Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L A Moyé

Publications and source records attributed to L A Moyé.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

A scoring system for ascertainment of incident stroke; the Risk Index Score (RISc).

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was to develop and validate a computer-based statistical algorithm that could be translated into a simple scoring system in order to ascertain incident stroke cases using hospital admission medical records data. METHODS: The Risk Index Score (RISc) algorithm was developed using data collected prospectively by the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi (BASIC) project, 2000. The validity of RISc was evaluated by estimating the concordance of scoring system stroke ascertainment to stroke ascertainment by physician and/or abstractor review of hospital admission records. RESULTS: RISc was developed on 1718 randomly selected patients (training set) and then statistically validated on an independent sample of 858 patients (validation set). A multivariable logistic model was used to develop RISc and subsequently evaluated by goodness-of-fit and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. The higher the value of RISc, the higher the patient's risk of potential stroke. The study showed RISc was well calibrated and discriminated those who had potential stroke from those that did not on initial screening. CONCLUSION: In this study we developed and validated a rapid, easy, efficient, and accurate method to ascertain incident stroke cases from routine hospital admission records for epidemiologic investigations. Validation of this scoring system was achieved statistically; however, clinical validation in a community hospital setting is warranted.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Ischemic stroke subtypes among Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites: the BASIC Project.

Ischemic stroke subtype distribution was compared between Mexican Americans (MAs) and non-Hispanic whites (NHWs) in a community-based stroke surveillance study in Nueces County, TX. There was no difference in the distribution of stroke subtype by ethnicity (p = 0.19). There was a similar proportion of small-vessel and large-artery strokes between the two ethnic groups (p = 0.32). Differences in stroke rates among MAs and NHWs are not explained by the distribution of ischemic stroke subtypes.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed2001

The platelet Pl(A2) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) D allele polymorphisms and the risk of recurrent events after acute myocardial infarction.

Chromosome 17q21-23 harbors genes for platelet glycoprotein IIIa and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), which are polymorphic for alleles Pl(A2) and ACE "D." These alleles have been independently and often associated with ischemic coronary artery disease (CAD). We sought to determine if the Pl(A2) and ACE D polymorphisms were risk factors for recurrent coronary events. In the Cholesterol And Recurrent Events (CARE) trial, 4,159 men and women with documented myocardial infarction (MI) were randomized to receive either placebo or pravastatin, and were followed prospectively for 5 years. Pl(A) and ACE genotypes were determined in 767 patients: 385 cases who had experienced a recurrent primary event (death due to coronary disease or nonfatal MI), and 382 age- and gender-matched controls. In patients receiving placebo, the Pl(A1,A2) genotype conferred a relative risk (RR) of 1.38 (confidence intervals [CI] 1.04 to 1.83; p = 0.028; adjusted RR = 1.32, CI = 0.99 to 1.76; p = 0.058]) for the primary end point. Compared with the placebo group, pravastatin reduced the excess RR of coronary disease death and recurrent MI in the Pl(A1,A2) patient population by 31% (p = 0.06). The ACE D allele appeared to have modestly additive effects on the Pl(A1,A2) risk. Among the Pl(A1,A2) patients, pravastatin had little effect on the risk of recurrent events with the ACE II genotype, but reduced the adjusted RR from 1.42 (placebo) to 0.58 for ACE ID patients, and from 1.56 (placebo) to 0.83 for ACE DD. The Pl(A1,A2) genotype was associated with an excess of recurrent coronary events in patients after MI who did not receive pravastatin, and the ACE D allele added to this risk. These data suggest that it would be important to perform a larger study to address the potential role of these genotypes in therapeutic decision making.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Random research.

Advances in computing have combined with the rapid dissemination of treatment discoveries for diseases of public health importance to create pressure for accelerated promulgation of promising research results to the medical community. The 2 recent examples of the US Carvedilol Heart Failure program and the Evaluation of Losartan In the Elderly (ELITE) study demonstrate the importance of the prospective nature of research design, as well as the consequences of its abandonment. This article explains in nonmathematical terms the rationale for the tenet "first say what you will do, then do what you said" in sample-based research.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed2001

Trials within trials: confirmatory subgroup analyses in controlled clinical experiments.

