Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L E Marks

Publications and source records attributed to L E Marks.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1987

On cross-modal similarity: auditory-visual interactions in speeded discrimination.

A series of four experiments explored how cross-modal similarities between sensory attributes in vision and hearing reveal themselves in speeded, two-stimulus discrimination. When subjects responded differentially to stimuli on one modality, speed and accuracy of response were greater on trials accompanied by informationally irrelevant "matching" versus "mismatching" stimuli from the other modality. Cross-modal interactions appeared in (a) responses to dim/bright lights and to dark/light colors accompanied by low-pitched/high-pitched tones; (b) responses to low-pitched/high-pitched tones accompanied by dim/bright lights or by dark/light colors; (c) responses to dim/bright lights, but not to dark/light colors, accompanied by soft/loud sounds; and (d) responses to rounded/sharp forms accompanied by low-pitched/high-pitched tones. These results concur with findings on cross-modal perception, synesthesia, and synesthetic metaphor, which reveal similarities between pitch and brightness, pitch and lightness, loudness and brightness, and pitch and form. The cross-modal interactions in response speed and accuracy may take place at a sensory/perceptual level of processing or after sensory stimuli are encoded semantically.

Auditory Perception↗
PubMed1987

Binaural versus monaural loudness: supersummation of tone partially masked by noise.

A series of three experiments used the method of magnitude estimation to examine binaural summation of the loudness of a 1000-Hz tone heard in the quiet and against various backgrounds of masking noise. In the quiet, binaural loudness as measured in sones, is twice monaural loudness. Two conditions of noise masking acted to increase the ratio of binaural/monaural loudness in sones above 2:1--that is, to produce supersummation. (1) When tone was presented to both ears, but masking noise to just one ear (dichotic stimulation), the loudness of the binaural tone was 30%-35% greater than the sum of the loudness of the monaural components. This increase in summation provides a suprathreshold analog to increases in threshold sensitivity observed with dichotic stimulation (masking-level differences). (2) Supersummation was also evident when tone and noise alike were presented to both ears (diotic stimulation); here, the binaural tone's loudness was 10%-25% greater than the sum of the monaural components. The increase in summation with diotic stimulation may be related to the characteristics of binaural summation of the noise masker itself.

Dominance, Cerebral↗
PubMed1987

Perceiving similarity and comprehending metaphor.

We conducted a series of 3 experiments to assess the comprehension of 4 types of cross-modal (synesthetic) similarities in nearly 500 3.5-13.5-year-old children and more than 100 adults. We tested both perceptual and verbal (metaphoric) modes. Children of all ages and adults matched pitch to brightness and loudness to brightness, thereby showing that even very young children recognize perceptual similarities between hearing and vision. Children did not consistently recognize similarity between pitch and size until about age 11. This difference in developmental timetables is compatible with the view that pitch-brightness and loudness-brightness similarities are intrinsic characteristics of perception (characteristics based, perhaps, on common sensory codes), whereas pitch-size similarity may be learned (perhaps through association of size with resonance properties). In a parallel verbal task, even 4-year-old children showed at least some capacity to translate meanings metaphorically from one modality to another (e.g., rating "low pitched" as dim and "high pitched" as bright). But not all literal meanings produced metaphoric equivalents in the youngest children (e.g., rating "sunlight" brighter but not louder than "moonlight"). Improvements with age in making metaphoric translations of synesthetic expressions paralleled increasing differentiation of meanings along literal dimensions and increasing capacity to integrate meanings of components in compound expressions. We postulate that perceptual knowledge about objects and events is represented in terms of locations in a multidimensional space; cross-modal similarities imply that the space is also multimodal. Verbal processes later gain access to this graded perceptual knowledge, thus permitting the interpretation of synesthetic metaphors according to the rules of cross-modal perception.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1986

On the cross-modal perception of intensity.

Are cross-modality matches based on absolute equivalences between the intensities of perceptual experiences in different senses, or are they based on relative positions within the respective sets of stimuli? To help answer this question, we conducted a series of three experiments; in each the levels of stimulus magnitude in one modality stayed constant while the levels in the other changed from session to session. Results obtained by two methods--magnitude matching and cross-modal difference estimation--agreed in revealing the following: First, the cross-modality matches seem to represent in all cases a compromise between absolute equivalence and relative (contextual) comparison, the compromise being about 50-50 for both auditory loudness versus vibratory loudness and auditory loudness versus visual brightness, but more nearly, though not wholly, absolute for perceived auditory duration versus visual duration. Second, individual variations abounded, with some subjects evidencing totally absolute matching, others totally relative matching (with little consistency, however, between tasks or between comparisons of different pairs of modalities). Third, the judgments of cross-modal difference were consistent with a model of linear subtraction, and in the case of loudness, the underlying scale was roughly compatible with Stevens's sone scale. Finally, a model designed to describe sequential dependencies in response can account for at least part of the context-induced changes in cross-modal equivalence.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1986

Taste and aging.

