Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Bolognese

Publications and source records attributed to L Bolognese.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Myocardial contrast echocardiography versus dobutamine echocardiography for predicting functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary angioplasty.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare myocardial contrast echocardiography with low dose dobutamine echocardiography for predicting 1-month recovery of ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary angioplasty. BACKGROUND: The relation between myocardial perfusion and contractile reserve in patients with acute myocardial infarction, in whom anterograde flow is fully restored without significant residual stenosis, is still unclear. METHODS: Thirty patients with acute myocardial infarction treated successfully with primary coronary angioplasty underwent intracoronary contrast echocardiography before and after angioplasty and dobutamine echocardiography 3 days after the index infarction. One month later, two-dimensional echocardiography and coronary angiography were repeated in all patients and contrast echocardiography in 18 patients. RESULTS: After coronary recanalization, 26 patients showed myocardial reperfusion within the risk area, although 4 did not. At 1-month follow-up, all patients had a patient infarct-related artery without significant restenosis. Both left ventricular ejection fraction and wall motion score index within the risk area significantly improved in the patients with reperfusion ([mean +/- SD] 38 +/- 8% vs. 48 +/- 12%, p < 0.005; and 2.35 +/- 0.5 vs. 2 +/- 0.6, p < 0.001, respectively), but not in those with no reflow. Of the 72 nonperfused segments before angioplasty, 27 showed functional improvement at follow-up. Myocardial contrast echocardiography had a sensitivity and a negative predictive value similar to dobutamine echocardiography in predicting late functional recovery (96% vs. 89% and 89% vs. 93%, respectively), but a lower specificity (18% vs. 91%, p < 0.001), positive predictive value (41% vs. 86%, p < 0.001) and overall accuracy (47% vs. 90%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Microvascular integrity is a prerequisite for myocardial viability after acute myocardial infarction. However, contrast enhancement shortly after recanalization does not necessarily imply a late functional improvement. Thus, contractile reserve elicited by low dose dobutamine is a more accurate predictor of regional functional recovery after reperfused acute myocardial infarction than microvascular integrity.

Adult↗

Early coronary angioplasty as compared with delayed coronary angioplasty in patients with high-risk unstable angina pectoris.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) results in a higher complication rate in patients with unstable angina pectoris than in patients with stable angina. The current management approach is directed towards achieving stabilization by medical treatment in order to reduce the rate of major complications, but the value of a conservative strategy has not been proved by clinical trials, nor has the duration of therapy been established. On the other hand, the definition of unstable angina encompasses a heterogeneous spectrum of patients with different prognoses. It is more appropriate to stratify patients according to different risk in order to evaluate the results of different therapeutic strategies. The purpose of this study was the evaluation of the results of early and delayed coronary angioplasty in patients with high-risk unstable angina. METHODS: We compared immediate and follow-up results of early and delayed coronary angioplasty in a series of 263 patients with high-risk unstable angina because of prolonged (more than 15 min) angina or early post-infarction angina at rest. Early PTCA (within 4 h of the last ischaemic episode) was performed in 110 patients with unstable angina refractory to maximized medical treatment, whereas 153 patients with stabilized angina underwent delayed PTCA (at more than 72 h and less than 1 week from the last ischaemic episode). RESULTS: No significant differences between the two groups were found in primary lesion success rates (92.7% compared with 94.1%), major in-hospital adverse events such as reocclusion (5.4% compared with 2.6%), emergency coronary artery surgery (1.8% compared with 3.2%), myocardial infarction (3.6% compared with 2.6%) and death (1.8% compared with 0.7%). The rates of major adverse events during 6 months follow-up were similar in the two groups: recurrent ischaemia (13.4% compared with 19.7%), repeat coronary angioplasty (11.5% compared with 14.9%), coronary artery surgery (1.9% compared with 4.7%), myocardial infarction (0), and death (0). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that an aggressive coronary angioplasty strategy in patients with high-risk unstable angina may result in a favourable outcome both immediately and at 6 months' follow-up, The achievement of a stabilization period seems neither to improve the clinical success rates nor to reduce major cardiac event rates.

Adult↗

[Comparison of outcome of primary PTCA for acute myocardial infarction in patients younger and older than 70 years of age].