Subgroup analyses remain a popular and necessary component of controlled clinical trials. However, lack of prospective specification, inadequate sample size, inability to maintain power, and the cumulative effect of sampling error can complicate their interpretation. This article demonstrates that clinical trial design tools that would allow the medical community to draw confirmatory and not just exploratory conclusions from specific subgroup evaluations are available to methodologists. Distinct from the use of a treatment by subgroup interaction term, this methodology provides an evaluation of the effect of an intervention within a particular subgroup stratum prospectively declared to be of interest to the investigators. The necessary prespecification of stratum-specific type I error rates, when combined with (1) a stratum-specific event rate in the subgroup, (2) a stratum-specific primary endpoint, (3) a stratum-specific endpoint precision, and/or (4) a stratum-specific efficacy, satisfies the requirements for a subgroup stratum's "stand-alone" interpretation at the trial's conclusion.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2001

Barriers to acute stroke therapy and stroke prevention in Mexican Americans.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify specific targets to improve acute stroke treatment and stroke prevention in the Mexican American (MA) community. METHODS: A professional, academic survey research team provided structured questions and elicited responses from 719 subjects identified by random-digit dialing in the biethnic community of Corpus Christi, TEXAS: This community of approximately 300 000 is approximately half MA and half non-Hispanic white (NHW). The cooperation rate for the survey was 58%. RESULTS: MAs (n=357) were younger, less well educated, and had lower family income than NHWs (n=362, P=0.001). MAs had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (P=0.001) but similar rates of hypertension, elevated cholesterol, and current tobacco use. MAs less commonly recognized that acute stroke therapy existed (P=0.029), were less likely to acknowledge a time window for acute stroke treatment (P=0.001), and were more reticent to say they would call 911 for stroke symptoms (P=0.01) than NHWS: MAs were significantly less able to recall stroke symptoms and risk factors than NHWS: Only approximately 20% of both groups identified stroke as the NO: 1 cause of disability. MAs expressed less confidence in their ability to prevent stroke (P<0.001), more distrust in the medical establishment (P=0.007), and more concern that money impedes their seeking medical care (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant barriers to both acute stroke treatment and stroke prevention in MAS: This study identifies specific targets amenable for testing in an intervention project following confirmation by a methodology other than telephone survey.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Evaluation of ethnic minorities and gender effects in clinical trials: opportunities lost and rediscovered.

Recent recognition has been given to the notion of demonstrating a beneficial effect of randomly allocated interventions utilized in controlled clinical trials to women and ethnic minorities. However, despite National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines on the inclusion of ethnic minorities and women into these studies, clinical trial investigators continue to suffer from an inability to persuasively reach conclusions about the intervention effect in these subgroups. Although a major factor in this limitation has been the inability to recruit large numbers of these patients into controlled clinical trials, an additional dilemma has been the clinical trial community's well demonstrated inability to draw reliable conclusions from the relevant subgroup analyses. As currently designed in clinical trials, subgroup analyses with neither good prospective planning nor concern for the multiplicity of type I error that accompanies the testing of multiple hypotheses are appropriately relegated to exploratory analyses which merely raise questions, not answer them. This article demonstrates that taking advantage of: (a) prospective, subgroup specific endpoint selection; (b) prospective, subgroup specific endpoint event rates; (c) prospective, subgroup specific therapy efficacy, and (d) prospective, subgroup specific nonuniform type I error levels will fortify a subgroup analysis. Thus, the tools traditionally available to clinical trialists, when wielded with renewed vigor and innovation, in concert with energetic, focused recruitment efforts can lead to a confirmatory analysis with appropriate statistical rigor for the effect of the randomly allocated intervention in these important demographic subgroups.

Data Collection↗
PubMed2000

Comparison of stroke hospitalization rates among Mexican-Americans and non-Hispanic whites.

