Pedigree-assisted genotype imputation enables cost-effective genomic prediction in Penaeus vannamei.
Genomic selection in Penaeus vannamei has long been constrained by the high cost of dense genotyping. To address this limitation, we evaluated genotype imputation from a low-density 1 K panel to a medium-density 55 K panel of the "Yellow Sea Array No. 1" and examined its impact on genomic prediction for harvest body weight in P. vannamei. A four-generation pedigree including 30 great-grandparents, 39 grandparents, 100 parents, and 608 offspring was genotyped using the 55 K panel. A two-step experimental design was implemented to (i) assess the performance of different imputation algorithms under reference population scenarios with varying proportions of siblings, and (ii) compare six alternative reference population structures incorporating parents, ancestors, and siblings. Genotype imputation using the pedigree-based method FImpute v3.0 consistently achieved higher accuracy than the population-based method Beagle v5.5. Using this pedigree-assisted approach, imputation accuracy increased from 0.73 when only parental genotypes were used to 0.84 with the inclusion of 10% siblings, and subsequently plateaued at 0.87-0.90 when sibling representation reached 20%. Across the six reference population structures, imputation accuracy was primarily driven by the availability of parental genotypes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 in the absence of parents to 0.88-0.89 when both parents and ancestral generations were included. Accuracy remained high when both parents were available (0.84-0.87 with siblings; 0.73 without siblings) but declined substantially when only one parent was genotyped (0.65-0.68). Imputation accuracy was positively associated with both minor allele frequency (MAF) and linkage disequilibrium (max r2LD), with LD exerting the stronger influence. Heritability estimates derived from imputed 55 K genotypes were highly consistent with those obtained from the original 55 K data (0.39 ± 0.14 vs. 0.41 ± 0.14), indicating that genotype imputation did not compromise variance component estimation. In predictive ability analyses, pedigree-based BLUP (PBLUP) achieved higher predictive ability than genomic BLUP (GBLUP) based on the 1 K panel, with predictive abilities of 0.42-0.44 for PBLUP compared with 0.34-0.35 for GBLUP. Using imputed genotypes for genomic prediction further improved predictive ability relative to the true 1 K panel, yielding values ranging from 0.35 to 0.47. Notably, when parental genotypes were included in the reference population, GBLUP based on imputed genotypes surpassed the predictive ability of PBLUP and approached that achieved with the original 55 K genotypes (0.45-0.47). Collectively, these results provide the first empirical evidence that low- to medium-density genotype imputation, combined with pedigree information, can effectively support genomic prediction in P. vannamei. This study establishes a cost-efficient and scalable framework for implementing genomic selection in P. vannamei and provides a practical reference for the application of genomic selection in other aquaculture species with constrained breeding budgets.