Life-threatening myelosuppression in patients with occult renal impairment receiving topotecan.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Bone Marrow↗
Biomedical subjects
L B Grochow
Publications and source records attributed to L B Grochow.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation improves survival. A prospective, single-institution experience.
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate prospectively survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, comparing two different postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation protocol to those of no adjuvant therapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Based on limited data from the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group, adjuvant chemoradiation therapy has been recommended after pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head, neck, or uncinate process of the pancrease. However, many patients continue to receive no such therapy. METHODS: From October 1991 through September 1995, all patients with resected, pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the head, neck, or uncinate process of the pancreas were reviewed by a multidisciplinary group (surgery, radiation oncology, medical oncology, and pathology) and were offered three options for postoperative treatment after pancreaticoduodenectomy: 1) standard therapy: external beam radiation therapy to the pancreatic bed (4000-4500 cGy) given with two 3-day fluorouracil (5-FU) courses and followed by weekly bolus 5-FU (500 mg/m2 per day) for 4 months; 2) intensive therapy: external beam radiation therapy to the pancreatic bed (5040-5760 cGy) with prophylactic hepatic irradiation (2340-2700 cGy) given with and followed by infusional 5-FU (200 mg/m2 per day) plus leucovorin (5 mg/m2 per day) for 5 of 7 days for 4 months; or 3) no therapy: no postoperative radiation therapy or chemotherapy. RESULTS: Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 174 patients, with 1 in-hospital death (0.6%). Ninety-nine patients elected standard therapy, 21 elected intensive therapy, and 53 patients declined therapy. The three groups were comparable with respect to race, gender, intraoperative blood loss, tumor differentiation, lymph node status, tumor diameter, and resection margin status. Univariate analyses indicated that tumor diameter < 3 cm, intraoperative blood loss < 700 mL, absence of intraoperative blood transfusions, and use of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy were associated with significantly longer survival (p < 0.05). By Cox proportional hazards survival analysis, the most powerful predictors of outcome were tumor diameter, intraoperative blood loss, status of resection margins, and use of postoperative adjuvant therapy. The use of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation therapy was a predictor of improved survival (median survival, 19.5 months compared to 13.5 months without therapy; p = 0.003). The intensive therapy group had no survival advantage when compared to that of the standard therapy group (median survival, 17.5 months vs. 21 months, p = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemoradiation therapy significantly improves survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head, neck, or uncinate process of the pancreas. Based on these survival data, standard adjuvant chemoradiation therapy appears to be indicated for patients treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head, neck, or uncinate process of the pancreas. Intensive therapy conferred no survival advantage over standard therapy in this analysis.
Adenocarcinoma↗
Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The authors reviewed the pathology, complications, and outcomes in a consecutive group of 650 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy in the 1990s. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Pancreaticoduodenectomy has been used increasingly in recent years to resect a variety of malignant and benign diseases of the pancreas and periampullary region. METHODS: Between January 1990 and July 1996, inclusive, 650 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenal resection at The Johns Hopkins Hospital. Data were recorded prospectively on all patients. All pathology specimens were reviewed and categorized. Statistical analyses were performed using both univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: The patients had a mean age of 63 +/- 12.8 years, with 54% male and 91% white. The number of resections per year rose from 60 in 1990 to 161 in 1995. Pathologic examination results showed pancreatic cancer (n = 282; 43%), ampullary cancer (n = 70; 11%), distal common bile duct cancer (n = 65; 10%), duodenal cancer (n = 26; 4%), chronic pancreatitis (n = 71; 11%), neuroendocrine tumor (n = 31; 5%), periampullary adenoma (n = 21; 3%), cystadenocarcinoma (n = 14; 2%), cystadenoma (n = 25; 4%), and other (n = 45; 7%). The surgical procedure involved pylorus preservation in 82%, partial pancreatectomy in 95%, and portal or superior mesenteric venous resection in 4%. Pancreatic-enteric reconstruction, when appropriate, was via pancreaticojejunostomy in 71% and pancreaticogastrostomy in 29%. The median intraoperative blood loss was 625 mL, median units of red cells transfused was zero, and the median operative time was 7 hours. During this period, 190 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies were performed without a mortality. Nine deaths occurred in-hospital or within 30 days of operation (1.4% operative mortality). The postoperative complication rate was 41%, with the most common complications being early delayed gastric emptying (19%), pancreatic fistula (14%), and wound infection (10%). Twenty-three patients required reoperation in the immediate postoperative period (3.5%), most commonly for bleeding, abscess, or dehiscence. The median postoperative length of stay was 13 days. A multivariate analysis of the 443 patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma indicated that the most powerful independent predictors favoring long-term survival included a pathologic diagnosis of duodenal adenocarcinoma, tumor diameter <3 cm, negative resection margins, absence of lymph node metastases, well-differentiated histology, and no reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: This single institution, high-volume experience indicates that pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed safely for a variety of malignant and benign disorders of the pancreas and periampullary region. Overall survival is determined largely by the pathology within the resection specimen.
