Impact of doctor's office testing on patient care.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to L Addison.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The effective management of Papanicolaou (Pap) smears depends on the reliability and accuracy of obtaining and interpreting the specimen. Provider sampling error is one of the important factors contributing to inadequate specimens. Feedback on provider performance may be an effective way to improve the quality of Pap smears. METHODS: A pilot study in a university-based residency program involving resident and faculty physicians was initiated to assess the impact of feedback on performance of Pap smears. After establishing adequacy and inadequacy criteria and recording adequacy rates for 3 months, individual and group feedback was implemented. No formal educational intervention on Pap smear technique was undertaken. RESULTS: The quality of 836 Pap smears performed by 9 faculty and 13 resident physicians showed continued improvement in both sampling and slide preparation to 90% adequacy over a 9-month period. This improvement, though clinically useful, was not statistically significant owing to the relatively small numbers of smears performed by each physician. This form of feedback may be useful in both practice and educational settings. CONCLUSIONS: Feedback without any formal educational intervention led to a clinically useful trend of improvement in the quality of Pap smears, which has been sustained since the study began. This type of simple feedback may be useful in practice settings and particularly valuable in pinpointing areas for improvement for learners in residency programs.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To improve the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening, quality assurance programs can be designed to ensure that normal Pap smear results are dealt with appropriately and that Pap smears yielding inadequate specimen material are brought to a physician's attention. The objective of this study was to use a new Pap Smear Quality Assurance (PAPQA) system to determine and monitor the performance of physicians in a family practice over a two-year period. METHODS: We developed a PAPQA system designed to gather data and report on: 1) Pap smear adequacy, 2) reporting of abnormal results to physicians, and 3) follow-up of patients who had abnormal Pap smear results. We followed these parameters for two years. RESULTS: Over a two-year period, 2,771 cervical Pap smears were performed, of which 64% were normal. The percentage of Pap smears that yielded adequate specimen material improved from 82% to 91%, an improvement we attributed to feedback the system provided to physicians. Overall, Pap smear results and follow-up appeared in the medical record of 94% of patients who had abnormal findings. However, during the second year, the quality assurance system detected a deterioration in documentation of results and follow-up plans that coincided with moving the practice to a new facility. The operating cost for this program was approximately $950 per year. CONCLUSIONS: Quality assurance programs can effectively monitor physicians' performance in dealing with abnormal Pap smears, can detect deteriorations in performance, and can improve some aspects of performance through feedback reporting to physicians.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.