Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Gianotti

Publications and source records attributed to L Gianotti.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Artificial nutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) often require postoperative artificial nutrition. This trial was undertaken to evaluate whether the route of administration and the composition of the postoperative nutritional support could affect the immunometabolic response and outcome. A prospective, randomized trial was carried out in 212 subjects who underwent PD. Patients were randomized to receive a standard enteral formula (standard group, n = 73) or an enteral formula enriched with arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, and RNA (immunonutrition group, n = 71), or total parenteral nutrition (parenteral group, n = 68). Postoperative feeding started 6 hours after surgery. The three regimens were isocaloric and isonitrogenous. Assessed parameters were phagocytosis ability of polymorphonuclear cells, plasma interleukin-2 receptors, C-reactive protein, retinol binding protein, tolerance of enteral feeding, rate of postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Full nutritional goal (25 kcal/kg) was achieved in 87% of enterally fed patients versus 95% in the parenteral group. Subjects receiving immunonutrition had a significantly better recovery of the immunometabolic parameters on postoperative day 8 compared to the other two groups. The rate of postoperative complications was lower in the immunonutrition group (33.8%) than in either the standard (43.8%) or parenteral group (58.8%) (p = 0.005 immunonutrition vs. parenteral). Also, the mean LOS was shorter in the immunonutrition group than in the standard and parenteral groups (15.1 vs. 17.0 vs. 18.8 days, respectively; p < 0.05). Early postoperative enteral feeding may safely and effectively replace parenteral nutrition in patients undergoing PD. Immunonutrition ameliorates the immunometabolic response and improves outcome compared to parenteral feeding.

Adult↗

Health care resources consumed to treat postoperative infections: cost saving by perioperative immunonutrition.

The objectives of the study were to calculate the costs of postoperative complications and to evaluate whether the use of perioperative enteral immunonutrition, may lead to a saving in health care resources consumed. The economic analysis was based on data from a randomized double-blind trial that include 206 cancer patients who received perioperatively either enteral immunonutrition (treatment group, n = 102) or a standard enteral diet (control group, n = 104). Estimates of costs were based on resource use for treatment of complications, which were valued according to the National List of Sanitary Costs of the Italian Ministry of Health and on the medical Diagnosis-Related-Group (DRG) reimbursement rates. Costs of nutrition were also calculated. Cost comparison and cost effectiveness analyses were then carried out. Intent-to-treat analysis showed that the total costs of 52 postoperative complications were 322,218 euros, with a consumption of the DRG reimbursement rate of 15.4%. The costs of nutrition were 35,437 euros in the treatment group versus 10,768 euros in the control group. The total costs (nutrition plus treating complications) amounted to 113,778 euros in the treatment group versus 254,450 euros in the control group. The mean total costs per patient were 1,115 euros in the treatment group versus 2,447 euros in the control group (P = 0.04). Effectiveness was 83.3% in the treatment group versus 68.3% in the control group (P = 0.009). Cost effectiveness analysis showed a net saving of 2,386 euros per complication-free patient in favor of the treatment group. In conclusion, the perioperative use of immunonutrition appears cost effective due to a substantial saving of resources used to treat postoperative complications.

Aged↗

Arginine counteracts the inhibitory effect of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I on the somatotroph responsiveness to growth hormone-releasing hormone in humans.

Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) exerts a negative feedback effect on GH secretion via either direct actions at the pituitary level or indirect ones at the hypothalamic level, through stimulation of somatostatin (SS) and/or inhibition of GHRH release. In fact, recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-I) in humans inhibits spontaneous GH secretion as well as the GH response to GHRH and even more to GH/GH-releasing peptides, whose main action is on the hypothalamus, antagonizing SS and enhancing GHRH activity. The aim of the present study was to further clarify in humans the mechanisms underlying IGF-I-induced inhibition of somatotroph secretion. In six normal young volunteers (all women; mean +/- SEM: age, 28.3+/-1.2 yr; body mass index, 21.3+/-1.2 kg/m2) we studied the GH response to GHRH (1 microg/kg, iv, at 0 min), both alone and combined with arginine (ARG; 0.5 g/kg, iv, from 0-30 min), which probably acts via inhibition of hypothalamic SS release, after pretreatment with rhIGF-I (20 microg/kg, sc, at -180 min) or placebo. rhIGF-I increased circulating IGF-I levels (peak at -60 vs. -180 min: 54.9+/-3.9 vs. 35.9+/-3.3 mmol/L; P < 0.05) to a reproducible extent, and these levels remained stable and within the normal range until 90 min. The mean GH concentration over 3 h (from -180 to 0 min) before ARG and/or GHRH was not modified by placebo or rhIGF-I. After placebo, the GH response to GHRH (peak, 23.6+/-2.9 microg/L) was strikingly enhanced (P < 0.05) by ARG coadministration (69.6+/-9.9 microg/L). rhIGF-I blunted the GH response to GHRH (13.1+/-4.5 microg/L; P < 0.05), whereas that to GHRH plus ARG was not modified (59.5+/-8.9 microg/L), although it occurred with some delay. Mean glucose and insulin concentrations were not modified by either placebo or rhIGF-I. In conclusion, ARG counteracts the inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I on somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH in humans. These findings suggest that the acute inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I on the GH response to GHRH takes place on the hypothalamus, possibly via enhancement of SS release, and that ARG overrides this action.

Adult↗

Effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I administration on spontaneous and growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone-stimulated GH secretion in anorexia nervosa.

Exaggerated GH and reduced insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels are common features in anorexia nervosa (AN). A reduction of the negative IGF-I feedback could account, in part, for GH hypersecretion. To ascertain this, we studied the effects of recombinant human (rh)IGF-I on spontaneous and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion in nine women with AN [body mass index, 14.1 +/- 0.6 kg/m2] and in weight matched controls (normal weight). Mean basal GH concentrations (mGHc) and GHRH (2.0 microg/kg, iv) stimulation were significantly higher in AN. rhIGF-I administration (20 microg/kg, sc) significantly reduced mGHc in AN (P < 0.01), but not normal weight, and inhibited peak GH response to GHRH in both groups; mGHc and peak GH, however, persisted at a significantly higher level in AN. Insulin, glucose, and IGFBP-1 basal levels were similar in both groups. rhIGF-I inhibited insulin in AN, whereas glucose remained unaffected in both groups. IGFBP-1 increased in both groups (P < 0.05), with significantly higher levels in AN. IGFBP-3 was under basal conditions at a lower level in AN (P < 0.05) and remained unaffected by rhIGF-I. This study demonstrates that a low rhIGF-I dose inhibits, but does not normalize, spontaneous and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in AN, pointing also to the existence of a defective hypothalamic control of GH release. Moreover, the increased IGFBP-1 levels might curtail the negative IGF-I feedback in AN.

Adolescent↗

Hypothalamic growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor-I axis across the human life span.

The activity of the growth hormone (GH)-insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) axis undergoes marked variations across the human life span, mainly reflecting age-related changes in the neural control of somatotroph function. IGF-I secretion generally reflects GH status, except in newborns, who secrete high levels of GH but low levels of IGF-I. Changes in the gonadal steroid milieu, particularly estradiol, play a major role in the enhanced activity of the GH-IGF-I axis at puberty and probably reflect further changes in the neuroendocrine control of somatotroph secretion. The change in responsiveness of somatotrophs to various stimuli, including GHRH, is not as marked as the spontaneous secretion of GH at puberty. However, in childhood, somatotrophs are unusually refractory to the somatostatin-mediated negative GH autofeedback mechanism. Normal children show normal responsiveness to the stimulatory influence of alpha-adrenergic and cholinergic agonists, galanin and arginine, but the activating effect of these stimuli on somatotroph secretion is reduced in elderly individuals, with the notable exception of arginine. Arginine potentiates both spontaneous and GHRH-induced GH secretion to the same extent in normally growing children, adults and elderly individuals, indicating that the releasable pool of GH is generally preserved across the human life span. Thus, the reduction in spontaneous and GHRH-induced GH secretion in the elderly probably reflects age-related changes in neurotransmitter control, leading to GHRH hypoactivity and absolute or relative somatostatin hyperactivity in the aged hypothalamus. Cholinergic impairment in the aging brain probably involves hypothalamic pathways and leads to decreased activity of the GH-IGF-I axis in normal and elderly individuals, as well as in individuals with premature brain aging. However, there is evidence indicating that age-related variations in the activity of the natural GH-secretagogue ligand(s) at the hypothalamic level could also play a role in the age-dependent changes in the GH-IGF-I axis.