The authors performed a prospective, community-based pilot stroke surveillance project in Nueces County, TX. Mexican-Americans showed a trend toward higher completed ischemic stroke hospitalization rates compared with non-Hispanic whites. Mexican-Americans were more commonly uninsured (p = 0.007) and were less likely to receive neuroimaging (p = 0.001). Additional studies are needed to confirm this finding and to determine the role of stroke risk factors and access to care variables.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Alpha calculus in clinical trials: considerations and commentary for the new millennium.

Regardless of whether a statistician believes in letting a data set speak for itself through nominal p-values or believes in strict alpha conservation, the interpretation of experiments which are negative for the primary endpoint but positive for secondary endpoints is the source of some angst. The purpose of this paper is to apply the notion of prospective alpha allocation in clinical trials to this difficult circumstance. An argument is presented for differentiating between the alpha for the experiment ('experimental alpha' or alpha(E)) and the alpha for the primary endpoint (primary alpha, or alpha(P)) and notation is presented which succinctly describes the findings of a clinical trial in terms of its conclusions. Capping alpha(E) at 0.10 and alpha(P) at 0.05 conserves sample size and preserves consistency with the strength of evidence for the primary endpoint of clinical trials. In addition, a case is presented for the well defined circumstances in which a trial which did not reject the null hypothesis for the primary endpoint but does reject the null hypothesis for at least one of the secondary endpoints may be considered positive in a manner consistent with conservative alpha management.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1999

Reduction of stroke incidence after myocardial infarction with pravastatin: the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) study. The Care Investigators.

BACKGROUND: The role of lipid modification in stroke prevention is controversial, although increasing evidence suggests that HMG-CoA reductase inhibition may reduce cerebrovascular events in patients with prevalent coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: To test the hypothesis that cholesterol reduction with pravastatin may reduce stroke incidence after myocardial infarction, we followed 4159 subjects with average total and LDL serum cholesterol levels (mean, 209 and 139 mg/dL, respectively) who had sustained an infarction an average of 10 months before study entry and who were randomized to pravastatin 40 mg/d or placebo in the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial. Using prospectively defined criteria, we assessed the incidence of stroke, a prespecified secondary end point, and transient ischemic attack (TIA) over a median 5-year follow-up period. Patients were well matched for stroke risk factors and the use of antiplatelet agents (85% of subjects in each group). Compared with placebo, pravastatin lowered total serum cholesterol by 20%, LDL cholesterol by 32%, and triglycerides by 14% and raised HDL cholesterol by 5% over the course of the trial. A total of 128 strokes (52 on pravastatin, 76 on placebo) and 216 strokes or TIAs (92 on pravastatin, 124 on placebo) were observed, representing a 32% reduction (95% CI, 4% to 52%, P=0.03) in all-cause stroke and 27% reduction in stroke or TIA (95% CI, 4% to 44%, P=0.02). All categories of strokes were reduced, and treatment effect was similar when adjusted for age, sex, history of hypertension, cigarette smoking, diabetes, left ventricular ejection fraction, and baseline total, HDL, and LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels. There was no increase in hemorrhagic stroke in patients on pravastatin compared with placebo (2 versus 6, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Pravastatin significantly reduced stroke and stroke or TIA incidence after myocardial infarction in patients with average serum cholesterol levels despite the high concurrent use of antiplatelet therapy.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

End-point interpretation in clinical trials: the case for discipline.

The recent submission of a new drug application to the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has led to vigorous discussion concerning the rules of clinical trial conduct. The regulatory importance of prospectively defined end points, long held as a fundamental tenet of well-designed research efforts, and the proper role of alpha-spending functions in clinical trials are current foci of attention. Sound public policy requires that the highest research standards govern statistical analyses to support a new drug application. These research standards should be rooted in the fundamentals of epidemiology and biostatistics, long accepted by clinical trial workers. Also, because the physician-scientists whose research results are disseminated to the community bear considerable responsibility for both that community's protection and the protection of the individual patient, these investigators must provide unambiguous interpretations of type I and type II error rates. This obligation includes clear prospective statements of analysis plans and complete reporting of findings for the prospectively defined endpoints in presentations and in manuscripts. The public health is best served if regulatory agencies continue to join clinical trial workers in repudiating the philosophy of "sound methodology or a small p-value" in judging research efforts. Reviewers of new drug applications might best take the tack "judge first what the investigators set out to do, then judge what else was discovered in an 'exploratory light.'"