Taste thresholds are known to rise with age, but the status of suprathreshold sensations is less clear. The present study assessed the perceived intensities of sodium chloride, sucrose, citric acid, and quinine hydrochloride with the method of magnitude matching. This method takes advantage of participants' ability to judge sensations from two sensory continua (in this case taste intensity and loudness) on a common intensity scale, in effect, matching them. Elderly and young adults matched most of the moderate and strong tastes to the same loudnesses. If the sounds were equivalently loud to elderly and young adults, then these results would mean that moderate and strong tastes were also equivalently strong, that is, taste sensation had not faded for our elderly adults. Water and dilute taste solutions were matched to louder sounds by elderly than young participants. This may reflect the presence of a mild dysgeusia (background taste).

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1984

Individual differences in loudness processing and loudness scales.

Parameters of the psychophysical function for loudness (a 1000-Hz tone) were assessed for individual subjects in three experiments: (a) binaural loudness summation, (b) temporal loudness summation, and (c) judgments of loudness intervals. The loudness scales that underlay the additive binaural summation closely approximated S. S. Stevens's (1956) sone scale but were nonlinearly related to the scales that underlay the subtractive interval judgments, the latter approximating Garner's (1954) lambda scale. Interindividual differences in temporal summation were unrelated to differences in scaling performance or in binaural summation. Although the exponents of magnitude-estimation functions and the exponents underlying interval judgments varied considerably from subject to subject, exponents computed on the basis of underlying binaural summation varied less. The results suggest that interindividual variation in the exponent of magnitude-estimation functions largely reflects differences in the ways that subjects use numbers to describe loudnesses and that the sensory representations of loudness are fairly uniform, though probably not wholly uniform, among people with normal hearing. The magnitude of individual variation in at least one measure of auditory intensity processing, namely, temporal summation, seems at least as great as the magnitude of the variation in the underlying loudness scale.

Adult↗
PubMed1983

Similarities and differences among the senses.

Each sense department appears specialized to process certain types of information. Yet the senses display similarities of function as well. Some of these similarities are superficial but others are deeper; they appear at four levels: (1) phenomenology; (2) information processing; (3) psychophysics; (4) neurophysiology. Similarities (and differences) at these levels may bear on sensory substitution in neural prosthetic devices (for instance, on tactile systems that could provide speech and spatial lay-out information to the deaf and blind). Examples of similarities appear in: (1) synesthetic resemblances between the attributes of pitch (hearing) and brightness (vision); (2) the identification of shapes by sight and by touch; (3) the skin as a model for the retina and for the cochlea. However, these similarities provide limited direct application to sensory aids. Several tactile systems (e.g., Braille, Optacon, Tadoma) do not rely on modes of functioning simply translated from one modality to another. It may be better to focus on the differences rather than on the similarities among the senses, and to gear sensory aids to the substitution modality's particular strengths.

Humans↗
PubMed1982

Thermal stimulus thresholds: sources of variability.

Thresholds to warming and cooling by a small Peltier stimulator were measured and remeasured in 24 adults and children aged 7-9. The median thresholds to warming and cooling of the forearm were +1.04 and -.15 degrees C. respectively, and neither age nor sex mattered significantly. The test-retest correlation was significant, suggesting intra-subject reliability, despite a large range of thresholds across subjects-about an order of magnitude. Measurements of skin temperature revealed that the same stimulus can cause a greater degree of warming or cooling in one subject than another. These differences proved reliable on retesting. Surprisingly, however, there was no correlation between this physical variation among people and the size of their psychophysical thresholds. Some compensatory mechanism is suggested by these data; the implication is that people who are less responsive physically may be more sensitive neurally and vice versa.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

Synesthetic perception and poetic metaphor.

To explore the role of cross-modal perception in the apprehension of synesthetic metaphors, subjects read 15 short lines from poetry, each of which contained a metaphor relating visual and auditory qualities; the subjects' task was to set the loudness of a 1000-Hz tone and the brightness of a white light to match the levels implied by each metaphor. The sound settings and light settings suggest that a cross-modal equivalence between loudness and brightness largely underlay the responses to the metaphors. This general cross-modal equivalence was characterized by some notable intersubject differences and was modified, in part, by certain metaphors that resisted complete equivalence. Even so, the metaphorically induced settings of loudness and brightness are mainly governed by a cross-modality matching function that is qualitatively like the relation found in people with visual-auditory synesthesia, and that is quantitatively like the function obtained in more traditional psychophysical studies.

Humans↗
PubMed1982

Bright sneezes and dark coughs, loud sunlight and soft moonlight.

Synesthetic metaphors (such as "the dawn comes up like thunder") are expressions in which words or phrases describing experiences proper to one sense modality transfer their meanings to another modality. In a series of four experiments, subjects used scales of loudness, pitch, and brightness to evaluate the meanings of a variety of synesthetic (auditory-visual) metaphors. Loudness and pitch expressed themselves metaphorically as greater brightness; in turn, brightness expressed itself as greater loudness and as higher pitch. Although loudness thus shared with brightness a metaphorical connection, pitch and brightness showed a connection that was closer and that applied more generally to different kinds of visual brightness. The ways that people evaluate synesthetic metaphors emulate the characteristics of synesthetic perception, thereby suggesting that synesthesia in perception and synesthesia in language both may emenate from the same source-from a phenomenological similarity in the makeup of sensory experiences of different modalities.

Adult↗