Adult↗

Interaction between glucagon and hexarelin, a peptidyl GH secretagogue, on somatotroph and corticotroph secretion in humans.

OBJECTIVE: Glucagon administration stimulates both somatotroph and corticotroph secretion in humans, although this happens only if glucagon is administered by the intramuscular route and not by the intravenous route. On the other hand, GH secretagogues (GHS) strongly stimulate GH and also possess ACTH-releasing activity. DESIGN AND METHODS: To clarify the mechanisms underlying the stimulatory effects of both glucagon and GHS on somatotroph and corticotroph secretion, we studied the GH, ACTH and cortisol responses to glucagon (GLU, 0.017 mg/kg i.m.) and Hexarelin, a peptidyl GHS (HEX, 2.0 microg/kg i.v.) given alone or in combination in 6 normal young volunteers (females, aged 26-32 years, body mass index 19.7-22.5 kg/m). RESULTS: GLU administration elicited a clear increase in GH (peak vs baseline, mean+/-S.E.M.: 11.6+/-3.4 vs 3. 3+/-0.7 microg/l, P<0.02), ACTH (11.6+/-3.3 vs 4.1+/-0.3 pmol/l, P<0. 02) and cortisol (613.5+/-65.6 vs 436.9+/-19.3 nmol/l, P<0.05) levels. HEX induced a marked increase in GH levels (55.7+/-19.8 vs 3. 7+/-1.9 microg/l, P<0.005) and also significant ACTH (5.7+/-1.1 vs 3. 4+/-0.6 pmol/l, P<0.01) and cortisol (400.2+/-31.4 vs 363.4+/-32.2 nmol/l, P<0.05) responses. The GH area under the curve (AUC) after HEX was clearly higher than after GLU (1637.3+/-494.0 vs 479.1+/-115. 7 microg/l/120 min, P<0.04) while HEX and GLU coadministration had a true synergistic effect on GH release (3243.8+/-687.5 microg/l/120 min, P<0.02). The ACTH and cortisol AUCs after HEX were lower (P<0. 02) than those after GLU (208.3+/-41.3 vs 426.3+/-80.9 pmol/l/120 min and 18 874.5+/-1626.1 vs 28 338.5+/-2430.7 nmol/l/120 min respectively). The combined administration of HEX and GLU had an effect which was less than additive on both ACTH (564.02+/-76.5 pmol/l/120 min) and cortisol (35 424.6+/-5548.1 nmol/l/120 min) secretion. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the intramuscular administration of glucagon releases less GH but more ACTH and cortisol than Hexarelin. The combined administration of glucagon and Hexarelin has a true synergistic effect on somatotroph secretion but a less than additive effect on corticotroph secretion; these findings suggest that these stimuli act via different mechanisms to stimulate somatotrophs while they could have a common action on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗

Rational base and clinical results of immunonutrition.

The use of enteral formulas supplemented with immunonutrients has been demonstrated to modulate gut function, inflammatory and immune response after trauma in both experimental and clinical settings. Most studies have focused on glutamine, arginine, w-3 fatty acids and nucleotides. Glutamine is an important source of nitrogen and calories and might be particularly useful in depleted patients or in patients affected by small bowel syndrome. Its use in the critical patient remains controversial. Data collected in two different recent metaanalysis consistently confirmed that enteral formulas enriched with, arginine, w-3 fatty acids and nucleotides reduced infectious complications and hospital stay after planned surgery, and decreased infectious complications, hospital stay and ventilator days in the critically ill. Mortality seems not to be affected by enteral administration of immunonutrients.

