Therapy for HCV nonresponders: Is two enough?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to L Blendis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The hyperdynamic circulation begins in the portal venous bed as a consequence of portal hypertension due to the increased resistance to flow from altered hepatic vascular morphology of chronic liver disease. Dilatation of the portal vein is associated with increased blood flow, as well as the opening up or formation of veno-venous shunts and splenomegaly. At the same time, portal hypertension leads to subclinical sodium retention resulting in expansion of all body fluid compartments, including the systemic and central blood volumes. This blood volume expansion is associated with vasorelaxation, as manifested by suppression of the renin--angiotensin--aldosterone system, initially only when the patient is in the supine position. Acute volume depletion in such patients results in normalisation of the hyperdynamic circulation, whilst acute volume expansion results in exaggerated natriuresis. As liver disease progresses and liver function deteriorates, the systemic hyperdynamic circulation becomes more manifest with activation of the renin--angiotensin--aldosterone system. The presence of vasodilatation in the presence of highly elevated levels of circulating vasoconstrictors may be explained by vascular hyporesponsiveness due to increased levels of vasodilators such as nitric oxide, as well as the development of an autonomic neuropathy. However, vasodilatation is not generalised, but confined to certain vascular beds, such as the splanchnic and pulmonary beds. Even here, the status may change with the natural history of the disease, since even portal blood flow may decrease and become reversed with advanced disease. The failure of these changes to reverse following liver transplantation may be due to remodelling and angiogenesis.
Advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of sodium retention and ascites formation in cirrhosis has helped improve the treatment of ascites in these patients. It is likely that further unraveling of these pathophysiologic changes will lead to the development of novel and better treatment options. For example, the development of aquaretic agents for the management of hyponatremia in cirrhosis may allow more effective use of diuretic therapy. The ultimate challenge is to use the understanding of the pathophysiology to develop new strategies to prevent the development of ascites in cirrhosis.
Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) remains one of the major therapeutic challenges in hepatology today. The pathogenesis is complex, but the final common pathway seems to be that sinusoidal portal hypertension, in the presence of severe hepatic decompensation, leads to splanchnic and systemic vasodilatation and decreased effective arterial blood volume. Renal vasoconstriction increases concomitantly, renal hemodynamics worsens, and renal failure occurs. Renal failure was shown 15 years ago to be potentially reversible after liver transplantation. This potential reversibility together with increased understanding of the pathogenesis has led to successful preliminary attempts to reverse HRS nonsurgically with combinations of splanchnic vasoconstrictors and colloid volume expansion, insertion of transjugular intrahepatic portovenous shunt radiologically, and improved forms of dialysis. Recent classification of HRS into the acute onset or severe type 1 with virtually 100% mortality and the more insidious less severe type II promises to shed more light on the pathogenesis of HRS, especially on the currently unrecognized precipitating factors. It is hoped that this classification will be included in the necessary and carefully performed clinical trials, which should lead to clearer indications for the available therapies. The challenge now is to use all this information to improve our management of cirrhotic patients to prevent occurrence of HRS in the future.
BACKGROUND: Impaired exercise capacity and oxygen consumption are common in cirrhosis. AIM: To explore the relationship between possible myocardial dysfunction and exercise tolerance in cirrhosis. METHODS: Cardiac responses to exercise, using radionuclide angiography and graded upright cycle ergometry with oxygen consumption, were assessed before and after exercise in 39 cirrhotics patients and compared with 12 age and sex matched healthy volunteers. Baseline cardiac chamber dimensions and wall thickness, ejection fraction, and diastolic function were measured using two dimensional echocardiography is all subjects. RESULTS: Baseline diastolic dysfunction with prolonged isovolumic relaxation times (p=0.02), left atrial enlargement, and left ventricular wall thickening were present in all cirrhotics (p=0.02), despite increased mean ejection fraction. With graded exercise, cirrhotics achieved 71 (4)% (p=0.03) (pre-ascitics) and 46 (3)% (p<0.001) (ascitics) of predicted work loads, respectively, without significant increases in ejection fraction. The smaller absolute and percentage increases in cardiac output (p=0.003) in the cirrhotics were associated with significantly reduced oxygen consumption (p=0.003) and anaerobic threshold (p<0.001), and correlated significantly with work and metabolic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired exercise capacity in cirrhosis is associated with myocardial thickening and ventricular stiffness leading to decreased diastolic function, inotropic and chronotropic incompetence under conditions of stress, with metabolic consequences. This picture is compatible with the condition now known as cirrhotic cardiomyopathy.
