Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L D Voss

Publications and source records attributed to L D Voss.

43 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

The reliability of height and height velocity in the assessment of growth (the Wessex Growth Study)

Both biochemical and auxological measurements can be used to assess growth. Quality control in routinely reported in laboratory studies, but the reproducibility of height measurements, and the height velocity data derived from them, is seldom considered. We have previously established our error and in this report we examine its implications for the screening of short children and subsequent monitoring of their growth. The 95% confidence interval for height for a 5 year old observed to be on the 3rd centile for height, spanned the 2nd-4th centile. However, the confidence interval for a 12 month height velocity appropriate to such a child spanned the 8th-52nd centiles, the lower limit pathological and the upper more than satisfactory. A single height velocity even over 12 months therefore lacks the precision to provide a reliable index of current growth in short children. Furthermore, serial height velocity calculations on a cohort of 78 short normal children showed no significant correlation from year to year, suggesting that velocity is also unable to predict future growth. Although the proportion of this cohort of short children lying beneath the 25th centile for velocity remained constant from year to year, the identity of the individuals comprising that proportion changed, a phenomenon which could be largely accounted for by the random error associated with height velocity. Our data suggest that, by the time a trend in abnormal velocity is reliably established, a deviation from the height centiles is clearly evident. Although velocity charts are attractive in concept, they seem to be no more discriminating than height charts in practice, and may be clinically deceptive unless interpreted with great care.

Body Height↗
PubMed1990

Treatment of short normal children with growth hormone--a cautionary tale?

41 short normal children were randomly allocated either to daily injections of growth hormone (rhGH) at 30 IU/m2 per week or to no treatment. 6 months of rhGH therapy produced up to 76% loss of fat mass and up to 25% increase in lean body mass (LBM). These changes were significantly different from those in the untreated group. LBM was the main determinant of resting energy expenditure (REE) expressed as kJ/24 h. REE expressed as kJ/kg LBM per 24 h correlated negatively with height, which was responsible for 66% of the variance in REE kJ/kg LBM per 24 h. Short children therefore expend more energy than tall children in fulfilling basic metabolic needs. After 6 months REE kJ/24 h increased significantly in treated children. However, treated children did not differ significantly from untreated children in REE kJ/kg LBM per 24 h. rhGH does not therefore seem to have a specific effect upon REE. The possibility that rhGH produces profound metabolic effects should limit its use in otherwise healthy children until the mechanism of action is more clearly elucidated.

Body Composition↗
PubMed1990

The reliability of height measurement (the Wessex Growth Study).

The two major components of reliability are accuracy and reproducibility. Three studies of the reliability of height measurement in children are reported. In the first, a standard metre rod was used to spot check the accuracy of installation of 230 measuring instruments in one health district in Wessex, UK. The readings obtained ranged from 90.0 to 108.5 cm and showed the urgent need for the positioning of instruments to be regularly checked. In a second study, to examine the reproducibility of height measurement, two experienced observers measured 10 young children (106.0 to 152.0 cm), three times on five instruments of different design. The observations were blind and in random order. The estimated standard deviation for a single height measurement was generally in the range 0.2-0.3 cm. Over 95% of the variance was attributable to the child, very little to the instrument or observer. Finally, the conditions of the second study were modified to examine the effect on reproducibility of non-blind and non-randomised measurements, as usually occurs in the clinic. A lower but inevitably false estimate of the error was obtained. It is recommended that the error of height measurement, appropriately established and expressed in simple terms, be stated in every published growth study.

Anthropometry↗