Arginine↗

Effect of somatostatin infusion on the somatotrope responsiveness to growth hormone-releasing hormone in patients with anorexia nervosa.

BACKGROUND: According to the existence in anorexia nervosa (AN) of peripheral growth hormone (GH) resistance, low circulating insulinlike growth factor I (IGF-I) levels may be coupled with GH hypersecretion; however, there is also evidence for alterations in the neural control of GH secretion. In fact, reportedly GH secretion is partially refractory to the inhibitory effect of muscarinic cholinergic antagonists as well as to the stimulatory effect of muscarinic cholinergic agonists, which act via opposite modulation of hypothalamic somatostatin (SS) release. Thus, somatostatinergic activity could be impaired in AN. This could be due to an impaired hypothalamic SS release or, alternatively, an altered somatotroph sensitivity to SS. METHODS: We studied in 10 women with AN in acute phase (AN, age, mean +/- SEM: 18.7 +/- 0.8 years) the effect of exogenous SS1-14 (25 and 75 micrograms/hour i.v., infused from +15 to +75 min), at doses that had previously been shown capable of increasing circulating SS levels within the physiological range, on the GH response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) (1 microgram/kg i.v. at 0 min). The same study protocol was performed in 8 normal age-matched women (NW, 22.9 +/- 1.0 years). RESULTS: In AN patients, IGF-I levels were lower (p < .01) than those in NW, while basal GH levels were similar in both groups. The GHRH-induced GH rise in AN was higher (p < .01) than that in NW. In AN, the exaggerated GH response to GHRH was inhibited to the same extent by both SS doses (p < .05) and became similar to that after GHRH alone in NW. In NW both 25 and 75 micrograms/hour SS decreased the GHRH-induced GH response; however, the inhibitory effect of the lower dose did not attain statistical significance, whereas the higher dose did (p < .02). During SS infusion, the GHRH-induced GH response in NW was persistently lower (p < .02) than that in AN. The percent inhibitory effect of SS on the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH was similar in both groups at each dose. CONCLUSIONS: Our present findings demonstrate that the sensitivity of somatotroph cells to exogenous SS given at physiological doses is preserved in patients with AN. It is noteworthy that, during the infusion of physiological SS doses, the GH response to GHRH in AN overlaps on that to GHRH alone under physiological conditions. Thus, in AN, the sensitivity of somatotroph cells to SS apparently being preserved, an impairment of somatostatinergic neurons cannot be ruled out.

Adolescent↗

Perioperative immunonutrition in patients undergoing cancer surgery: results of a randomized double-blind phase 3 trial.

HYPOTHESIS: Perioperative administration of a supplemented enteral formula may reduce the rate of postoperative infections. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. SETTING: Department of surgery at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred six patients with neoplasm of colorectum, stomach, or pancreas. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to drink 1 L/d of either a control enteral formula (n = 104) or the same formula enriched with arginine, RNA, and omega3 fatty acids (n = 102) for 7 consecutive days before surgery. The 2 diets were isoenergetic and isonitrogenous. Jejunal infusion with the same formulas was started 6 hours after operation and continued until postoperative day 7. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of postoperative infectious complications and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable for age, sex, weight loss, Karnofsky scale score, nutritional status, hemoglobin level, duration of surgery, blood loss, and rate of homologous transfusion. Intent-to-treat analysis showed a 14% (14/102) infectious complication rate in the supplemented group vs 30% (31/104) in the control group (P = .009). In the eligible population, the postoperative infection rate was 11% (9/85) in the supplemented group vs. 24% (21/86) in the control group (P = .02). The mean +/- SD length of postoperative stay was 11.1+/-4.4 days in the supplemented group and 12.9+/-4.6 in the control group (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Perioperative administration of a supplemented enteral formula significantly reduced postoperative infections and length of stay in patients undergoing surgery for cancer.

