Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L E Gerweck

Publications and source records attributed to L E Gerweck.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Enhancement of cysteamine cytotoxicity by hyperthermia and its modification by catalase and superoxide dismutase in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Chinese hamster ovary cells were exposed to the sulfhydryl compound cysteamine at concentrations ranging from 0 to 8 mM for 120 min. No toxicity was found in cells maintained at 5 degrees during treatment; however, at 37 degrees and 44 degrees a paradoxical toxicity was observed, i.e., substantial toxicity was observed at cysteamine concentrations of 0.2 to 1 mM but decreased at higher drug concentrations. When drug-treated cells were exposed to a 30-min 44 degrees -heat treatment (surviving fraction, 0.15 in the absence of drug) toxicity was markedly enhanced. At 0.4 mM cysteamine, the surviving fraction was approximately 0.6 at 5 degrees, 0.01 at 37 degrees, and 0.00008 when the 44 degrees -heat treatment was also used. Cysteamine toxicity was not modified by the addition of superoxide dismutase (10 micrograms/ml) but was completely blocked by the addition of catalase (50 micrograms/ml) over the drug concentration range of 0.2 to 2.0 mM. Cysteamine autoxidation as measured by O2 uptake at 0.4 mM proceeds through hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production as evidenced by the regeneration of O2 upon the addition of catalase. In contrast, at 4.0 mM cysteamine, O2 regeneration was not pronounced. The data suggest that the production of H2O2 is the first reaction step in the mechanism of cysteamine toxicity. The subsequent production of highly reactive oxygen species like hydroxyl radicals (.OH) from H2O2 in the presence of reduced metal (Fenton chemistry) probably leads to the observed cellular toxicity.

Animals↗

Effect of pH on single or fractionated heat treatments at 42-45 degrees.

The temperature dependency of the pH-sensitizing effect was determined in cells exposed to single or fractionated heat treatments over the temperature range of 42-45 degrees. Chinese hamster ovary cells were exposed to single graded heat treatments or to an initial heat treatment followed 10 hr later by second heat treatments. Sensitization was quantitated by comparing survival curve terminal slopes of cells heated at pH 7.4 or pH 6.7. Reduction in pH increased the sensitivity of cells exposed to single or fractionated treatments. The magnitude of this sensitizing effect was most pronounced at 42 degrees, regardless of the fractionation scheme and decreased with increasing temperature. At survival levels below approximately 0.15, low pH sensitization was greater by a factor of 2 in cells exposed to fractionated compared to single heat treatments over the temperature range of 43-45 degrees. The increased sensitivity of cells exposed to fractionated heat treatments occurred as a result of reduction in medium pH between heat treatments which inhibited the development of thermoltolerance.

Animals↗

Kinetics of thermotolerance decay in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

The kinetics of thermotolerance decay and cell proliferation was determined following initial heat treatments of 10 or 30 min at 44 degrees in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Thermotolerance was more pronounced following the longer initial heat treatment, but maximal tolerance developed by 10 hr in both cases. After its maximal development, tolerance decayed in an exponential manner. The half-times of tolerance decay were 11 or 16 hr following 10- or 30-min pretreatments. Thermotolerance was apparent in the progeny of heated cells for 4 to 5 postheat cell generations.

Animals↗

Influence of low pH on the development and decay of 42 degrees C thermotolerance in CHO cells.

The development, magnitude and decay of thermotolerance in Chinese hamster ovary cells heated to 42 degrees C at pH 6.7 was examined. The cells were exposed to single or fractionated heat treatments with 0 to 168 hours elapsing between the treatments. Administration of a specified heat treatment in two fractions at low pH substantially reduced the lethal effect of heat. The rate of hyperthermic cell killing was reduced by a factor of approximately 2.5 in preheated cells compared to cells not receiving prior heat treatment. Tolerance to second heat treatments was apparent when 3 hours at 37 degrees C separated the treatments, and was near maximum when 6 hours separated the treatments. Beginning about 96 hours after the initial heat treatment, resistance to second heat treatments began to decline, and was not evident when 168 hours at 37 degrees C separated the treatments. In contrast to these results, a sparing effect as a result of dose fraction was not observed at pH 7.4. At pH 7.4, cells developed thermotolerance during the initial heat treatment and additional culturing at 37 degrees C was without additional effect. Nevertheless, the sensitivity of cells to hyperthermia was greater at pH 6.7 than at pH 7.4. This pH sensitizing effect was more pronounced in cells exposed to single heat treatments than in cells exposed to fractionated treatments at 42 degrees C.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

Effect of microenvironmental factors on the response of cells to single and fractionated heat treatments.

