Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L F Callahan

Publications and source records attributed to L F Callahan.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

The 'side effects' of rheumatoid arthritis: joint destruction, disability and early mortality.

Most patients with RA experience disease progression over periods longer than 5 years, characterized by radiographic joint destruction, declines in functional capacity to perform activities of daily living, frequent work disability, high levels of co-morbidities, and death earlier than expected. These long-term consequences of RA may be viewed as 'side effects' of disease, which must be balanced against possible side effects of drugs in planning treatments of patients with RA. Aggressive approaches, which may include acceptance of mild and even moderate side effects of drugs, may be appropriate in efforts to prevent 'side effects' of RA.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗
PubMed1992

Comparison and sensitivity to change of self-report scales to assess difficulty, dissatisfaction, and pain in performing activities of daily living over one and five years in rheumatoid arthritis.

We analyzed the longitudinal sensitivity to change of three self-report activities of daily living (ADL) scales over 1 and 5 years in 982 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from 15 private practices. Over 1 year, the ADL difficulty status worsened in 28.3% of the patients, remained the same in 50.2%, and improved in 21.5%. Over 5 years, 41.3% worsened, 38.8% stayed the same, and 19.9% were improved. Similar percentages for 1- and 5-year changes were found for the ADL dissatisfaction and pain scales. The effect sizes for change over 1 and 5 years for the ADL difficulty, dissatisfaction, and pain scales were--(-)0.05, 0.01, and -0.02, and -0.28, -0.20, and -0.14, respectively, indicating small to moderate declines. These data indicate that the three ADL scales are sensitive to change in status, and ADL change status scores after 1 and 5 years were significantly correlated with each other (r = 0.49-0.68, all p < 0.001). Monitoring of these three constructs may be helpful in the longitudinal evaluation of some patients with RA.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1992

Identification of work disability in rheumatoid arthritis: physical, radiographic and laboratory variables do not add explanatory power to demographic and functional variables.

Work disability, a common problem in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), is known to be associated with demographic variables such as occupation, age, and formal education, as well as with disease duration. However, physical, radiographic and laboratory variables, which are included in the traditional "medical model" of work disability and collected routinely in the application process, have not been studied for their capacity to explain whether patients are working or receiving work disability payments. A cross-sectional database which included an extensively characterized group of patients with RA was examined to determine possible associations of demographic, functional, physical, radiographic and laboratory variables with work disability status. All these variables differed in patients who were receiving work disability payments and those who were working full time, but in multivariate analyses, work or disability status was best identified by demographic and functional variables. Physical, radiographic, and laboratory data did not add significantly to explanation of work disability status beyond the demographic and functional variables and disease duration, despite the fact that receipt of disability payments was used as the criterion for work disability status.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1992

Quantitative measures to assess, monitor and predict morbidity and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis.

The use of quantitative measures to analyse the long-term course of RA appears to have provided new insights into the severe morbidity and increased mortality rates of this disease. Quantitative assessment of RA may be viewed as an expression of clinical rheumatology as a quantitative science designed to assess accurately the long-term course of disease. The description of the joint count, radiographic scores, laboratory tests, questionnaire measures and physical measures of functional status, as well as the importance of socio-economic status, may provide new insights into the pathogenesis, prevalence, morbidity and mortality of RA.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1992

Longterm drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis in seven rheumatology private practices: I. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.

The probability of continuation of a particular nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) over 5 years was estimated for 1,775 courses taken by 532 patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated in 7 rheumatology private practices. Similar results were seen for 15 different NSAID--48% of courses were continued at 12 months, 36% at 24 months, and 20% at 60 months. Only acetylated salicylates, other than plain aspirin, were continued significantly longer than any of the other NSAID. The probability of continuation of plain aspirin was similar to other NSAID, including nonacetylated salicylates and nonsalicylate NSAID. The first NSAID taken by an individual patient was continued only marginally longer than the 4th NSAID taken by the same patient. While most NSAID courses were not continued for long periods, 20% were continued for longer than 5 years, suggesting effective longterm results in this minority of courses.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed1992

Longterm drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis in seven rheumatology private practices: II. Second line drugs and prednisone.