Adolescent↗

Splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: comparison of laparoscopic and conventional surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the safety, efficacy, and clinical benefits of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) to open splenectomy (OS) in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). METHODS: The results from 14 consecutive patients who underwent LS for ITP were reviewed and compared with the results from patients who underwent OS for the same disease. Demographics, concomitant disease on admission, and platelet counts were evaluated, as were details of the surgical procedure, postoperative physiologic status, and hospital stay. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 88.3 min for OS and 146.4 min in LS group (p < 0.05). The conversion rate to open splenectomy was 7.1. Therapeutic response to splenectomy was 92.8% in the LS group and 86.6% in the OS group. Bowel canalization, return to liquid diet, and length of hospital stay were all significantly delayed in the OS group as compared with those who underwent LS (p = 0.01, p = 0.02, p = 0.005, respectively). In the OS group the morbidity rate was 13.3%, whereas in the LS group it was 7.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic splenectomy represents a valid alternative to conventional splenectomy in the treatment of ITP.

Adult↗

Activity of GH/IGF-I axis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVE: There is evidence showing that GH and IGF-I have specific receptors in the heart and that these hormones are able to promote cardiac remodelling and inotropism. It has been reported that patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) benefit from treatment with rhGH showing a striking increase in cardiac contractility. However, until now, the activity of GH/IGF-I axis in DCM has never been clearly assessed. PATIENTS: To clarify this point, we enrolled 39 patients with idiopathic or post-ischaemic DCM (36 M/3 F; age (mean +/- S.D.) 55.3 +/- 9.0 years; BMI: 25.3 +/- 3.2 kg/m2; New York Heart Association class (NYHA) I/2, II/19, III/15, IV/3) and 42 age-matched controls (CS, 38 M/4 F; age 56.0 +/- 7.8 years; BMI: 24.9 +/- 1.5 kg/m2). DCM patients were characterized by a left-ventricular diastolic diameter of 73.8 +/- 8.3 mm, a shortening fraction of 15.9 +/- 6.4% and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 25.1 +/- 8.7%. In all subjects clinical and biochemical indices of renal and hepatic function as well as nutritional parameters were in the normal range. MEASUREMENTS: In both groups we studied: a) IGF-I levels in basal conditions and after administration of low rhGH doses for 4 days (5.0 or 10.0 mu/kg/day x 4 days); b) the acute GH-response to GHRH (1.0 mu/kg i.v.) or hexarelin (HEX, 2.0 mu/kg i.v.), a peptidyl GH secretagogue (GHRP); c) mean GH concentration (mGHc) over 10 h sampling (every 20 min) from 2200 h to 0800 h. RESULTS: Basal IGF-I levels in DCM were lower (P = 0.000039) than in CS (135.2 +/- 46.8 vs. 193.7 +/- 63.7 mu/l), whereas, basal IGFBP-3 and GHBP2 levels in DCM and CS were similar (2.5 +/- 1.3 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.5 mg/l and 25.3 +/- 3.6 vs. 28.3 +/- 5.0%; P = 0.95 and P = 0.085, respectively). After 4 days of 5.0 mu/kg/day rhGH administration, IGF-I levels in DCM (215.4 +/- 82.0 mu/l; P = 0.0023 vs. baseline) remained lower (P = 0.027) than those in CS (280.0 +/- 80.7 mu/l; P = 0.000080 vs. baseline). After 10.0 mu/kg/day for 4 days, IGF-I levels in DCM (297.2 +/- 109.2 mu/l; P = 0.0033 vs. baseline) were similar (P = 0.76) to those in CS (310.9 +/- 81.7 mu/l; P = 0.000060 vs. baseline). The GH response to GHRH in DCM was lower (P = 0.0022) than that in CS (hAUC0-120: 192.0 +/- 177.3 vs. 345.3 +/- 191.1 mu/l/h) whereas that to HEX in DCM and CS was similar (611.0 +/- 437.5 vs. 535.4 +/- 302.8 mu/l/h; P = 0.95). Within the DCM group, basal and rhGH-stimulated IGF-levels as wel as the GH response to GHRH or HEX were not different among NYHA classes and did not show any correlation with ECHO parameters. The mGHc in DCM (1.0 +/- 0.5 mu/l) was similar (P = 0.57) to that in CS (0.9 = 0.7 mu/l). CONCLUSIONS: Our present data demonstrate that in dilated cardiomyopathy patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction basal IGF-I levels are reduced whereas the IGF-I response to low rhGH doses is preserved. These findings suggest a normal peripheral GH sensitivity in dilated cardiomyopathy. On the other hand, though nocturnal mean GH concentration in dilated cardiomyopathy patients is similar to that in normal subjects, the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH, but not that to hexarelin, is reduced. Thus, subtle alterations in the activity of GH/IGF-I axis are present in dilated cardiomyopathy.