BACKGROUND: The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial infarction Study Group reported that the benefit of primary PTCA was observed mainly among patients who were classified as "not low risk" including those over age 70, with anterior infarction and heart rate > 100 bpm. The present study compares procedural success rate and in-hospital and one-month clinical outcome of primary PTCA in acute myocardial infarction patients < 70 and > or = 70 years of age. METHODS AND RESULTS: During 1995 121 patients with acute myocardial infarction underwent primary PTCA within 6 hours of symptoms onset or within 24 hours in case of evidence of ongoing ischemia. Eighty-two patients (Group I) were < 70 (mean age 56 +/- 9) and 39 patients (Group II) were > or = 70 (mean age 75 +/- 3). In group II there was a trend, although not significant, toward a higher prevalence of prior angina and infarction. Multivessel disease was more frequent in group II than in group I (69% vs 48%; p = 0.041). Ejection fraction was markedly depressed in both groups (38 +/- 10% in group I vs 34 +/- 11% in group II). Ejection fraction < or = 30% and shock on admission were more frequent in group II (39% vs 15% and 36% vs 21%, respectively). Optimal angiographic success (< or = 30% stenosis associated with TIMI grade 3 flow) was achieved in 77% of group II and in 98% of group I (p = 0.00059). The in-hospital mortality rate was 26% in group II and 1.2% in group I (p = 0.000042). Shock on admission and PTCA failure predicted high mortality rates. There was no difference between the two groups as regards to non-fatal reinfarction, recurrent ischemia, life-threatening arrhythmias, severe heart failure, revascularization procedures. There were no strokes. At one-month follow-up, recurrence of ischemia or positive response to stress test were more frequent in group II (24% vs 8%; p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute myocardial infarction < 70 years of age primary coronary angioplasty is associated with low rates of mortality and cardiac events. Mortality rate remains high in patients over age 70, especially when shock is present on admission or PTCA falls.

Age Factors↗

Bailout Palmaz-Schatz coronary stenting in 39 patients with occlusive dissection complicating conventional angioplasty.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of bailout Palmaz-Schatz stenting in a series of 39 patients with coronary dissection associated with acute or unequivocal threatened closure complicating conventional angioplasty. No anatomical characteristics other than reference vessel diameter < 3 mm were considered as contraindications for bailout coronary stenting. Stringent criteria were adopted in defining optimal results (< 10% residual stenosis, no angiographic evidence of residual dissection), suboptimal results (> 10% residual stenosis or angiographic evidence of residual dissection), deployment failure (failure to deploy the stent because of poor trackability or persistent occlusion despite stent deployment). A total of 49 stents and 7 half-stents were implanted in 36 patients (range 1-5; mean 1.45 +/- 0.84). Successful stenting without in-hospital death, urgent or semielective coronary surgery, stent thrombosis, or Q-wave myocardial infarction was achieved in 33/39 patients (85%). A suboptimal result was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital recurrence of ischemia and other related major adverse events (2/5 patients with suboptimal results vs. 1/31 patients with complete deployment success; P < 0.05). Multiple stents implantation did not carry a significant risk of major cardiac adverse events. The results of this study suggest that bailout Palmaz-Schatz stenting may be considered a stand-alone treatment of coronary dissection if an optimal acute angiographic result is achieved.

Adult↗

Stress echocardiographic results predict risk of reinfarction early after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction: large-scale multicenter study. Echo Persantine International Cooperative (EPIC) Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the value of dipyridamole echocardiography in predicting reinfarction in patients evaluated early after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: The identification of future nonfatal reinfarction seems an elusive target for physiologic testing. However, a large sample population is needed to detect minor differences in phenomena with a low event rate. METHODS: We assessed the value of dipyridamole echocardiography in predicting reinfarction in 1,080 patients (mean [+/- SD] age 56 +/- 9 years; 926 men, 154 women) evaluated early (10 +/- 5 days) after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction and followed up for 14 +/- 10 months. RESULTS: Submaximal studies due to limiting side effects occurred in 14 patients (1.3%); these test results were included in the analysis. Results of dipyridamole echocardiography were positive in 475 patients (44%). During follow-up, there were 50 reinfarctions: 45 nonfatal, 5 fatal (followed by cardiac death < or = 4 days after reinfarction). Reinfarction (either nonfatal or fatal) occurred in 30 patients with positive and 20 with negative results (6.3% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.01). Nonfatal reinfarction occurred in 25 patients with positive and 20 with negative results (5% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.05). Reinfarction was fatal in 5 of 30 patients with positive and in none of 20 with negative results (16.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.07). The relative risk of reinfarction was 1.9. CONCLUSIONS: Dipyridamole echocardiographic positivity identifies patients evaluated early after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction at higher risk of reinfarction, especially fatal reinfarction.

