Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L C Parish

Publications and source records attributed to L C Parish.

230 records · Page 13Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of cutaneous infections.

A multicenter clinical trial was conducted in 125 out-patients with skin and skin structure infections due to bacteria in order to compare the safety and efficacy of cefuroxime axetil and cefaclor. Patients with a median age of 32 years were randomly allocated to treatment for 10 days with one of three treatments: cefuroxime axetil 250 mg b.i.d., cefuroxime axetil 500 mg b.i.d., or cefaclor 250 mg t.i.d. Clinical evaluations of each patient were done pre-treatment, 2 to 4 days intra-treatment, and within 3 days post-treatment. One patient discontinued cefuroxime axetil due to severe urticaria and one patient discontinued cefaclor due to a persistent headache and vomiting. Cefuroxime axetil was an effective antibacterial agent for treatment of common skin infections. Clinically beneficial outcome was achieved for 92% (cefuroxime axetil 250 mg b.i.d.), 95% (cefuroxime axetil 500 mg b.i.d.), and 97% (cefaclor 250 mg t.i.d.) of patients. Since the study failed to demonstrate a significant advantage of higher dosage, cefuroxime axetil should be prescribed in a regimen of 250 mg twice a day for patients with skin infections.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cefprozil versus cefaclor in the treatment of mild to moderate skin and skin-structure infections. The Cefprozil Multicenter Study Group.

In a multicenter study, 598 patients with skin or skin-structure infections were randomly assigned to receive 500 mg of cefprozil once daily (or 20 mg/kg once daily) or 250 mg of cefaclor three times daily (or 20 mg/kg daily in three equal doses) for 5 to 10 days. Treatment was evaluated in 212 cefprozil-treated patients and in 210 cefaclor-treated patients. The patients were aged 2 to 99 years (mean, 28 years) and their primary diagnoses were impetigo (in 99 patients), pyoderma (in 98), superficial abscess (in 70), and cellulitis (in 64). A satisfactory clinical response was found in 93% of the cefprozil-treated patients and in 92% of the cefaclor-treated patients, the pathogens were eradicated in 91% and 89%, and overall treatment was rated effective in 87% of both groups. Adverse clinical events were reported by 5% of the patients in both groups; one cefprozil-treated patient and three cefaclor-treated patients withdrew from treatment because of adverse events. It is concluded that cefprozil administered once daily is as effective and safe as cefaclor administered three times daily in the treatment of mild to moderate skin and skin-structure infections.

Abscess↗