Keith A Baggerly — Page 2

PubMed2002

Steps toward mapping the human vasculature by phage display.

The molecular diversity of receptors in human blood vessels remains largely unexplored. We developed a selection method in which peptides that home to specific vascular beds are identified after administration of a peptide library. Here we report the first in vivo screening of a peptide library in a patient. We surveyed 47,160 motifs that localized to different organs. This large-scale screening indicates that the tissue distribution of circulating peptides is nonrandom. High-throughput analysis of the motifs revealed similarities to ligands for differentially expressed cell-surface proteins, and a candidate ligand-receptor pair was validated. These data represent a step toward the construction of a molecular map of human vasculature and may have broad implications for the development of targeted therapies.

Blood Vessels↗

PubMed2002

Identifying and quantifying sources of variation in microarray data using high-density cDNA membrane arrays.

Microarray experiments involve many steps, including spotting cDNA, extracting RNA, labeling targets, hybridizing, scanning, and analyzing images. Each step introduces variability, confounding our ability to obtain accurate estimates of the biological differences between samples. We ran repeated experiments using high-density cDNA microarray membranes (Research Genetics Human GeneFilters Microarrays Version I) and 33P-labeled targets. Total RNA was extracted from a Burkitt lymphoma cell line (GA-10). We estimated the components of variation coming from: (1) image analysis, (2) exposure time to PhosphorImager screens, (3) differences in membranes, (4) reuse of membranes, and (5) differences in targets prepared from two independent RNA extractions. Variation was assessed qualitatively using a clustering algorithm and quantitatively using a version of ANOVA adapted to multivariate microarray data. The largest contribution to variation came from reusing membranes, which contributed 38% of the total variation. Differences in membranes and in exposure time each contributed about 10%. Differences in target preparations contributed less than 5%. The effect of image quantification was negligible. Much of the effect from reusing membranes was attributable to increasing levels of background radiation and can be reduced by using membranes at most four times. The effects of exposure time, which were partly attributable to variation in the scanning process, can be minimized by using the same exposure time for all experiments.

Algorithms↗