Dipyridamole↗

Risk stratification after myocardial infarction: targets and tools.

The increasing use of thrombolytic therapy and coronary revascularization, either as acute therapy or early thereafter, has ushered in the "interventional era" of management of myocardial infarction (MI). This new scenario has at least two clear cut clinical implications. First, the cardiologist can intervene earlier to change the "natural history" of MI, not only to improve the immediate inhospital prognosis but also to prevent the development of those factors affecting the clinical outcome after discharge. Second, patients currently selected for predischarge evaluation are at lower risk for subsequent cardiac events. The critical management decision is with the majority of patients who have an uncomplicated MI. Two approaches may be applied to this large cohort to assess cardiac risk before hospital discharge. One method is the initial use of noninvasive tests reserving coronary angiography for patients with abnormal test results. The second approach comprises early cardiac catheterization in virtually all survivors. The routine use of angiography after MI does not appear to lead to an improved course compared to a more selective approach. Based on observation of an excellent 1-year outcome of patients in the conservative group of the large TIMI-2 and SWIFT trials, one could conclude that predischarge risk stratification by stress testing and clinical assessment has been empirically, albeit not experimentally, validated. On the other hand, if a noninvasive test proved to be highly predictive of subsequent cardiac events, the need for doing routine coronary angiography would in large part be obviated. Developing or refining such a test should take into account several caveats.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cardiac Catheterization↗

[Primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction associated with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Results in 50 patients].

BACKGROUND: Considerable controversy exists about the therapeutic value of primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. The available data suggest that primary angioplasty may improve the outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock, while some clinical studies have found no benefit in routine angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction that were considered at high risk because of severe left ventricular dysfunction associated with myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: During a 16-month period, 50 patients with acute myocardial infarction and severe left ventricular dysfunction underwent primary coronary angioplasty. Patients were enrolled if angiographic left ventricular ejection fraction was > or = 40% and symptom duration <6 hours, or >6 hours if there was evidence of ongoing ischemia. Optimal angiographic success (<30% stenosis associated with TIMI grade 3 flow) was achieved in 45 patients (90%), and a suboptimal result (>30% and <50% stenosis associated with TIMI grade 3 flow, or <30% stenosis associated with TIMI grade 2 flow) was achieved in 3 patients (6%), while in 2 patients angioplasty failed to reopen the infarct related vessel or was associated with a refractory no-reflow phenomenon. In 5 patients an optimal angiographic result was achieved after coronary stenting. Emergency repeated coronary angioplasty was required in 1 patient with reocclusion of a stented vessel, and after unsuccessful repeated coronary angioplasty, the patient underwent bypass surgery on a semi-elective basis. In 6 patients with multivessel disease, after successful primary angioplasty of the infarct-related vessel, a more complete revasculariziation was achieved with a second coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery before discharge. The in-hospital mortality rate was 6%. The follow-up of 47 patients surviving initial hospitalization was 171 +/- 163 days. There were 2 deaths (4%), both due to congestive heart failure, and 1 nonfatal reinfarction. Two patients (4%), were readmitted to the hospital for recurrent ischemia and both underwent successful repeated coronary angioplasty for restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that in patients with acute myocardial infarction associated with severe left ventricular dysfunction, primary coronary angioplasty may be considered a first choice treatment because of high reperfusion rate, relative low in-hospital mortality and few recurrent myocardial ischemic events.

Adult↗

Prognostic value of left ventricular mass in uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction and one-vessel coronary artery disease.

