Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kevin B Weiss

Publications and source records attributed to Kevin B Weiss.

49 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Asthma medication use and disease burden in children in a primary care population.

BACKGROUND: Children with persistent asthma underuse controller medications and overuse relievers. A better understanding of the appropriateness of regimens, medication adherence, and adequacy of asthma control is needed. OBJECTIVES: To describe use of asthma medications and disease burden in children with persistent asthma, to determine whether use of controllers and relievers is consistent with national guidelines, and to estimate adequacy of asthma control. DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study. SETTING: Forty-two primary care practices participating in 3 regions of the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Parents of 638 children aged 3 to 15 years with asthma. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Asthma symptom-days, use of reliever and controller medications, and adequacy of asthma control, ascertained by face-to-face questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean age was 9.4 years, and 59.9% were boys. In the preceding 2 weeks, two thirds (67.5%) of subjects had 0 to 4 symptom-days, 15.8% had 5 to 9 symptom-days, and 16.6% had 10 to 14 symptom-days (percentages do not total 100 because of rounding). One third (32.6%) of children using relievers had high levels of use. One third (34.3%) of children using controllers used them 4 or fewer days per week. Among children with some evidence of persistent disease (use of controllers, excess symptoms, or excess reliever use), almost two thirds (64.3%) were inadequately controlled. This group consisted both of children reportedly using controllers less than recommended and those reporting not receiving controller medication at all. CONCLUSIONS: In this insured population, inappropriate reliance on relievers and nonadherence to controllers were common. Inadequate asthma control was common regardless of whether controllers were prescribed.

Adolescent↗

Cost-effectiveness analysis of early intervention with budesonide in mild persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: The Inhaled Steroid as Regular Therapy in Early Asthma (START) study reported that early intervention with budesonide in mild persistent asthma reduces severe asthmatic events and improves symptom outcomes and lung function in adults and children. OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of early intervention with budesonide, as observed within the START study. METHODS: START was a randomized, 3-year controlled trial of budesonide in early onset mild asthma among 7165 subjects ages 5 to 66 years. Three age groups (5-10, 11-17, and >or=18 years) were studied separately and overall. Differences in the probability of emergency treatments, symptom-free days (SFDs), and costs of health care were determined. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated from the health care payer and societal perspectives. RESULTS: Compared with usual therapy, patients receiving budesonide experienced an average of 14.1 (SE, 1.3) more SFDs per year (P <.001), fewer hospital days (69%, P <.001), and fewer emergency department visits (67%, P <.05). From the health care payer perspective, the net cost of early use of budesonide was an additional US dollars 0.42 (SE, dollars 0.04) per day, and the resultant cost-effectiveness ratio was US dollars 11.30 (95% CI, US dollars 8.60-US dollars 14.90) per SFD gained. From the societal perspective, the cost offsets of lower absence from school or work reduced the net cost of early budesonide to US dollars 0.14 (SE, US dollars 0.07) per day and decreased the cost-effectiveness ratio to US dollars 3.70 (95% CI, US dollars 0.10-US dollars 8.00). Early intervention was more effective and cost saving in the youngest age group. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with budesonide appears to be cost-effective in patients with mild persistent asthma of recent onset.

Adolescent↗

Resource costs for asthma-related care among pediatric patients in managed care.

