age 25 +/- 2 years, BMI 22.7 +/- 1.4 kg/m2). Serum insulin concentrations increased after injection of U40 or U100 from similar baseline values to maximal individual concentrations of 305 +/- 79 vs. 285 +/- 62 pmol/l (NS) after 90 +/- 33 vs. 114 +/- 58 min (NS). Ten, 15, and 20 min post injection insulin concentrations were significantly higher by an average of 30 pmol/l after U40 insulin vs. U100 insulin (p less than 0.05). Glucose infusion rates increased from comparable baseline rates to maximal individual glucose infusion rates of 10.7 +/- 2.4 vs. 10.9 +/- 3.0 mg/kg/min (NS) after 172 +/- 51 vs. 169 +/- (39) min (NS). At the three time points when significantly different serum insulin concentrations occurred soon after insulin injection, glucose infusion rates were not significantly different between U40 and U100. Although small differences in insulin pharmacokinetics were detected early after s.c. insulin injection (U40 was absorbed faster than U100 insulin) the pharmacodynamics of the U40 and U100 formulation of regular human insulin appear to be comparable in healthy subjects.

Adult↗

Accuracy of blood glucose self monitoring in elderly insulin treated diabetic patients.

We investigated the accuracy of blood glucose self monitoring in 131 patients (mean +/- SD age 65 +/- 7 years, duration of diabetes 11 +/- 6 years) who participated in a 5-day inpatient group treatment and teaching programme especially designed for elderly insulin-treated patients. Patients' estimations and laboratory blood glucose measurements were compared on day 1 (after theoretical and practical introduction into blood glucose self monitoring) and on day 4 of the programme. Patients were trained in the visual reading of Haemoglukotest 20-800R; blood glucose meters were recommended only exceptionally. Error grid analysis showed a high accuracy of visually assessed blood glucose values, both on day 1 (94% of measurements in zone A, 5% in zone B) and on day 4 (95% in zone A, 4% in zone B). Patients with no prior experience in blood glucose self monitoring (n = 67) showed a significant improvement (p less than 0.02) in accuracy from day 1 to day 4. Values determined by blood glucose meters were less accurate, although this trend did not reach statistical significance. A second group of 94 consecutive patients was reexamined 5 years after participation in the treatment and teaching programme. 55 patients were still alive and 42 could be evaluated. Accuracy of blood glucose estimations was assessed in all 26 patients practising blood glucose self monitoring (age 69 +/- 5 years, diabetes duration 18 +/- 8 years), either at their homes (n = 23) or at our diabetes outpatient clinic (n = 3). Error grid analysis showed a high accuracy by visual reading (n = 21, 95% zone A, 5% zone B).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