The effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in treatment of leg ulcers.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to L Gaspar.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The authors present their results obtained with Holter ECG monitoring during gastroscopy in a group of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. In one third of the group, endoscopic procedure induced complex cardiac arrhythmias and also significant myocardial ischaemia. These findings can have serious hemodynamic consequences. Therefore previous evaluation of cardiac findings and extemporaneous for urgent therapeutical intervention are necessary. To these patients, especially to those with cardiac arrhythmias--including atrial fibrillation--it is necessary to devote intensified attention and precaution with interdisciplinary co-operation.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of postoperative beta irradiation and to analyze treatment sequelae in patients with primary and recurrent pterygium. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From June 1986 to June 1998, 94 patients corresponding to 100 eyes received postoperative beta irradiation. Two groups of patients were treated: 37 eyes with primary pterygium (Group I) and 63 eyes with recurrent pterygium (Group II). Terson technique surgery was used in the majority of patients. Time between surgery and beta irradiation ranged from 2 to 48 h. Radiation doses and fractionation consisted of 30 Gy/3 fractions/5 days in 17 cases, 60 Gy/6 fractions/6 weeks in 80 cases, and 20 Gy/1 fraction in 3 patients. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 100 cases (14%) treated with surgery and adjuvant irradiation recurred. The overall crude local recurrence rates were 5.4% for Group I and 19% for Group II patients. The 5-year probability of local tumor control was 83.5% for the whole group of patients, 94% for Group I, and 76.9% for Group II (p = 0.04). The early sequelae related to surgery or irradiation were self limited and disappeared by 6 months after the end of the treatment: ocular irritation (14 cases), scleral atrophy (5 cases), and neovascularization (7 cases). A greater incidence of sequelae was observed in Group II patients, but the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). No significant correlation between treatment sequelae and treatment dose was noted: 29% sequelae with 30 Gy vs. 18.7% sequelae with 60 Gy (p = 0.32). No late complications have been observed. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant beta irradiation provides effective therapy for primary pterygium, is somewhate less effective in patients with recurrent pterygium, and is associated with a moderate rate of early and transient sequelae.
The performance of an automated treatment planning algorithm was tested using cases of patients with pancreatic carcinoma; the system implements optimization tools that suggest high-quality plans for consideration by the planner and physician, making best use of the capabilities of a conventional linear accelerator: isocentric setup, shaped fields, and wedges. Ten consecutive patients presenting with pancreatic cancer were first planned using a conventional 3-field protocol to provide a basis for comparison. Each was then planned using an automated optimization technique using a genetic algorithm and a dose-based score function subject to volume-dose constraints. Two sets of optimized plans were created, 1 using only axial beams and the other permitting non-axial beams. The improvement afforded by the optimization was assessed by comparing the score function results and by computing the combined normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for a constant isocenter dose. In all 10 cases, optimization improved the dose-based score function. In 9 cases, the non-axial plan scored higher than the axial plan. Optimization driven by the dose-based score function improved or equaled the predicted NTCP in 8 axial and 9 nonaxial plans. This study demonstrates progress toward the goal of developing an automated planning tool that can robustly suggest high-quality plans.
RTOG 92-05 was a phase II trial developed to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and acceptance of a three times daily accelerated hyperfractionation radiation therapy schedule delivering 110 cGy, three times daily, to 79.2 Gy uncorrected tumor dose in 72 fractions, in 24 treatment days, in patients with bronchogenic cancer. The radiographically visible tumor received accelerated hyperfractionation and the other radiation volume received standard hyperfractionation. Three times a day, a dose of 110 cGy was delivered, with an interfractional interval of 4 hours; the middle fraction was a gross tumor boost. This schedule allowed treatment to be completed in approximately 4 1/2 weeks in an effort to minimize repopulation, to have a better biologically modeled therapeutic ratio than other schedules that have been completed in cooperative groups, and to use doses within cooperative group experience. In 33 months 35 patients were entered into the study; 15 of the patients had squamous cell carcinomas, 10 had adenocarcinomas, 8 had large-cell undifferentiated carcinomas, and 2 had unspecified non-small-cell cancers. Nineteen patients had AJCC stage IIIB; 13, IIIA; 14, T4; 10, T3; 13, N2; and 7, N3. Twenty-one patients (60%) had greater than 5% weight loss. The Karnofsky performance status was 90 to 100 in 12 patients and 70 to 80 in 23 patients. Treatment was completed in 91% of patients. Acute toxicity >RTOG grade II occurred in three patients: one skin, one lung, and two esophagus (one each III and IV, the only grade IV in the study). Overall late toxicity > or = grade III occurred in six patients: three lung, one thyroid, one esophagus, and one subcutaneous tissue (all grade III). The median survival was 10.5 months, 1-year survival was 42%, and 3-year survival was 18%. The outcome in this group of patients with many adverse prognostic variables compared favorably to prior RTOG radiation-alone studies.