This study assesses the relative prognostic value of increased left ventricular (LV) mass compared with residual ischemic myocardium and angiographic characteristics of the diseased vessel in 76 patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction associated with 1-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). All patients underwent symptom-limited treadmill exercise testing, resting and dipyridamole echocardiography and coronary angiography before discharge, and were followed-up for 32 +/- 6 months. LV measurements were obtained in diastole according to the Penn convention. Measurements of LV mass were divided by body surface area to obtain LV mass index. A cut-off value of 135 g/m2 body surface area for men and 112 g/m2 for women was prospectively selected. The individual effects of clinical, stress testing and angiographic variables were evaluated by using the Cox regression model. Echocardiographic LV mass index was increased in 43 patients and normal in 33. There was no intergroup difference with respect to baseline clinical and angiographic variables, ejection fraction and prevalence of stress-induced ischemia. During follow-up there were 23 cardiac events in the 43 patients with increased LV mass index and only 5 in the 33 with normal LV mass index (p < 0.001). No patient died or had nonfatal reinfarction among patients with normal LV mass. Cox survival analysis identified an increased LV mass index as the only independent predictor of cardiac events (chi-square = 7.9; p < 0.005; RR = 5.4). Thus, these data suggest that LV mass is an important independent risk factor in patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction associated with 1-vessel CAD.

Adult↗

Improvement in identification of multivessel disease after acute myocardial infarction following stress-recovery analysis of ST depression in the heart rate domain during exercise.

The demonstration of extensive coronary artery disease (CAD) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has important prognostic implications. Exercise-induced ST segment depression is commonly used for detecting the presence of CAD and evaluating its extension. However, even though there have been many attempts to increase its diagnostic yield, the accuracy of the electrocardiographic signal for identifying multivessel disease (MVD) is relatively low, particularly in post-MI patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of a simple index, combining information on the amount and kinetics of ST depression in the heart rate domain during exercise and recovery, to identify MVD after AMI. Seventy patients (mean age 53.4 years) underwent a bicycle, symptom-limited exercise stress test and coronary angiography 2-3 weeks and 6 weeks respectively, after uncomplicated AMI while cardioactive therapy was discontinued. After obtaining a computer-derived measurement of ST levels based on incremental averaging of normal complexes, the area subtended to baseline and limited by the ST trend against heart rate during both exercise (A1) and recovery (A2) was calculated. The difference (A1-A2) was defined as the 'Stress-Recovery Index' (SRI) and dichotomized, by means of receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis, at 5 mm x beats.min-1 to define an increased risk of MVD. The SRI of patients with MVD was significantly lower than that of patients with single vessel disease. The sensitivity of SRI < -5 mm x beats.min-1 (65%) for predicting MVD was significantly higher than that obtained by other conventional parameters, without appreciable loss of specificity (81%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Prognostic value of dipyridamole echocardiography early after uncomplicated myocardial infarction: a large-scale, multicenter trial. The EPIC Study Group.

PURPOSE: To determine the prognostic capability of the dipyridamole echocardiography test (DET) early after an acute myocardial infarction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: On the basis of 11 different echocardiographic laboratories, all with established experience in stress echocardiography and fulfilling quality-control requirements for stress echocardiographic readings, 925 patients were evaluated after a mean of 10 days from an acute myocardial infarction and followed up for a mean of 14 months. RESULTS: During the follow-up, there were 34 deaths and 37 nonfatal myocardial infarctions; 104 patients developed class III or IV angina and 149 had coronary revascularization procedures (bypass or angioplasty). Considering all spontaneous events (angina, reinfarction, and death), the most important univariate predictor was the presence of an inducible wall motion abnormality after dipyridamole administration (chi 2 = 45.8). With a Cox analysis, echocardiographic positivity, age, and male gender were found to have an independent and additive value. Considering survival (and, therefore, death as the only event), age was the most meaningful parameter, followed by the wall motion score index during dipyridamole administration (chi 2 = 12.1). Among other parameters, the resting wall motion score index was a significant predictor of death. In a multivariate analysis, the prognostic contributions of age (relative risk estimate = 1.08) and wall motion score index during dipyridamole administration (relative risk estimate = 4.1) were independent and additive. In particular, considering death only, the event rate was 2% in patients with negative DET results, 4% in patients with positive high-dose DET results, and 7% in patients with positive low-dose DET results. CONCLUSIONS: DET is feasible and safe early after uncomplicated myocardial infarction and allows effective risk stratification on the basis of the presence, severity, extent, and timing of the induced dyssynergy.