The probability of continuation of 1,077 courses of 2nd line drugs taken by 532 patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated in 7 rheumatology private practices was examined. This probability was that 50% of courses were continued over 10 months for oral gold, 20 months for hydroxychloroquine, 21 months for penicillamine, 25 months for parenteral gold, 27 months for azathioprine, and more than 60 months for methotrexate (MTX). MTX and prednisone were the only drugs continued by more than 50% of patients after 60 months, while about 20% of courses of other 2nd line drugs other than oral gold were estimated to be continued at 60 months. Estimated drug continuation did not differ significantly according to age, duration of disease, or whether the drug was the first, second, or 3rd 2nd line drug used. Some patients took each 2nd line drug for more than 5 years, suggesting a favorable experience, but most courses were not continued beyond 2 years.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1992

Rheumatology function tests: grip strength, walking time, button test and questionnaires document and predict longterm morbidity and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis.

Four quantitative measures of functional status, grip strength, walking time, the button test, and a questionnaire regarding activities of daily living, were assessed nine years apart in 75 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). After 9 years, 20 patients had died; none were lost to followup. Functional status had declined in more than 80% of patients according to each of the 4 measures, and patients with poor values at baseline were most likely to die over the next 5 years, as reported. We report that baseline values of these measures of functional status were predictive of values 9 years later. These measures may be regarded as "rheumatology function tests" to document and predict morbidity and mortality in RA over long periods.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed1991

The Beck Depression Inventory, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and General Well-Being Schedule depression subscale in rheumatoid arthritis. Criterion contamination of responses.

Three widely used depression scales--the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CES-D), and General Well-Being Schedule depression subscale (GWB-D)--were studied in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Twenty-three rheumatologists identified 19 of the 45 items on these three questionnaires as likely to differ in patients with RA and control subjects because of the presence of RA, regardless of psychological status. Responses to 13 of these 19 individual scale items, designated as "RA-related items," differed significantly in 41 RA patients versus 57 age-matched control subjects. Only three of the other 26 items differed significantly in the two groups. These data extend evidence that responses of people with RA on widely used depression scales might be affected by somatic disease regardless of psychological status.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1991

Reliability of grip strength, walking time and button test performed according to a standard protocol.

Excellent interobserver and intraobserver reliability (reproducibility) was seen for the grip strength, walking time and button test measures in 40 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), when measurement was performed according to a standard protocol. Evidence of reliability, coupled with the observation that baseline measures predict longterm morbidity and mortality in individual patients, suggests that these measures might be more widely used in general rheumatologic care.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed1990

Learned helplessness in systemic lupus erythematosus: analysis using the Rheumatology Attitudes Index.

The Rheumatology Attitudes Index (RAI) was administered to 138 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to determine its reliability and to examine the construct of learned helplessness in patients with this disease. The internal consistency of the RAI was indicated by Cronbach's standardized alpha value (alpha = 0.70). Significant correlations were observed between RAI scores and the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire Activities of Daily Living difficulty (r = 0.34, P less than or equal to 0.001) and dissatisfaction (r = 0.32, P less than or equal to 0.001) scores, the 10-cm visual analog pain scale (r = 0.42, P less than or equal to 0.001), and the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale raw total (r = 0.63, P less than or equal to 0.01). These findings support the external validity of the RAI in SLE. In addition, these data suggest that the learned helplessness construct might be relevant to the outcomes of morbidity and mortality in patients with SLE.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1990

Associations between clinical status questionnaire scores and formal education level in persons with systemic lupus erythematosus.

In a study of 124 systemic lupus erythematosus patients, clinical status, according to 5 questionnaire scales, was poorer in patients with less than or equal to 11 years versus those with greater than or equal to 12 years of formal education. These results were statistically significant when adjusted for age, race, sex, and disease duration, though results on some scales were not significant when adjusted for multiple comparisons. These findings further support observations that formal education level is associated with clinical status in rheumatic and other chronic diseases.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

A clue from a self-report questionnaire to distinguish rheumatoid arthritis from noninflammatory diffuse musculoskeletal pain. The P-VAS:D-ADL ratio.