The lack of experience and fundamental knowledge about mycology by some mushroomers is one of the leading causes of increasing occurrence of fatal mushroom poisonings. Mushroom intoxications are caused not only by poisonous mushrooms (true primary intoxications), but under certain conditions also by edible mushrooms (secondary intoxications, false intoxications, pseudo-intoxications). Apart from fresh mushrooms intoxications may result also from preserved mushrooms (sterilized in pickles, soured, dried, used for preparation of mushroom extracts, powders, etc.), which are used as garnish. (Tab. 1, Ref. 44.)
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: Promising results from new approaches such as radiosurgery or stereotactic surgery of brain metastases have recently been reported. Are these results due to the therapy alone or can the results be attributed in part to patient selection? An analysis of tumor/patient characteristics and treatment variables in previous Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) brain metastases studies was considered necessary to fully evaluate the benefit of these new interventions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The database included 1200 patients from three consecutive RTOG trials conducted between 1979 and 1993, which tested several different dose fractionation schemes and radiation sensitizers. Using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), a statistical methodology which creates a regression tree according to prognostic significance, eighteen pretreatment characteristics and three treatment-related variables were analyzed. RESULTS: According to the RPA tree the best survival (median: 7.1 months) was observed in patients < 65 years of age with a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of at least 70, and a controlled primary tumor with the brain the only site of metastases. The worst survival (median: 2.3 months) was seen in patients with a KPS less than 70. All other patients had relatively minor differences in observed survival, with a median of 4.2 months. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this analysis, we suggest the following three classes: Class 1: patients with KPS > or = 70, < 65 years of age with controlled primary and no extracranial metastases; Class 3: KPS < 70; Class 2- all others. Using these classes or stages, new treatment techniques can be tested on homogeneous patient groups.
From January 1992 to November 1996, 17 patients with the diagnosis of intracranial meningioma underwent radiosurgical treatment. Of these, 7 patients were treated using a Linac-based system (group 1), and 10 using the Leksell Gamma Knife unit (group 2). The follow-up ranged between 12 and 48 (median 33) months for group 1 and between 1 and 11 (median 5) months for group 2, consisting of clinical and MRI assessments every 3 months during the first year, and every 6 months thereafter. There were 14 women and 3 men. The mean age was 42 years. Prior to radiosurgery, 15 patients underwent surgical procedures. Histological diagnosis was consistent with benign meningioma, except in 2 patients (malignant meningioma). In 15 patients with benign meningiomas there was no evidence of tumor growth as demonstrated by clinical and radiological evaluation, in 2 patients with a malignant histological type there was tumor progression.
BACKGROUND: Cerebral metastasis is a common oncologic problem that occurs in 15-30% of cancer patients; approximately half such metastases are single. Previous retrospective studies and two randomized trials reported that the addition of surgical extirpation prior to radiation therapy increased survival, neurologic function, and quality of life compared with radiation alone in patients with a single brain metastasis. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in which patients with a single brain metastasis were allocated to undergo radiation alone or surgery plus radiation. Radiation consisted of 3000 centigray to the whole brain in 10 fractions. RESULTS: Forty-three patients received radiation alone and 41 patients surgery plus radiation. All but two of the study patients died. No difference in survival was detected between the groups; the median survival for the radiation group was 6.3 months (95% confidence interval, 3-11.4) compared with 5.6 months for the surgery plus radiation group (95% confidence interval, 3.9-7.2) (P = 0.24). Most patients died within the first year (69.8% in the radiation arm vs. 87.8% in the surgery plus radiation arm). There were no significant differences in the 30-day mortality, morbidity, or causes of death. Extracranial metastases was an important predictor of mortality (relative risk, 2.3). The mean proportion of days that the Karnofsky performance status was > or = 70% did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: This trial failed to demonstrate that the addition of surgery to radiation therapy improved outcome of patients with a single brain metastasis. Thus, the efficacy of surgery plus radiation compared with radiation alone needs to be addressed by further clinical trials and/or a meta-analysis.