Adenocarcinoma↗
Phase I and pharmacologic study of penclomedine, a novel alkylating agent, in patients with solid tumors.
PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), principal toxicities, and pharmacologic behavior of penclomedine, a novel alkylating agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Penclomedine (45 to 550 mg/ m2/d every 3 weeks) was administered as a 1- or 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion for 5 consecutive days to patients with solid tumors. RESULTS: On a 1-hour dosing schedule, ataxia, vertigo, nystagmus, and a motor aphasia were the principal toxicities of penclomedine. These neurologic effects were dose-related, and evolved from complaints of somnolence and dizziness, to more pronounced signs and symptoms of cerebellar dysfunction. Up to and including doses of 415 mg/m2, these effects were well tolerated and resolved within 2 hours posttreatment. In contrast, both patients treated at the 550-mg/m2 dose level experienced a dose-limiting constellation of perinfusional aphasia and vertigo, with either ataxia of over 2 weeks' duration or recurrent dizziness. Prolongation of the infusion duration to 3 hours at this dose level resulted in less neurotoxicity; however, delayed trilineage hematologic toxicity precluded timely administration on this schedule. A statistically significant relationship was demonstrated between the development of ataxia and maximum plasma concentrations of penclomedine. CONCLUSION: Neurotoxicity was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of penclomedine administered as a 1-hour infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks, and the recommended dose for further evaluations was 415 mg/m2. The nature of the principal toxicities and the lack of any detectible antitumor activity indicate that phase II evaluations of penclomedine on this administration schedule should be focused on specific disease settings, such as breast cancer and intracerebral tumors, in which antitumor activity has been demonstrated.
Adult↗
Pharmacology of cancer chemotherapy in the older person.
With more widespread use of effective chemotherapy, more elderly patients are candidates for treatment with cytotoxic drugs. This article reviews and discusses the relevant age-related factors that may alter drug disposition and its relationship to pharmacokinetics effects and to pharmacodynamic effects in the elderly.
Aged↗
An overview of the clinical pharmacology of topotecan.
Topotecan (Hycamtin; SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is a semisynthetic camptothecin that has been structurally modified for increased water solubility. The closed lactone ring predominates at acidic pH, but the reverse reaction of the parent into the metabolite predominates at physiologic pH. The pharmacokinetic profile of topotecan is usually characterized by a two-compartment model and is linear in the dose range of 0.5 to 3.5 mg/m2. Following intravenous administration for 5 days at doses of 0.5 to 1.5 mg/m2/d as a 30-minute infusion, topotecan has a volume of distribution of approximately 130 L. Mean plasma clearance for topotecan (total) was approximately 1,000 mL/min with a plasma half-life of 2 to 3 hours. Renal clearance is an important determinant of topotecan elimination, with approximately 30% of the dose excreted in the urine. In three phase I studies in which the schedule of five daily doses every 21 or 28 days was investigated, all found 1.5 mg/m2/d to be the maximum tolerated dose. Neutropenia (reversible and noncumulative over time) was the major dose-limiting toxicity; fevers and infections were infrequently reported. The magnitude of topotecan exposure was correlated to the observed myelosuppression.
Antineoplastic Agents↗
Nonlinear pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide/aldophosphamide in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation.
The pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide/aldophosphamide has been evaluated in 12 patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing high-dose chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplantation. Each patient received an initial dose of 4 g/m2 of cyclophosphamide over 90 min to prime peripheral blood progenitor cells (the first course), and 3 weeks later, 6 g/m2 of cyclophosphamide with 800 mg/m2 of thiotepa by 96-hr infusion before marrow stem cell infusion (the second course). Whole blood cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide/aldophosphamide concentrations were measured by a GC-EIMS method using deuterium labeled compounds as internal standards. In addition, plasma and urine cyclophosphamide concentrations were determined by a GC assay. Whole blood concentrations of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide/aldophosphamide vs. time data and urinary excretion of cyclophosphamide data from the first course were co-modeled using a one-compartment model with Michaelis-Menten saturable elimination in parallel with first-order renal elimination (N = 7) or first-order metabolic and renal elimination (N = 5) for cyclophosphamide and one-compartment model with first-order elimination for 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide/aldophosphamide. The parallelism between cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide/aldophosphamide disposition curves implies that the pharmacokinetics of 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide/aldophosphamide is formation limited; only the fractional 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide/ aldophosphamide clearance rate (Clmet/Fmet) can be estimated. The mean Vmax and Km for cyclophosphamide were 0.78 microM/min and 247 microM, respectively. The mean nonrenal clearance (Clnr) of cyclophosphamide for five patients with apparent first-order elimination of cyclophosphamide was 67 ml/min. The mean Clmet/Fmet of 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide/aldophosphamide was 2982 ml/min. The mean renal clearance (Clr) of cyclophosphamide was 29 ml/min and 24 ml/min for the first course and the second course, respectively. The correlations between cyclophosphamide AUCs and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide/aldophosphamide AUCs were sought for both drug courses. Blood and plasma cyclophosphamide concentrations were remarkably similar, indicating that cyclophosphamide partitions equally in the red cell and plasma volume. Computer simulation of the effect of potential alterations in Michaelis-Menten saturable elimination and renal clearance on 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide/aldophosphamide has been used to illustrate the complex relationship between the exposure to parent compound and active metabolite.
Adult↗
Phase I and pharmacological study of CI-980, a novel synthetic antimicrotubule agent.
CI-980 (NSC 613862) is one of a novel class of 1,2-dihydropyrido[3, 4-b]pyrazines that inhibits tubulin polymerization, presumably by binding to the colchicine binding site of tubulin. In a Phase I and pharmacological study, 16 patients with advanced solid neoplasms were treated with CI-980 on a continuous 72-h infusion schedule at doses ranging from 3.0-5.4 mg/m2/day every 3 weeks. High rates of central nervous system (CNS) toxicity and neutropenia occurred in both minimally and heavily pretreated patients who were treated with CI-980 doses above 3.75 mg/m2/day, which is the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose for additional evaluations. CNS effects, characterized by neurocortical, mood, and cerebellar manifestations, were generally observed toward the end of the infusion and immediately posttreatment and usually resolved within 48 h after the completion of treatment. Toxicity was mild to modest at the 3.75 mg/m2/day dose level. Neither clinical nor pharmacological risk factors that may predispose patients to the development of CNS effects were evident. Although no objective antineoplastic activity was observed in this Phase I study, CI-980 steady-state plasma concentrations achieved at the recommended dose of 3.75 mg/m2/day (mean +/- SE, 5.74 +/- 0.54 nM) approached and exceeded concentrations that have been associated with significant activity in preclinical studies, indicating that additional disease-directed evaluations of CI-980 may be warranted.
Adult↗
Cytotoxic synergy between pyrazoloacridine (NSC 366140) and cisplatin in vitro: inhibition of platinum-DNA adduct removal.
