Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Cataliotti

Publications and source records attributed to L Cataliotti.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

EUSOMA accreditation of breast units.

EUSOMA (European Society of Mastology) is the organisation representing Breast Cancer Specialists in all disciplines, covering all aspects of breast cancer from risk and prevention, through diagnosis and treatment of the primary tumour, follow-up, treatment of recurrent and advanced disease, pathology, reconstruction, psychology and audit. EUSOMA Guidelines have been published on several aspects of breast cancer and are on service provision as well as giving clinical guidance and providing the basis for audit.

Accreditation↗
PubMed2005

Avoiding axillary dissection in breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial to assess the role of axillary radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The need to dissect axillary nodes in patients with early breast cancer and clinically negative axilla remains controversial. The aim of the study was to assess the role of axillary radiotherapy (RT) in reducing axillary metastases in patients with early breast cancer who did not receive axillary dissection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1995 to 1998, 435 patients over 45 years old with breast cancer up to 1.2 cm and no palpable axillary nodes were randomized 214 to breast conservation without axillary treatment and 221 to breast conservation plus axillary RT. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 63 months, overt axillary metastases were fewer than expected: three cases in the no axillary treatment group (1.5%) and one in the RT group (0.5%). Expected cases were 43 in the no axillary treatment group and 10 in the RT group. Rates of distant metastases and local failures were low, and 5-year disease free survival was 96.0% (95% confidence interval, 94.1%-97.9%) without significant differences between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that occult axillary metastases might never become clinically overt and axillary dissection might be avoided in patients with small carcinomas and a clinically negative axilla. Axillary RT seems to protect the patients from axillary recurrence almost completely.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

The management of elderly patients with T1-T2 breast cancer treated with or without radiotherapy.

AIM: The aim of the current study is to identify a subgroup of patients with breast cancer who have a low risk of local recurrence after conservative surgery in order to avoid radiotherapy treatment. METHODS: A group of 472 patients underwent conservative surgery without radiotherapy, and it was compared to a second group of 755 patients with similar characteristics, but who had received radiotherapy treatment (RT) after conservative surgery. RESULTS: Breast relapse's univariate analysis demonstrated statistical significance for the following factors: radiotherapy treatment, clinical stage, pathological stage, positive axillary nodes and tumour grading. Different results were obtained studying breast relapse. In the no-RT group breast relapse was 10.6% while in the irradiated group it was 3.4%. The breast relapse incidence decreases as the age of the patients increases especially over 75 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, there is clinical evidence of avoiding adjuvant radiotherapy for patients over 75 years with T1-T2 cancer treated with quadrantectomy with a clear excision margin.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Monitoring surgical treatment of screen-detected breast lesions in Italy.

The object of this study was to assess quality of care and adherence to treatment guidelines of screen-detected lesions in Italy using a new audit system. Data on screen-detected cases surgically treated in 1997 were collected using a system (QT 2.3) developed within the Italian Group for Planning and Evaluating Mammographic Screening Programmes (GISMa) and the European Breast Cancer Screening Network. Results of 18 performance parameters were considered compared with the reference standards. In 1997, 515 lesions (335 invasive, 60 in situ and 120 benign) in 496 patients were collected from 14 departments in the Central and Northern area of Italy. The 18 indicators were analysed and grouped according to six quality objectives. Some results were good and others were excellent, such as intraoperative identification, breast conservation surgery, adequate axillary procedures and completeness of pathology reports, but most of them failed: waiting times, preoperative diagnosis, employment of frozen section on small lesions and avoiding axillary procedures in ductal carcinoma-in-situ. This work is a first attempt in Italy to evaluate and uniform the criteria adopted for quality control of breast cancer treatment, using a standardised system. Some results are good or excellent, the overall level of compliance with quality indicators is not satisfactory and corrective actions should be undertaken for a number of issues. A continuous monitoring should be performed and appropriate action taken in order to verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions and to provide screen-detected patients with the best quality of care.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2004

Measurement of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 mRNA in breast cancer and corresponding normal tissue.

