Biomedical subjects

Kun-Pin Wu

Publications and source records attributed to Kun-Pin Wu.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Multi-Q: a fully automated tool for multiplexed protein quantitation.

The iTRAQ labeling method combined with shotgun proteomic techniques represents a new dimension in multiplexed quantitation for relative protein expression measurement in different cell states. To expedite the analysis of vast amounts of spectral data, we present a fully automated software package, called Multi-Q, for multiplexed iTRAQ-based quantitation in protein profiling. Multi-Q is designed as a generic platform that can accommodate various input data formats from search engines and mass spectrometer manufacturers. To calculate peptide ratios, the software automatically processes iTRAQ's signature peaks, including peak detection, background subtraction, isotope correction, and normalization to remove systematic errors. Furthermore, Multi-Q allows users to define their own data-filtering thresholds based on semiempirical values or statistical models so that the computed results of fold changes in peptide ratios are statistically significant. This feature facilitates the use of Multi-Q with various instrument types with different dynamic ranges, which is an important aspect of iTRAQ analysis. The performance of Multi-Q is evaluated with a mixture of 10 standard proteins and human Jurkat T cells. The results are consistent with expected protein ratios and thus demonstrate the high accuracy, full automation, and high-throughput capability of Multi-Q as a large-scale quantitation proteomics tool. These features allow rapid interpretation of output from large proteomic datasets without the need for manual validation. Executable Multi-Q files are available on Windows platform at http://ms.iis.sinica.edu.tw/Multi-Q/.

Chromatography, Liquid↗

PubMed2006

RIBRA--an error-tolerant algorithm for the NMR backbone assignment problem.

We develop an iterative relaxation algorithm called RIBRA for NMR protein backbone assignment. RIBRA applies nearest neighbor and weighted maximum independent set algorithms to solve the problem. To deal with noisy NMR spectral data, RIBRA is executed in an iterative fashion based on the quality of spectral peaks. We first produce spin system pairs using the spectral data without missing peaks, then the data group with one missing peak, and finally, the data group with two missing peaks. We test RIBRA on two real NMR datasets, hbSBD and hbLBD, and perfect BMRB data (with 902 proteins) and four synthetic BMRB data which simulate four kinds of errors. The accuracy of RIBRA on hbSBD and hbLBD are 91.4% and 83.6%, respectively. The average accuracy of RIBRA on perfect BMRB datasets is 98.28%, and 98.28%, 95.61%, 98.16%, and 96.28% on four kinds of synthetic datasets, respectively.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2005

GANA--a genetic algorithm for NMR backbone resonance assignment.

NMR data from different experiments often contain errors; thus, automated backbone resonance assignment is a very challenging issue. In this paper, we present a method called GANA that uses a genetic algorithm to automatically perform backbone resonance assignment with a high degree of precision and recall. Precision is the number of correctly assigned residues divided by the number of assigned residues, and recall is the number of correctly assigned residues divided by the number of residues with known human curated answers. GANA takes spin systems as input data and uses two data structures, candidate lists and adjacency lists, to assign the spin systems to each amino acid of a target protein. Using GANA, almost all spin systems can be mapped correctly onto a target protein, even if the data are noisy. We use the BioMagResBank (BMRB) dataset (901 proteins) to test the performance of GANA. To evaluate the robustness of GANA, we generate four additional datasets from the BMRB dataset to simulate data errors of false positives, false negatives and linking errors. We also use a combination of these three error types to examine the fault tolerance of our method. The average precision rates of GANA on BMRB and the four simulated test cases are 99.61, 99.55, 99.34, 99.35 and 98.60%, respectively. The average recall rates of GANA on BMRB and the four simulated test cases are 99.26, 99.19, 98.85, 98.87 and 97.78%, respectively. We also test GANA on two real wet-lab datasets, hbSBD and hbLBD. The precision and recall rates of GANA on hbSBD are 95.12 and 92.86%, respectively, and those of hbLBD are 100 and 97.40%, respectively.

Algorithms↗