Pyrazoloacridine (PA), an acridine congener that has shown selective toxicity in solid tumor cells, full activity against noncycling and hypoxic cells, and promising activity in a recent Phase I trial, is currently undergoing Phase II testing as a solid tumor-selective agent. In the present study, clonogenic assays were used to examine the cytotoxic effects when PA was combined with other antineoplastic agents in A549 human non-small cell lung cancer cells in vitro. Data were analyzed by the median effect method. Combinations of PA with antimetabolites (5-fluorouracil, methotrexate, and cytarabine) or with antimicrotubule agents (paclitaxel and vincristine) failed to exhibit synergy. Likewise, combinations of PA with alkylating agents (melphalan, 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide) were less than additive. In contrast, the combination of PA and cisplatin exhibited cytotoxicity that was additive or synergistic over a broad range of clinically achievable concentrations. Moreover, studies involving sequential exposure to PA and cisplatin revealed a synergistic interaction when cells were exposed to the two agents in either sequence. Synergy was likewise observed with this combination in T98G human glioblastoma cells and HCT8 human intestinal adenocarcinoma cells as well as AuxB1 hamster ovary cells. Flow microfluorimetry revealed that PA caused arrest of A549 cells in G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle, providing a potential explanation for the antagonism between PA and antimetabolites or antimicrotubule agents. Further studies revealed that PA inhibited removal of platinum-DNA adducts in A549 cells in a dose-dependent fashion, with almost complete inhibition occurring at 1 microM PA. These latter observations provide a mechanistic explanation for the synergy between PA and cisplatin and suggest that this combination warrants further preclinical and clinical investigation.
Acridines↗
Factors affecting topotecan sensitivity in human leukemia samples.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antineoplastic Agents↗
Phase I and pharmacologic studies of topotecan in patients with impaired hepatic function.
BACKGROUND: Topotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor that has demonstrated anticancer activity toward leukemias and solid tumors in clinical trials, is eliminated via hepatic and renal routes. However, dosing guidelines for the administration of topotecan to patients with impaired hepatic function have not yet been established. PURPOSE: We compared the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), the toxic effects, and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topotecan in patients who had refractory, malignant, solid tumors and who either had or lacked hepatic injury. The potential role of three substrate markers of liver function (indocyanin green [ICG]-- a marker of hepatic blood flow; lorazepam--a substrate marker of hepatic glucuronidation; and antipyrine--a substrate marker for cytochrome P450 activity) in optimizing topotecan doses for patients with liver injury was also evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-one cancer patients, 14 of whom had hepatic injury due to metastatic disease, biliary obstruction, or cirrhosis, were treated with intravenously delivered courses of topotecan consisting of 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 mg/m2 of drug per day for 5 days. Most patients received more than one course of treatment, with new courses initiated at 3-week intervals. Patient responses (evaluated by tumor measurements) and treatment-induced toxic effects were assessed. Prior to the initiation of topotecan treatment, patients were given intravenous injections of ICG, lorazepam, and antipyrine to determine the plasma pharmacokinetics of these compounds. The pharmacokinetics of topotecan (both the lactone and the carboxylate forms) were determined by analysis of plasma and urine samples collected on the first day of the first course of drug treatment. Scatter plots of area under the plasma concentration versus time curves in relation to percent decreases in either absolute neutrophil count or platelet count were used to explore the pharmacodynamics of topotecan. The Student's t test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare pharmacokinetic parameters between patients with and without abnormal hepatic function. Correlations were assessed using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs). Reported P values are based on two-tailed tests of significance. RESULTS: Patients with hepatic injury tolerated topotecan doses up to 1.5 mg/m2, i.e., the MTD of this drug established in previous studies. The nature and severity of treatment-induced toxic effects and the pharmacokinetics of topotecan were similar in patients with and without liver injury. No differences were observed in the urinary excretion of topotecan between the two patient groups. Clearances of total topotecan and its lactone species correlated only with clearance of ICG (rs = .64, P = .004; and rs = .68, P = .0017, respectively). The pharmacodynamic effects of topotecan were not altered by liver dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Cancer patients with hepatic injury can be treated with topotecan at a starting dose of 1.5 mg/m2, given daily for 5 days and administered every 3 weeks. Topotecan dose modifications do not appear to be required for patients with hepatic dysfunction and normal renal function.
Adult↗
Cytotoxic effects of topotecan combined with various anticancer agents in human cancer cell lines.