Adult↗

Prognostic value of dipyridamole echocardiography early after myocardial infarction in elderly patients. Echo Persantine Italian Cooperative (EPIC) Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to assess the feasibility, safety and prognostic value of dipyridamole echocardiography in elderly patients recovering from an uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction in a subset analysis performed on the patients entered in the subproject "residual ischemia" of the Echo Persantine Italian Cooperative Study (EPIC). BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease accounts for two thirds of all deaths in the age group > 65 years, and > 50% of all patients admitted to the hospital with acute myocardial infarction are > 65 years old. The prognostic value of dipyridamole-induced left ventricular dysfunction was clearly established in patients evaluated early after acute infarction. METHODS: In a subgroup analysis of the Echo Persantine Italian Cooperative Study (EPIC), we assessed the value of dipyridamole echocardiography in predicting cardiac events in 190 elderly (> or = 65 years) patients (age 68.4 +/- 3.3 years, range 65 to 78; 147 men and 43 women) evaluated early (mean 10 days) after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction and followed up for 14 +/- 9.8 months. RESULTS: There was no major side effect during dipyridamole echocardiography. A positive test result occurred in 85 patients (44.7%). During follow-up, there were 62 events (14 cardiac deaths, 7 nonfatal reinfarctions, 21 cases of class III or IV angina and 20 revascularization procedures). Of these 62 events, 44 occurred among 85 patients with positive dipyridamole echocardiography and 18 among 105 patients with negative dipyridamole echocardiography (52% vs. 17%, p < 0.001). Spontaneous events (death, reinfarction, angina) occurred in 31 patients with positive and in 11 with negative dipyridamole echocardiography (36% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). Hard events (myocardial infarction or death) occurred in 14 patients with positive and 7 with negative dipyridamole echocardiography (16% vs. 6%, p < 0.05). Death occurred in 11 patients with positive and in 3 with negative dipyridamole echocardiography (13% vs. 3%, p < 0.01). The positive predictive value of positive dipyridamole echocardiography and negative predictive value of negative dipyridamole echocardiography as related to the occurrence of all events in the follow-up period (death, reinfarction, angina, revascularization procedures) were 52% and 83%, respectively. The relative risk (that is, the relative risk of occurrence of future cardiac events in the group with positive dipyridamole echocardiography compared with that in those with negative dipyridamole echocardiography) was 3 for all events and 4.4 for death. CONCLUSIONS: Dipyridamole echocardiography was well tolerated by elderly patients and proved to be very effective in prognostic stratification early after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction, even when only survival was considered.

Aged↗

Safety of intravenous high-dose dipyridamole echocardiography. The Echo-Persantine International Cooperative Study Group.

Clinical data on 10,451 high-dose (up to 0.84 mg/kg over 10 minutes) dipyridamole-echocardiography tests (DET) performed in 9,122 patients were prospectively collected from 33 echocardiographic laboratories, each contributing greater than 100 tests. All patients were studied for documented or suspected coronary artery disease (1,117 early [less than 18 days] after acute myocardial infarction and 293 had unstable angina). Significant side effects including major adverse reactions and minor but limiting side effects occurred in 113 patients (1.2%). Major adverse reactions occurred in 7 cases (0.07%). In 6 of these cases, adverse reactions were associated with echocardiographically assessed ischemia and included 1 prolonged cardiac asystole (complicated by acute myocardial infarction and coma, with death after 23 days), 1 short-lasting cardiac asystole, 2 myocardial infarctions, 1 pulmonary edema and 1 sustained ventricular tachycardia. In all 6 cases, the cardiologist-echocardiographer performing the study had a limited experience (less than 100 tests) with DET, and at off-line reading in 5 cases, the obvious echo-positivity preceded the onset of complications by 1 to 5 minutes. The only ischemia-independent major side effect was a short-lasting cardiac asystole that was reversed by aminophylline and atropine. Significant side effects associated with echocardiographically assessed ischemia occurred in 89 additional cases (21 with and 68 without concomitant echocardiographically assessed myocardial ischemia). The most frequent of these side effects was hypotension or bradycardia, or both, which occurred in 40 patients with negative and 6 with positive DET. In all cases, side effects promptly subsided after aminophylline. In 1,857 cases, the high dose was not given for echo-positivity before the eighth minute.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Silent versus symptomatic dipyridamole-induced ischemia after myocardial infarction: clinical and prognostic significance.