Somatostatin analogs are effective in inhibiting growth of human breast cancer cell lines. These antiproliferative effects are mediated by specific receptors located on cell membranes. The somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (sst2) is the principal mediator of somatostatin effects in normal and cancer cells, and its presence has already been demonstrated in breast cancer. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of the expression of sst2 by quantifying its mRNA in a large group of infiltrating breast cancers and their corresponding normal tissues. The expression of sst2 mRNA was measured with quantitative real time RT-PCR in 169 breast cancers and in their corresponding unaffected tissues. We evaluated the association of sst2 expression with the commonest clinical-pathologic features of breast cancer. The correlation with a marker of cell proliferation (Ki-67) and with receptor concentration was also evaluated. In cancer tissues, we found that the absolute concentrations of sst2 mRNA were significantly higher in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive samples (P=0.002) as well as in lymph-node-negative cancers (P=0.04) (Student's t-test or one-way ANOVA). In addition, sst2 mRNA was significantly higher in breast cancers than in corresponding unaffected tissues (P=0.0002). However, when the clinical-pathologic parameters were considered, this gradient maintained its statistical significance only in tumors expressing positive prognostic markers, such as the presence of ER (P=0.0005) and progesterone receptors (PgR) (P=0005), and the lack of lymph-node involvement (P=0.0003). The same difference was also significant in postmenopausal women (P=0.001) and in T1 patients (P=0.001). In addition, sst2 mRNA expression was significantly higher (P=0.008) in low-proliferating breast cancers. Finally, we found that the quantitative expression of sst2 mRNA was directly related to the PgR concentration in breast cancer tissues (P<0.001). Our data seem to indicate that an upregulation of sst2 gene expression is a common feature of breast cancers which, on the basis of conventional predictive parameters, are expected to have a better prognosis. Featuring a possible role of somatostatin analogs in combined endocrine therapies for breast cancer, our results seem to confirm that the sst2 status of the tumor should be previously investigated.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Effects of patient selection on the applicability of results from a randomised clinical trial (EORTC 10853) investigating breast-conserving therapy for DCIS.

Selection of patients for randomised clinical trials may have a large impact on the applicability of the study results to the general population presenting the same disorder. However, clinical characteristics and outcome data on non-entered patients are usually not available. The effects of patient selection for the EORTC 10853 trial investigating the role of radiotherapy in breast conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ have been studied, in an analysis of all patients treated for ductal carcinoma in situ in five participating institutes. The reasons for not entering patients were evaluated and treatment results of the randomised patients were compared to those not entered. A total of 910 patients were treated for ductal carcinoma in situ. Of these, 477 (52%) were ineligible, with the size of the lesion being the main reason for ineligibility (30% of all ductal carcinoma in situ). Of the 433 eligible patients, 278 (64%) were randomised into the trial. The main reasons for non-entry of eligible patients were either physicians' preference for one of the treatment arms (26%) or patients' refusal (9%). These percentages showed significant variation among the institutes. At 4 years follow-up, those patients not entered in the trial and treated with local excision and radiotherapy, had higher local recurrence rates than the patients randomised in the trial and treated with the same approach, (17 vs 2%, P=0.03). The patients treated with local excision alone had equal local recurrence rates (11% in both groups). Selection of patients may explain the differences in outcome of the randomised patients, and those not-entered. Thus, the results of this trial may not be applicable to all patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Breast-conserving therapy for Paget disease of the nipple: a prospective European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer study of 61 patients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to assess the outcome of breast-conserving therapy by means of a cone excision and radiotherapy in patients with Paget disease of the nipple without associated invasive breast carcinoma. METHODS: Between 1987 and 1998, 61 eligible patients were registered in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study 10873. The majority of patients (97%) presented without an associated palpable mass. At histologic examination, the majority (93%%) of patients had an underlying ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); in the remaining 7%, only Paget disease was found. Treatment was comprised of a complete excision of the nipple-areolar complex including the underlying breast tissue with tumor free margins, followed by external irradiation to the whole breast (50 gray in 25 fractions). The primary endpoint was local recurrence. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 4 of the 61 patients developed a recurrence in the treated breast (1 patient with DCIS and 3 patients with invasive disease). One patient with an invasive local recurrence died of disseminated breast carcinoma. The 5-year local recurrence rate was 5.2% (95% confidence interval, 1.8-14.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Breast-conserving therapy is a feasible alternative for patients with Paget disease and a limited extent of underlying DCIS. To achieve good local control, treatment should be comprised of a complete excision of the nipple-areolar complex including the underlying disease, followed by irradiation to the whole breast.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

[Somatostatin receptors in non-endocrine tumours].