Cardiomyopathy, Dilated↗

Complications of pancreatic surgery and the role of perioperative nutrition.

BACKGROUND: According to international guidelines, artificial nutrition may be indicated after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This clinical study was designed to evaluate whether the route of administration and the composition of the postoperative nutritional support could affect outcome. METHODS: One hundred patients who underwent PD for cancer of the pancreatic head were prospectively studied. Patients were randomized to receive a standard enteral formula (SEN; n = 35) or immunonutrition with an enteral formula enriched with arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, and RNA (IEN group; n = 33), or total parenteral nutrition (TPN; n = 32). Postoperative feeding was started within 12 h after surgery. The three regimens were isoenergetic and isonitrogenous. Tolerance of enteral feeding, rate and severity of postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were evaluated. RESULTS: Full nutritional goal (25 kcal/kg) was achieved in 84% of enterally fed patients versus 96% in the parenteral group (p = NS). The rate of postoperative complications was lower in the IEN group (33%) than in the SEN (40%) and TPN groups (59%). The severity of infectious complications (sepsis score) was lower in the IEN (5.5) than the SEN (7.9) and TPN groups (10.4; p < 0.05). LOS was shorter in the IEN than in the SEN and TPN groups (16.3 vs. 17.8 vs. 19.3 days, respectively; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing PD the established nutritional goal can be obtained by enteral feeding. Immunonutrition seems to improve outcome.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Endocrine and non-endocrine activities of growth hormone secretagogues in humans.

Growth hormone (GH) secretagogues (GHS) are synthetic peptidyl and non-peptidyl molecules which possess strong, dose-dependent and reproducible GH releasing effects as well as significant prolactin (PRL) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) releasing effects. The neuroendocrine activities of GHS are mediated by specific receptors mainly present at the pituitary and hypothalamic level but also elsewhere in the central nervous system. GHS release GH via actions at the pituitary and (mainly) the hypothalamic level, probably acting on GH releasing hormone (GHRH) secreting neurons and/or as functional somatostatin antagonists. GHS release more GH than GHRH and the coadministration of these peptides has a synergistic effect but these effects need the integrity of the hypothalamo-pituitary unit. The GH releasing effect of GHS is generally gender-independent and undergoes marked age-related variations reflecting age-related changes in the neural control of anterior pituitary function. The PRL releasing activity of GHS probably comes from direct pituitary action, which indeed is slight and independent of both age and gender. The acute stimulatory effect of GHS on ACTH/cortisol secretion is similar to that of corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) and arginine vasopressin (AVP). In physiological conditions, the ACTH releasing activity of GHS is mediated by central mechanisms, at least partially, independent of both CRH and AVP but probably involving GABAergic mechanisms. The ACTH releasing activity of GHS is gender-independent and undergoes peculiar age-related variations showing a trend towards increase in ageing. GHS possess specific receptors also at the peripheral levels in endocrine and non-endocrine human tissues. Cardiac receptors are specific for peptidyl GHS and probably mediate GH-independent cardiotropic activities both in animals and in humans.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗

Effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I administration on growth hormone (GH) secretion, both spontaneous and stimulated by GH-releasing hormone or hexarelin, a peptidyl GH secretagogue, in humans.

