Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Kensuke Kumamoto

Publications and source records attributed to Kensuke Kumamoto.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Laparoscopic Surgery Is Associated With Reduced Small Bowel Obstruction Risk After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Nationwide Cohort Study of 5458 Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a major complication following colorectal cancer surgery, yet evidence-based prevention strategies remain unclear. We aimed to clarify site-specific risk factors for SBO and evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and adhesion prevention materials (APMs) in preventing SBO after colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 5458 patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery at 32 Japanese institutions between 2012 and 2014. The primary endpoint was the 5-year risk of SBO. We evaluated the effects of laparoscopic surgery, APM use, and stoma creation on SBO risk. Clinical variables included demographics, tumor site, operative approach, operative details, and postoperative complications. Hospital-level clustering was addressed using mixed-effects logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall SBO incidence was 5.2% (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;283). Rectal cancer had the highest risk, whereas all colonic sites except the descending colon showed significantly lower odds. Laparoscopic surgery was associated with a 42% reduction in odds (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.45-0.74; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), with significant reductions in ascending (NNT&#x2009;=&#x2009;22.2, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.001) and sigmoid colon surgery (NNT&#x2009;=&#x2009;30.2, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.003). APMs showed no protective effect (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.78-1.32; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.94). Stoma creation significantly increased SBO risk (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.35-2.51; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). Secondary analysis identified reoperation and postoperative ileus as additional independent risk factors. DISCUSSION: Laparoscopic surgery was associated with reduced long-term SBO risk, with significant benefits in ascending and sigmoid colon surgery. APMs showed no measurable benefit. Stoma creation increased SBO risk, with no observed difference between ileostomy and colostomy.

adhesion prevention material

Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Resectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: From Retrospective Studies to Randomized Evidence.

Complete resection remains the only potentially curative treatment for localized intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), yet postoperative recurrence is common, particularly in patients with high-risk disease. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy may permit earlier control of occult micrometastatic disease, optimize the delivery of systemic treatment, and provide an in vivo assessment of tumor biology prior to major hepatectomy. These potential benefits must be balanced against treatment-related toxicity, surgical delay, and the risk of disease progression precluding resection. Early evidence was primarily derived from retrospective studies, which yielded inconsistent survival outcomes and exhibited substantial vulnerability to confounding and treatment-selection bias. The single-arm NEO-GAP trial subsequently demonstrated the feasibility of administering neoadjuvant gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel followed by surgical resection. More recently, the randomized phase II-III ZSAB-neoGOLP trial showed that neoadjuvant gemcitabine-oxaliplatin, lenvatinib, and toripalimab followed by surgery prolonged median event-free survival compared with upfront surgery (median: 18.0 vs. 8.7 months) without substantially compromising surgical feasibility. However, the interim overall survival analysis was inconclusive, and the generalizability of these findings beyond selected, medically fit patients treated at Chinese centers remains uncertain. This narrative review critically appraises the evolving evidence, discusses patient selection and perioperative treatment, and identifies priorities for future research. Current evidence supports the selective consideration of neoadjuvant therapy in medically fit patients with technically resectable but oncologically high-risk iCCA, rather than its routine use in all resectable cases.

GOLP