Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Flicker

Publications and source records attributed to L Flicker.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Equity of access to a memory clinic in Melbourne? Non-English speaking background attenders are more severely demented and have increased rates of psychiatric disorders.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare demographic and clinical features of patients from Non-English Speaking Background (NESB) with those from English Speaking Background (ESB) who attended a memory clinic in Melbourne, Australia. METHODS: Data on 556 consecutive patients attending the memory clinic were analysed retrospectively. All patients were assessed by a geriatrician (Italian speaking) or psychogeriatrician with the aid of Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders in the Elderly (CAMDEX) interview schedule. Patients were classified into the categories of dementia, functional psychiatric disorder (including depression), cognitive impairment other than dementia and normal, using ICD 10 criteria. Severity of dementia was determined using the Clinical Dementia Rating scale. Demographic information and use of community services were also documented. RESULTS: Of those seen, 148 (28.8%) were of NESB, the majority Italian (69, 12.4%). Patients of NESB were younger (p = 0.001), less educated (p = 0.001) and less likely to live alone (p = 0.009) compared to persons of ESB. Those of NESB were more likely present with a functional psychiatric disorder (particularly depression) or normal cognition (p = 0.001). Patients of NESB with dementia presented at a later stage of their disease as determined by CDR (p = 0.003). Those of NESB scored significantly lower (more impaired) on CAMCOG in all patients seen (including normal and psychiatric groups) (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and demographic features of people of NESB referred to a memory clinic in Melbourne, Australia, differ from their ESB counterparts, with specific groups being under represented. This has implications for equity of assessment, service provision and utilisation for those of ethnically diverse backgrounds.

Aged↗

Relationships with serum parathyroid hormone in old institutionalized subjects.

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND: Old people in residential care are at the highest risk of any group for hip fracture. This may relate to their high prevalence of hyperparathyroidism. There are few data, however, on relationships with serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) in these individuals. This study therefore examined complex associations with serum PTH in nursing home and hostel residents. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. PATIENTS: One hundred and forty-three nursing home and hostel residents of median age 84 years. MEASUREMENTS: Serum PTH, 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25-(OH)2D), plasma creatinine, phosphate, calcium, albumin, Bsm-1 vitamin D receptor genotype, age, weight and use of frusemide or thiazide. RESULTS: The statistical models determined accounted for half the interindividual variation in serum PTH. Heavier weight was associated with both the prevalence of secondary hyperparathyroidism and the serum concentration of PTH. Novel interactions with serum PTH were identified between: weight and 25OHD; 25OHD and phosphate; and phosphate and thiazide diuretic use. Plasma phosphate was associated with PTH independently of calcium and 1,25-(OH)2D. There was no independent association between PTH and nuclear vitamin D receptor genotype. CONCLUSIONS: Heavier weight is associated with both the prevalence and severity of secondary hyperparathyroidism and consistent with animal models of secondary hyperparathyroidism, phosphate may relate to serum PTH independently of 1,25-(OH)2D or calcium.

Aged↗

Selegiline for Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia in older people accounting for some 60% of cases with late-onset cognitive deterioration. It is now thought that several neurotransmitter dysfunctions are involved from an early stage in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease-associated cognitive decline. The efficacy of selegiline for symptoms of Alzheimer's disease remains controversial and is reflected by its low rate of prescription and the lack of approval by several regulatory authorities in Europe and elsewhere. Reasons for this uncertainty involve the modest overall effects observed in some trials, the lack of benefit observed in several trials, the use of cross-over designs which harbour methodological problems in a disease like dementia and the difficulty in interpreting results from trials when a variety of measurement scales are used to assess outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to assess whether or not selegiline improves the well-being of patients with Alzheimer's disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Group Register of Clinical Trials, was searched using the terms 'selegiline', 'l-deprenyl', "eldepryl" and "monamine oxidase inhibitor-B". MEDLINE, PsycLIT and EMBASE electronic databases were searched with the above terms in addition to using the group strategy (see group details) to limit the searches to randomised controlled trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded, double-blind, randomised controlled trials in which treatment with selegiline was administered for more than a day and compared to placebo in patients with dementia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by the reviewers (JSB & LF), pooled where appropriate and possible, and the weighted or standardised mean differences (95%CI) estimated. Where possible, intention-to-treat data were used but usually the meta analyses were restricted to completers' data (data on people who completed the study). MAIN RESULTS: There are 15 included trials. All trials examined the cognitive effects of selegiline, and in addition, 12 trials examined the behavioural and mood effects. The results of 8 trials suggested some beneficial effect of selegiline in the treatment of cognitive deficits and in 3 trials in the treatment of behaviour and mood. The meta-analysis revealed benefits on memory function as evidenced by improvement in the memory tests from several cognitive tests. Pooling the data for all cognitive tests suggested significant benefits in those subjects treated with selegiline as compared to controls. There were benefits in mood and behaviour as demonstrated by measurements on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Dementia Mood Assessment Scale. The global rating scales showed no effect of selegiline. Unfortunately, the evidence using standardised global cognitive scales was extremely limited, for both the MMSE and ADAS-cog. A variety of adverse effects were recorded, but very few patients left a trial as a direct result of the intervention. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Although the evidence for a beneficial effect of selegiline on patients with Alzheimer's disease is promising there is not yet enough evidence to recommend its use routinely in practice. The individual patient data review will yield further evidence on the effects of selegiline compared to control as would additional studies evaluating the use of selegiline for the endpoints of standardised cognitive scales, clinician impression of global change, dependency and caregiver quality of life.

