Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kevin Fiscella

Publications and source records attributed to Kevin Fiscella.

47 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Does patient educational level affect office visits to family physicians?

Significant disparities in health care based on patient socioeconomic status have been documented. The extent to which physician behavior accounts for these differences is not known. We examined the impact of patient socioeconomic status, measured by years of education, on physician behavior assessed by direct observation of office visits, chart audits, and patient reports among 138 family physicians in 84 practices. Outcomes included time use measured with the Davis Observation Code, delivery of preventive services recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force, satisfaction assessed with the MOS 9-item Visit Rating Scale, and delivery of attributes of primary care measured by the Components of Primary Care Index. After controlling for patient characteristics among 2538 visits by adult patients who returned questionnaires, a high school education or less was associated with slightly greater proportion of time spent on physical examination and providing nutrition counseling, and less time on patient questions, assessing patient health knowledge, negotiation, and exercise counseling. This indicates that physicians adopt a more directive style with less educated patients. Screening tests were provided at lower rates among less educated patients, but there were no differences in rates of health habit counseling or immunization services delivered and no differences in delivery of patient-reported components of primary care. Less educated patients had similar overall visit satisfaction, but were slightly less likely to have their expectations met. These show that patients' education has relatively small, but potentially important, effects on the outpatient delivery of primary care.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗

Twelve-month safety and efficacy of low-dose mifepristone for uterine myomas.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to assess long-term effects of low-dose mifepristone on myoma regression, symptoms, and endometrial pathology. The secondary aim was to assess regrowth of myomas after cessation of mifepristone. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial of 5 mg versus 10 mg mifepristone daily for 1 year, in women with large, symptomatic myomas, with variable follow-up among a subset of subjects (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University research group set in a community hospital. PATIENTS: Forty premenopausal women with large, symptomatic myomas. INTERVENTION: Oral mifepristone 5 or 10 mg daily for 1 year. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean uterine volumes decreased in both groups by 48% after 6 months of mifepristone and by 52% to 53 % in both groups after 12 months. Amenorrhea occurred in 61% to 65% at 6 months, and 40% to 70 % at 12 months. Eighty endometrial biopsies were performed. Simple hyperplasia was seen in 5 (13.9 %) of 36 subjects at 6 months and 1 (4.8 %) of 21 at 12 months. All cases of hyperplasia occurred in the 10 mg group. No endometrial sample showed cytologic atypia. Nine women were followed posttreatment for an average of 5.7 months. Uterine volumes increased among most of these subjects, although they remained on average 42% less than baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term administration of low-dose mifepristone results in myoma shrinkage and amelioration of symptoms; modest rates of low-grade endometrial hyperplasia, but no evidence of premalignant potential, also occur. Regrowth occurs slowly following cessation of the drug.

Endometrium↗

The inverse care law: implications for healthcare of vulnerable populations.

Past and present, those with the greatest healthcare needs often receive the least adequate healthcare. This phenomenon, termed the "inverse care law," has implications for healthcare and outcomes for vulnerable populations including low-income persons, racial and ethnic minorities, and the uninsured among others. This article reviews disparities in health status and access to healthcare for vulnerable populations. It illustrates how concentration of risk factors within individuals, families, and communities worsens the paradox between healthcare need and access and highlights the models of healthcare delivery needed to adequately meet the needs of vulnerable populations.

Chronic Disease↗

Physicians' responses to patients' medically unexplained symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: To understand how physicians communicate may contribute to the mistrust and poor clinical outcomes observed in patients who present with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). METHODS: After providing informed consent, 100 primary care physicians in greater Rochester, New York, were visited by two unannounced covert standardized patients (actors, or SPs) portraying two chest pain roles: classic symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with nausea and insomnia (the GERD role) and poorly characterized chest pain with fatigue and dizziness (the MUS role). The visits were surreptitiously audiorecorded and analyzed using the Measure of Patient-Centered Communication (MPCC), which scores physicians on their exploration of the patients' experience of illness (component 1) and psychosocial context (component 2), and their attempts to find common ground on diagnosis and treatment (component 3). RESULTS: In multivariate analyses, MUS visits yielded significantly lower scores on MPCC component 1 (p = .01). Subanalysis of component 1 scores showed that patients' symptoms were not explored as fully and that validation was less likely to be used in response to patient concerns in the MUS than in the GERD visits. Component 2 and component 3 were unchanged. CONCLUSION: Physicians' inquiry into and validation of symptoms in patients with MUS was less common compared with more medically straightforward patient presentations. Further research should study the relationship between communication variables and poor clinical outcomes, misunderstandings, mutual distrust, and inappropriate healthcare utilization in this population, and test interventions to address this problem.

