Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Grimard

Publications and source records attributed to L Grimard.

25 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1989

A new combined approach in the conservative management of rectal cancer.

Between 1980 and 1987, 25 patients with rectal cancer were treated with a combination of preoperative external irradiation of 35 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks which was followed, 6 to 8 weeks later, by a tumorectomy and peroperative placement of a plastic tube loop for post-operative interstitial therapy by iridium-192. This boost dose was 20 Gy (Paris System) for submucosal lesions (seven patients) and 25 Gy for intramural (eight patients) and extramural (ten patients) lesions. With a mean follow-up of 40.5 months, there have been five local recurrences, the latest occurring 16 months post-tumorectomy. Two of these five patients are alive and disease-free 1 year post salvage abdominoperineal resection. The 20 patients with local control have preserved a full functional sphincter and 19 of them are disease-free; there were few complications. This sphincter preserving combined approach seems promising for patients with tumors of the middle and lower rectum who cannot undergo major surgery and for selected patients who refuse abdominoperineal resection.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1988

Does parasternal irradiation reduce thoracic vertebral metastases in breast cancer?

A review of 197 patients with bone metastases from breast carcinoma was undertaken to assess the effect of adjuvant parasternal irradiation on the distribution of those metastases. A total of 128 patients (Group I) received radiation. The control group consisted of 69 patients (Group II) who did not receive adjuvant radiation. The dose absorbed by the mid-thoracic vertebrae (T3 to T8) varied from 10 Gy in 3 weeks to 20 Gy in 4 weeks. The distribution of bone metastases was analyzed at the initial development in the 197 patients. Repeat assessments (X ray/scans) were available for analysis in 132 patients. Patients in Group I had less metastases from T3 to T8: 37/128 (29%), vs 30/69 (43.5%) for patients in Group II: (chi 2 = 3.62; p less than 0.10). For the 132 patients with serial assessments, the difference at last evaluation was more significant: 45/86 (52%) in Group I, vs 36/46 (78%) in Group II: (chi 2 = 7.44; p less than 0.01). The data shows that patients receiving low-dose exit beam irradiation from the parasternal field have fewer mid-thoracic bone metastases. Potential implications are discussed.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1988

Prognostic significance of endometrial extension in carcinoma of the cervix.

A retrospective analysis of 343 consecutive patients with histologically proven carcinoma of the cervix, treated at the Ottawa General Hospital, was undertaken to evaluate the prognostic significance of endometrial extension. All these patient had a D + C as part of their work-up. Sixty-seven patients had a (+) D + C: 34/150 (23%) in Stage IB, 21/106 (20%) in Stage II, and 12/87 (14%) in Stage III. Survival was closely related to the D + C findings in early stages. In Stage IB, the 5-year survival of D + C (-) patients was 90% vs 50% in D + C (+) patients (P less than 0.003) and in Stage II, the 5-year survival was 77% and 55%, respectively (P = 0.089). There was, however, no difference in survival in Stage III patients (35% vs 29%). Pelvic failures were similar in both groups, stage for stage, but those with a (+) D + C had a higher incidence of distant metastasis. In Stage IB, distant metastases were found in 8.5% (10/116) of D + C (-) patients compared to 38% (13/34) in D + C (+) patients (P less than 0.001) and in Stage II, in 18.5% (16/85 and 33% (7/21) of the patients (P = 0.126), respectively. There was no difference in Stage III patients (28% vs 25%). This study suggests that endometrial extension is a significant prognostic factor in early stages and is associated with a higher risk of distant metastases. Management of these high risk patients is discussed.

Dilatation and Curettage↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Induction chemotherapy in head and neck cancer: results of a phase III trial.

Between December 1982 and October 1986, 131 patients with stage II-III-IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx or oral cavity were randomized to induction chemotherapy, consisting of bleomycin (10 mg/m2/day in continuous infusion from day 1 to day 5), methotrexate (120 mg/m2 on day 2) followed by folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (5 FU) (600 mg/m2 on day 2), and cisplatin (120 mg/m2 on day 4) every 4 weeks for a total of three cycles followed by definitive locoregional treatment versus locoregional treatment alone. The modalities of definitive treatment (radiotherapy +/- surgery) were chosen prior to randomization. A total of 116 patients were evaluable. Of 55 patients in the chemotherapy arm, four (7%) had a complete response (CR) and 23 (42%) a partial response (PR) following the induction regimen. At the completion of locoregional treatment, 76% (42 of 55) of patients in the experimental group were in CR compared to 89% (54 of 61) in the control group. There was no difference in survival, cause-specific survival, and pattern of relapse between both groups. The median survival was 22 months in the chemotherapy group and 29 months in the control group. Responders to chemotherapy did not fare better than nonresponders. Chemotherapy-related toxicities were few and most of them related to cisplatin which was reduced to 100 mg/m2 for 35 patients. There were no treatment-related deaths and, in the experimental arm of the trial, no increased morbidity from locoregional treatment. This induction regimen does not offer any advantages over standard treatment.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[In vitro radiosensitivity of skin fibroblasts can identify a group of patients with complications in various health tissues after radiotherapy].

PURPOSE: A retrospective study of the in vitro radiosensitivity of skin fibroblasts derived from two groups of patients treated by definitive radiotherapy for a variety of tumors who either displayed or did not display severe complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven radiotherapy patients were selected: three were treated for head and neck, prostate and non-Hodgkin lymphoma tumors, and did not develop any significant complications (control group); four patients were treated for bladder, thyroid, head and neck and anal canal tumors and developed serious acute and especially late reactions (hypersensitive group). Primary cell cultures of skin fibroblasts were established and their radiosensitivity studied by the clonogenic assay after exposing to single radiation doses ranging between 1 and 8 Gy. RESULTS: The survival fraction at 2 Gy (SF2) ranged from 0.27 to 0.38, with a mean of 0.33 for the control group, and from 0.10 to 0.20 with a mean of 0.17 for the hypersensitive group. The Mann-Whitney non-parametric test showed that the difference between the two means was statistically significant (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The data are in favor of a correlation between the radiosensitivity of patients' fibroblasts and the reactions of different normal tissues to radiotherapy. This association supports the use of the clonogenic survival, or a surrogate test, as a predictive assay. The multiplicity of normal tissues and organs implicated in this association suggests the existence of genetic factors that determine, at least in part, the radiosensitivity of target cells involved in the expression of normal tissues complications following radiotherapy.

Aged↗