Alzheimer Disease↗

Piracetam for dementia or cognitive impairment.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical efficacy of piracetam for the features of dementia or cognitive impairment, classified according to the major subtypes of dementia: vascular, Alzheimer's disease or mixed vascular and Alzheimer's disease or unclassified dementia or cognitive impairment not fulfilling the criteria for dementia. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Group Register of Clinical Trials was searched using the terms "piracetam", "nootropic" and "2-oxo-l-pyrrolidine acetamide". Electronic bibliographic databases including Medline, Embase, PychLit, Current Contents, Sociofile were searched back to 1966 with the terms piracetam, nootropics, 2-oxo-1-pyrrolidine and trials. In addition the pharmaceutical company responsible for marketing most of the piracetam worldwide, UCB Pharma, provided a comprehensive list of abstracts, which included many unpublished studies. As many of these unpublished, placebo control studies will be reviewed as possible. SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded trials specified as randomised in which treatment with piracetam was administered for more than a day and compared with placebo in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type, vascular dementia or mixed vascular and Alzheimer's disease or uncalssified dementia or cognitive impairment not fulfilling the criteria for dementia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Each study was independently verified as fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Studies were rated for methodological quality by assessment of blinding and loss before analysis as described by Jadad et al. (1996). Studies were pooled if appropriate and possible, and the pooled odds ratios (95%CI) or the average differences (95%CI) were estimated. Where possible, intention-to-treat data were used. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine if successive elimination of those studies performing most poorly on these quality criteria changed the effect estimate. MAIN RESULTS: Unfortunately, many of these studies were crossover in design and data were unavailable from the first period. In many other studies data were not able to be extracted from the first period. From the data that were pooled there was only one outcome where significant amounts of evidence were available, Global Impression of Change. There was evidence of heterogeneity in the results from the individual studies, Chi squared test = 20.8 (df=5). Using a fixed effects model the odds ratio for improvement in the Piracetem group compared with the Placebo group was 3.55, [95% CI][2.45, 5.16]. If a random effects model was used the odds ratio was 3.47 [1.29, 9.30]. If one single-blind study was excluded, the fixed effects model yielded an odds ratio of 3.36 [2.29, 4.99] and if a random effects model was applied then the odds ratio was 2.89 [1.01, 8.24]. The evidence of effects on cognition and other measures, was inconclusive. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: At this stage the evidence available from the published literature does not support the use of Piracetem in the treatment of people with dementia or cognitive impairment because effects were found only on global impression of change but not on any of the more specific measures. There is a need for further evaluation of piracetam by : 1) Obtaining the data from these studies for an individual patient database review, 2) Performing a randomised trial of Piracetam in patients with diagnoses made by currently accepted diagnostic criteria. Piracetam should be trialled for a period of at least 6 months and preferably longer. Specific cognitive instruments which are sensitive to change, Clinician Global Impression of Change, levels of dependency and caregiver quality of life scales should also be incorporated in such a study.

Alzheimer Disease↗

Lecithin for dementia and cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND: People with Alzheimer's disease have been found to have a relative lack of the enzyme responsible for converting choline into acetylcholine within the brain. Lecithin is a major dietary source of choline, so extra consumption may assist in the production of acetylcholine and reduce some of the symptoms of dementia. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of lecithin in the treatment of dementia or cognitive impairment. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Group Register of Clinical Trials has been searched, as have the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Psychlit, ISI and Current Contents. Reference lists and relevant books have been examined. SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded, randomised trials comparing lecithin with placebo in a treatment period longer than one day, in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type, vascular dementia, mixed vascular and Alzheimer's disease, unclassified or other dementia or unclassified cognitive impairment not fulfilling the criteria for dementia are eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data are extracted by two independent reviewers and cross checked. Meta-analyses are performed when more than one trial provide data on a comparable outcome on sufficiently similar patients. Random effects analyses are performed whenever heterogeneity between results appears to be present. Standardised mean difference are used due do the use of different scales and periods of treatment. Odds ratios for dichotomous data are pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel or DerSimonian and Laird methods. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven randomised trials have been identified involving patients with Alzheimer's disease (265 patients) and Parkinsonian dementia (21 patients). No trials reported any clear clinical benefit of lecithin. Few trials contributed data to meta-analyses. The only statistically significant result was in favour of placebo for adverse events, based on one trial, which appears likely to be a spurious result. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from randomised trials does not support the use of lecithin in the treatment of patients with dementia or cognitive impairment. A moderate effect cannot be ruled out, but results from the small trials to date do not indicate priority for a large randomised trial.

