Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kristina S Beekhuizen

Publications and source records attributed to Kristina S Beekhuizen.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

New perspectives on improving upper extremity function after spinal cord injury.

Injury to the cervical spinal cord adversely affects arm and hand function to varying degrees depending on the level and severity of injury. These impairments typically result in reduced independence in the performance of activities of daily living and limit participation in recreational activities. There is evidence to suggest individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury may benefit from intensive rehabilitation interventions aimed at improving hand and arm function. Massed practice (repetitive activity-based training) and somatosensory stimulation (prolonged peripheral nerve electrical stimulation at submotor threshold intensity) are 2 interventions that have been shown to improve strength and function in individuals with stroke, presumably by changing cortical excitability. These techniques, however, had not previously been investigated in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). In this article the stroke and SCI literature supporting the use of massed practice and somatosensory stimulation as a potential rehabilitative tool to promote recovery of function in individuals with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) is reviewed. Recently published research using these novel techniques in which a combination of massed practice and somatosensory stimulation resulted in increased pinch grip strength and upper extremity function in individuals with incomplete cervical SCI when compared to subjects participating in massed practice alone is presented.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Massed practice versus massed practice with stimulation: effects on upper extremity function and cortical plasticity in individuals with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of massed practice (MP) versus massed practice combined with somatosensory stimulation (MP+SS) on cortical plasticity and function in persons with incomplete tetraplegia. METHODS: Ten subjects were assigned to either MP or MP+SS. Median nerve stimulation (500 ms train, 10 Hz, 1 ms pulse duration) was delivered at the intensity eliciting a motor threshold response. Training sessions were 5 d/week for 3 weeks at 2 h/session. Outcome measures included 1) motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), motor threshold (MT) and MEP amplitude at 1.2 MT; 2) maximal pinch grip force; 3) Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and Jebsen Hand Function Test. RESULTS: The MP+SS group demonstrated significant improvements (P < 0.05) in pinch grip strength (190%), WMFT scores (52%), and Jebsen test scores (33%), whereas the MP group demonstrated significant improvement (P < 0.05) only in Jebsen test scores (11%). No significant changes were detected in cortical excitability in the MP+SS or MP group. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this preliminary study suggest that MP+SS results in greater increases in pinch strength and timed functional test scores than MP. Optimal stimulation paradigms and training methods are needed to further test this strategy.

Aged↗