The prevalence and prognostic significance of silent myocardial ischemia were prospectively assessed in 217 patients (mean age 57 +/- 9 years, 83% male) recovering from a first uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction and undergoing a dipyridamole echocardiography test before hospital discharge. Clinical, angiographic, exercise electrocardiographic (ECG) and dipyridamole echocardiographic variables were also examined. Of the 217 patients, 89 had no echocardiographically proved dyssynergy after dipyridamole, whereas 128 had dipyridamole-induced wall motion abnormalities that were silent in 94 (Group I) and symptomatic in 34 (Group II). There was no intergroup difference with respect to dipyridamole time (i.e., the time from onset of the test to frank dyssynergy: 7 +/- 3 vs. 8 +/- 3 min; p = NS); prevalence of inferior myocardial infarction (69% vs. 71%; p = NS); ischemic ECG changes during the test (83% vs. 71%; p = NS); diabetes (8.5% vs. 6%; p = NS); ongoing medical therapy; multivessel disease (57% vs. 56%; p = NS); and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (57 +/- 13% vs. 57 +/- 10%; p = NS). There was also no significant difference between Group I and Group II with respect to wall motion score index at peak dipyridamole effect (1.77 +/- 0.39 vs. 1.78 +/- 0.36; p = NS). Patients were followed up for 24 +/- 4 and 25 +/- 5 months, respectively (p = NS). Life table analysis revealed no difference in unstable angina, reinfarction and death between the two groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Dipyridamole-echocardiography: clinical usefulness following interventions.

Dipyridamole-echocardiography test response can be expressed not only in a black or white (positive vs negative) code but also, in positive tests, by a gray scale integrating the severity and extent of the dyssynergy as well as the ischemia-free stress time. The recognition of the dyssynergy is important to establish the diagnosis; however, the evaluation of the degree of the induced ischemia, stratified according to spatiotemporal coordinates, is even more important because it accurately predicts the coronary anatomical and functional situation, as well as the prognosis of the individual patient. Furthermore, the "shades of gray" in a positive response have proved useful in assessing the beneficial effects of several interventions: coronary angioplasty; coronary artery bypass surgery; thrombolysis; and medical antianginal therapy. Due to its excellent reproducibility, dipyridamole-echocardiography can play a pivotal role for simple, safe, fast, accurate, and objective assessment of therapeutic interventions, either mechanical or pharmacological, based upon the presence, timing, severity, and extent of dipyridamole-induced dyssynergy.

Angina Pectoris↗

Oral vs intravenous dipyridamole echocardiography for detecting coronary artery disease.

The usefulness of the intravenous dipyridamole-echocardiography test (12-lead and two-dimensional [2-D] echo monitoring during dipyridamole infusion) in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease recently has been suggested. However, the intravenous form of dipyridamole is not available for clinical use in some countries and therefore the administration of oral dipyridamole has been employed in combination with echocardiography. In order to evaluate the relative usefulness of the oral (300 mg of pulverized tablets) vs the intravenous (up to 0.84 mg/kg in 10 min) dipyridamole-echocardiography test, we performed the two tests, on different days and in random order, in 28 inhospital patients: 21 had coronary artery disease (seven had one-vessel disease, eight had two-vessel disease, and six had three-vessel disease); seven patients had no significant coronary artery disease. For both tests, the diagnostic end-point was the development of a transient dyssynergy of contraction. Sensitivity was 95 percent for the intravenous and 52 percent for the oral dipyridamole-echocardiography test (p < 0.01); in positive cases, the dyssynergy after the dipyridamole administration appeared at 6.5 +/- 2.5 min for the intravenous and at 27.8 +/- 12.4 min for the oral test (p < 0.01). Specificity was 100 percent for both the intravenous and oral dipyridamole-echocardiography test. One or more extracardiac side effects (headache, gastrointestinal upset, flushing, etc) occurred in 61 percent of the intravenous and 68 percent of the oral tests (p = ns). Nine patients with a positive intravenous and oral dipyridamole-echocardiography test also had a positive exercise-electrocardiography test. A significant correlation between exercise time (ie, the time from onset of exercise and 0.1 m V of ST segment shift) and dipyridamole time (ie, the time from onset of dipyridamole administration and the development of frank dyssynergy) was present for the intravenous (r = 0.6, p < 0.05) but not for the oral test. We conclude that the oral dipyridamole-echocardiography test, in comparison with the intravenous dipyridamole-echocardiography test, has a lower sensitivity and requires a substantially longer imaging time. The dipyridamole time is related to exercise time for intravenous but not for the oral dipyridamole-echocardiography test.