The negative feedback exerted by insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) on GH secretion occurs at the pituitary, as well as the hypothalamic level, via stimulation of SS and/or inhibition of GHRH release. In fact, recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-I) administration inhibits basal GH secretion, at least in fasted humans, though its effect on the GH response to GHRH is still controversial. GH secretagogues (GHS) are peptidyl and nonpeptidyl molecules that act on specific receptors at the pituitary and/or the hypothalamic level. Contrary to GHRH, the GH-releasing activity of GHS is strong, reproducible, and even partially refractory to inhibitory influences such as exogenous somatostatin. We studied the effects of rhIGF-I administration (20 microg/kg s.c. at 0 min) on GH secretion, either spontaneous or stimulated by GHRH (2 microg/kg i.v. at +180 min) or Hexarelin (HEX, 2.0 microg/kg i.v at +180 min), a GHS, in eight normal young women (age, mean +/- SEM, 28.3 +/- 1.2 yr; body mass index, 20.1 +/- 0.5 kg/m2). rhIGF-I administration increased IGF-I levels (peak vs. baseline: 420.3 +/- 30.5 vs. 274.4 +/- 25.3 microg/L, P < 0.05) within the physiological range from +120 to +300 min. No variation in glucose or insulin levels was recorded. rhIGF-I did not reduce spontaneous GH secretion [areas under curves (AUC)(0-300 min) 140.6 +/- 66.3 vs. 114.6 +/- 32.1 microg/L x h], whereas it inhibited the GH response to both GHRH (AUC(180-300 min) 447.7 +/- 159.4 vs. 715.9 +/- 104.3 microg/L x h, P < 0.05) and HEX (620.3 +/- 110.4 vs. 1705.9 +/- 328.9 microg/L x h, P < 0.03). The percent inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I on the GH response to GHRH (41.7 +/- 12.8%) was lower than that on the response to HEX (57.7 +/- 11.0%). In fact, the GH response to GHRH alone was clearly lower than that to HEX alone (P < 0.05), whereas the GH responses to GHRH and HEXwere similar after rhIGF-I. Our findings show that the sc administration of low rhIGF-I doses inhibits the GH response to GHRH and, even more, that to HEX; whereas, at least in this experimental design in fed conditions, it does not modify the spontaneous GH secretion. Because GHS generally show partial refractoriness to inhibitory inputs, including exogenous somatostatin, the present results point toward a peculiar sensitivity of GHS to the negative feedback action of IGF-I.

Adult↗

The inhibitory effect of alprazolam, a benzodiazepine, overrides the stimulatory effect of metyrapone-induced lack of negative cortisol feedback on corticotroph secretion in humans.

Alprazolam (ALP), a benzodiazepine that activates gamma-aminobutyric acid-ergic receptors, inhibits the activity of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, probably via inhibition of hypothalamic CRH and/or arginine vasopressin release. To further clarify the effects of ALP on the HPA axis in humans, in six normal young women (26-34 yr old) we studied the effects of 0.02 mg/kg ALP (administered orally at 0700 h) or placebo on ACTH, cortisol (F), and 11-deoxycortisol (S) levels assayed after placebo or metyrapone (MET; 0.04 g/kg administered orally at 2300 h the night before). After placebo administration, ACTH, F, and S levels showed a progressive decrease from 0700-1200 h (P < 0.03). At 0700 h, ACTH, F, and S levels before ALP overlapped with those after placebo. At 1200 h, ACTH, F, and S levels after ALP were lower than those after placebo (P < 0.03). MET pretreatment strongly increased ACTH (P < 0.03) and S (P < 0.02) while clearly inhibiting F (P < 0.03) levels at 0700 h. After MET, ACTH levels did not show any decrease up to 1200 h; similarly, S levels persisted similar up to 1200 h, whereas F levels at 1200 h were significantly increased (P < 0.03). At 0700 h, MET-induced ACTH and F levels before ALP overlapped with those after MET alone. The MET-induced ACTH levels at 1200 h were markedly inhibited by ALP (P < 0.05). At 1200 h after MET and ALP, a clear reduction of S levels (P < 0.02) and an insignificant F reduction were also found. In conclusion, our present data show that ALP inhibits basal and, much more, metyrapone-induced corticotroph secretion. These findings indicate that the inhibitory effect of central gamma-aminobutyric acid-ergic activation by ALP overrides the stimulatory effect of the MET-induced lack of negative F feedback on corticotroph secretion. These results also point toward potential contraindication of ALP administration in patients with suspected hypoadrenalism.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