The thermal sensitivity of cells is substantially influenced by variations in the concentration of hydrogen ions, glucose, and oxygen under certain conditions. The clinical significance of these observations is based on the reported differences in concentration of these metabolites in normal and tumor interstitial fluid. In general, tumor-like nutritional conditions sensitize cells to hyperthermia. However, these sensitizing effects may be cell line and temperature dependent and may be modified by fractionated heat treatments. Data relevant to these considerations are reviewed and their clinical relevancy is discussed.

Aerobiosis↗

Influence of pH on the thermal sensitivity of cultured human glioblastoma cells.

The hyperthermic sensitivity of cultured human glioblastoma cells was determined in 1 degree increments from 42 through 46 degrees over the pH range of 6.1 to 7.4. These cells were 5 to 10 times less heat sensitive than were Chinese hamster ovary cells and are among the most resistant cells examined in cell culture. At pH 7.4, the rate of cell killing doubles with each 1 degree increase in temperature above 44 degrees, a phenomenon previously observed in other cell lines heated above 43 degrees. It is speculated that thermotolerance develops during heat treatment and accounts for this apparent resistance to heat below 44 degrees. Reduction in medium pH from 7.4 to 7.0 during heat treatment did not significantly influence thermal sensitivity; however, below pH 7.0 a pH-sensitizing effect was increasingly evident. The magnitude of this sensitizing effect, determined from survival curve slope ratios, was temperature dependent and was most pronounced at temperatures which were moderately lethal at pH 7.4. At pH 6.7, heat sensitivity was increased from a factor of congruent to 1.25 at 46-44 degrees to 2 at 43 degrees compared to treatment at pH 7.4. This pH-sensitizing effect and its temperature dependency was more pronounced at pH 6.1.

Cell Survival↗

Influence of pH on the response of cells to single and split doses of hyperthermia.

The time course of development and loss of thermotolerance in Chinese hamster ovary cells exposed to 42 degrees was determined. The influence of pH on the heat sensitivity of normal and thermotolerant cells was examined. Exposure of cells to single graded heat treatments at pH 7.4 resulted in a decrease in survival to 5 to 10% after 3 to 4 hr treatment. Continued heating for an additional 4 to 5 hr resulted in an additional decrease in survival by a factor of only 1 to 2. At pH 6.7, exposure of cells to single heat treatments caused a marked reduction in survival to congruent to 0.02% after 3 hr treatment, and resistance to further killing was not evident until survival decreased to congruent to 0.001%. Cells initially heated at pH 7.4 for 3 hr and then stored at 37 degrees remained resistant to additional treatment for up to 48 hr later. Thermotolerance began to decay 72 hr after the initial treatment and was lost when 144 hr separated the treatments. The marked resistance to second treatments was observed irrespective of the pH at the time of the second treatment. Parallel studies also established that the viable progeny of heated cells remained resistant to hyperthermia for more than one postheat generation. These studies suggest that low pH conditions occurring in tumors may be expected to maximally influence response when fractionation intervals are sufficiently long that thermotolerance decays between treatments.

Animals↗

Response of cells to hyperthermia under acute and chronic hypoxic conditions.

The lethal response of Chinese hamster cells heated to 42 degrees was determined following 0 to 30 hr culturing under hypoxic conditions. Oxygenated and acutely hypoxic cells were equally sensitive to hyperthermia; however, sensitivity increased with the time of culturing under hypoxic conditions prior to treatment. Three hr at 42 degrees resulted in a surviving fraction of approximately or equal to 0.1 under acute hypoxic conditions and less than 0.001 for cells cultured for 30 hr under oxygen-deprived conditions before the heat treatment. The increased sensitivity to hyperthermia was was due in part to a decrease in the pH of the medium which occurred as a result of cell metabolism; this could be reversed by increasing pH to 7.3 immediately prior to heat treatment. However, even under fully controlled pH conditions, prolonged oxygen deprivation increased hyperthermic cell killing by a factor of approximately or equal to 5. This effect was not reversed by returning the cells to normal oxygen tension prior to treatment. These data demonstrate that tumorlike microenvironmental conditions (reduced O2 tension and pH) substantially increase the sensitivity of cells to 42 degrees hyperthermia.

Animals↗

Cellular responses to combinations of hyperthermia and radiation.

The two principal rationales for applying hyperthermia in cancer therapy are that: (a) the S phase, which is relatively radioresistant, is the most sensitive phase to hyperthermia, and can be selectively radiosensitized by combining hyperthermia with x-irradiation; the cycling tumor cells in S phase which would normally survive an x-ray dose could thus be killed by subjecting these cells to hyperthermia; and (b) the relatively radioresistant hypoxic cells in the tumor may be selectively destroyed by combinations of hyperthermia and x-irradiation. Both of these rationales have been mentioned as reasons for using high LET irradiation in cancer therapy; therefore where such irradiation may be of use, hyperthermia may also be advantageous.

Animals↗