Response to Krutish et al.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Clinical genetics↗
Biomedical subjects
Kym M Boycott
Publications and source records attributed to Kym M Boycott.
Comparing the performance of exome and genome sequencing for rare disease diagnostics: A randomized implementation effectiveness trial.
PURPOSE: Exome sequencing (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) can improve rare disease diagnosis but are not routinely available in many jurisdictions. To inform implementation, we report on a randomized implementation effectiveness trial comparing ES and GS. METHODS: Eligible trios were randomized to receive ES or GS in the same clinically accredited laboratory. Patient-level data on diagnostic utility and turnaround times were collected. Outcomes were compared statistically between clinically important subgroups. RESULTS: Of 1048 patients, 68.5% had syndromic intellectual disability/developmental delay (ID/DD) and 20.5% had multisystem disorders without ID/DD. Most had prior genetic test(s) that were nondiagnostic (95.5%), and of these, 91.6% included chromosome microarray. Diagnostic yields were 33.8% and 33.6%, for ES (n = 526) and GS (n = 522), respectively. Within sequencing groups, diagnostic results were more frequent among those with ID/DD than those without (P < .005). For routine (ie, nonexpedited) patients (n = 1020), 87.0% were reported in <12 weeks, and the mean turnaround time was 55.5 days (SD: 24.0). Turnaround time for ES and GS did not differ; however, result type (P < .001) and age of onset (P < .005) significantly affected turnaround time. CONCLUSION: Findings provide robust evidence of diagnostic utility and timeliness of ES and GS and will inform policy related to the organization, delivery, and reimbursement of clinical-grade genome diagnostics for rare diseases.
Adolescent↗
Delineating the pathogenic threshold and phenotypic spectrum of SCA27B: findings from a large French-Canadian cohort.
BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia 27B (SCA27B), caused by an intronic (GAA•TTC) repeat expansion in FGF14, is a common cause of late-onset cerebellar ataxia, but its genotypic and phenotypic spectrum remains to be fully established. METHODS: We analysed the FGF14 (GAA•TTC) repeat expansion in a cohort of 134 patients with ataxia and 822 controls from Quebec. We conducted segregation study in large families to further characterize intergenerational repeat instability. RESULTS: We found a significant enrichment of (GAA•TTC)≥200 alleles in the ataxia cohort compared to controls (53.0%, 71/134, vs 3.6%, 30/822, p < 0.0001), including for (GAA•TTC)200-249 alleles (8.2% vs 2.6%, p = 0.0026). We identified 12 ataxic patients with a phenotype compatible with SCA27B carrying a (GAA•TTC)200-249 expansion supporting the pathogenicity of these alleles in some patients. We further delineated the phenotype of 125 symptomatic individuals from 69 families who carried an FGF14 (GAA•TTC)≥200 repeat expansion. Patients with (GAA•TTC)200-249, (GAA•TTC)250-299, and (GAA•TTC)≥300 had a similar phenotype. We observed that 14% of patients with episodic symptoms (13/92) had severe episodes that were initially misdiagnosed as stroke, vestibular neuritis, Wernicke's encephalopathy, or seizures. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This large cohort demonstrates that (GAA•TTC)200-249 alleles are enriched in patients with ataxia compared to controls and can be pathogenic for SCA27B, supporting the need to define a lower pathogenic threshold in the presence of specific clinical criteria.
Humans↗
A microcosting and cost consequence analysis from a randomized controlled trial comparing genome sequencing with exome sequencing for genetic diagnosis.
PURPOSE: Diagnosing rare diseases is costly. The objectives were to microcost exome (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) trios and estimate the incremental costs of GS per additional diagnosis from an institutional payer perspective. METHODS: Trios (proband plus biological parents) that are referred for sequencing were randomly assigned to ES or GS. Laboratory workflow and sequencing were microcosted. Total and category cost per trio were estimated probabilistically. Effectiveness was expressed as diagnostic yield (rates of diagnostic or partially diagnostic variants detected). Incremental costs and effectiveness were calculated. RESULTS: The mean total cost per trio was CAD 2888.79 (95% CI 2567.72, 3492.72) for ES (n = 329) and 4364.02 (95% CI 3984.94, 5013.67) for GS (n = 324). Reagents accounted for 34% and 61% of total costs for ES and GS, respectively. The incremental cost of GS was 1475.23. The diagnostic yield was 35.9% for ES and 32.7% for GS with a difference of 0.032 (95% CI: -0.041, 0.104, P value .397). CONCLUSION: GS demonstrated higher costs and a similar diagnostic yield to ES but was limited by technical capabilities at the time of the study. The study provides comprehensive costs for the economic evaluation comparing alternative diagnostic pathways and impetus for further evaluating variants uniquely detectable by GS.
Humans↗
Mainstreaming of clinical genetic testing: A conceptual framework.
PURPOSE: Demand for genetic testing is increasing across medicine, whereas the genetics workforce remains stable. In response, mainstreaming models are being introduced, in which nongeneticist clinicians are increasingly involved in the genetic testing pathway. Because a standardized approach would facilitate evaluation and optimal patient care, a unified framework is warranted. METHODS: Through a focus group with clinical genetics experts, a conceptual framework for the mainstreaming of clinical genetic testing is proposed. Through a consensus process, experts elucidated the steps in the diagnostic care pathway and defined a set of variables that influence which mainstreaming model is best suited to specific patient care scenarios. RESULTS: A total of 35 individuals representing 20 distinct clinical genetics services and all Canadian provinces participated in the development of the framework. The framework describes 4 generalizable mainstreaming models of care, each with varying levels of involvement of the clinical genetics service in the diagnostic care pathway. CONCLUSION: This framework will help guide clinical teams in the design and evaluation of mainstreaming efforts. It is critical that these programs are evaluated and shared in a standardized way so that we can implement strategies that allow optimal utilization of genetics resources and improve patient care.
Humans↗
Microduplications of ARID1A and ARID1B cause a novel clinical and epigenetic distinct BAFopathy.
PURPOSE: ARID1A/ARID1B haploinsufficiency leads to Coffin-Siris syndrome, duplications of ARID1A lead to a distinct clinical syndrome, whilst ARID1B duplications have not yet been linked to a phenotype. METHODS: We collected patients with duplications encompassing ARID1A and ARID1B duplications. RESULTS: 16 ARID1A and 13 ARID1B duplication cases were included with duplication sizes ranging from 0.1 to 1.2 Mb (1-44 genes) for ARID1A and 0.9 to 10.3 Mb (2-101 genes) for ARID1B. Both groups shared features, with ARID1A patients having more severe intellectual disability, growth delay, and congenital anomalies. DNA methylation analysis showed that ARID1A patients had a specific methylation pattern in blood, which differed from controls and from patients with ARID1A or ARID1B loss-of-function variants. ARID1B patients appeared to have a distinct methylation pattern, similar to ARID1A duplication patients, but further research is needed to validate these results. Five cases with duplications including ARID1A or ARID1B initially annotated as duplications of uncertain significance were evaluated using PhenoScore and DNA methylation reanalysis, resulting in the reclassification of 2 ARID1A and 2 ARID1B duplications as pathogenic. CONCLUSION: Our findings reveal that ARID1B duplications manifest a clinical phenotype, and ARID1A duplications have a distinct episignature that overlaps with that of ARID1B duplications, providing further evidence for a distinct and emerging BAFopathy caused by whole-gene duplication rather than haploinsufficiency.
Humans↗