BACKGROUND: In 1998, the economic burden of asthma in the United States was estimated to be 12.7 billion dollars. Yet few studies have examined the relationship between the total costs of asthma-related care and measures of asthma morbidity. Understanding the relationship between total costs of asthma-related care and morbidity can assist in designing the most cost-effective asthma care strategies to improve patient outcomes and minimize total costs. OBJECTIVE: To investigate correlates of asthma costs for children with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma and, specifically, to characterize how closely the percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and symptom days were correlated with costs of illness. METHODS: A total of 638 parents and children with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma in 4 managed care delivery systems in 3 different US geographic regions were enrolled. Symptom burden and annual resource utilization were determined from reports of physician visits, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, medication use, and parental missed workdays. Spirometry was conducted on children who were 5 years and older. To characterize the relationship between symptom days and the percentage of predicted FEV1 with costs, we specified a multivariate regression model. RESULTS: The median total annual asthma-related cost for the group was 564 dollars (interquartile range [IQR], 131 dollars-1602 dollars). Indirect costs represented 54.6% of total costs. Medicines accounted for 52.6% of direct costs. The mean percentage of predicted FEV1 was 101.6% (range, 39.3%-183.5%; IQR, 91.6%-111.3%), with 91.4% of patients with a percentage of predicted FEV1 of more than 80%. Based on multivariate modeling, increasing asthma severity, use of peak expiratory flow rate meters, younger age, low-income status and nonwhite race, and longer duration of asthma were significantly associated with increasing cost. Symptom days (P < 0.001) predicted annual costs better than percentage of predicted FEV1 (P < 0.16) in this group of children. CONCLUSIONS: For the large number of children with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma and normal or near-normal lung function, symptom days are predictive of health care costs. For these insured children receiving care from 3 large managed care providers, low-income status and nonwhite race were the strongest correlates for increased asthma-related costs.

Age Factors↗

Trends in emergency department asthma care in metropolitan Chicago: results from the Chicago Asthma Surveillance Initiative.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess trends in emergency department (ED) asthma care in a single large community and to address how these trends meet expectations of national guidelines for asthma care. DESIGN AND SETTING: This study is based on a repeated cross-sectional, self-administered survey of ED directors (or designees) in the Chicago area. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-one EDs that responded to both the 1996-1997 and 2000 surveys comprise the database for this study. RESULTS: Areas of significant improvement from 1996-1997 to 2000 include reduction in the use of theophylline (10.1% vs 3.1%, p < 0.0001), increased use of systemic steroid prescriptions at discharge (57.7% vs 77.2%, p < 0.0001), decreased use of arterial blood gas (ABG) analyses as part of the initial patient assessment (10.2% vs 4.5%, p = 0.02) and to document improvement after treatments (18.8% vs 8.9%, p = 0.03) and increased use of pulse oximetry as part of the initial patient assessment (95.1% vs 98.1%, p = 0.05). Areas of significant worsening of asthma care from 1996-1997 to 2000 include reduction in the use of ABG analyses in the assessment of severe cases (71.5% vs 47.5%, p < 0.0001), decreased use of instructions to inform patients what to do in the event of inability to attend their follow-up appointment (94.4% vs 38.9%, p = 0.0004), and decreased use of peak expiratory flow rate measurements to document improvement after treatments (82.7% vs 78.6%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: From 1996-1997 to 2000, ED asthma care in metropolitan Chicago has improved in some areas and worsened in others. However, most aspects of asthma care have continued to fall short of national asthma guidelines. The lack of overall improvement with the current widespread knowledge of national guidelines suggests that a dissemination strategy of medical education by itself is not sufficient to improve ED asthma care.

Asthma↗

The burden of asthma in the United States: level and distribution are dependent on interpretation of the national asthma education and prevention program guidelines.

Asthma imposes a growing burden on society in terms of morbidity, quality of life, and healthcare costs. Although federally sponsored national surveys provide estimates of asthma prevalence, these surveys are not designed to characterize the burden of asthma by self-reported disease activity. We sought to characterize asthma burden in the United States. This study was based on a cross-sectional random-digit-dial household telephone survey designed to identify adult patients and parents of children with current asthma. Global asthma burden was comprised of three components: short-term symptom burden (4-week recall), long-term symptom burden (past year), and functional impact (activity limitation). Using this construct, only 10.7% of individuals were classified as having a global asthma burden consistent with mild intermittent disease, and 77.3% had moderate to severe persistent disease. These results suggest that a majority of the United States population with asthma experiences persistent rather than intermittent asthma burden. In addition, the discordance in type and distribution of asthma symptoms reported by individual subjects suggests that the exact estimate of the burden of asthma is related to how the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program classification is operationalized. Inquiry into recent day or nighttime symptoms alone underestimates the burden of asthma and may lead to inadequate treatment of asthma based on national guideline recommendations.