BACKGROUND: Preascitic cirrhotic patients receiving 200 mmol of sodium daily for seven days remain in positive sodium balance. Thereafter, sodium handling is unknown. AIM: To assess renal sodium handling in preascitic cirrhosis on a high sodium diet for five weeks. METHODS: Sixteen biopsy proven preascitic cirrhotics were assessed at weekly intervals for five weeks on a diet of 200 mmol sodium/day using a daily weight diary and weekly 24 hour urinary sodium estimations. Fasting supine neurohormone levels were measured at baseline and weekly for five weeks while haemodynamics were measured at baseline and at five weeks. RESULTS: The daily diet of 200 mmol of sodium resulted in weight gain and a positive sodium balance for three weeks, associated with significant suppression of plasma renin activity and aldosterone levels, and a significant rise in plasma atrial natriuretic peptide levels (p<0.05). Patients' weights plateaued during week 4, associated with complete sodium balance and significant suppression of plasma noradrenaline levels (p<0.05). This was followed by a negative sodium balance and weight loss, and finally complete sodium balance, again despite a mean net gain of 2.3 (0.3) kg, associated with a return of plasma renin activity and aldosterone levels to within normal ranges. The lack of increase in central blood volume in addition to the persistent increase in plasma atrial natriuretic peptide levels indicated that residual volume expansion, consequent to persistent weight gain, was distributed on the venous side of the circulation. No free fluid was seen on repeat abdominal ultrasound after five weeks. CONCLUSION: Preascitic cirrhotics have a natriuretic "escape" after three weeks on high sodium dietary intake, associated with elevated plasma atrial natriuretic peptide levels and suppression of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. With continued suppressed sympathetic activity, preascitics re-establish complete sodium balance but with a net weight gain and presumed increased intravascular volume, but without ascites. This further elucidates the compensated sodium retaining abnormality that characterises preascitic cirrhosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Since the description of HRS more than 100 years ago, significant advances have been made in understanding the pathophysiology of HRS and in the management of these patients. There is now a therapeutic armamentarium: medical (ornipressin plus plasma volume expansion), radiographic (TIPS shunt), and surgical (liver transplantation). The diagnosis of HRS is no longer synonymous with a death sentence; instead, it is a therapeutic challenge, and a coordinated approach by intensivists, hepatologists, nephrologists, interventional radiologists, and transplant surgeons is needed to continue to improve the prognosis of cirrhotic patients presenting with HRS. Increased understanding of HRS will allow preventative rather than therapeutic measures to be used. As in all fields of medicine, these advances will come only with innovative clinical investigation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The renin-angiotensin system may be implicated in the subtle sodium handling abnormality in preascitic cirrhosis. AIMS: To assess the role of angiotensin II in sodium homoeostasis in preascitic cirrhosis, using losartan, its receptor antagonist. PATIENTS: Nine male, preascitic cirrhotic patients, and six age matched, healthy male controls. METHODS: A dose response study using 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 mg of losartan was performed on a daily 200 mmol sodium intake, followed by repeat studies with the optimal dose, 7.5 mg of losartan, to determine its effects on systemic and renal haemodynamics, renal sodium handling, and neurohumoral factors. RESULTS: Preascitic cirrhotic patients had significantly reduced baseline urinary sodium excretion compared with controls (154 (8) versus 191 (12) mmol/day, p<0.05), associated with significantly reduced systemic angiotensin II levels (6.0 (1.7) versus 39.5 (10.0) pmol/l, p=0.002). Losartan 7.5 mg normalised renal sodium handling in the preascitic cirrhotic patients (202 (12) mmol/day, p=0.05 versus baseline), without any change in systemic or renal haemodynamics, but with significantly increased systemic angiotensin II levels (7.8 (2.3) pmol/l, p=0.05 versus baseline). Losartan had no effect on renal sodium handling in controls. CONCLUSIONS: In preascitic cirrhotic patients, the subtle renal sodium retention, paradoxically associated with low systemic neurohumoral factor levels, is improved with low dose losartan, suggesting the involvement of angiotensin II via its direct action on the renal tubule.