Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Fry

Publications and source records attributed to L Fry.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed1975

Immunoglobulins in the skin in dermatitis herpetiformis and their relevance in diagnosis.

Eighty skin biopsies from fifty patients with dermatitis herpetiformis (DH) have been examined for immunoglobulin deposits by direct immunofluorescence. IgA was found in all fifty patients. However, in two patients no IgA was detected in their first biopsy, and it is stressed that if the clinical suspicion of DH is high and no IgA is found in a single biopsy, then the biopsy should be repeated. There are two distinct patterns of immunoglobulin deposition in DH. The most common form of deposition is seen in the dermal papillae, termed the 'papillary' pattern. This pattern was the only one present in sixty-seven of the seventy-eight biopsies. A less common pattern is that of a 'continuous' line along the dermo-epidermal junction. This was the only pattern of immunoglobulin deposition in nine of the seventy-eight biopsies. In two biopsies both the papillary and continuous patterns were present. IgA was found in all seventy-eight of the positive biopsies and was the only immunoglobulin detected in sixty-seven biopsies. In addition to IgA, IgM was present in seven biopsies, and IgG in two biopsies. In one biopsy IgM and IgG were present with the IgA. The detection of IgA in the uninvolved skin in patients with DH is a simple test to perform, and at the present time is the most reliable way of establishing the diagnosis

Adult↗
PubMed1974

The small intestine in dermatitis herpetiformis.

Small intestinal biopsies from 43 patients with dermatitis herpetiformis have been studied. The diagnosis of dermatitis herpetiformis was made on clinical and histological criteria and the presence of IgA deposits in the uninvolved skin. The macroscopic appearance of the intestinal biopsy was flat in 13, convoluted in 10, leaves only in eight, and fingers and leaves in 12. Twenty small intestinal biopsies from patients who did not have dermatitis herpetiformis or gastrointestinal disorder showed leaves only in three and fingers and leaves in 17. The mean total lymphocyte count per 1000 epithelial cells for this control group was 159 +/- SE 13; for the dermatitis herpetiformis patients with flat biopsies it was 464 +/- SE 27; for the convoluted biopsies 365 +/- SE 59; for leaves only 535 +/- SE 39; and for the fingers and leaves biopsies 301 +/- SE 31. The counts for all four groups are significantly greater than the control group (P < 0.001). Three of the 43 patients with dermatitis herpetiformis had lymphocyte counts below 200 per 1000 epithelial cells, and four of our controls had counts greater than 200 but none above 300. In the control group the mean counts for lymphocytes per 1000 epithelial cells in the basal position of the intestinal epithelium was 79 +/- SE 8; in the dermatitis herpetiformis flat biopsies it was 89 +/- SE 11; for the convoluted biopsies 93 +/- SE 12; for the leaves only biopsies 121 +/- SE 18 and for the fingers and leaves 98 +/- SE 13. However, the mean lymphocyte count in the perinuclear position was 81 +/- SE 7 for the controls, 362 +/- SE 23 for the flat dermatitis herpetiformis biopsies; 251 +/- SE 46 for the convoluted specimens; 402 +/- SE 43 for the leaves only specimens, and 195 +/- SE 25 for the fingers and leaves biopsies. The mean lymphocyte count for the supranuclear position was 0.55 +/- SE 0.22 for the control group; 13.7 +/- SE 2.3 for the flat dermatitis herpetiformis biopsies; 20.0 +/- SE 6.9 for the convoluted biopsies; 14.5 +/- SE 3.3 for the leaves only biopsies; and 8.3 +/- SE 2.6 for the fingers and leaves biopsies. Thus in gluten-sensitive enteropathy the increase in lymphocytes in the intestinal epithelium is in the perinuclear and supranuclear position. The ratio of basal lymphocytes to peri- and supranuclear lymphocytes appears to be 1:1 in normal intestinal epithelium, but approximately 1:4 in the gluten-sensitive enteropathy of dermatitis herpetiformis.

Adult↗
PubMed1973

Antireticulin antibody: incidence and diagnostic significance.

Sera from 101 patients with adult coeliac disease, 46 patients with childhood coeliac disease, 50 patients with dermatitis herpetiformis, and 479 patients with various other diseases, including skin, gastrointestinal, haematological, and immunological disorders, have been tested for the presence of the antireticulin antibody. Positive sera were retested at higher dilutions. Antireticulin antibody was only found in a significant proportion of patients with three diseases, ie, coeliac disease, dermatitis herpetiformis, and Crohn's disease. Antireticulin antibody was present in 38 out of 101 patients (38%) with adult coeliac disease, 27 out of 46 patients (59%) with childhood coeliac disease, 11 out of 50 patients (22%) with dermatitis herpetiformis, and nine out of 38 patients (24%) with Crohn's disease. In the 434 other patients with various disorders the antireticulin antibody was present in only six 1.4%) (two patients were pregnant, one had vitiligo, one had tropical sprue, one had reticulum cell sarcoma, and one had pernicious anaemia). In patients with gluten-sensitive enteropathy, ie, coeliac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis, there was a significantly higher incidence in patients taking a normal diet compared with those on a gluten-free diet. The presence of antireticulin antibody would appear to be particularly helpful in diagnosing childhood coeliac disease as it was found in 22 out of 26 patients (85%) taking a normal diet.

Adult↗