The study of the antiproliferative action of somatostatin (ss) is important not only to understand the regulation of neuroendocrine tumours that express receptors (sst), but also non-endocrine tumours which express these receptors. We previously demonstrated the presence of sst2 in a wide panel of cell lines from human neuroblastoma. Although hypotheses have been put forward that treatment with ss or its analogs may be beneficial in oncological patients, this does not appear to be the case in neuroblastoma; patients with high sst2 levels (who are therefore sensitive to ss treatment) have per se a relatively positive outcome. Therefore, adjuvant treatment with ss is not necessary. Viceversa, patients with a poor prognosis are essentially characterized by a low expression of sst2 (and therefore are insensitive to a therapy with ss). In these patients adjuvant treatment with ss might be indicated, but would have little chance of success. Although the majority of neuroendocrine tumours expresses sst2, pancreas and prostate cancer express sst1 but not sst2, and are therefore insensitive to octreotide treatment which binds preferentially to sst2. Tumours like colorectal carcinoma and breast cancer also express sst2 in their more favourable forms. However, the concentration of sst2 in colorectal cancer is similar, if not lower than that in the surrounding normal tissue. Therefore, the probability of successful adjuvant therapy with ss is relatively low. In breast cancer, it is possible that sensitivity to estrogens may have a positive influence on the expression of sst2. This might justify clinical trials with ss in breast cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Principles and guidelines for surgeons--management of symptomatic breast cancer. On behalf of the European Society of Surgical Oncology.

The European Society of Surgical Oncology is actively involved in the promotion of a high standard of surgical oncology throughout Europe. Such an ambition involves recognition of Centres of Excellence in the management of cancer patients throughout Europe. These centres have a multi-disciplinary system involved in the total care of patients with cancer and are concerned with the delivery of care to the highest available standards. It is accepted that not all patients with cancer can, nor should, necessarily be treated in such highly specialized centres. Yet all cancer patients should be guaranteed a high standard of care. High surgical standards can be ensured if surgeons treating cancer are trained in specialist centres and, when in independent practice, follow established guidelines or protocols of treatment. In common with many national surgical oncology societies, the European Society of Surgical Oncology is in the process of establishing good practice guidelines in the treatment of solid tumours. This document on the management of symptomatic breast cancer is the first of a series of guidelines to be proposed by ESSO. It draws heavily on excellent documents already in existence from the British Association of Surgical Oncology and from the Danish Breast Cancer Co-Operative Group. It is hoped that this document will be sufficiently clear and purposeful to be of help to the individual surgeon and yet sufficiently flexible to allow it to be adopted in the different medical systems throughout Europe.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1998

European guidelines for quality assurance in the surgical management of mammographically detected lesions. European Breast Cancer Working Group.

The European Guidelines developed for mammography screening have contributed to the general discussion on quality assurance and the important tasks of the health professionals dealing with breast cancer screening. The cooperation of each medical discipline is of utmost importance in order to achieve optimal results and eventually a mortality reduction. The following guidelines are based on the British NHS quality assurance guidelines for surgeons in breast cancer screening and modified to meet the different needs in the European Countries. The term "surgeon" denotes a medical doctor trained and involved in the surgical treatment of breast diseases. The members of the working group who participated in order to adapt these guidelines are listed above. We hope that this document will contribute towards a more comprehensive approach of breast cancer screening-detected lesions throughout Europe.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1997

Principles and guidelines for surgeons--management of symptomatic breast cancer. European Society of Surgical Oncology.

The European Society of Surgical Oncology is actively involved in the promotion of a high standard of surgical oncology throughout Europe. Such an ambition involves recognition of Centres of Excellence in the management of cancer patients throughout Europe. These centres have a multi-disciplinary system involved in the total care of patients with cancer and are concerned with the delivery of care to the highest available standards. It is accepted that not all patients with cancer can, nor should, necessarily be treated in such highly specialized centres. Yet all cancer patients should be guaranteed a high standard of care. High surgical standards can be ensured if surgeons treating cancer are trained in specialist centres and, when in independent practice, follow established guidelines or protocols of treatment. In common with many national surgical oncology societies, the European Society of Surgical Oncology is in the process of establishing good practice guidelines in the treatment of solid tumours. This document on the management of symptomatic breast cancer is the first of a series of guidelines to be proposed by ESSO. It draws heavily on excellent documents already in existence from the British Association of Surgical Oncology and from the Danish Breast Cancer Co-Operative Group. It is hoped that this document will be sufficiently clear and purposeful to be of help to the individual surgeon and yet sufficiently flexible to allow it to be adopted in the different medical systems throughout Europe.

Adult↗