Adolescent↗

Parent-reported environmental exposures and environmental control measures for children with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence suggests that indoor allergens and irritants contribute to childhood asthma. National asthma guidelines highlight the importance of their reduction as part of comprehensive asthma treatment. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of potential environmental triggers, to identify risk factors for such exposures, and to determine whether prior parental education about trigger avoidance is associated with fewer such exposures. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Children with asthma in practices affiliated with 3 managed care organizations. INTERVENTIONS: Parents of 638 children, aged 3 to 15 years, were interviewed on enrollment in a randomized trial of asthma care improvement strategies. Parents reported recent asthma symptoms and exposures to potential environmental triggers. Multivariate models were used to identify specific demographic risk factors for environmental exposures and to determine if prior education was associated with fewer such exposures. RESULTS: Exposures to environmental triggers were frequent: 30% of households had a smoker, 18% had household pests, and 59% had furry pets. Other exposures included bedroom carpeting (78%) and forced-air heat (58%). Most children did not have mattress (65%) or pillow (84%) covers. Of the parents, 45% reported ever receiving written instructions regarding trigger avoidance and 11% reported them given in the past year. However, 42% reported discussing triggers in the home environment with a clinician in the past 6 months. In multivariate models, predictors of smoking at home included low annual family income and lower parental educational attainment. Dog ownership was associated with low educational attainment, and dog and cat ownership were less likely with black race. Reports of pests were increased for black children compared with white children. Black race was associated with lower rates of other exposures, including bedroom carpeting. After controlling for potential confounders, there was no association of reduced exposures with prior receipt of environmental control instructions. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to potential environmental triggers is common, and recommended trigger avoidance measures are infrequently adopted. While specific exposures may vary with demographic and socioeconomic variables, all children are at risk. New methods for educating parents to reduce such exposures should be tested.

Adolescent↗

The cost-effectiveness of an inner-city asthma intervention for children.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive management efforts to reduce asthma morbidity among children in urban areas with high levels of poverty and large minority populations have been inconclusive. The National Cooperative Inner-City Asthma Study (NCICAS) demonstrated improved symptom outcomes but did not evaluate cost-effectiveness in this population. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the incremental cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive social worker-based education program and environmental control in children with asthma stratified by baseline level of asthma control. METHODS: We performed a prospective cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized trial. A total of 1033 children and their families residing in 8 inner-city urban areas in the United States were enrolled in the NCICAS. Outcomes included symptom-free days, cost per symptom-free day gained, and annual costs of asthma morbidity compared by baseline symptom control, previous hospitalization, and previous unscheduled physician visits. RESULTS: The NCICAS intervention significantly reduced asthma symptoms. First-year intervention costs were 245 US dollars higher for the intervention children compared with those receiving usual care. There were no additional intervention-related costs during the second year. When compared with usual care, the intervention improved outcomes at an average additional cost of 9.20 US dollars per symptom-free day gained (95% CI, -12.56 to 55.29 US dollars). The intervention was cost saving in 3 strata of children with increasing asthma severity. CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted asthma intervention program reduced symptom days and was cost-effective for inner-city children with asthma. In children with more severe disease, the intervention was substantially more effective and reduced costs compared with that seen in control children. Organizations serving this population should consider this strategy as part of a comprehensive disease-management program for asthma.