Adult↗

Do HMOs affect educational disparities in health care?

BACKGROUND: We wanted to examine how membership in a health maintenance organization (HMO) is related to delivery of preventive clinical services to patients with different educational levels. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the 1996-1997 Community Tracking Study Household Survey among adults aged 18 to 64 years with private or Medicaid health insurance. We examined interactions between respondent educational level and HMO membership for the following measures: having a regular source of care and, in the past year, having had a physician visit, a mental health visit, a mammogram (women > or = 50 years), an influenza vaccination (ages > or = 55 years), or smoking cessation counseling (smokers). RESULTS: After adjustment for sociodemographic factors, community size, insurance type, physical and mental health status, and smoking, respondents with less education were significantly less likely to have had a physician visit or mental health visit, mammogram, or influenza vaccination in the past year. Disparities in receipt of preventive care by educational level were smaller among HMO members. Differences in disparities between HMO members and non-HMO members reached statistical significance for influenza vaccination and showed a trend for mental health visits (P = .06). Moreover, HMO members with less than 12 years of education received services at levels comparable to non-HMO members with more education. CONCLUSIONS: There are appreciable disparities in receipt of preventive care by education among nonelderly insured persons. HMO membership is associated with smaller disparities for some services. Those with the lowest levels of education appeared to benefit the most from HMO membership.

Adolescent↗

Are patients' ratings of their physicians related to health outcomes?

PURPOSE: Observational studies using patient reports suggest associations between physician interpersonal styles and patient outcomes. Possible confounding of these associations has not been carefully examined. METHODS: Approximately 4,700 patients of 96 physicians completed a survey instrument that included reported health status changes during the previous year, perceptions of their physician (satisfaction, trust, knowledge of patient, and autonomy support), and sociodemographic and clinical covariates. We examined the adjusted relationship between patient perceptions of their physicians and reported health status changes. Using multilevel analyses, we then explored differences among physicians in patient perceptions of their physicians and whether these differences were explained by the relationship between patient perceptions and reported health status changes. RESULTS: There were significant adjusted relationships between patient perceptions of their physician and reported health status changes: better perceptions were associated with a smaller risk of health status decline (adjusted odds ratio = 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.24; P <.01). Multilevel analysis showed significant differences between physicians in patient perceptions of their physicians (rho = 0.10; 95% CI, 0.07-0.13; P <.01), but these physician differences were unrelated to reported health status decline (rho = 0; P >.99). CONCLUSIONS: Using methods similar to those of previous studies, we found a relationship between patient perceptions of their physicians and reported health status declines. Multilevel analysis, however, suggested that this relationship is not a physician effect; it may reflect unmeasured patient confounding. Multilevel analyses may help to examine the relationships between physician styles and outcomes.

Adult↗

Rochester Participatory Decision-Making Scale (RPAD): reliability and validity.

PURPOSE: We wanted develop a reliable and valid objective measure of patient-physician collaborative decision making, the Rochester Participatory Decision-Making Scale (RPAD). METHODS: Based on an informed decision-making model, the RPAD assesses physician behavior that encourages patient participation in decision making. Data were from a study of physician-patient communication of 100 primary care physicians. Physician encounters with 2 standardized patients each were audio recorded, resulting in 193 useable recordings. Transcribed recordings were coded both with RPAD and the Measure of Patient-Centered Communication (MPCC), which includes a related construct, Finding Common Ground. Two sets of dependent variables were derived from (1) surveys of the standardized patients and (2) surveys of 50 patients of each physician, who assessed their perceptions of the physician-patient relationship. RESULTS: The RPAD was coded reliably (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.72). RPAD correlated with Finding Common Ground (r = 0.19, P < .01) and with the survey measures of standardized patient's perceptions of the physician-patient relationship (r = 0.32 - 0.36 [P < .005]) but less with the patient survey measures (r = 0.06 to 0.07 [P < .005]). Multivariate, hierarchical analyses suggested that the RPAD made a more robust contribution to explaining variance in standardized patient perceptions than did the MPCC Finding Common Ground. CONCLUSIONS: The RPAD shows promise as a reliable, valid, and easy-to-code objective measure of participatory decision making.