A clue to distinguishing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from noninflammatory diffuse musculoskeletal pain is described on the basis of 2 self-report questionnaire scales, one to assess difficulty in activities of daily living (D-ADL) and a pain visual analog scale (P-VAS). Patients with RA have significantly higher scores on the D-ADL scale compared with the P-VAS scale, while patients with noninflammatory diffuse musculoskeletal pain show the reciprocal pattern. Therefore, the ratio of the P-VAS:D-ADL scores differed significantly in the 2 groups. Ratios of less than 3 were seen in 67% of RA patients versus 28% of patients with noninflammatory diffuse musculoskeletal pain, while ratios greater than 5 were seen in 27% of patients with noninflammatory diffuse musculoskeletal pain, but not in any patients with RA. This simple ratio is clearly not a diagnostic test, but provides an initial approach to diagnosis in rheumatic diseases using a self-report questionnaire.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1990

Health status reports in the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

We examined the use of formal health status reports every 3 months over 1 year in the clinical care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The reports consisted of single-page, computer-generated summaries of scores derived from either the AIMS (Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales) or the MHAQ (Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire) health status questionnaires. A total of 1920 subjects from 27 community practice sites were randomly assigned to three study groups in each practice: intervention, attention placebo and control. Results showed that 55% of the physicians found the reports to be at least moderately useful as an aid to patient management, primarily for improving the doctor-patient relationship. However, no detectable differences among the three groups were seen in terms of medication compliance, number of physician visits, number of referrals, frequency of major medication changes, attitudes towards the physician, patient satisfaction or change in health status over 1 year. The failure to demonstrate objective benefits of health status reports in this study may be due to physician unfamiliarity with health status scores, failure to link the report with an office visit, the relative stability of clinical status in the subjects over 1 year and the relatively short time-frame of the study.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1990

Problems with the Steinbrocker staging system for radiographic assessment of the rheumatoid hand and wrist.

Hand and wrist radiographs of 202 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were graded with the classical Steinbrocker Staging System, and were also assigned quantitative scores for joint space narrowing, erosion, and malalignment according to a detailed scoring method. Steinbrocker Stage scores were correlated significantly with total detailed scores (r = 0.60 to 0.66, P less than 0.001). However, the ranges of detailed total and subtotal scores among the various Steinbrocker Stage scores were broad, with considerable overlap. Practical problems in applying the Steinbrocker staging method were identified in 26.5% of the hands graded with the Steinbrocker method. Additionally, analysis of scoring data showed discrepancies between the scoring methods in 25.2% of the hands examined; one-half of these discrepancies were felt to result from the global or overall approach of the Steinbrocker method in contrast to individual joint analysis. Asymmetry in assigned stages between right and left hands was found in 15.8% of patients. The detailed scoring method, although more time-consuming, appears superior to the Steinbrocker Stage for quantitative assessment of patient radiographic status in rheumatoid arthritis.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed1989

Self-report questionnaire scores in rheumatoid arthritis compared with traditional physical, radiographic, and laboratory measures.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess whether scores on a simple self-report questionnaire to depict the clinical status of patients with rheumatoid arthritis are correlated with traditional measures of physical, radiographic, laboratory, functional, and global status. DESIGN: The self-report questionnaire was administered at the same time the following variables were assessed: American Rheumatism Association functional class, joint count, hand radiograph, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, rheumatoid factor titer, walking time, grip strength, button test, and global self-assessment. SETTING: University rheumatology clinic, the rheumatology clinic of a Veterans Administration hospital, and a private rheumatology practice. PATIENTS: The study included 259 patients who met the criteria of the American Rheumatism Association for a diagnosis of definite or classic rheumatoid arthritis. INTERVENTIONS: Standard rheumatologic care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Self-report questionnaire scores were significantly correlated with the joint count, radiographic score, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, grip strength, button test, walking time, American Rheumatism Association functional class, and global self-assessment. Patients were categorized into five questionnaire score categories of 1.00, indicating no dysfunction, and 1.01 to 1.50, 1.51 to 2.00, 2.01 to 3.00, and 3.01 to 4.00, indicating progressive dysfunction. In these five categories, more than ten involved joints were seen in 11%, 37%, 67%, 79%, and 100% of patients, respectively, and erythrocyte sedimentation rates greater than 20 mm/h in 29%, 49%, 64%, 74%, and 85% of patients, respectively. Similar results were seen for other physical and radiographic measures. The questionnaire score was as effective in explaining other measures of clinical status as was any other available measure. CONCLUSIONS: A simple self-report questionnaire provides information similar to many traditional measures in rheumatoid arthritis and appears to be an attractive, cost-effective approach to assessing and monitoring quantitatively the status of an individual patient.

Activities of Daily Living↗