Asthma↗

Process of care for Medicaid-enrolled children with asthma: served by community health centers and other providers.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the process of care received by Medicaid-enrolled children with asthma served by community health centers (CHCs) and other Medicaid providers. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Five provider types serving Massachusetts Medicaid enrollees: three provider groups--CHCs, hospital outpatient departments (OPDs), and solo/group physicians--participating in the statewide Primary Care Clinician Plan; a staff model health maintenance organization (HMO); and fee-for-service (FFS) providers. STUDY POPULATION: Six thousand three hundred twenty-one Medicaid-enrolled children (age 2-18) with asthma assigned to one of the above provider types in 1994. DATA: Person-level files were constructed by linking Medicaid claims, demographic and enrollment files with HMO encounter data. METHODS: Five claims-based process of care measures reflecting aspects of care recommended in national guidelines were developed and used to analyze patterns of care across provider types, controlling for case-mix and other covariates. RESULTS: Children served by CHCs and the HMO had significantly higher asthma visit rates compared with those served by OPDs, solo/group physicians and FFS providers. CHCs emergency department (ED) visit rates for asthma were lower than those of OPDs (P <0.001) and similar to other providers. However, CHC patients averaged more asthma hospitalizations relative to solo/group physicians or the HMO (P <0.0001). In multivariate analyses, children served by CHCs were 2.2 times as likely (95% CI, 1.02-4.91) as those served by solo/group physicians to receive a follow-up visit within 5 days of an asthma ED visit and 4.3 times as likely (95% CI, 1.45-12.68) to receive a follow-up visit within 5 days of hospital discharge. CHC patients with utilization suggestive of persistent asthma were less likely (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13-0.59) than those served by solo/group physicians to be seen by an asthma specialist. There were no significant differences in measures of asthma pharmacotherapy across providers types. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that CHCs provide more timely follow-up care after an asthma ED visit or hospitalization relative to solo/group physicians, but diminished access to asthma specialists. There were no differences in asthma pharmacology across providers. Relatively low access to asthma specialists among children served by CHCs warrants further investigation.

Adolescent↗

An update on the health economics of asthma and allergy.

Health economics is receiving more attention as decision-makers--whether purchaser, physician, or patient--are looking for a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of adopting new healthcare strategies. In this article we review the recent advances in the health economics of asthma and allergy. In burden of illness studies, estimates of the economic burden of asthma and allergy were reported from countries and regions not previously detailing these costs. There were economic evaluations comparing medications and those that evaluated disease management programs. The recent studies of pharmaceuticals have focused on evaluating the cost-effectiveness of various controller medications for the treatment of asthma. Although mostly observational, such studies increase the evidence that these medications are relatively cost-effective. A few recent economic evaluations have been published examining disease management and education programs. These studies are generally long-term evaluations and have not shown consistent health economic impact. The field of health economics in asthma and allergy continues to evolve and aims to provide information to aid in decision making.

Asthma↗

Clinical effectiveness research in managed-care systems: lessons from the Pediatric Asthma Care PORT. Patient Outcomes Research Team.

OBJECTIVE: To highlight the unique challenges of evaluative research on practice behavior change in the "real world" settings of contemporary managed-care organizations, using the experience of the Pediatric Asthma Care PORT (Patient Outcomes Research Team). STUDY SETTING: The Pediatric Asthma Care PORT is a five-year initiative funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to study strategies for asthma care improvement in three managed-care plans in Chicago, Seattle, and Boston. At its core is a randomized trial of two care improvement strategies compared with usual care: (1) a targeted physician education program using practice based Peer Leaders (PL) as change agents, (2) adding to the PL intervention a "Planned Asthma Care Intervention" incorporating joint "asthma check-tips" by nurse-physician teams. During the trial, each of the participating organizations viewed asthma care improvement as an immediate priority and had their own corporate improvement programs underway. DATA COLLECTION: Investigators at each health plan described the organizational and implementation challenges in conducting the PAC PORT randomized trial. These experiences were reviewed for common themes and "lessons" that might be useful to investigators planning interventional research in similar care-delivery settings. CONCLUSIONS: Randomized trials in "real world" settings represent the most robust design available to test care improvement strategies. In complex, rapidly changing managed-care organizations, blinding is not feasible, corporate initiatives may complicate implementation, and the assumption that a "usual care" arm will be static is highly likely to be mistaken. Investigators must be prepared to use innovative strategies to maintain the integrity of the study design, including: continuous improvement within the intervention arms, comanagement by researchers and health plan managers of condition-related quality improvement initiatives, procedures for avoiding respondent burden in health plan enrollees, and anticipation and minimization of risks from experimental arm contamination and major organizational change. With attention to these delivery system issues, as well as the usual design features of randomized trials, we believe managed-care organizations can serve as important laboratories to test care improvement strategies.

