Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kunlin Wei

Publications and source records attributed to Kunlin Wei.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Intermanual interactions during initiation and production of rhythmic and discrete movements in individuals lacking a corpus callosum.

Three individuals lacking a corpus callosum, two due to callosotomy and one agenesis, and three age-matched healthy controls were tested on a bimanual task in which a discrete or rhythmic arm movement was initiated following a visual signal while the other arm produced continuous, rhythmic movements. The control participants initiated the secondary, rhythmic movement in phase with the ongoing rhythmic base movement and the two limbs were coupled in an inphase mode across the duration of the trial. In contrast, the acallosal individuals failed to show phase entrainment at the initiation of the secondary, rhythmic movements. Moreover, the callosotomy patients exhibited weak coupling between the rhythmically moving limbs while the individual with callosal agenesis consistently synchronized in an antiphase mode. The control participants exhibited increased perturbation of the ongoing base movement when initiating a discrete movement; for the acallosal participants, the base movement was similarly perturbed in both secondary movement conditions. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that intermanual interactions observed during bimanual movements arise from various levels of control, and that these are distinct for discrete and rhythmic movements. Temporal coupling during rhythmic movements arises in large part from transcallosal interactions between the two hemispheres. The imposition of a secondary movement may transiently disrupt an ongoing rhythmic movement even in the absence of the corpus callosum. This may reflect subcortical interactions associated with response initiation, or, due to dual task demands, a transient shift in attentional resources.

Agenesis of Corpus Callosum↗

Actively tracking 'passive' stability in a ball bouncing task.

This study investigates the control involved in a task where subjects rhythmically bounce a ball with a hand-held racket as regularly as possible to a prescribed amplitude. Stability analyses of a kinematic model of the ball-racket system revealed that dynamically stable solutions exist if the racket hits the ball in its decelerating upward movement phase. Such solutions are resistant to small perturbations obviating explicit error corrections. Previous studies reported that subjects' performance was consistent with this 'passive' stability. However, some 'active' control is needed to attune to this passive stability. The present study investigates this control by confronting subjects with perturbations where stable behavior cannot be maintained solely from passive stability. Six subjects performed rhythmic ball bouncing in a virtual reality set-up with and without perturbations. In the perturbation trials the coefficient of restitution of the ball-racket contact was changed at every fifth contact leading to unexpected ball amplitudes. The perturbations were compensated for within 2-3 bouncing cycles such that ball amplitudes decreased to initial values. Passive stability was reestablished as indicated by negative racket acceleration. Results revealed that an adjustment of the racket period ensured that the impacts occurred at a phase associated with passive stability. These findings were implemented in a model consisting of a neural oscillator that drives a mechanical actuator (forearm holding the racket) to bounce the ball. Following the perturbation, the oscillator's period is adjusted based on the perceived ball velocity after impact. Simulation results reproduced the major aspects of the experimental results.

Acceleration↗

Interactions between rhythmic and discrete components in a bimanual task.

An asymmetric bimanual task was investigated in which participants performed a rhythmic movement with their dominant arm and initiated a second movement with their nondominant arm at a random phase of the continued oscillations. The objective was to examine whether different constraints existed between rhythmic and discrete movements and, more generally, whether rhythmic and discrete movements can be regarded as two different movement primitives. Participants performed rhythmic forearm rotations at 1 of 4 prescribed metronome periods. After a random interval, a trigger signaled to initiate either a discrete or rhythmic movement with the left forearm as fast as possible while continuing the oscillations. Analyses extracted the mutual influences that the two movements exerted on each other and contrasted discrete-rhythmic and rhythmic-rhythmic coupling. (a) The initiation of the rhythmic movement was constrained to occur in-phase with the ongoing rhythmic movement, while the discrete movement could be initiated at any arbitrary phase. (b) Reaction time of the initiated rhythmic movement scaled with the oscillation period, while the discrete movement's reaction time was invariant across periods. (c) Peak velocity of the initiated movement scaled with the oscillatory period in both tasks but more strongly in the discrete movement. (d) Synchronization of EMG bursts of both arm flexors was evident in both tasks but more strongly in the rhythmic-rhythmic combination. The results are interpreted as support for the hypothesis that discrete and rhythmic actions are two different control regimes, and coupling occurs at a higher level in the central nervous system.

Adult↗