Buffer balance in bicarbonate hemodiafiltration.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Bicarbonates↗
Biomedical subjects
L Bragantini
Publications and source records attributed to L Bragantini.
Oxalate removal by differing dialysis techniques.
Secondary hyperoxalemia is a common feature in patients with chronic renal failure, but oxalate removal is not adequately accomplished by regular dialysis treatment. Oxalate removal in two groups of patients, 11 on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and 12 on hemodialysis (HD), was investigated. HD patients were studied during a regular bicarbonate dialysis and during hemodiafiltration (HDF) with a high convective component (UF = 66 mL/min) and AN69 filter (Hospal Filtral 12, 1.2 m2, Hospal Industrie, Meyzieu, France). All HD and HDF spent dialysate and all 24 hr CAPD effluents were collected; oxalate concentration was measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using an ion exchange column. Both oxalate flux and total extraction were statistically higher during HDF treatments (HDF = 1.87 +/- 0.77 mg/min and 335.9 +/- 131.5 mg/session, respectively; HD = 0.99 +/- 0.74 mg/min, 226 +/- 153 mg/session, respectively; p < 0.02). The positive interaction of convective and diffusive fluxes probably played a major role in oxalate removal during treatment with a high convective component; solute-membrane interactions can occur by using either cellulosic or synthetic fibers. In CAPD patients, oxalate removal (76.42 +/- 50.85 mg/day) was lower than in patients on either HD or HDF, although weekly oxalate extraction was statistically no different between CAPD (535.46 +/- 356 mg/week) and HD (677.72 +/- 460.82 mg/week). It was concluded that HDF is more effective than HD or CAPD in oxalate removal. Long-term studies are needed to demonstrate whether these kinetic findings have clinical relevance.
Adult↗
The importance of ultrafiltration on acid-base status in a dialysis population.
The amount of fluid withdrawn by ultrafiltration in a dialysis session plays an important role in regulating the acid-base status of patients. It has been previously demonstrated that an interdialytic weight gain of 3 kilograms requires the removal of 3 liters, mostly of extracellular fluid, which may contain 60-70 mMols of bicarbonate. Such losses require an increase in the buffer mass transfer to achieve a good buffer balance. The importance of interdialytic weight gain (IWG) on acid-base status was evaluated in two significantly different periods. In the period where the IWG was lower, predialytic pH and HCO3 were significantly higher than in the alternate period. Since dialysis schedule, dialysate buffer, daily protein intake and given medications did not differ during the two periods, we conclude that a reduced ultrafiltration due to less weight gain betters predialytic acid-base status.
Acid-Base Equilibrium↗
Technical and clinical evaluation of a new system for ultrafiltration control during hemodialysis.
A new system for ultrafiltration control during hemodialysis is described. The apparatus consists of a computer operated system of load cells that register variations in weight of the outlet dialysate versus inlet dialysate. Once the weight loss of the patient has been established, the gravimetric control operates on the dialysate circuit to obtain the transmembrane pressure adequate to achieve the desired ultrafiltration rate and patient weight loss. The system can be used as a complete dialysis machine or as a separate module that can be adapted to any standard dialysis machine. This module was tested in more than 220 dialysis sessions, using different membranes and ultrafiltration rates. The difference between the scheduled and the real weight loss was always less than 100 g at the end of the dialysis session. The number of technical interventions required were few, as was the rate of complications related to the system. The system is safe and reliable and offers a low cost opportunity to improve dialysis tolerance by accurate and progressive ultrafiltration during the session.
Body Weight↗
Total solute extraction versus clearance in the evaluation of standard and short hemodialysis.
The authors compared the efficiency of standard HD (t = 240 minutes, Qb = 300 ml/min, Qd = 500 ml/min) with short HD (t = 150 minutes, Qb = 500 ml/min, Qd = 700 ml/min). The study was carried out in 11 patients in two sequential dialysis sessions, utilizing the same high surface area hollow fiber dialyzers, after a 2 day interdialytic period. With short HD, as expected, the clearance (Cl) of BUN, creatinine (Cr), and phosphates (P) was significantly higher than in standard HD:Cl BUN = 331 vs. 225, Cl Cr = 286 vs. 193, and Cl P = 231 vs. 176 ml/min. No significant difference in the total BUN extraction (measured on the total amount of exhausted dialysate) was found between the two techniques. As to Cr and P, despite higher Cl in short HD, the total extractions were significantly lower. In conclusion, in the evaluation of short HD efficiency, instantaneous Cl can be adequate for small molecules, while for larger solutes, other parameters, such as total extraction, must be considered.
Blood Flow Velocity↗