Asthma↗

Improving childhood asthma outcomes in the United States: a blueprint for policy action.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Asthma is increasingly being recognized as an important public health concern for children in the United States. Effective management of childhood asthma may require not only improving guideline-based therapeutic interventions, but also addressing social and physical environmental risk factors. The objective of this project was to create a blueprint for improvement of national policy in this area. DESIGN/METHODS: A nominal group process with nationally recognized experts and leaders (referred to as "the committee") in childhood asthma. RESULTS: The committee identified 11 policy recommendations (numbered in order below) in 2 broad categories: Improving Health Care Delivery and Financing, and Strengthening the Public Health Infrastructure. Recommendations regarding Improving Health Care Delivery and Financing include the development and implementation of quality-of-care standards in 1) primary care, 2) self-management education, and 3) case-management interventions, and the expansion of insurance coverage and benefit design by 4) extending continuous health insurance coverage for all children, 5) developing model insurance benefits packages for essential childhood asthma services, and 6) educating health care purchasers in how to use them. Recommendations for Strengthening the Public Health Infrastructure include public funding of asthma services that fall outside the insurance system through establishing 7) public health grants to foster asthma-friendly communities and 8) school-based asthma initiatives. 9) Launching a national asthma public education campaign, 10) developing a national asthma surveillance system, and 11) establishing a national agenda for asthma prevention research, with an emphasis on epidemiologic and behavioral sciences, are also recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing these recommendations will require coordination of activities at the national, state, and local community level, and within and outside the health care delivery system. With a further commitment of national and local resources, implementation of these recommendations will likely lead to improved child and family asthma outcomes in the United States. childhood asthma, health care policy, health care services.

Advisory Committees↗

Measuring success in the treatment of children in the emergency department setting: process versus outcomes?

The current best design practices for clinical studies require consideration of the assessment of end points that combine key processes and outcomes. Process assessment measures events in the pathway on which a more important intermediate or ultimate health outcome depends. Process assessment can be either formative or summative. Outcomes assessment relates to identifying the results related to a process, and is most often defined as the change in a patient's current or future health state. The development of process and outcomes measures for any study is difficult, and children and emergency department settings present unique sets of issues worth highlighting. This article presents an overview of issues relating to choice of process and outcomes measures in studies of pediatric emergency medicine. Asthma care is used to illustrate the complex issues surrounding the measurement of success in management in the emergency department setting.

Asthma↗

Comparing asthma care provided to Medicaid-enrolled children in a Primary Care Case Manager plan and a staff model HMO.

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in selected processes of asthma care provided to Medicaid-enrolled children in a state-administered Primary Care Case Manager (PCCM) plan and a staff model health maintenance organization (HMO). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study assessing performance on 6 claims-based processes of care measures that reflect aspects of pediatric asthma care recommended in national guidelines. Analyzed Medicaid and HMO claims and encounter data for 2365 children with asthma in the Massachusetts Medicaid program in 1994. RESULTS: There were no plan differences in asthma primary care visits, asthma pharmacotherapy or follow-up care after asthma hospitalization. Children in the HMO were only 54% as likely (confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.80; P<.01) as those in the PCCM plan to experience an asthma emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization. HMO-enrolled children were only half as likely (CI: 0.38-0.64; P<.001) to meet the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) definition for persistent asthma and only 32% as likely (CI: 0.19-0.56; P<.001) to have prior asthma ED visits or hospitalizations relative to children in the PCCM plan. Controlling for case mix and other covariates, children in the HMO were 2.9 times as likely (CI: 1.09-7.78; P<.05) as children in the PCCM plan to receive timely follow-up care (within 5 days) after an asthma ED visit and 1.8 times as likely (CI: 1.05-3.01; P<.05) as those in the PCCM plan to receive a specialist visit during the year. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the HMO served a less sick pediatric asthma population. After controlling for case mix, the staff model HMO provided greater access to asthma specialists and more timely follow-up care after asthma ED visits relative to providers in the state-administered PCCM plan. Further understanding of the impact of these differences on clinical outcomes could guide asthma improvement efforts.

Adolescent↗