Decision Making↗

Patient-centered communication and diagnostic testing.

PURPOSE: Although patient-centered communication is associated with improved health and patient trust, information about the impact of patient-centered communication on health care costs is limited. We studied the relationship between patient-centered communication and diagnostic testing expenditures. METHODS: We undertook an observational cross-sectional study using covert standardized patient visits to study physician interaction style and its relationship to diagnostic testing costs. Participants were 100 primary care physicians in the Rochester, NY, area participating in a large managed care organization (MCO). Audio recordings of 2 standardized patient encounters for each physician were rated using the Measure of Patient-Centered Communication (MPCC). Standardized diagnostic testing and other expenditures, adjusted for patient demographics and case-mix, were derived from the MCO claims database. Analyses were adjusted for demographics and standardized patient detection. RESULTS: Compared with other physicians, those who had MPCC scores in the lowest tercile had greater standardized diagnostic testing expenditures (11.0% higher, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5%-17.8%) and greater total standardized expenditures (3.5% higher, 95% CI, 1.0%-6.1%). Whereas lower MPCC scores were associated with shorter visits, adjustment for visit length and standardized patient detection did not affect the relationship with expenditures. Total (testing, ambulatory and hospital care) expenditures were also greater for physicians who had lower MPCC scores, an effect primarily associated with the effect on testing expenditures. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-centered communication is associated with fewer diagnostic testing expenditures but also with increased visit length. Because costs and visit length may affect physicians' and health systems' willingness to endorse and practice a patient-centered approach, these results should be confirmed in future randomized trials.

Communication↗

Should years of schooling be used to guide treatment of coronary risk factors?

PURPOSE: We wanted to compare the risk of death from coronary heart disease (CHD) for patients of low socioeconomic status, measured by educational level, with established risk factors. METHODS: We undertook a prospective cohort study. Participants included a representative sample of 6,479 adults aged 25 to 74 years in the United States who were free of CHD at enrollment in the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I). RESULTS: Baseline measures included years of education, age, sex, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, total cholesterol level, and smoking. Outcome was death within 10 years from CHD. The relative risk (RR) associated with less than 12 years of education compared with more than 12 years (RR 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-1.8) was comparable to being male (RR 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6), smoking (RR 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6), having a total cholesterol level of greater than 280 mg/dL (RR 1.6; 95% CI, 0.9-2.7), and systolic blood pressure of 130-139 mm Hg (RR 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.4). Findings were comparable for estimates of absolute risk. CONCLUSIONS: Low educational level is associated with comparable risk as established risk factors for CHD mortality. Incorporation of educational level into risk-based guidelines for treatment could potentially reduce socioeconomic disparities in CHD by lowering thresholds for treatment.

Adult↗

Health information technology and quality improvement for community health centers.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is committed to promoting health information technology (HIT) throughout health care. However, selection, acquisition, and implementation of HIT for quality improvement (QI) are beyond the means of many federally supported community health centers (CHCs). In the absence of federal leadership and investment, adoption of HIT will be slow, haphazard, duplicative, and wasteful. HHS should actively support HIT to improve quality in CHCs. This will maximize HIT benefits, minimize costs, and ensure that CHCs have the tools to address the needs of vulnerable populations.

Ambulatory Care Information Systems↗

Influence of accompanied encounters on patient-centeredness with older patients.

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a pilot study to examine physician patient interaction when elderly patients are accompanied during a medical visit. METHODS: This was a study in which 30 patients were randomly assigned to be accompanied (13) or unaccompanied (17) during a regular medical visit to their physician. Visits were tape recorded, transcribed, and coded with the Measure of Patient-Centered Communication (MPCC) and with the Rochester Participatory Decision-Making Scale (RPAD). RESULTS: We found no differences between the number of words spoken in accompanied versus unaccompanied visits, comparing patients alone with patients and companions combined. Physicians spoke longer without interruption in accompanied encounters (39.9 vs 78.6 words per speech turn). There were no differences in the level of MPCC or in the level of participatory decision making between the 2 types of visits. In accompanied visits, patients introduced most of the concerns and physicians discussed concerns with patients more than with companions. CONCLUSIONS: Previously reported differences in accompanied versus unaccompanied visits may reflect patients' preferences for being accompanied, the role they wish their companion to play, and the patients' health status. Being accompanied by a family member or friend does not result in less attention being paid to patients' concerns.

Aged↗