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed1999

Carvedilol and the Food and Drug Administration approval process: an introduction.

We discuss briefly the new drug carvedilol (Coreg), a beta-blocker, alpha-blocker, and antioxidant. This drug was developed for congestive heart failure in a series of trials, four in the United States and one in Australia and New Zealand, briefly summarized in this document. We also summarize the classical paradigm of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for drug approval and the FDA's use of advisory committees. This document serves as background to the discussion of carvedilol's approval.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed1999

Influence of baseline lipids on effectiveness of pravastatin in the CARE Trial. Cholesterol And Recurrent Events.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the influence of baseline lipid levels on coronary event rates and the effectiveness of pravastatin therapy in the Cholesterol And Recurrent Events (CARE) study. BACKGROUND: The CARE study cohort provided a relatively unique opportunity to examine the relation between lipid levels and clinical events in a post-myocardial infarction (MI) population with relatively low cholesterol and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol values. METHODS: There were 4,159 patients with a previous infarct and a total cholesterol level <240 mg/dl, LDL cholesterol level 115 to 174 mg/dl and triglyceride level <350 mg/dl randomly allocated to placebo (n=2,078) or pravastatin 40 mg/day (n=2,081). Time to either coronary death or nonfatal MI (primary end point) or to the secondary end point, which included undergoing a coronary revascularization procedure, was determined as a function of baseline lipids (total, LDL, high density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol and triglyceride levels). RESULTS: Quartile analysis indicated important effects for LDL cholesterol, in which a higher LDL was associated with greater cardiac event rates (in the placebo group, every 25-mg/dl increment in LDL was associated with a 28% increased risk [5% to 56%, p=0.015]) in the primary event. The differential event rates with respect to baseline LDL cholesterol for placebo and pravastatin groups reduced the difference in clinical outcomes at lower LDL cholesterol levels. In both the placebo and pravastatin groups, an inverse relation between baseline HDL cholesterol and cardiac events was observed (10 mg/dl lower baseline HDL cholesterol level was associated with a 10% [0% to 19%, p=0.046] increase in coronary death or nonfatal MI). CONCLUSIONS: Within the LDL cholesterol levels in CARE (115 to 174 mg/dl), baseline values influenced both the risk of events in the placebo group as well as the clinical effectiveness of pravastatin therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Pravastatin prevents clinical events in revascularized patients with average cholesterol concentrations. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events CARE Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: This analysis was carried out to determine if revascularized patients derive benefit from the 3-hydroxy-3 methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor pravastatin. BACKGROUND: The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors result in substantial reductions in serum cholesterol and stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: Pravastatin was found to reduce clinical cardiovascular events in the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial consisting of 4,159 patients with a documented myocardial infarction and an average cholesterol level (mean 209 mg/dl and all <240 mg/dl). A total of 2,245 patients underwent coronary revascularization before randomization including 1,154 patients with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) alone, 876 patients with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) alone, and 215 patients with both procedures. Clinical events in revascularized patients were compared between patients on placebo and on pravastatin. RESULTS: In the 2,245 patients who had undergone revascularization, the primary endpoint of coronary heart disease death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) was reduced by 4.1% with pravastatin (relative risk [RR] reduction 36%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17 to 51, p = 0.001). Fatal or nonfatal MI was reduced by 3.3% (RR reduction 39%, 95% CI 16 to 55, p = 0.002), postrandomization repeat revascularization was reduced by 2.6% (RR reduction 18%, 95% CI 1 to 33, p = 0.068) and stroke was reduced by 1.5% (RR reduction 39%, 95% CI 3 to 62, p = 0.037) with pravastatin. Pravastatin was beneficial in both the 1,154 PTCA patients and in the 1,091 CABG patients who had undergone revascularization before randomization. CONCLUSIONS: Pravastatin reduced clinical events in revascularized postinfarction patients with average cholesterol levels. This therapy was well tolerated and its use should be considered in most patients following coronary revascularization.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