BACKGROUND: Topotecan (TPT) is a topoisomerase I poison that exhibits antineoplastic activity. Analysis of the cytotoxic effects of combinations of TPT and other anticancer agents has been limited. PURPOSE: We assessed the cytotoxic effects produced by combinations of TPT and other antineoplastic agents in experiments involving multiple human cancer cell lines of diverse histologic origins. METHODS: The cytotoxic effects of various antimetabolites (fluorouracil, methotrexate, or cytarabine), antimicrotubule agents (vincristine or paclitaxel [Taxol]), DNA alkylating agents (melphalan, bis[chloroethyl]nitrosourea [BCNU], or 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide [4HC]), and a DNA-platinating agent (cisplatin), alone and in combination with TPT, were measured in clonogenic (i.e., colony-forming) assays. HCT8 ileocecal adenocarcinoma, A549 non-small-cell lung carcinoma, NCI-H82ras(H) lung cancer, T98G glioblastoma, and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines were used in these assays. The data were analyzed by the median effect method, primarily under the assumption that drug mechanisms of action were mutually nonexclusive (i.e., completely independent of one another). For each level of cytotoxicity (ranging from 5% to 95%), a drug combination index (CI) was calculated. A CI less than 1 indicated synergy (i.e., the effect of the combination was greater than that expected from the additive effects of the component agents), a CI equal to 1 indicated additivity, and a CI greater than 1 indicated antagonism (the effect of the combination was less than that expected from the additive effects of the component agents). RESULTS: When the mechanisms of drug action were assumed to be mutually nonexclusive, virtually all CIs for combinations of TPT and either antimetabolites or antimicrotubule agents revealed cytotoxic effects that were less than additive. The CIs calculated at low-to-intermediate levels of cytotoxicity for combinations of TPT and the DNA alkylating agents melphalan, BCNU, and 4HC also showed drug effects that were less than additive; in most cases, however, nearly additive or even synergistic effects were observed with these same drug combinations at high levels of cytotoxicity (i.e., at > or = 90% inhibition of colony formation). Results obtained with combinations of TPT and cisplatin varied according to the cell line examined. With A549 cells, less than additive effects were seen at low-to-intermediate levels of cytotoxicity, and more than additive effects were seen at high levels of cytotoxicity. With NCI-H82ras(H) cells, synergy was observed over most of the cytotoxicity range. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: TPT cytotoxicity appears to be enhanced more by combination with certain DNA-damaging agents than by combination with antimetabolites or antimicrotubule agents. Interactions between TPT and other drugs can vary depending on the cell type examined. Further investigation is required to determine the basis of the observed effects and to determine whether these in vitro findings are predictive of results obtained in vivo.
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
Early evaluation of abdominal/hepatic irradiation and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin infusion after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
PURPOSE: To describe the toxicities of a combined modality adjuvant regimen for patients with resectable periampullary adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fourteen patients with surgically resected periampullary adenocarcinoma were treated with adjuvant therapy consisting of prophylactic hepatic irradiation and pancreatic bed irradiation and concurrent infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV). Starting within 60 days of surgery, patients received radiation treatments of 1.8 Gy per fraction to the liver and pancreatic bed (13 fractions), followed by 1.8 Gy per fraction to the pancreatic region (15 fractions). All radiation treatments were given with infusional 5-FU (200 mg/m2/day) and leucovorin (5 mg/m2/day) for 5 out of every 7 days during the 38-day treatment sequence. After a 1-month break, patients were scheduled to receive four cycles of infusional 5-FU/LV (2 weeks on/2 weeks off). RESULTS: All 14 patients completed the initial combination treatment. Toxicities were tolerable; three patients had Grade 3/4 toxicities that were primarily gastrointestinal in nature. Six patients required hospitalization during therapy for treatment-related toxicities. Two patients required radiation treatment breaks of less than 1 week, and two others had radiation held for 2-4 weeks. Three patients required chemotherapy dose reductions secondary to toxicities. Toxicities in the subsequent chemotherapy-alone cycles were few and primarily manifested by Grade 2 rises in liver injury tests. Higher toxicity grades were associated with tumor progression. Twelve patients have developed recurrent disease with an equal number of recurrences occurring in the pancreatic bed as in the liver over the 12-month median follow-up. Median survival for this cohort is 417 days, not significantly different from previously reported adjuvant trials in this patient population. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that adjuvant therapy with concomitant large-field radiation and infusional chemotherapy is feasible and associated with mangeable toxicities in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma. Improvement in survival over other adjuvant regimens has not thus far been observed. Modification of this strategy may be required.