Administration, Oral↗

[Prognostic value of the dipyridamole-echocardiography test immediately after a non-complicated myocardial infarct: a large scale multicenter study. Echo Persantine Italian Cooperative Study].

BACKGROUND: Any new diagnostic test should follow a pathway similar to that of a new drug, from initial studies in highly selected populations under strictly controlled conditions, up to large scale multicenter trials more likely to represent the true performance of the test in the clinical arena. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the capability of prognostic stratification of high dose (up to 0.84 mg/kg over 10') dipyridamole-echocardiography test (DET) early after an acute myocardial infarction in a "phase IV" study, based upon 11 different echocardiographic laboratories, all with established experience in stress echo and fulfilling quality control requirements for stress echo readings. STUDY POPULATION: Nine-hundred twenty five patients were evaluated after a mean of 10 days from an acute myocardial infarction and followed up for a mean of 14 months. RESULTS: During DET, one major adverse reaction occurred, consisting of a prolonged ischemia resistant to aminophylline and nitrates, and progressing to small uncomplicated reinfarction. In 11 patients the lower dipyridamole dose (0.56 mg/kg over 4') gave limiting side effects. Patients were followed up for 14 +/- 9.9 months (range = 1.53). During the follow-up, there were 34 deaths and 37 non-fatal myocardial infarctions; 104 patients developed class III or IV angina, and 149 had coronary revascularization procedures (bypass or angioplasty). Considering all spontaneous events (angina, reinfarction and death), the most important univariate predictor was the result of DET (chi-square = 45.8). With a Cox analysis, echocardiographic positivity, age and sex were found to have an independent and additive value. Considering survival (and therefore death as the only event) age was the most meaningful parameter, followed by the Wall Motion Score Index during dipyridamole (chi-square = 12.1); among other parameters, the resting Wall Motion Score Index was a significant predictor of death. By Cox analysis, age (relative risk estimate = 1.02) and Wall Motion Score Index during dipyridamole (relative risk estimate = 14) showed an independent and additional prognostic value. In particular, considering death only, the event rate was of 2% in patients with negative DET, 4% in patients with high dose positive DET and 7% in patients with low dose positive DET. CONCLUSIONS: Dipyridamole echocardiography is feasible and safe early after uncomplicated myocardial infarction and allows an effective risk stratification on the basis of the presence, severity, extent and timing of the induced dyssynergy. In particular, the risk of death doubles in patients with high dose positivity and almost quadruples in patients with low dose positivity.

Adult↗

Comparison of intravenous urokinase plus heparin versus heparin alone in acute myocardial infarction. Urochinasi per via Sistemica nell'Infarto Miocardico (USIM) Collaborative Group.

In a randomized trial of the effects on in-hospital mortality of intravenous urokinase plus heparin versus heparin alone, 2,531 patients with acute myocardial infarction in 89 coronary care units were enrolled for greater than 30 months. Patients admitted within 4 hours of the onset of pain were randomized to receive either intravenous urokinase (a bolus dose of 1 million U repeated after 60 minutes) plus heparin (a bolus dose of 10,000 U followed by 1,000 IU/hour for 48 hours) or heparin alone (infused at the same rate). Complete data were obtained in 2,201 patients (1,128 taking urokinase and 1,073 taking heparin). At 16 days, overall hospital mortality was 8% in the urokinase and 8.3% in the heparin group (p = not significant). Among patients with anterior infarction, mortality was 10.3% in the urokinase and 13.9% in the heparin group (p = 0.09; relative risk = 0.73). The incidence of major bleeding (urokinase 0.44%, heparin 0.37%) as well as the overall incidence of stroke (urokinase 0.35%, heparin 0.20%) was similar in the 2 groups. The rates of major in-hospital cardiac complications (reinfarction, postinfarction angina) were also similar.

Adult↗