PURPOSE: Cerebral low-grade gliomas (LGG) in adults are mostly composed of astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, and mixed oligoastrocytomas. There is at present no consensus in the policy of treatment of these tumors. We sought to determine the efficacy of radiotherapy and the presence of a dose-response relationship for these tumors in two multicentric randomized trials conducted by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). The dose-response study is the subject of this article. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For the dose-response trial, 379 adult patients with cerebral LGGs were randomized centrally at the EORTC Data Center to receive irradiation postoperatively (or postbiopsy) with either 45 Gy in 5 weeks or 59.4 Gy in 6.6 weeks with quality-controlled radiation therapy. All known parameters with possible influences on prognosis were prospectively recorded. Conventional treatment techniques were recommended. RESULTS: With 343 (91%) eligible and evaluable patients followed up for at least 50 months with a median of 74 months, there is no significant difference in terms of survival (58% for the low-dose arm and 59% for the high-dose arm) or the progression free survival (47% and 50%) between the two arms of the trial. However, this prospective trial has revealed some important facets about the prognostic parameters: The T of the TNM classifications as proposed in the protocol appears to be one of the most important prognostic factors (p < 0.0001) on multivariate analysis. Other prognostic factors, most of which are known, have now been quantified and confirmed in this prospective study. CONCLUSION: The EORTC trial 22844 has not revealed the presence of radiotherapeutic dose-response for patients with LGG for the two dose levels investigated with this conventional setup, but objective prognostic parameters are recognized. The tumor size or T parameter as used in this study appears to be a very important factor.
PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate strategies to overcome the resistance of anaplastic gliomas of the brain to external beam radiotherapy (ERT) plus carmustine (BCNU). Patients were > or = 15 years of age, had a histologic diagnosis of malignant glioma, and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or = 60%. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In Randomization 1, patients were assigned to receive either ERT alone (61.2 Gy) or ERT plus mitomycin C (Mito, IV 12.5 mg/m(2)) during the first and fourth week of ERT. After this treatment, patients went on to Randomization 2, where they were assigned to receive either BCNU (i.v. 200 mg/m(2)) given at 6-week intervals or 6-mercaptopurine (6- MP, 750 mg/m(2) IV daily for 3 days every six weeks), with BCNU given on the third day of the 6-MP treatment. Three hundred twenty-seven patients underwent Randomization 1. One hundred sixty-four received ERT alone, and 163 received ERT + Mito [average 52.7 years; 63% male; 69% glioblastoma multiforme (GBM); 66% had a resection; 56% KPS > or = 90%]. Step-wise analysis of survival from Randomization 1 or 2 indicates that survival was significantly diminished by: (a) age > or = 45 years (b) KPS < 90%; (c) GBM/gliosarcoma histology; (d) stereotactic biopsy as opposed to open biopsy or resection. Median survival from Randomization 1 in both arms (ERT + Mito) was 10.8 months. Median survival from Randomization 2 was 9.3 months for BCNU/6MP vs. 11.4 months for the BCNU group (p = 0.35). Carmustine/6-MP showed a possible survival benefit for histologies other than GBM/GS. Two hundred and thirty-three patients underwent Randomization 2. The proportion of patients in the ERT group who terminated study prior to Randomization 2 was significantly less in the ERT group than in the ERT + Mito group (20 vs. 37%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: (a) The addition of Mito to ERT had no impact on survival; (b) patients treated with ERT + Mito were at greater risk of terminating therapy prior to Randomization 2; (c) there was not a significant survival benefit to the addition of 6-MP to BCNU.
PURPOSE: To review our experience with pre-radiation chemotherapy for malignant glioma. METHODS: Consecutive adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, anaplastic oligodendroglioma and anaplastic mixed glioma with a Karnofsky Performance Score of 60 or greater were treated with one cycle of procarbazine, lomustine and vincristine or lomustine alone, prior to radiation. Computed tomographic scans were obtained soon after surgery, eight weeks later, after radiation, and at regular intervals thereafter. The effects of chemotherapy and subsequent radiation and durations of tumor control and survival were assessed in this single arm, single center, prospective trial. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients started chemotherapy, 36 were rescanned eight weeks after diagnosis. Five patients (16%) responded to the first cycle of chemotherapy, three had glioblastoma and two anaplastic oligodendroglioma. Seven (19%) progressed during the first cycle, 6 had glioblastoma; with the addition of radiation one progressive case responded, three stabilized, and three continued to progress. Median times to progression and median durations of survival were 26 weeks and 60 weeks for the entire group, 24 weeks and 44 weeks for glioblastoma, and greater than 104 weeks for anaplastic astrocytoma. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with glioblastoma do not respond to one cycle of nitrosourea-based chemotherapy given prior to radiation, but patients with anaplastic oligodendroglioma sometimes do. Patients with anaplastic astrocytoma may not respond to one cycle of chemotherapy, but often respond to subsequent radiation. Judging by survival results, radiation can be delayed eight weeks without appearing to compromise patient outcome. IMPLICATIONS: Pre-radiation chemotherapy with newer agents can be evaluated more fully in the future knowing that brief delays in radiation are unlikely to yield substantially inferior results.