Adenocarcinoma↗
A phase II trial of topotecan in patients with previously untreated pancreatic cancer.
Because currently available chemotherapeutic agents are largely ineffective in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, novel treatments are urgently needed to improve outcomes in this disease. The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the anti-tumor activity of topotecan, a hydrophilic camptothecin analog that has demonstrated a wide range of anti-tumor activity in preclinical and phase I studies. Topotecan was administered as a 30 min infusion at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2/day for five consecutive days every 3 weeks, to chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Neutropenia was the principal toxicity of topotecan on this dosing schedule. No significant anti-tumor responses were observed in 27 patients with measurable disease. The median time to disease progression was 7 weeks and the median survival duration was 17.5 weeks. Thus, topotecan, administered on this schedule, is ineffective for patients with pancreatic carcinoma.
Adult↗
Phase I and pharmacologic study of topotecan in patients with impaired renal function.
PURPOSE: To determine the toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and recommended doses of the topoisomerase I inhibitor, topotecan, in patients with varying degrees of renal excretory dysfunction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with normal renal function [creatinine clearance (CrCl) > or = 60 mL/min] and 28 patients with varying degrees of renal dysfunction were treated with topotecan 0.4 to 2.0 mg/m2/d as a 30-minute infusion for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Plasma and urine samples were obtained to determine the disposition of topotecan. RESULTS: In patients with mild renal dysfunction (CrCl = 40 to 59 mL/min), dose-limiting hematologic toxicity was observed in three of eight patients receiving topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d and in two of five patients receiving topotecan 1.5 mg/m2/d. In patients with moderate renal dysfunction (CrCl = 20 to 39 mL/min), dose-limiting hematologic toxicity was observed in three of eight patients who received topotecan 0.5 mg/m2/d, and in two of four patients receiving topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d; these events were more frequently observed in extensively pretreated patients. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed significant correlations between CrCl and the plasma clearance of both total topotecan [Spearman's correlation coefficient (r2) = 0.65, P = .00001] and topotecan lactone (r2 = 0.65, P = .00003). Mean systemic plasma clearance of total topotecan was significantly reduced in patients with mild (P = .04) and moderate (P = .00006) renal dysfunction. There was no evidence of changes in the pharmacodynamic relationship between topotecan exposure (AUC) and myelotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Dose adjustments are required in patients with moderate, but not mild, renal impairment. For patients with moderate renal dysfunction, the recommended starting dose of topotecan is 0.75 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 3 weeks. Moreover, extensively pretreated patients need further dose reductions.
Adult↗
Sequences of topotecan and cisplatin: phase I, pharmacologic, and in vitro studies to examine sequence dependence.
PURPOSE: A phase I and pharmacologic study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of administering the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) in minimally pretreated adults with solid tumors. The study was designed to evaluate the magnitude of the toxicologic and pharmacologic differences between the two sequences of drug administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TPT was administered as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days and CDDP was given either before TPT on day 1 or after TPT on day 5. Each patient was treated with both schedules on an alternating basis every 3 weeks. Sequential dose escalation of TPT or CDDP resulted in three dosage permutation of TPT/CDDP (mg/m2): 0.75/50, 1/50, and 0.75/75. After the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) level was achieved, the feasibility of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to permit further dose escalation was studied. To examine the interaction of TPT and CDDP in vitro, human A549 lung cancer cells were exposed to these agents concurrently and sequentially. RESULTS: Dose-limiting neutropenia and thrombocytopenia resulted after the doses of TPT or CDDP were increased to greater than 0.75 and 50 mg/m2, respectively, without and with G-CSF. The sequence of CDDP before TPT induced significantly worse neutropenia and thrombocytopenia than the alternate sequence. In vitro studies failed to provide any evidence for the differences in the cytotoxicity of these two sequences. Instead, pharmacokinetic studies suggested that the differences in toxicity were due, in part, to lower TPT clearance and exposure when CDDP preceeds TPT, possibly due to subclinical renal tubular toxicity induced by CDDP. CONCLUSION: The sequence of CDDP before TPT at doses of 50 and 0.75 mg/m2, respectively, is recommended for subsequent clinical trials in tumor types in which both agents have significant single-agent activity. The potential for sequence-dependent cytotoxic, toxicologic, and pharmacologic effects should be evaluated in concurrent clinical and laboratory studies in the course of developing combination chemotherapy regimens that consist of topo I-targeting agents and other antineoplastic agents, particularly DNA-damaging agents.