Alzheimer Disease↗

Urine calcium and urine sodium concentrations are not related, after adjustment for urine magnesium.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Urine calcium correlates with urine sodium. The aims of this study were to investigate whether the urine sodium-calcium relationship persists into old age and whether it holds after adjustment for urine magnesium. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive analysis. PATIENTS: Residents of two aged care institutions (median age 84 years) who were not taking diuretics, calcium or vitamin D supplements. MEASUREMENTS: Early morning urine calcium, sodium and magnesium, plasma creatinine and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hormone. RESULTS: Urine calcium correlated with urine sodium (r = 0.29, P < 0.01) and with urine magnesium (r = 0.56, P < 0.001). After adjustment for urine magnesium, the relationship between urine sodium and urine calcium was no longer significant. Forty-five percent of the interindividual variation in urine calcium was explained by a linear model on the basis of urine magnesium and plasma creatinine. CONCLUSION: The data indicate that a correlation between urine sodium and calcium persists in very old age. However, this correlation no longer holds after adjustment for urine magnesium. Further studies examining urine calcium excretion should also consider urine magnesium.

25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2↗

Postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Several years ago, Osteoporosis Australia published Guidelines for the management of osteoporosis. Since then significant advances in our understanding of the treatment of osteoporosis have been published. The importance of this is heightened as early diagnosis is now possible with precise methods of bone density measurement. OBJECTIVE: This article presents updated guidelines developed on behalf of Osteoporosis Australia for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis to help general practitioners identify those women at risk and to review current treatment strategies. DISCUSSION: Osteoporosis and its associated problems are major health concerns in Australia, especially with an ageing population. While important principles of management are still considered to be maximising peak bone mass and prevention of postmenopausal bone loss by oestrogen therapy, new clinical trial data about drugs such as raloxifene and the bisphosphonates have recently become available and the relative role of various agents is gradually becoming clearer.

Accidental Falls↗

Improving the health behaviours of elderly people: randomised controlled trial of a general practice education programme.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the effect of an educational intervention for general practitioners on the health behaviours and wellbeing of elderly patients. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with 1 year follow up. SETTING: Metropolitan general practices in Melbourne, Australia. SUBJECTS: 42 general practitioners and 267 of their patients aged over 65 years. INTERVENTION: Educational and clinical practice audit programme for general practitioners on health promotion for elderly people. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' physical activity, functional status, self rated health, immunisation status, social contacts, psychological wellbeing, drug usage, and rate of influenza vaccination. Primary efficacy variables were changes in outcome measures over 1 year period. RESULTS: Patients in the intervention group had increased (a) walking by an average of 88 minutes per fortnight, (b) frequency of pleasurable activities, and (c) self rated health compared with the control group. No change was seen in drug usage, rate of influenza vaccination, functional status, or psychological wellbeing as a result of the intervention. Extrapolations of the known effect of these changes in behaviour suggest mortality could be reduced by 22% if activity was sustained for 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Education of the general practitioners had a positive effect on health outcomes of their elderly patients. General practitioners may have considerable public health impact in promotion of health for elderly patients.

Aged↗

Do memory clinics improve the quality of life of carers? A randomized pilot trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of attendance at a memory clinic on the psychosocial health of carers. DESIGN: Randomized control trial. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty community dwelling subjects with mild to moderate dementia and their carers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Carer burden, psychological morbidity and psychosocial health related quality of life at 6 and 12 months post intervention. MAIN RESULTS: There was significant improvement in psychosocial health related quality of life of carers as measured by the psychosocial domain of the Functional Limitation Profile (FLP) at 6 months (p < 0.01), including improvement in the subgroups of alertness behaviour (p < 0.05) and social interaction (p < 0.01), after adjustment for age of subject and baseline scores. The improvement in social interaction was maintained at 12 months (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in carer psychological morbidity (General Health Questionnaire), carer burden (Zarit family interview) or carer knowledge of dementia (Dementia Knowledge Test) at 6 or 12 months, between groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate improved psychosocial health related quality of life for carers of those with mild to moderate cognitive impairment attending a memory clinic. Further research in this area is indicated, comparing memory clinic intervention with alternative support.

Aged↗