Adenocarcinoma↗
Pharmacokinetic, oral bioavailability, and safety study of fluorouracil in patients treated with 776C85, an inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase.
PURPOSE: To study the absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of an oral solution of fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients treated with 776C85, an oral inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and to evaluate the feasibility of administering oral 5-FU and 776C85 on a multiple-daily dosing schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with refractory solid tumors were enrolled onto this three-period study. In periods 1 and 2, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 5-FU 10 mg/m2 on day 2 given by either the oral or intravenous (IV) route with oral 776C85 3.7 mg/m2/d on days 1 and 2. In period 3, patients received escalating doses of 5-FU (10 to 25 mg/ m2/d) orally for 5 days (days 2 to 6) with 776C85 3.7 mg/m2/d orally (days 1 to 7) every 4 weeks. Pharmaco-kinetic studies were performed in periods 1 and 2, and after the fifth oral dose of 5-FU in period 3. RESULTS: Twelve patients completed the bioavailability and pharmacokinetic studies. Following oral 5-FU 10 mg/m2, the bioavailability was 122% +/- 40% (mean +/- SD), the terminal half-life (t1/2 beta) was 4.5 +/- 1.6 hours, the apparent volume of distribution (V beta) was 21.4 +/- 5.9 L/ m2, and the systemic clearance (Clsys) was 57.6 +/- 16.4 mL/min/m2. A correlation was observed between oral 5-FU systemic clearance and calculated creatinine clearance (r = .74; P = .009). Multiple-daily dosing did not appear to affect the pharmacokinetics of oral 5-FU. Neutropenia was the principal toxicity of oral 5-FU and 776C85, precluding escalation of oral 5-FU to doses greater than 25 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 4 weeks with 776C85. CONCLUSION: The oral DPD inactivator 776C85 enables oral administration of 5-FU and may alter conventional 5-FU administration practices.
Absorption↗
Phase I and pharmacologic study of high doses of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with solid tumors.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of escalating doses of the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in minimally pretreated adults with solid tumors and to study whether G-CSF scheduling variably affects the ability to escalate TPT doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients received 121 courses of TPT as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks at doses that ranged from 2.0 to 4.2 mg/m2/d. G-CSF 5 microg/kg/d subcutaneously (SC) was initiated concurrently with TPT (starting on day 1). Because the concurrent administration of TPT and G-CSF resulted in severe myelosuppression at the lowest TPT dose level, an alternate posttreatment G-CSF schedule in which G-CSF dosing began after TPT (starting on day 6) was subsequently evaluated. Plasma sampling was performed to characterize the pharmacologic behavior of high-dose TPT and to determine whether G-CSF altered the pharmacokinetic profile of TPT. RESULTS: Severe myelosuppression precluded the administration of TPT at the first dose, 2.0 mg/m2/d, with G-CSF on the concurrent schedule. However, dose escalation of TPT with G-CSF on a posttreatment schedule proceeded to 4.2 mg/m2/d. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. One partial response was noted in a patient with colorectal carcinoma refractory to fluoropyrimidines. Pharmacokinetics were linear within the dosing range of 2.0 to 3.5 mg/m2/d, but TPT clearance was lower at the 4.2-mg/m2/d dose level. At 3.5 mg/m2/d, which is the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose for subsequent-phase studies of TPT with G-CSF, the area under the concentration-versus-time curves (AUCs) for total TPT and lactone averaged 2.2- and 2.3-fold higher, respectively, than the AUCs achieved at the lowest TPT dose, 2.0 mg/m2/d. The pharmacologic behavior of high-dose TPT was not significantly altered by the scheduling of G-CSF. CONCLUSION: G-CSF administered after 5 daily 30-minute infusions of TPT permits a 2.3-fold dose escalation of TPT above the MTD in solid-tumor patients, whereas concurrent therapy with G-CSF and TPT results in severe myelosuppression.
Adult↗